中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据
本文选取了博士生论文的确定途径、博士生的研究与导师研究之间的关系、博士生跟导师探讨博士论文的频率和博士生对导师指导论文的认可程度这四个维度，比较分析了中日两国博士生学习与生活的数据。结果发现，我国博士生在学位论文指导过程中需要进一步提高科研自主性和独立性，加强导师与博士生之间的互动，更好地发挥导师的引导和决策作用，才能提高博士生创新能力，保证博士生培养的质量...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 比較教育研究 2008-07, Vol.30 (7), p.61-65 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 65 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | 比較教育研究 |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | 姜星海 葛军娜 |
| description | 本文选取了博士生论文的确定途径、博士生的研究与导师研究之间的关系、博士生跟导师探讨博士论文的频率和博士生对导师指导论文的认可程度这四个维度，比较分析了中日两国博士生学习与生活的数据。结果发现，我国博士生在学位论文指导过程中需要进一步提高科研自主性和独立性，加强导师与博士生之间的互动，更好地发挥导师的引导和决策作用，才能提高博士生创新能力，保证博士生培养的质量 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2008.07.013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_bjjyyj200807013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>bjjyyj200807013</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>bjjyyj200807013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h513-ee892870fa3bfc29fb07228e31e0d1c20c879411ae9630288ba4312d2b5e167d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UEtLAlEYvYuCxPwDrYNWTt-9d5w7swzpBUIb98PMeCcdYgKHEHeCkS2aaGEFUimEQYSPRYSZ9WNk5o67_kIjSqtzOJwHHIQ2MUhUU7RtRyp5nithAJpmisIkAqBKwCTAdAUl_vU1lPK8kgmAMRAMmQSyg1FP3HdDvxU-v0XNdth7Cb79WX8s7hriqhEOJlHrXAyas596eHkhnm5-J37YHgfj62ntIeo0o9ePZeqzE4yuYy7ev2bDumh3p7XHefZ2KPz-Olq1jROPp5aYRPm93Xz2IJ072j_M7uTSxQymac5VjagMbIOatkU02wRGiMop5lDAFgFLZZqMscE1hQJRVdOQKSYFYmY4VliBJtHWorZiuLbhHuvO6VnZjQd103GqVWd-C7D4lNi5sXAWqxVu6rxcsnQAkIkmE_oHd0eHPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>姜星海 ; 葛军娜</creator><creatorcontrib>姜星海 ; 葛军娜</creatorcontrib><description>本文选取了博士生论文的确定途径、博士生的研究与导师研究之间的关系、博士生跟导师探讨博士论文的频率和博士生对导师指导论文的认可程度这四个维度，比较分析了中日两国博士生学习与生活的数据。结果发现，我国博士生在学位论文指导过程中需要进一步提高科研自主性和独立性，加强导师与博士生之间的互动，更好地发挥导师的引导和决策作用，才能提高博士生创新能力，保证博士生培养的质量</description><description>PhDs are the main power of knowledge innovation today. The quality of PhD candidates is related to the overall level of China's human resources. This paper focuses on the Ph.D. thesis supervision, comparing Sino-Japanese practices on several questions, including the way to choose topic, the relation with tutor's topic, the frequency of tutorial, and the satisfaction degree of PhD candidates. It also analyzes the differences with grades and subjects. The data reveal that Chinese PhD candidates need to enhance their self-determination and independence on research work, improve mutual communication between tutors and PhD candidates, so as to ensure the high quality of doctorial education</description><identifier>ISSN: 1003-7667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2008.07.013</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>大陸: 北京師範大學/研究所</publisher><ispartof>比較教育研究, 2008-07, Vol.30 (7), p.61-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/bjjyyj/bjjyyj.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>姜星海</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>葛军娜</creatorcontrib><title>中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据</title><title>比較教育研究</title><addtitle>Comparative Education Review</addtitle><description>本文选取了博士生论文的确定途径、博士生的研究与导师研究之间的关系、博士生跟导师探讨博士论文的频率和博士生对导师指导论文的认可程度这四个维度，比较分析了中日两国博士生学习与生活的数据。