System and method for evaluating work product
The invention is a system and method for evaluating written work-product which includes several categories in which work-product is rated using a unique set of Levels and categories. An exemplary embodiment of the rating scheme includes a rating scale of integers from 1 to 5, inclusive, in which rat...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Patent |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Candura, Dan Gunderson, Dawn Smythe, Deana Stober, Edward Chaya, Jake Wright, Gregory Appelbaum, Gayle Carles, David Etheridge, Jana Hastings, Daniel Osweiler, Debra Jensen, Linne Erny, Roger Ramsey, Jeffrey |
| description | The invention is a system and method for evaluating written work-product which includes several categories in which work-product is rated using a unique set of Levels and categories. An exemplary embodiment of the rating scheme includes a rating scale of integers from 1 to 5, inclusive, in which rating below 3 is considered unacceptable. After a particular piece of work-product is reviewed, another piece of work-product produced by the same person may also be reviewed. Typically, each review is performed by two reviewers. In the event that two reviewers disagree as to the rating of a particular work-product item, a third reviewer, or arbitrator, is used to rate the work-product again to determine a rating for the product. Each creator of work-product may have two or more items of their work-product reviewed to determine the overall quality of the creator's work. |
| format | Patent |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>uspatents_EFI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uspatents_applications_20010032156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20010032156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-uspatents_applications_200100321563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNANriwuSc1VSMxLUchNLcnIT1FIyy9SSC1LzClNLMnMS1cozy_KVigoyk8pTS7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMmm6uIc4euqXFBYklqXklxfGJBQU5mclArfl5xfFGBgaGBgbGRoamZsakqAUAEZoxQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>patent</recordtype></control><display><type>patent</type><title>System and method for evaluating work product</title><source>USPTO Published Applications</source><creator>Candura, Dan ; Gunderson, Dawn ; Smythe, Deana ; Stober, Edward ; Chaya, Jake ; Wright, Gregory ; Appelbaum, Gayle ; Carles, David ; Etheridge, Jana ; Hastings, Daniel ; Osweiler, Debra ; Jensen, Linne ; Erny, Roger ; Ramsey, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Candura, Dan ; Gunderson, Dawn ; Smythe, Deana ; Stober, Edward ; Chaya, Jake ; Wright, Gregory ; Appelbaum, Gayle ; Carles, David ; Etheridge, Jana ; Hastings, Daniel ; Osweiler, Debra ; Jensen, Linne ; Erny, Roger ; Ramsey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>The invention is a system and method for evaluating written work-product which includes several categories in which work-product is rated using a unique set of Levels and categories. An exemplary embodiment of the rating scheme includes a rating scale of integers from 1 to 5, inclusive, in which rating below 3 is considered unacceptable. After a particular piece of work-product is reviewed, another piece of work-product produced by the same person may also be reviewed. Typically, each review is performed by two reviewers. In the event that two reviewers disagree as to the rating of a particular work-product item, a third reviewer, or arbitrator, is used to rate the work-product again to determine a rating for the product. Each creator of work-product may have two or more items of their work-product reviewed to determine the overall quality of the creator's work.</description><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/20010032156$$EPDF$$P50$$Guspatents$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,308,777,870,882,64038</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://patentcenter.uspto.gov/applications/09731163$$EView_record_in_USPTO$$FView_record_in_$$GUSPTO$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Candura, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunderson, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smythe, Deana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaya, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelbaum, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etheridge, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osweiler, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Linne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erny, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>System and method for evaluating work product</title><description>The invention is a system and method for evaluating written work-product which includes several categories in which work-product is rated using a unique set of Levels and categories. An exemplary embodiment of the rating scheme includes a rating scale of integers from 1 to 5, inclusive, in which rating below 3 is considered unacceptable. After a particular piece of work-product is reviewed, another piece of work-product produced by the same person may also be reviewed. Typically, each review is performed by two reviewers. In the event that two reviewers disagree as to the rating of a particular work-product item, a third reviewer, or arbitrator, is used to rate the work-product again to determine a rating for the product. Each creator of work-product may have two or more items of their work-product reviewed to determine the overall quality of the creator's work.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>patent</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>patent</recordtype><sourceid>EFI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNANriwuSc1VSMxLUchNLcnIT1FIyy9SSC1LzClNLMnMS1cozy_KVigoyk8pTS7hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMmm6uIc4euqXFBYklqXklxfGJBQU5mclArfl5xfFGBgaGBgbGRoamZsakqAUAEZoxQA</recordid><startdate>20011018</startdate><enddate>20011018</enddate><creator>Candura, Dan</creator><creator>Gunderson, Dawn</creator><creator>Smythe, Deana</creator><creator>Stober, Edward</creator><creator>Chaya, Jake</creator><creator>Wright, Gregory</creator><creator>Appelbaum, Gayle</creator><creator>Carles, David</creator><creator>Etheridge, Jana</creator><creator>Hastings, Daniel</creator><creator>Osweiler, Debra</creator><creator>Jensen, Linne</creator><creator>Erny, Roger</creator><creator>Ramsey, Jeffrey</creator><scope>EFI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011018</creationdate><title>System and method for evaluating work product</title><author>Candura, Dan ; Gunderson, Dawn ; Smythe, Deana ; Stober, Edward ; Chaya, Jake ; Wright, Gregory ; Appelbaum, Gayle ; Carles, David ; Etheridge, Jana ; Hastings, Daniel ; Osweiler, Debra ; Jensen, Linne ; Erny, Roger ; Ramsey, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-uspatents_applications_200100321563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>patents</rsrctype><prefilter>patents</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Candura, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunderson, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smythe, Deana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaya, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelbaum, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etheridge, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osweiler, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Linne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erny, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>USPTO Published Applications</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Candura, Dan</au><au>Gunderson, Dawn</au><au>Smythe, Deana</au><au>Stober, Edward</au><au>Chaya, Jake</au><au>Wright, Gregory</au><au>Appelbaum, Gayle</au><au>Carles, David</au><au>Etheridge, Jana</au><au>Hastings, Daniel</au><au>Osweiler, Debra</au><au>Jensen, Linne</au><au>Erny, Roger</au><au>Ramsey, Jeffrey</au><format>patent</format><genre>patent</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>System and method for evaluating work product</title><date>2001-10-18</date><risdate>2001</risdate><abstract>The invention is a system and method for evaluating written work-product which includes several categories in which work-product is rated using a unique set of Levels and categories. An exemplary embodiment of the rating scheme includes a rating scale of integers from 1 to 5, inclusive, in which rating below 3 is considered unacceptable. After a particular piece of work-product is reviewed, another piece of work-product produced by the same person may also be reviewed. Typically, each review is performed by two reviewers. In the event that two reviewers disagree as to the rating of a particular work-product item, a third reviewer, or arbitrator, is used to rate the work-product again to determine a rating for the product. Each creator of work-product may have two or more items of their work-product reviewed to determine the overall quality of the creator's work.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_uspatents_applications_20010032156 |
| source | USPTO Published Applications |
| title | System and method for evaluating work product |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-uspatents_EFI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:patent&rft.genre=patent&rft.au=Candura,%20Dan&rft.date=2001-10-18&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cuspatents_EFI%3E20010032156%3C/uspatents_EFI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |