Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus
Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of cat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 653 |
container_title | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Wendt, Fabian |
description | Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we
follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are
. For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/dzph-2018-0046 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_00466656533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljrsKwjAYRoMoWC-rczen6J-0iRXcxOLiIu4h2NgLMZWkUfTpTcE3cPrO8B04CC0IrAgjbF18HhWmQDIMkPIBiijZUkzSjA5RBEACQ8rGaOJcAwDZhkKElqfWSl27a6XivLWFst6UysTeFPFZadnVz9rdvZuh0U1qp-a_naJdfrjsj_gldaeCV1r_DiCa1lsTHoKA6LNEnyX6LNFncc44S5I_9S_bcEb3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Wendt, Fabian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><description>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we
follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are
. For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-1482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/dzph-2018-0046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>categorical bindingness ; contractarianism ; legitimacy ; moral demands ; Peter Stemmer ; relativism</subject><ispartof>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><title>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</title><description>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we
follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are
. For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</description><subject>categorical bindingness</subject><subject>contractarianism</subject><subject>legitimacy</subject><subject>moral demands</subject><subject>Peter Stemmer</subject><subject>relativism</subject><issn>0012-1045</issn><issn>2192-1482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljrsKwjAYRoMoWC-rczen6J-0iRXcxOLiIu4h2NgLMZWkUfTpTcE3cPrO8B04CC0IrAgjbF18HhWmQDIMkPIBiijZUkzSjA5RBEACQ8rGaOJcAwDZhkKElqfWSl27a6XivLWFst6UysTeFPFZadnVz9rdvZuh0U1qp-a_naJdfrjsj_gldaeCV1r_DiCa1lsTHoKA6LNEnyX6LNFncc44S5I_9S_bcEb3</recordid><startdate>20181025</startdate><enddate>20181025</enddate><creator>Wendt, Fabian</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20181025</creationdate><title>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</title><author>Wendt, Fabian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_00466656533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>categorical bindingness</topic><topic>contractarianism</topic><topic>legitimacy</topic><topic>moral demands</topic><topic>Peter Stemmer</topic><topic>relativism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Fabian</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendt, Fabian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus</atitle><jtitle>Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie</jtitle><date>2018-10-25</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>653-668</pages><issn>0012-1045</issn><eissn>2192-1482</eissn><abstract>Peter Stemmer has developed an elegant and impressive theory of normativity and morality. In this article, I try to show that he does not achieve two goals he set for himself. First, his theory does not capture the categorical bindingness of moral demands, even in Stemmer’s own interpretation of categorical bindingness: it does not show that we
follow moral demands no matter what our personal goals and desires are. Second, just because it would be rational to establish positive moralities in a hypothetical pre-moral scenario, it does not follow – and Stemmer does not establish – that only positive moralities that are in the interest of all members (and contain a prohibition on oppression) are
. For that reason, his contractarian theory collapses into relativism.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/dzph-2018-0046</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-1045 |
ispartof | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2018-10, Vol.66 (5), p.653-668 |
issn | 0012-1045 2192-1482 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | categorical bindingness contractarianism legitimacy moral demands Peter Stemmer relativism |
title | Moralische Forderungen und Relativismus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A18%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moralische%20Forderungen%20und%20Relativismus&rft.jtitle=Deutsche%20Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20Philosophie&rft.au=Wendt,%20Fabian&rft.date=2018-10-25&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=653-668&rft.issn=0012-1045&rft.eissn=2192-1482&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/dzph-2018-0046&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter%3E10_1515_dzph_2018_0046665653%3C/walterdegruyter%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |