Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA
This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Thre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China) China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 481 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 462 |
container_title | Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Adeyilola, Adedoyin Nordeng, Stephan Hu, Qinhong |
description | This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (>50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_dqkx_e202202017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>dqkx_e202202017</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>dqkx_e202202017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhaOqSB3BPAA7Syy6aYqvnTimOwrlRxpaREGdneUk1zOGGRvsDD879mx5Qp4Eh1RihWX5XlvfOZZ9smwT6HegtNqOwErJc8ogh6KUOf-UjUCKKgeA6efUi6rIC1lNv2TjGC9pGpxVEqpR9nTqg4-2eyDatSRtkPzG7s6Hq0isI-d2Nu_Ivl_42HmHL4_PJ6v2rSVnGDHcehviD3LsYg9GYoJfkm6OZB9vvbM6OcwDIjl4M0zrUnfWu2_kn10sbG9Efupo08HF392NbM3oRcTx_7qeXRz8Ot87yid_Do_3did5wwvZ5QUvWsEZ718lRG1qKkxrSlpr3tQ7pkZRSyNbiWAqQ42RDZVYlyBEI3mjDV_Pvg6-d9oZ7Wbq0q-CSzeq9ubqXiGjLE0KVSK3BvI6-JsVxu4dZaKkFBgDligYqCZ9ZQxo1HWwSx0eFFDVB6SGgFQKSPUBKZ40bNDExLoZhnfnj0WvHwiVrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650012212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (>50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-487X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-111X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wuhan: China University of Geosciences</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Biogeosciences ; Clay ; Clay minerals ; Conglomerates ; Devonian ; Diameters ; Dolomite ; Dolostone ; Drilling ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electron microscopy ; Feldspars ; Fractures ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Helium ; Identification ; Lithofacies ; Mercury ; Microfracture ; Microporosity ; Microscopy ; Minerals ; Mudstone ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Petroleum ; Pore size ; Porosity ; Quartz ; Reservoirs ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Size distribution ; Systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481</ispartof><rights>China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/dqkx-e/dqkx-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordeng, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><title>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</title><addtitle>J. Earth Sci</addtitle><description>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (>50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Conglomerates</subject><subject>Devonian</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dolomite</subject><subject>Dolostone</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Feldspars</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Lithofacies</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Microfracture</subject><subject>Microporosity</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mudstone</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><issn>1674-487X</issn><issn>1867-111X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhaOqSB3BPAA7Syy6aYqvnTimOwrlRxpaREGdneUk1zOGGRvsDD879mx5Qp4Eh1RihWX5XlvfOZZ9smwT6HegtNqOwErJc8ogh6KUOf-UjUCKKgeA6efUi6rIC1lNv2TjGC9pGpxVEqpR9nTqg4-2eyDatSRtkPzG7s6Hq0isI-d2Nu_Ivl_42HmHL4_PJ6v2rSVnGDHcehviD3LsYg9GYoJfkm6OZB9vvbM6OcwDIjl4M0zrUnfWu2_kn10sbG9Efupo08HF392NbM3oRcTx_7qeXRz8Ot87yid_Do_3did5wwvZ5QUvWsEZ718lRG1qKkxrSlpr3tQ7pkZRSyNbiWAqQ42RDZVYlyBEI3mjDV_Pvg6-d9oZ7Wbq0q-CSzeq9ubqXiGjLE0KVSK3BvI6-JsVxu4dZaKkFBgDligYqCZ9ZQxo1HWwSx0eFFDVB6SGgFQKSPUBKZ40bNDExLoZhnfnj0WvHwiVrw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creator><creator>Nordeng, Stephan</creator><creator>Hu, Qinhong</creator><general>China University of Geosciences</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science,Central Michigan University,Mount Pleasant,MI 48859,USA%Harold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering,University of North Dakota,Grand Forks,ND 58202,USA%Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences,The University of Texas at Arlington,500 Yates Street,Arlington,TX 76019,USA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</title><author>Adeyilola, Adedoyin ; Nordeng, Stephan ; Hu, Qinhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-434d6323167466bfb06fdf50ba3cb9fbe6b8f8d8e1f7f0ff8c08eb5166c83caf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Conglomerates</topic><topic>Devonian</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dolomite</topic><topic>Dolostone</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Feldspars</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Lithofacies</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Microfracture</topic><topic>Microporosity</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mudstone</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordeng, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qinhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adeyilola, Adedoyin</au><au>Nordeng, Stephan</au><au>Hu, Qinhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China)</jtitle><stitle>J. Earth Sci</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>462-481</pages><issn>1674-487X</issn><eissn>1867-111X</eissn><abstract>This study was performed to evaluate pore systems of reservoir lithofacies within the Devonian Three Forks Formation in the Williston Basin through micro-scale pore characterization. These lithofacies are from the Upper Three Forks section, which is a prominent drilling target within the Bakken-Three Forks Petroleum System. Samples from the Formation were examined by (1) physical core description, (2) petrographic thin section microscopy, (3) x-ray diffractometry (XRD) minerals analysis, (4) scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and (5) porosity measurements from helium porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). These were done to provide better understanding of the local variations in pore structures and how such structures impact reservoir quality within the Three Forks Formation. Seven reservoir lithofacies were identified and described, including laminated lithofacies, massive dolostone, mottled dolostone, massive mudstone, mottled mudstone, mudstone conglomerates, and brecciated mudstone. Samples show a diverse variation in mineralogical composition, pore types, porosity, and pore-size distribution. Six types of pores were identified: interparticle, intercrystalline, intracrystalline, vuggy, microfractures, and mudstone microporosity. Dolostone-rich lithofacies have abundant dolomite and less siliciclastic minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and clays. They also have relatively low porosity and generally larger pore size. A general positive trend exists between porosity with clay minerals and feldspar, in contrast to a negative trend with dolomite, and no clear relationship with quartz content. Results from the gas adsorption analysis, NMR and MIP pore-size distribution confirm an abundance of macropores (>50 nm in diameters) in dolostone dominated lithofacies while other lithofacies generally have abundant mesopores (2–50 nm).</abstract><cop>Wuhan</cop><pub>China University of Geosciences</pub><doi>10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-5998</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1674-487X |
ispartof | Journal of earth science (Wuhan, China), 2022-04, Vol.33 (2), p.462-481 |
issn | 1674-487X 1867-111X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_dqkx_e202202017 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adsorption Biogeosciences Clay Clay minerals Conglomerates Devonian Diameters Dolomite Dolostone Drilling Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Electron microscopy Feldspars Fractures Geochemistry Geology Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Helium Identification Lithofacies Mercury Microfracture Microporosity Microscopy Minerals Mudstone NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Petroleum Pore size Porosity Quartz Reservoirs Scanning electron microscopy Size distribution Systems analysis |
title | Porosity and Pore Networks in Tight Dolostone—Mudstone Reservoirs: Insights from the Devonian Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A55%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Porosity%20and%20Pore%20Networks%20in%20Tight%20Dolostone%E2%80%94Mudstone%20Reservoirs:%20Insights%20from%20the%20Devonian%20Three%20Forks%20Formation,%20Williston%20Basin,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20earth%20science%20(Wuhan,%20China)&rft.au=Adeyilola,%20Adedoyin&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=462-481&rft.issn=1674-487X&rft.eissn=1867-111X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12583-021-1458-3&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Edqkx_e202202017%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650012212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=dqkx_e202202017&rfr_iscdi=true |