One world anthropology
Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HAU journal of ethnographic theory 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 171 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 158 |
container_title | HAU journal of ethnographic theory |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Ingold, Tim |
description | Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/698315 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_698315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284713869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz8tLxDAQBvAgCi7revS8oHirZpJmkh5l8QULe9FzSPPYB7WpSYvsf2-lC85l5vDjGz5CroE-AFX4iJXiIM7IjNGyKgBAnI-3kKKAkvNLssj5QMdBCsDZjNxsWr_8ialxS9P2uxS72MTt8YpcBNNkvzjtOfl8ef5YvRXrzev76mldWA6sL5ispK9NkBgkr50C6VWwtFbeKGeNqbBEJxh6qnyNTAmL3CFHR42XLig-J7dTbpfi9-Bzrw9xSO34UjOmSglcYTWq-0nZFHNOPugu7b9MOmqg-q-2nmqP8G6Cg93trdnGLvmc_zNP7BfWt1QP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284713869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One world anthropology</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Ingold, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-1115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/698315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><ispartof>HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171</ispartof><rights>2018 The Society for Ethnographic Theory. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>One world anthropology</title><title>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</title><description>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</description><issn>2575-1433</issn><issn>2049-1115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz8tLxDAQBvAgCi7revS8oHirZpJmkh5l8QULe9FzSPPYB7WpSYvsf2-lC85l5vDjGz5CroE-AFX4iJXiIM7IjNGyKgBAnI-3kKKAkvNLssj5QMdBCsDZjNxsWr_8ialxS9P2uxS72MTt8YpcBNNkvzjtOfl8ef5YvRXrzev76mldWA6sL5ispK9NkBgkr50C6VWwtFbeKGeNqbBEJxh6qnyNTAmL3CFHR42XLig-J7dTbpfi9-Bzrw9xSO34UjOmSglcYTWq-0nZFHNOPugu7b9MOmqg-q-2nmqP8G6Cg93trdnGLvmc_zNP7BfWt1QP</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Ingold, Tim</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>One world anthropology</title><author>Ingold, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingold, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One world anthropology</atitle><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>158-171</pages><issn>2575-1433</issn><eissn>2049-1115</eissn><abstract>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/698315</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2575-1433 |
ispartof | HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171 |
issn | 2575-1433 2049-1115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_698315 |
source | Freely Accessible Journals |
title | One world anthropology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20world%20anthropology&rft.jtitle=HAU%20journal%20of%20ethnographic%20theory&rft.au=Ingold,%20Tim&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=158-171&rft.issn=2575-1433&rft.eissn=2049-1115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/698315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_uchic%3E2284713869%3C/proquest_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284713869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |