Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA

This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Thre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China) China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481
Hauptverfasser: Adeyilola, Adedoyin, Nordeng, Stephan, Hu, Qinhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 481
container_issue 2
container_start_page 462
container_title Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)
container_volume 33
creator Adeyilola, Adedoyin
Nordeng, Stephan
Hu, Qinhong
description This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (>50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_dqkx_e202202017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>dqkx_e202202017</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>dqkx_e202202017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhaOqSB3BPAA7Syy6aYqvnTimOwrlRxpaREGdneUk1zOGGRvsDD879mx5Qp4Eh1RihWX5XlvfOZZ9smwT6HegtNqOwErJc8ogh6KUOf-UjUCKKgeA6efUi6rIC1lNv2TjGC9pGpxVEqpR9nTqg4-2eyDatSRtkPzG7s6Hq0isI-d2Nu_Ivl_42HmHL4_PJ6v2rSVnGDHcehviD3LsYg9GYoJfkm6OZB9vvbM6OcwDIjl4M0zrUnfWu2_kn10sbG9Efupo08HF392NbM3oRcTx_7qeXRz8Ot87yid_Do_3did5wwvZ5QUvWsEZ718lRG1qKkxrSlpr3tQ7pkZRSyNbiWAqQ42RDZVYlyBEI3mjDV_Pvg6-d9oZ7Wbq0q-CSzeq9ubqXiGjLE0KVSK3BvI6-JsVxu4dZaKkFBgDligYqCZ9ZQxo1HWwSx0eFFDVB6SGgFQKSPUBKZ40bNDExLoZhnfnj0WvHwiVrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650012212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (&gt;50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-487X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-111X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wuhan: China University of Geosciences</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Biogeosciences ; Clay ; Clay minerals ; Conglomerates ; Devonian ; Diameters ; Dolomite ; Dolostone ; Drilling ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electron microscopy ; Feldspars ; Fractures ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Helium ; Identification ; Lithofacies ; Mercury ; Microfracture ; Microporosity ; Microscopy ; Minerals ; Mudstone ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Petroleum ; Pore size ; Porosity ; Quartz ; Reservoirs ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Size distribution ; Systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481</ispartof><rights>China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/dqkx-e/dqkx-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordeng, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><title>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</title><addtitle>J. Earth Sci</addtitle><description>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (&gt;50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Conglomerates</subject><subject>Devonian</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dolomite</subject><subject>Dolostone</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Feldspars</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Lithofacies</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Microfracture</subject><subject>Microporosity</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mudstone</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><issn>1674-487X</issn><issn>1867-111X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhaOqSB3BPAA7Syy6aYqvnTimOwrlRxpaREGdneUk1zOGGRvsDD879mx5Qp4Eh1RihWX5XlvfOZZ9smwT6HegtNqOwErJc8ogh6KUOf-UjUCKKgeA6efUi6rIC1lNv2TjGC9pGpxVEqpR9nTqg4-2eyDatSRtkPzG7s6Hq0isI-d2Nu_Ivl_42HmHL4_PJ6v2rSVnGDHcehviD3LsYg9GYoJfkm6OZB9vvbM6OcwDIjl4M0zrUnfWu2_kn10sbG9Efupo08HF392NbM3oRcTx_7qeXRz8Ot87yid_Do_3did5wwvZ5QUvWsEZ718lRG1qKkxrSlpr3tQ7pkZRSyNbiWAqQ42RDZVYlyBEI3mjDV_Pvg6-d9oZ7Wbq0q-CSzeq9ubqXiGjLE0KVSK3BvI6-JsVxu4dZaKkFBgDligYqCZ9ZQxo1HWwSx0eFFDVB6SGgFQKSPUBKZ40bNDExLoZhnfnj0WvHwiVrw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creator><creator>Nordeng, Stephan</creator><creator>Hu, Qinhong</creator><general>China University of Geosciences</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science,Central Michigan University,Mount Pleasant,MI 48859,USA%Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering,University of North Dakota,Grand Forks,ND 58202,USA%Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences,The University of Texas at Arlington,500 Yates Street,Arlington,TX 76019,USA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><author>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Conglomerates</topic><topic>Devonian</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dolomite</topic><topic>Dolostone</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Feldspars</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Lithofacies</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Microfracture</topic><topic>Microporosity</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mudstone</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordeng, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</au><au>Nordeng, Stephan</au><au>Hu, Qinhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</jtitle><stitle>J. Earth Sci</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>462-481</pages><issn>1674-487X</issn><eissn>1867-111X</eissn><abstract>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (&gt;50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</abstract><cop>Wuhan</cop><pub>China University of Geosciences</pub><doi>10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1674-487X
ispartof Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481
issn 1674-487X
1867-111X
language eng
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_dqkx_e202202017
source SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adsorption
Biogeosciences
Clay
Clay minerals
Conglomerates
Devonian
Diameters
Dolomite
Dolostone
Drilling
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Electron microscopy
Feldspars
Fractures
Geochemistry
Geology
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Helium
Identification
Lithofacies
Mercury
Microfracture
Microporosity
Microscopy
Minerals
Mudstone
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Petroleum
Pore size
Porosity
Quartz
Reservoirs
Scanning electron microscopy
Size distribution
Systems analysis
title Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A55%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Porosity%20and%20Pore%20Networks%20in%20Tight%20Dolostone%E2%80%94Mudstone%20Reservoirs:%20Insights%20from%20the%20Devonian%20Three%20Forks%20Formation,%20Williston%20Basin,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20earth%20science%20(Wuhan,%20China)&rft.au=Adeyilola,%20Adedoyin&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=462-481&rft.issn=1674-487X&rft.eissn=1867-111X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Edqkx_e202202017%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650012212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=dqkx_e202202017&rfr_iscdi=true