结果发现，我国博士生在学位论文指导过程中需要进一步提高科研自主性和独立性，加强导师与博士生之间的互动，更好地发挥导师的引导和决策作用，才能提高博士生创新能力，保证博士生培养的质量</description><description>PhDs are the main power of knowledge innovation today. The quality of PhD candidates is related to the overall level of China's human resources. This paper focuses on the Ph.D. thesis supervision, comparing Sino-Japanese practices on several questions, including the way to choose topic, the relation with tutor's topic, the frequency of tutorial, and the satisfaction degree of PhD candidates. It also analyzes the differences with grades and subjects. The data reveal that Chinese PhD candidates need to enhance their self-determination and independence on research work, improve mutual communication between tutors and PhD candidates, so as to ensure the high quality of doctorial education</description><issn>1003-7667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UEtLAlEYvYuCxPwDrYNWTt-9d5w7swzpBUIb98PMeCcdYgKHEHeCkS2aaGEFUimEQYSPRYSZ9WNk5o67_kIjSqtzOJwHHIQ2MUhUU7RtRyp5nithAJpmisIkAqBKwCTAdAUl_vU1lPK8kgmAMRAMmQSyg1FP3HdDvxU-v0XNdth7Cb79WX8s7hriqhEOJlHrXAyas596eHkhnm5-J37YHgfj62ntIeo0o9ePZeqzE4yuYy7ev2bDumh3p7XHefZ2KPz-Olq1jROPp5aYRPm93Xz2IJ072j_M7uTSxQymac5VjagMbIOatkU02wRGiMop5lDAFgFLZZqMscE1hQJRVdOQKSYFYmY4VliBJtHWorZiuLbhHuvO6VnZjQd103GqVWd-C7D4lNi5sXAWqxVu6rxcsnQAkIkmE_oHd0eHPA</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>姜星海</creator><creator>葛军娜</creator><general>北京師範大學/研究所</general><general>北京师范大学教育学院高等教育研究所,北京,100875</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据</title><author>姜星海 ; 葛军娜</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h513-ee892870fa3bfc29fb07228e31e0d1c20c879411ae9630288ba4312d2b5e167d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>姜星海</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>葛军娜</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>比較教育研究</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>姜星海</au><au>葛军娜</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据</atitle><jtitle>比較教育研究</jtitle><addtitle>Comparative Education Review</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>61-65</pages><issn>1003-7667</issn><abstract>本文选取了博士生论文的确定途径、博士生的研究与导师研究之间的关系、博士生跟导师探讨博士论文的频率和博士生对导师指导论文的认可程度这四个维度，比较分析了中日两国博士生学习与生活的数据。结果发现，我国博士生在学位论文指导过程中需要进一步提高科研自主性和独立性，加强导师与博士生之间的互动，更好地发挥导师的引导和决策作用，才能提高博士生创新能力，保证博士生培养的质量</abstract><abstract>PhDs are the main power of knowledge innovation today. The quality of PhD candidates is related to the overall level of China's human resources. This paper focuses on the Ph.D. thesis supervision, comparing Sino-Japanese practices on several questions, including the way to choose topic, the relation with tutor's topic, the frequency of tutorial, and the satisfaction degree of PhD candidates. It also analyzes the differences with grades and subjects. The data reveal that Chinese PhD candidates need to enhance their self-determination and independence on research work, improve mutual communication between tutors and PhD candidates, so as to ensure the high quality of doctorial education</abstract><cop>大陸</cop><pub>北京師範大學/研究所</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2008.07.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1003-7667 |
| ispartof | 比較教育研究, 2008-07, Vol.30 (7), p.61-65 |
| issn | 1003-7667 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_bjjyyj200807013 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| title | 中日博士生学位论文指导的比较分析－基于“研究生学习与生活调查”的数据 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E4%B8%AD%E6%97%A5%E5%8D%9A%E5%A3%AB%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%A6%E4%BD%8D%E8%AE%BA%E6%96%87%E6%8C%87%E5%AF%BC%E7%9A%84%E6%AF%94%E8%BE%83%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%EF%BC%8D%E5%9F%BA%E4%BA%8E%E2%80%9C%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0%E4%B8%8E%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E8%B0%83%E6%9F%A5%E2%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE&rft.jtitle=%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.au=%E5%A7%9C%E6%98%9F%E6%B5%B7&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=61-65&rft.issn=1003-7667&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2008.07.013&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_hyweb%3Ebjjyyj200807013%3C/wanfang_jour_hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=bjjyyj200807013&rfr_iscdi=true |