Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions

Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural and resource economics 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Tong, Xu, Zheng, Kolady, Deepthi, Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D., Clay, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 307
container_issue 2
container_start_page 287
container_title Journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 46
creator Wang, Tong
Xu, Zheng
Kolady, Deepthi
Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.
Clay, David
description Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.
doi_str_mv 10.22004/ag.econ.304768
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_umn_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_304768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27154113</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27154113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-e52b6692350be999b786357a11ed954f94d2995c934e1b8cfb020b9bb2d227a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LxDAQhoMoWFfPnoSC59ZkkjTJUeonLHjQPYekTbu7uk1NWsF_b6R7moF5n-F5EbomuATAmN2ZvnSNH0qKmajkCcqAgigkSH6KMoIrWXCO4RxdxLjHOCFSZSiv_Y8LRR38mG-i6V2-G_J3P0_b_MF8-slcorPOfEV3dZwrtHl6_KhfivXb82t9vy56SmAqHAdbVQoox9YppayQFeXCEOJaxVmnWAtK8UZR5oiVTWeTgVXWQgsgDKUrRJa_82HQySM10d7sjmt0JjRb_X9z7ayXiom5XZgx-O_ZxUnv_RyGpKmBC8IUIwxS6mZJ7ePkgx7D7mDCrwZBOCOE0j8pzVol</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571494142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</title><source>AgEcon</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</creatorcontrib><description>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</description><edition>1835</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1068-5502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.304768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Logan: Western Agricultural Economics Association</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Conservation ; Corn ; Cover crops ; Crops ; Decisions ; Economics ; Environmental Economics and Policy ; Farm Management ; Farmers ; Information centers ; Perceptions ; Production Economics ; Profitability ; Profits ; Questionnaires ; Sequestering ; Soil erosion ; Soybeans ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tillage ; Transition zone ; Water quality ; Water stress</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2021 the authors</rights><rights>Copyright Western Agricultural Economics Association May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,25384,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolady, Deepthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, David</creatorcontrib><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</title><title>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Economics and Policy</subject><subject>Farm Management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Information centers</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Production Economics</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sequestering</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Transition zone</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><issn>1068-5502</issn><issn>2327-8285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>JAG</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LxDAQhoMoWFfPnoSC59ZkkjTJUeonLHjQPYekTbu7uk1NWsF_b6R7moF5n-F5EbomuATAmN2ZvnSNH0qKmajkCcqAgigkSH6KMoIrWXCO4RxdxLjHOCFSZSiv_Y8LRR38mG-i6V2-G_J3P0_b_MF8-slcorPOfEV3dZwrtHl6_KhfivXb82t9vy56SmAqHAdbVQoox9YppayQFeXCEOJaxVmnWAtK8UZR5oiVTWeTgVXWQgsgDKUrRJa_82HQySM10d7sjmt0JjRb_X9z7ayXiom5XZgx-O_ZxUnv_RyGpKmBC8IUIwxS6mZJ7ePkgx7D7mDCrwZBOCOE0j8pzVol</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Wang, Tong</creator><creator>Xu, Zheng</creator><creator>Kolady, Deepthi</creator><creator>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creator><creator>Clay, David</creator><general>Western Agricultural Economics Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>JAG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota</title><author>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-e52b6692350be999b786357a11ed954f94d2995c934e1b8cfb020b9bb2d227a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Economics and Policy</topic><topic>Farm Management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Information centers</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Production Economics</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sequestering</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Transition zone</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolady, Deepthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AgEcon</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tong</au><au>Xu, Zheng</au><au>Kolady, Deepthi</au><au>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</au><au>Clay, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>287-307</pages><issn>1068-5502</issn><eissn>2327-8285</eissn><abstract>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</abstract><cop>Logan</cop><pub>Western Agricultural Economics Association</pub><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.304768</doi><tpages>21</tpages><edition>1835</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-5502
ispartof Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
language eng
recordid cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_304768
source AgEcon; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Conservation
Corn
Cover crops
Crops
Decisions
Economics
Environmental Economics and Policy
Farm Management
Farmers
Information centers
Perceptions
Production Economics
Profitability
Profits
Questionnaires
Sequestering
Soil erosion
Soybeans
Sustainable agriculture
Tillage
Transition zone
Water quality
Water stress
title Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A42%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_umn_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cover-Crop%20Usage%20in%20South%20Dakota:%20Farmer%20Perceived%20Profitability%20and%20Future%20Adoption%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Wang,%20Tong&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=287-307&rft.issn=1068-5502&rft.eissn=2327-8285&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.304768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_umn_a%3E27154113%3C/jstor_umn_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571494142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27154113&rfr_iscdi=true