Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments

In response to the looming climate crisis, many countries are adopting technologies to reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases. However, national energy policies are often multiobjective and resolution deeply divisive. The result is a policy trilemma between the energy mix and the trade-offs wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2023-01, Vol.67 (2), p.155-175
Hauptverfasser: Tocock, Mark, Tinch, Dugald, MacDonald, Darla Hatton, Rose, John M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 67
creator Tocock, Mark
Tinch, Dugald
MacDonald, Darla Hatton
Rose, John M
description In response to the looming climate crisis, many countries are adopting technologies to reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases. However, national energy policies are often multiobjective and resolution deeply divisive. The result is a policy trilemma between the energy mix and the trade-offs with other policy objectives, including cost and reliability. Utilising a discrete choice experiment (DCE), the objective of this study is to explore Australian household preferences for alternative electricity contracts containing features reflecting changes in future energy policy. The first set of features include investments in renewable generation and community-based energy storage. The second set of features reflect demand-side management policies, including installing smart meters and consumption limits being imposed on households during peak demand. Two versions of the DCE were developed to obtain both willingness to pay and willingness to accept estimates for the same features. In line with the literature, differences in the two sets of estimates were observed, with the willingness to accept estimates being statistically larger for some features. These dollar value measures can be used to support public policy decision-making –the choice of which depending on the context of the policy problem being considered.
doi_str_mv 10.22004/ag.econ.343046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>umn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_343046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_343046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_3430463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdTzFOxDAQtBAnccDVtPsALjiJFQ46hEA019FHe_bGMbId5HV03Ad4N4lIQU21s5qdmR0hbkpZVJWU6g5tQXqIRa1qqZozsS5Vc7_dqd3D-R98IS6ZP6SUlWqqtfjeY0TrooXcE1CkZE-Qk_MUAsLQQSLv8OC8y6dbwK4bkllWwGgmOtIRD574EZ6YiXn2mt7gMVACQ2G6Yji63INxrBNlAt0PTk9pX5-UXKCY-VqsOvRMm2VeifL15f35bTuG2KKde7UDugUyYdJ9O3Nkxva3cP0fzQ-5cWe3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Tocock, Mark ; Tinch, Dugald ; MacDonald, Darla Hatton ; Rose, John M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tocock, Mark ; Tinch, Dugald ; MacDonald, Darla Hatton ; Rose, John M</creatorcontrib><description>In response to the looming climate crisis, many countries are adopting technologies to reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases. However, national energy policies are often multiobjective and resolution deeply divisive. The result is a policy trilemma between the energy mix and the trade-offs with other policy objectives, including cost and reliability. Utilising a discrete choice experiment (DCE), the objective of this study is to explore Australian household preferences for alternative electricity contracts containing features reflecting changes in future energy policy. The first set of features include investments in renewable generation and community-based energy storage. The second set of features reflect demand-side management policies, including installing smart meters and consumption limits being imposed on households during peak demand. Two versions of the DCE were developed to obtain both willingness to pay and willingness to accept estimates for the same features. In line with the literature, differences in the two sets of estimates were observed, with the willingness to accept estimates being statistically larger for some features. These dollar value measures can be used to support public policy decision-making –the choice of which depending on the context of the policy problem being considered.</description><edition>428</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343046</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Australian National Electricity Market ; community battery storage ; demand-side management ; discrete choice experiment ; renewable energy ; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2023-01, Vol.67 (2), p.155-175</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tocock, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinch, Dugald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Darla Hatton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John M</creatorcontrib><title>Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>In response to the looming climate crisis, many countries are adopting technologies to reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases. However, national energy policies are often multiobjective and resolution deeply divisive. The result is a policy trilemma between the energy mix and the trade-offs with other policy objectives, including cost and reliability. Utilising a discrete choice experiment (DCE), the objective of this study is to explore Australian household preferences for alternative electricity contracts containing features reflecting changes in future energy policy. The first set of features include investments in renewable generation and community-based energy storage. The second set of features reflect demand-side management policies, including installing smart meters and consumption limits being imposed on households during peak demand. Two versions of the DCE were developed to obtain both willingness to pay and willingness to accept estimates for the same features. In line with the literature, differences in the two sets of estimates were observed, with the willingness to accept estimates being statistically larger for some features. These dollar value measures can be used to support public policy decision-making –the choice of which depending on the context of the policy problem being considered.</description><subject>Australian National Electricity Market</subject><subject>community battery storage</subject><subject>demand-side management</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>renewable energy</subject><subject>Resource /Energy Economics and Policy</subject><issn>1467-8489</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JAG</sourceid><recordid>eNqdTzFOxDAQtBAnccDVtPsALjiJFQ46hEA019FHe_bGMbId5HV03Ad4N4lIQU21s5qdmR0hbkpZVJWU6g5tQXqIRa1qqZozsS5Vc7_dqd3D-R98IS6ZP6SUlWqqtfjeY0TrooXcE1CkZE-Qk_MUAsLQQSLv8OC8y6dbwK4bkllWwGgmOtIRD574EZ6YiXn2mt7gMVACQ2G6Yji63INxrBNlAt0PTk9pX5-UXKCY-VqsOvRMm2VeifL15f35bTuG2KKde7UDugUyYdJ9O3Nkxva3cP0fzQ-5cWe3</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Tocock, Mark</creator><creator>Tinch, Dugald</creator><creator>MacDonald, Darla Hatton</creator><creator>Rose, John M</creator><scope>JAG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments</title><author>Tocock, Mark ; Tinch, Dugald ; MacDonald, Darla Hatton ; Rose, John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_3430463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Australian National Electricity Market</topic><topic>community battery storage</topic><topic>demand-side management</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>renewable energy</topic><topic>Resource /Energy Economics and Policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tocock, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinch, Dugald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Darla Hatton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John M</creatorcontrib><collection>AgEcon</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tocock, Mark</au><au>Tinch, Dugald</au><au>MacDonald, Darla Hatton</au><au>Rose, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>155-175</pages><issn>1467-8489</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>In response to the looming climate crisis, many countries are adopting technologies to reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases. However, national energy policies are often multiobjective and resolution deeply divisive. The result is a policy trilemma between the energy mix and the trade-offs with other policy objectives, including cost and reliability. Utilising a discrete choice experiment (DCE), the objective of this study is to explore Australian household preferences for alternative electricity contracts containing features reflecting changes in future energy policy. The first set of features include investments in renewable generation and community-based energy storage. The second set of features reflect demand-side management policies, including installing smart meters and consumption limits being imposed on households during peak demand. Two versions of the DCE were developed to obtain both willingness to pay and willingness to accept estimates for the same features. In line with the literature, differences in the two sets of estimates were observed, with the willingness to accept estimates being statistically larger for some features. These dollar value measures can be used to support public policy decision-making –the choice of which depending on the context of the policy problem being considered.</abstract><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.343046</doi><edition>428</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-8489
ispartof The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2023-01, Vol.67 (2), p.155-175
issn 1467-8489
1467-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_343046
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Australian National Electricity Market
community battery storage
demand-side management
discrete choice experiment
renewable energy
Resource /Energy Economics and Policy
title Managing the energy trilemma of reliability, affordability and renewables: Assessing consumer demands with discrete choice experiments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A49%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-umn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20the%20energy%20trilemma%20of%20reliability,%20affordability%20and%20renewables:%20Assessing%20consumer%20demands%20with%20discrete%20choice%20experiments&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Tocock,%20Mark&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=155-175&rft.issn=1467-8489&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.343046&rft_dat=%3Cumn%3Eoai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_343046%3C/umn%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true