Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets

Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets

Using climate policy debates as a case study, I argue that a certain response to the argument from inductive risk, the hedging defense, runs afoul of a reasonable ethical principle: the no-passing-the-buck principle according to which scientists ought to offer their scientific judgment when such jud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy of science 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.979-990
1. Verfasser: Frisch, Mathias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Climate policy
Environmental policy
Public policy
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 990
container_issue 5
container_start_page 979
container_title Philosophy of science
container_volume 87
creator Frisch, Mathias
description Using climate policy debates as a case study, I argue that a certain response to the argument from inductive risk, the hedging defense, runs afoul of a reasonable ethical principle: the no-passing-the-buck principle according to which scientists ought to offer their scientific judgment when such judgment is both possible and needed in public policy debates.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/710538
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_710538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470546219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-31073bf61675cdec8f278cd876d678623a474261e47b0deebd8c9c901d90db6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMoWEf9DQXFhVh9L0mTdCnFLxhwMyPuQpqkY4fajkm78N_boQOuzuZw7-UScolwj6DEg0TImToiCeasyKSQn8ckAWCYKcrVKTmLcQuAqEAl5HbdWR8G03RD4-Nd-mHacU_TubRsm28z-HRlwsYP8Zyc1KaN_uLABVk_P63K12z5_vJWPi4zSxUMGUOQrKoFCplb562qqVTWKSmckEpQZrjkVKDnsgLnfeWULWwB6ApwlajZglzNubvQ_0xjBr3tx9BNlZpyCTkXFIvJupktG_oYg6_1Lkxzw69G0Psf9PzDJF7P4mi_Gms2_S74GP8zD9ofcEhZog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470546219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Frisch, Mathias</creator><creatorcontrib>Frisch, Mathias</creatorcontrib><description>Using climate policy debates as a case study, I argue that a certain response to the argument from inductive risk, the hedging defense, runs afoul of a reasonable ethical principle: the no-passing-the-buck principle according to which scientists ought to offer their scientific judgment when such judgment is both possible and needed in public policy debates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-767X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/710538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Climate policy ; Environmental policy ; Public policy</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.979-990</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-31073bf61675cdec8f278cd876d678623a474261e47b0deebd8c9c901d90db6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-31073bf61675cdec8f278cd876d678623a474261e47b0deebd8c9c901d90db6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frisch, Mathias</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets</title><title>Philosophy of science</title><description>Using climate policy debates as a case study, I argue that a certain response to the argument from inductive risk, the hedging defense, runs afoul of a reasonable ethical principle: the no-passing-the-buck principle according to which scientists ought to offer their scientific judgment when such judgment is both possible and needed in public policy debates.</description><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><issn>0031-8248</issn><issn>1539-767X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMoWEf9DQXFhVh9L0mTdCnFLxhwMyPuQpqkY4fajkm78N_boQOuzuZw7-UScolwj6DEg0TImToiCeasyKSQn8ckAWCYKcrVKTmLcQuAqEAl5HbdWR8G03RD4-Nd-mHacU_TubRsm28z-HRlwsYP8Zyc1KaN_uLABVk_P63K12z5_vJWPi4zSxUMGUOQrKoFCplb562qqVTWKSmckEpQZrjkVKDnsgLnfeWULWwB6ApwlajZglzNubvQ_0xjBr3tx9BNlZpyCTkXFIvJupktG_oYg6_1Lkxzw69G0Psf9PzDJF7P4mi_Gms2_S74GP8zD9ofcEhZog</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Frisch, Mathias</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets</title><author>Frisch, Mathias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-31073bf61675cdec8f278cd876d678623a474261e47b0deebd8c9c901d90db6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frisch, Mathias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frisch, Mathias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>979</spage><epage>990</epage><pages>979-990</pages><issn>0031-8248</issn><eissn>1539-767X</eissn><abstract>Using climate policy debates as a case study, I argue that a certain response to the argument from inductive risk, the hedging defense, runs afoul of a reasonable ethical principle: the no-passing-the-buck principle according to which scientists ought to offer their scientific judgment when such judgment is both possible and needed in public policy debates.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/710538</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8248
ispartof Philosophy of science, 2020-12, Vol.87 (5), p.979-990
issn 0031-8248
1539-767X
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_710538
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Climate policy
Environmental policy
Public policy
title Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainties,%20Values,%20and%20Climate%20Targets&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20science&rft.au=Frisch,%20Mathias&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=979&rft.epage=990&rft.pages=979-990&rft.issn=0031-8248&rft.eissn=1539-767X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/710538&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_uchic%3E2470546219%3C/proquest_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470546219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true