System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases

The American legal system, judges and lawyers are continually researching an ever-expanding body of past judicial opinions, or case law, for the ones most relevant to resolution of new disputes. To facilitate these searches, some companies collect and publish the judicial opinions of courts across t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Peter, Al-Kofahi, Khalid
Format: Patent
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Jackson, Peter
Al-Kofahi, Khalid
description The American legal system, judges and lawyers are continually researching an ever-expanding body of past judicial opinions, or case law, for the ones most relevant to resolution of new disputes. To facilitate these searches, some companies collect and publish the judicial opinions of courts across the United States in both paper and electronic forms, with some of the cases containing references to prior cases from other courts that have previously ruled on all or part of the same dispute. Identifying the prior cases is problematic, because, for example, conventional computer text-matching not only suggests too many non-prior cases, but also misses too many actual prior cases. Accordingly, the present inventors devised systems, methods, and software that generally facilitate identification of one or more documents that are related to a given document, and particularly facilitate identification of prior cases for a given case. One specific embodiment retrieves prior-case candidates based on information extracted from an input case, and then uses a support vector machine to determine which of the prior-case candidates are most probably prior cases for the input case.
format Patent
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>uspatents_EFH</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uspatents_grants_07984053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>07984053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-uspatents_grants_079840533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrEKwjAQANAsDqL-w31AhUIV7SyKi5PucjSX9OCaSO5E8vcq-AFOb3lzd7lWNZoamMjG7BvA5EFzsBcWgpALsKdkHCqnCCOr5cIDilQoJGjkQSiiwIBKunSzgKK0-rlwcDreDuf1Ux-fm0zvseCXdtfvN-226_4ob5s3NzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>patent</recordtype></control><display><type>patent</type><title>System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases</title><source>USPTO Issued Patents</source><creator>Jackson, Peter ; Al-Kofahi, Khalid</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Peter ; Al-Kofahi, Khalid ; West Services, Inc</creatorcontrib><description>The American legal system, judges and lawyers are continually researching an ever-expanding body of past judicial opinions, or case law, for the ones most relevant to resolution of new disputes. To facilitate these searches, some companies collect and publish the judicial opinions of courts across the United States in both paper and electronic forms, with some of the cases containing references to prior cases from other courts that have previously ruled on all or part of the same dispute. Identifying the prior cases is problematic, because, for example, conventional computer text-matching not only suggests too many non-prior cases, but also misses too many actual prior cases. Accordingly, the present inventors devised systems, methods, and software that generally facilitate identification of one or more documents that are related to a given document, and particularly facilitate identification of prior cases for a given case. One specific embodiment retrieves prior-case candidates based on information extracted from an input case, and then uses a support vector machine to determine which of the prior-case candidates are most probably prior cases for the input case.</description><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/7984053$$EPDF$$P50$$Guspatents$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,308,780,802,885,64039</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/7984053$$EView_record_in_USPTO$$FView_record_in_$$GUSPTO$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Kofahi, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West Services, Inc</creatorcontrib><title>System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases</title><description>The American legal system, judges and lawyers are continually researching an ever-expanding body of past judicial opinions, or case law, for the ones most relevant to resolution of new disputes. To facilitate these searches, some companies collect and publish the judicial opinions of courts across the United States in both paper and electronic forms, with some of the cases containing references to prior cases from other courts that have previously ruled on all or part of the same dispute. Identifying the prior cases is problematic, because, for example, conventional computer text-matching not only suggests too many non-prior cases, but also misses too many actual prior cases. Accordingly, the present inventors devised systems, methods, and software that generally facilitate identification of one or more documents that are related to a given document, and particularly facilitate identification of prior cases for a given case. One specific embodiment retrieves prior-case candidates based on information extracted from an input case, and then uses a support vector machine to determine which of the prior-case candidates are most probably prior cases for the input case.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>patent</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>patent</recordtype><sourceid>EFH</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrEKwjAQANAsDqL-w31AhUIV7SyKi5PucjSX9OCaSO5E8vcq-AFOb3lzd7lWNZoamMjG7BvA5EFzsBcWgpALsKdkHCqnCCOr5cIDilQoJGjkQSiiwIBKunSzgKK0-rlwcDreDuf1Ux-fm0zvseCXdtfvN-226_4ob5s3NzM</recordid><startdate>20110719</startdate><enddate>20110719</enddate><creator>Jackson, Peter</creator><creator>Al-Kofahi, Khalid</creator><scope>EFH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110719</creationdate><title>System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases</title><author>Jackson, Peter ; Al-Kofahi, Khalid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-uspatents_grants_079840533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>patents</rsrctype><prefilter>patents</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Kofahi, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West Services, Inc</creatorcontrib><collection>USPTO Issued Patents</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Peter</au><au>Al-Kofahi, Khalid</au><aucorp>West Services, Inc</aucorp><format>patent</format><genre>patent</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases</title><date>2011-07-19</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>The American legal system, judges and lawyers are continually researching an ever-expanding body of past judicial opinions, or case law, for the ones most relevant to resolution of new disputes. To facilitate these searches, some companies collect and publish the judicial opinions of courts across the United States in both paper and electronic forms, with some of the cases containing references to prior cases from other courts that have previously ruled on all or part of the same dispute. Identifying the prior cases is problematic, because, for example, conventional computer text-matching not only suggests too many non-prior cases, but also misses too many actual prior cases. Accordingly, the present inventors devised systems, methods, and software that generally facilitate identification of one or more documents that are related to a given document, and particularly facilitate identification of prior cases for a given case. One specific embodiment retrieves prior-case candidates based on information extracted from an input case, and then uses a support vector machine to determine which of the prior-case candidates are most probably prior cases for the input case.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_uspatents_grants_07984053
source USPTO Issued Patents
title System, method, and software for identifying historically related legal cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-uspatents_EFH&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:patent&rft.genre=patent&rft.au=Jackson,%20Peter&rft.aucorp=West%20Services,%20Inc&rft.date=2011-07-19&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cuspatents_EFH%3E07984053%3C/uspatents_EFH%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true