Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?

Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?

In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR) 2019-06, Vol.1 (1), p.67-70
1. Verfasser: Wilson, Paul N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Faculty evaluation
quality of education
responsibility-centered management
teaching
Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR)
container_volume 1
creator Wilson, Paul N
description In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize the relational and hence the learning environment of higher education, particularly at the undergraduate level. Mutual faculty-student engagement remains a critical component of a quality education.
doi_str_mv 10.22004/ag.econ.294017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>umn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_294017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_294017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_2940173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjkELgjAYhncoSMpz1_0BbTNT10UijC4dgqCjfM5NB3OD5g7--xD7BZ3eFx4eeBDaUxInCSHpAbpYcGvihKWE5isUJFlRRCfG2AaFzqmGpEVOs5SwAJUPa8TUgNZYGTz2Al84tGKYzvjdKymV6bBdwNODVuOErcRV6zmMyppyh9YStBPhb7eI3qrX9R75wdTQzR21BfW7TsCH9_XMROvrJfD4j_MFNWFKTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Paul N</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Paul N</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize the relational and hence the learning environment of higher education, particularly at the undergraduate level. Mutual faculty-student engagement remains a critical component of a quality education.</description><edition>2226</edition><identifier>ISSN: 2688-5999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.294017</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Faculty evaluation ; quality of education ; responsibility-centered management ; teaching ; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession</subject><ispartof>Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), 2019-06, Vol.1 (1), p.67-70</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Paul N</creatorcontrib><title>Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?</title><title>Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR)</title><description>In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize the relational and hence the learning environment of higher education, particularly at the undergraduate level. Mutual faculty-student engagement remains a critical component of a quality education.</description><subject>Faculty evaluation</subject><subject>quality of education</subject><subject>responsibility-centered management</subject><subject>teaching</subject><subject>Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession</subject><issn>2688-5999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JAG</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjkELgjAYhncoSMpz1_0BbTNT10UijC4dgqCjfM5NB3OD5g7--xD7BZ3eFx4eeBDaUxInCSHpAbpYcGvihKWE5isUJFlRRCfG2AaFzqmGpEVOs5SwAJUPa8TUgNZYGTz2Al84tGKYzvjdKymV6bBdwNODVuOErcRV6zmMyppyh9YStBPhb7eI3qrX9R75wdTQzR21BfW7TsCH9_XMROvrJfD4j_MFNWFKTA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Wilson, Paul N</creator><scope>JAG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?</title><author>Wilson, Paul N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_2940173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Faculty evaluation</topic><topic>quality of education</topic><topic>responsibility-centered management</topic><topic>teaching</topic><topic>Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Paul N</creatorcontrib><collection>AgEcon</collection><jtitle>Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Paul N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?</atitle><jtitle>Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR)</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>67-70</pages><issn>2688-5999</issn><abstract>In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize the relational and hence the learning environment of higher education, particularly at the undergraduate level. Mutual faculty-student engagement remains a critical component of a quality education.</abstract><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.294017</doi><edition>2226</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2688-5999
ispartof Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), 2019-06, Vol.1 (1), p.67-70
issn 2688-5999
language eng
recordid cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_294017
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Faculty evaluation
quality of education
responsibility-centered management
teaching
Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession
title Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-umn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moneyball%20in%20the%20Academy:%20Whiffing%20on%20the%20Quality%20of%20Education?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Economics%20Teaching%20Resources%20(AETR)&rft.au=Wilson,%20Paul%20N&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=67-70&rft.issn=2688-5999&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.294017&rft_dat=%3Cumn%3Eoai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_294017%3C/umn%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true