代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效

本文采用不同的代理成本和成长性指标划分了不同的样本区间，对杠杆比率和债务期限结构与企业盈利的关系进行了检验，实证发现在国有控股、高股权集中度和高流通股比例这三种情况下，负债的负效用相对较小，而债务期限结构的正效用相对大小则并不一致。...

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu 2007 (1), p.111-114
1. Verfasser:	程建伟
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	chi
Schlagworte:	代理成本债务成长性盈利
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	114
container_issue	1
container_start_page	111
container_title	Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu
container_volume
creator	程建伟
description	本文采用不同的代理成本和成长性指标划分了不同的样本区间，对杠杆比率和债务期限结构与企业盈利的关系进行了检验，实证发现在国有控股、高股权集中度和高流通股比例这三种情况下，负债的负效用相对较小，而债务期限结构的正效用相对大小则并不一致。
doi_str_mv	10.3969/j.issn.1001-6260.2007.01.019
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_cmyj200701019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>23895705</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>cmyj200701019</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>cmyj200701019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579-fece295f7ce3042b509db90e9fb70fca6a489eb45cbd95fb2e29503dcec3e17e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z81Kw0AQB_A9KFhqX0L0mDibzSbZoxS_oOCl97C72a2pNUWDiLcoKqWH2ksv4kU8iNAHCPbgw5gPfAu3VISBGYYfM_wR2sZgE-ax3b4dp2liYwBseY4HtgPg24BNsTXU-N9voFaaxgIAWECxixvIKxZv9fSxGk2rl_l3dmuGn9lXlb0X-aTIx2V-Vz7My6e8zD7L8Wv9fF8vPqrZaBOtaz5IVeuvN1H3YL_bPrI6J4fH7b2OJanPLK2kchjVvlQEXEdQYJFgoJgWPmjJPe4GTAmXShEZJpylBhJJJYnCviJNtLM6e80TzZNe2B9eXSbmYSjPb_rLkIBNROO2Vk6eDpPeRWyk4PJMxwMVOiRg1AdKfgEwbGga</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (NSSD)</source><creator>程建伟</creator><creatorcontrib>程建伟</creatorcontrib><description>本文采用不同的代理成本和成长性指标划分了不同的样本区间，对杠杆比率和债务期限结构与企业盈利的关系进行了检验，实证发现在国有控股、高股权集中度和高流通股比例这三种情况下，负债的负效用相对较小，而债务期限结构的正效用相对大小则并不一致。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1001-6260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6260.2007.01.019</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>浙江工商大学,金融学院,浙江,杭州,310035</publisher><subject>代理成本 ; 债务 ; 成长性 ; 盈利</subject><ispartof>Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu, 2007 (1), p.111-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/96680A/96680A.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>程建伟</creatorcontrib><title>代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效</title><title>Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu</title><addtitle>Finance and Trade Research</addtitle><description>本文采用不同的代理成本和成长性指标划分了不同的样本区间，对杠杆比率和债务期限结构与企业盈利的关系进行了检验，实证发现在国有控股、高股权集中度和高流通股比例这三种情况下，负债的负效用相对较小，而债务期限结构的正效用相对大小则并不一致。</description><subject>代理成本</subject><subject>债务</subject><subject>成长性</subject><subject>盈利</subject><issn>1001-6260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9z81Kw0AQB_A9KFhqX0L0mDibzSbZoxS_oOCl97C72a2pNUWDiLcoKqWH2ksv4kU8iNAHCPbgw5gPfAu3VISBGYYfM_wR2sZgE-ax3b4dp2liYwBseY4HtgPg24BNsTXU-N9voFaaxgIAWECxixvIKxZv9fSxGk2rl_l3dmuGn9lXlb0X-aTIx2V-Vz7My6e8zD7L8Wv9fF8vPqrZaBOtaz5IVeuvN1H3YL_bPrI6J4fH7b2OJanPLK2kchjVvlQEXEdQYJFgoJgWPmjJPe4GTAmXShEZJpylBhJJJYnCviJNtLM6e80TzZNe2B9eXSbmYSjPb_rLkIBNROO2Vk6eDpPeRWyk4PJMxwMVOiRg1AdKfgEwbGga</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>程建伟</creator><general>浙江工商大学,金融学院,浙江,杭州,310035</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效</title><author>程建伟</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579-fece295f7ce3042b509db90e9fb70fca6a489eb45cbd95fb2e29503dcec3e17e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>代理成本</topic><topic>债务</topic><topic>成长性</topic><topic>盈利</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>程建伟</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>维普中文期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>程建伟</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效</atitle><jtitle>Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu</jtitle><addtitle>Finance and Trade Research</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>111-114</pages><issn>1001-6260</issn><abstract>本文采用不同的代理成本和成长性指标划分了不同的样本区间，对杠杆比率和债务期限结构与企业盈利的关系进行了检验，实证发现在国有控股、高股权集中度和高流通股比例这三种情况下，负债的负效用相对较小，而债务期限结构的正效用相对大小则并不一致。</abstract><pub>浙江工商大学,金融学院,浙江,杭州,310035</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1001-6260.2007.01.019</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1001-6260
ispartof	Cai mao yan jiu = Caimao yanjiu, 2007 (1), p.111-114
issn	1001-6260
language	chi
recordid	cdi_wanfang_journals_cmyj200701019
source	国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (NSSD)
subjects	代理成本债务成长性盈利
title	代理成本、成长性与上市公司债务的绩效
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A16%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E4%BB%A3%E7%90%86%E6%88%90%E6%9C%AC%E3%80%81%E6%88%90%E9%95%BF%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E4%B8%8A%E5%B8%82%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E5%80%BA%E5%8A%A1%E7%9A%84%E7%BB%A9%E6%95%88&rft.jtitle=Cai%20mao%20yan%20jiu%20=%20Caimao%20yanjiu&rft.au=%E7%A8%8B%E5%BB%BA%E4%BC%9F&rft.date=2007&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=111-114&rft.issn=1001-6260&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6260.2007.01.019&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Ecmyj200701019%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=23895705&rft_wanfj_id=cmyj200701019&rfr_iscdi=true