Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions
Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural and resource economics 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural and resource economics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Wang, Tong Xu, Zheng Kolady, Deepthi Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. Clay, David |
description | Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops. |
doi_str_mv | 10.22004/ag.econ.304768 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_umn_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_304768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27154113</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27154113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-e52b6692350be999b786357a11ed954f94d2995c934e1b8cfb020b9bb2d227a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LxDAQhoMoWFfPnoSC59ZkkjTJUeonLHjQPYekTbu7uk1NWsF_b6R7moF5n-F5EbomuATAmN2ZvnSNH0qKmajkCcqAgigkSH6KMoIrWXCO4RxdxLjHOCFSZSiv_Y8LRR38mG-i6V2-G_J3P0_b_MF8-slcorPOfEV3dZwrtHl6_KhfivXb82t9vy56SmAqHAdbVQoox9YppayQFeXCEOJaxVmnWAtK8UZR5oiVTWeTgVXWQgsgDKUrRJa_82HQySM10d7sjmt0JjRb_X9z7ayXiom5XZgx-O_ZxUnv_RyGpKmBC8IUIwxS6mZJ7ePkgx7D7mDCrwZBOCOE0j8pzVol</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571494142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</title><source>AgEcon</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</creatorcontrib><description>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</description><edition>1835</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1068-5502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.304768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Logan: Western Agricultural Economics Association</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Conservation ; Corn ; Cover crops ; Crops ; Decisions ; Economics ; Environmental Economics and Policy ; Farm Management ; Farmers ; Information centers ; Perceptions ; Production Economics ; Profitability ; Profits ; Questionnaires ; Sequestering ; Soil erosion ; Soybeans ; Sustainable agriculture ; Tillage ; Transition zone ; Water quality ; Water stress</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2021 the authors</rights><rights>Copyright Western Agricultural Economics Association May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,25384,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolady, Deepthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, David</creatorcontrib><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</title><title>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Economics and Policy</subject><subject>Farm Management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Information centers</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Production Economics</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sequestering</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Transition zone</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><issn>1068-5502</issn><issn>2327-8285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>JAG</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LxDAQhoMoWFfPnoSC59ZkkjTJUeonLHjQPYekTbu7uk1NWsF_b6R7moF5n-F5EbomuATAmN2ZvnSNH0qKmajkCcqAgigkSH6KMoIrWXCO4RxdxLjHOCFSZSiv_Y8LRR38mG-i6V2-G_J3P0_b_MF8-slcorPOfEV3dZwrtHl6_KhfivXb82t9vy56SmAqHAdbVQoox9YppayQFeXCEOJaxVmnWAtK8UZR5oiVTWeTgVXWQgsgDKUrRJa_82HQySM10d7sjmt0JjRb_X9z7ayXiom5XZgx-O_ZxUnv_RyGpKmBC8IUIwxS6mZJ7ePkgx7D7mDCrwZBOCOE0j8pzVol</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Wang, Tong</creator><creator>Xu, Zheng</creator><creator>Kolady, Deepthi</creator><creator>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creator><creator>Clay, David</creator><general>Western Agricultural Economics Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>JAG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota</title><author>Wang, Tong ; Xu, Zheng ; Kolady, Deepthi ; Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. ; Clay, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-e52b6692350be999b786357a11ed954f94d2995c934e1b8cfb020b9bb2d227a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Economics and Policy</topic><topic>Farm Management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Information centers</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Production Economics</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sequestering</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Transition zone</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolady, Deepthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AgEcon</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tong</au><au>Xu, Zheng</au><au>Kolady, Deepthi</au><au>Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.</au><au>Clay, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>287-307</pages><issn>1068-5502</issn><eissn>2327-8285</eissn><abstract>Using bivariate ordered logit models, we investigate factors that determine farmers' perceptions of cover-crop profitability and likelihood of future usage in the climate transition zone of the Northern Great Plains. Our results indicate that approximately 40% of long-term (10+ years) users perceived a profit increase of more than 5%. Additionally, future adoption decisions are positively affected by environment-oriented attitudes and negatively affected by prioritizing short-term profitability. More efforts can be directed toward educational programs that enhance understanding of the short- versus long-term economic benefits of cover crops.</abstract><cop>Logan</cop><pub>Western Agricultural Economics Association</pub><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.304768</doi><tpages>21</tpages><edition>1835</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-5502 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2021-05, Vol.46 (2), p.287-307 |
issn | 1068-5502 2327-8285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_304768 |
source | AgEcon; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agriculture Conservation Corn Cover crops Crops Decisions Economics Environmental Economics and Policy Farm Management Farmers Information centers Perceptions Production Economics Profitability Profits Questionnaires Sequestering Soil erosion Soybeans Sustainable agriculture Tillage Transition zone Water quality Water stress |
title | Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A42%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_umn_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cover-Crop%20Usage%20in%20South%20Dakota:%20Farmer%20Perceived%20Profitability%20and%20Future%20Adoption%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Wang,%20Tong&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=287-307&rft.issn=1068-5502&rft.eissn=2327-8285&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.304768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_umn_a%3E27154113%3C/jstor_umn_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571494142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27154113&rfr_iscdi=true |