MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII

The paper describes a DEA-based method for multiple criteria decision making. A problem of multiple criteria decision making is considered here as an efficiency evaluation problem where variants are equal to decision making units, minimization criteria are taken as inputs and maximization criteria a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Acta oeconomica et informatica 2006, Vol.9 (2), p.32-36
1. Verfasser:	FANDEL, Peter
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	slo
Schlagworte:	Agricultural and Food Policy Agricultural Finance assurance region method DEA interval weights multiple criteria decision making
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	36
container_issue	2
container_start_page	32
container_title	Acta oeconomica et informatica
container_volume	9
creator	FANDEL, Peter
description	The paper describes a DEA-based method for multiple criteria decision making. A problem of multiple criteria decision making is considered here as an efficiency evaluation problem where variants are equal to decision making units, minimization criteria are taken as inputs and maximization criteria are understood as outputs. DEA assurance region method with absolute and relative bounds for weights is then applied for evaluation of variants with interval weights of criteria. The decision-making regarding a choice of a site for location of municipal waste dump has been used to demonstrate the proposed methods. Six variants were evaluated by five criteria: needed area of agricultural land, cost of investments, negative impacts on inhabitants, negative effects on water resources, and dump capacity (years).
doi_str_mv	10.22004/ag.econ.267824
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>umn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_267824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_267824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_2678243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdT8FqwkAUXKQFQ_XsdX_AuNmk23p8mEgemn2SpAsNQlji1ipthAb_vxFz6LlzmYGZgRnGZoHwpRQiWtij75pL60v18iqjEfOCMFTzpVTBwx89ZtOuO4sez5FSkfDYPqNKU1Ei39FbhSUCjxPghrhBWG1yLJMcYasp4zlVKcVkQCMvOOreMbClPlpBDPo9Q24ghZ6GGk7Y44f96tx04CcWrJNylc6v321tj7fB9cWeBtk5-9N81jfPHa71_Un4n84vvnNPGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FANDEL, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>FANDEL, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The paper describes a DEA-based method for multiple criteria decision making. A problem of multiple criteria decision making is considered here as an efficiency evaluation problem where variants are equal to decision making units, minimization criteria are taken as inputs and maximization criteria are understood as outputs. DEA assurance region method with absolute and relative bounds for weights is then applied for evaluation of variants with interval weights of criteria. The decision-making regarding a choice of a site for location of municipal waste dump has been used to demonstrate the proposed methods. Six variants were evaluated by five criteria: needed area of agricultural land, cost of investments, negative impacts on inhabitants, negative effects on water resources, and dump capacity (years).</description><edition>394</edition><identifier>ISSN: 1336-9261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1336-9261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267824</identifier><language>slo</language><subject>Agricultural and Food Policy ; Agricultural Finance ; assurance region method ; DEA ; interval weights ; multiple criteria decision making</subject><ispartof>Acta oeconomica et informatica, 2006, Vol.9 (2), p.32-36</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FANDEL, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII</title><title>Acta oeconomica et informatica</title><description>The paper describes a DEA-based method for multiple criteria decision making. A problem of multiple criteria decision making is considered here as an efficiency evaluation problem where variants are equal to decision making units, minimization criteria are taken as inputs and maximization criteria are understood as outputs. DEA assurance region method with absolute and relative bounds for weights is then applied for evaluation of variants with interval weights of criteria. The decision-making regarding a choice of a site for location of municipal waste dump has been used to demonstrate the proposed methods. Six variants were evaluated by five criteria: needed area of agricultural land, cost of investments, negative impacts on inhabitants, negative effects on water resources, and dump capacity (years).</description><subject>Agricultural and Food Policy</subject><subject>Agricultural Finance</subject><subject>assurance region method</subject><subject>DEA</subject><subject>interval weights</subject><subject>multiple criteria decision making</subject><issn>1336-9261</issn><issn>1336-9261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JAG</sourceid><recordid>eNqdT8FqwkAUXKQFQ_XsdX_AuNmk23p8mEgemn2SpAsNQlji1ipthAb_vxFz6LlzmYGZgRnGZoHwpRQiWtij75pL60v18iqjEfOCMFTzpVTBwx89ZtOuO4sez5FSkfDYPqNKU1Ei39FbhSUCjxPghrhBWG1yLJMcYasp4zlVKcVkQCMvOOreMbClPlpBDPo9Q24ghZ6GGk7Y44f96tx04CcWrJNylc6v321tj7fB9cWeBtk5-9N81jfPHa71_Un4n84vvnNPGA</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>FANDEL, Peter</creator><scope>JAG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII</title><author>FANDEL, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_2678243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>slo</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and Food Policy</topic><topic>Agricultural Finance</topic><topic>assurance region method</topic><topic>DEA</topic><topic>interval weights</topic><topic>multiple criteria decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FANDEL, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>AgEcon</collection><jtitle>Acta oeconomica et informatica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FANDEL, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII</atitle><jtitle>Acta oeconomica et informatica</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>32-36</pages><issn>1336-9261</issn><eissn>1336-9261</eissn><abstract>The paper describes a DEA-based method for multiple criteria decision making. A problem of multiple criteria decision making is considered here as an efficiency evaluation problem where variants are equal to decision making units, minimization criteria are taken as inputs and maximization criteria are understood as outputs. DEA assurance region method with absolute and relative bounds for weights is then applied for evaluation of variants with interval weights of criteria. The decision-making regarding a choice of a site for location of municipal waste dump has been used to demonstrate the proposed methods. Six variants were evaluated by five criteria: needed area of agricultural land, cost of investments, negative impacts on inhabitants, negative effects on water resources, and dump capacity (years).</abstract><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.267824</doi><edition>394</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1336-9261
ispartof	Acta oeconomica et informatica, 2006, Vol.9 (2), p.32-36
issn	1336-9261 1336-9261
language	slo
recordid	cdi_umn_agecon_oai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_267824
source	Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects	Agricultural and Food Policy Agricultural Finance assurance region method DEA interval weights multiple criteria decision making
title	MOZNOSTI POUZITIA DEA VO VIACKRITERIALNOM ROZHODOVANI S INTERVALOVO ZADANYMI VAHAMI KRITERII
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A19%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-umn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MOZNOSTI%20POUZITIA%20DEA%20VO%20VIACKRITERIALNOM%20ROZHODOVANI%20S%20INTERVALOVO%20ZADANYMI%20VAHAMI%20KRITERII&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oeconomica%20et%20informatica&rft.au=FANDEL,%20Peter&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=32-36&rft.issn=1336-9261&rft.eissn=1336-9261&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.267824&rft_dat=%3Cumn%3Eoai_ageconsearch_umn_edu_267824%3C/umn%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true