Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus

Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of cat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668
1. Verfasser: Wendt, Fabian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 668
container_issue 5
container_start_page 653
container_title Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
container_volume 66
creator Wendt, Fabian
description Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are . For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/dzph-2018-0046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_00466656533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljrsKwjAYRoMoWC-rczen6J-0iRXcxOLiIu4h2NgLMZWkUfTpTcE3cPrO8B04CC0IrAgjbF18HhWmQDIMkPIBiijZUkzSjA5RBEACQ8rGaOJcAwDZhkKElqfWSl27a6XivLWFst6UysTeFPFZadnVz9rdvZuh0U1qp-a_naJdfrjsj_gldaeCV1r_DiCa1lsTHoKA6LNEnyX6LNFncc44S5I_9S_bcEb3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Wendt, Fabian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><description>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are . For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-1482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>categorical bindingness ; contractarianism ; legitimacy ; moral demands ; Peter Stemmer ; relativism</subject><ispartof>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><title>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</title><description>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are . For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</description><subject>categorical bindingness</subject><subject>contractarianism</subject><subject>legitimacy</subject><subject>moral demands</subject><subject>Peter Stemmer</subject><subject>relativism</subject><issn>0012-1045</issn><issn>2192-1482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljrsKwjAYRoMoWC-rczen6J-0iRXcxOLiIu4h2NgLMZWkUfTpTcE3cPrO8B04CC0IrAgjbF18HhWmQDIMkPIBiijZUkzSjA5RBEACQ8rGaOJcAwDZhkKElqfWSl27a6XivLWFst6UysTeFPFZadnVz9rdvZuh0U1qp-a_naJdfrjsj_gldaeCV1r_DiCa1lsTHoKA6LNEnyX6LNFncc44S5I_9S_bcEb3</recordid><startdate>20181025</startdate><enddate>20181025</enddate><creator>Wendt, Fabian</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20181025</creationdate><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><author>Wendt, Fabian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_00466656533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>categorical bindingness</topic><topic>contractarianism</topic><topic>legitimacy</topic><topic>moral demands</topic><topic>Peter Stemmer</topic><topic>relativism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendt, Fabian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</atitle><jtitle>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</jtitle><date>2018-10-25</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>653-668</pages><issn>0012-1045</issn><eissn>2192-1482</eissn><abstract>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are . For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/dzph-2018-0046</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1045
ispartof Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668
issn 0012-1045
2192-1482
language eng
recordid cdi_walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653
source De Gruyter journals
subjects categorical bindingness
contractarianism
legitimacy
moral demands
Peter Stemmer
relativism
title Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A18%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moralische%20Forderungen%20und%20Relativismus&rft.jtitle=Deutsche%20Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20Philosophie&rft.au=Wendt,%20Fabian&rft.date=2018-10-25&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=653-668&rft.issn=0012-1045&rft.eissn=2192-1482&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter%3E10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653%3C/walterdegruyter%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true