One world anthropology

Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HAU journal of ethnographic theory 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171
1. Verfasser: Ingold, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 171
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 158
container_title HAU journal of ethnographic theory
container_volume 8
creator Ingold, Tim
description Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/698315
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_698315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284713869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz8tLxDAQBvAgCi7revS8oHirZpJmkh5l8QULe9FzSPPYB7WpSYvsf2-lC85l5vDjGz5CroE-AFX4iJXiIM7IjNGyKgBAnI-3kKKAkvNLssj5QMdBCsDZjNxsWr_8ialxS9P2uxS72MTt8YpcBNNkvzjtOfl8ef5YvRXrzev76mldWA6sL5ispK9NkBgkr50C6VWwtFbeKGeNqbBEJxh6qnyNTAmL3CFHR42XLig-J7dTbpfi9-Bzrw9xSO34UjOmSglcYTWq-0nZFHNOPugu7b9MOmqg-q-2nmqP8G6Cg93trdnGLvmc_zNP7BfWt1QP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284713869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One world anthropology</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Ingold, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-1115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/698315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><ispartof>HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171</ispartof><rights>2018 The Society for Ethnographic Theory. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>One world anthropology</title><title>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</title><description>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</description><issn>2575-1433</issn><issn>2049-1115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz8tLxDAQBvAgCi7revS8oHirZpJmkh5l8QULe9FzSPPYB7WpSYvsf2-lC85l5vDjGz5CroE-AFX4iJXiIM7IjNGyKgBAnI-3kKKAkvNLssj5QMdBCsDZjNxsWr_8ialxS9P2uxS72MTt8YpcBNNkvzjtOfl8ef5YvRXrzev76mldWA6sL5ispK9NkBgkr50C6VWwtFbeKGeNqbBEJxh6qnyNTAmL3CFHR42XLig-J7dTbpfi9-Bzrw9xSO34UjOmSglcYTWq-0nZFHNOPugu7b9MOmqg-q-2nmqP8G6Cg93trdnGLvmc_zNP7BfWt1QP</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Ingold, Tim</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>One world anthropology</title><author>Ingold, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-2797ebaf76f73bd817e8fc0b8ea8dcaa9646d526e08eb6285c63d636d0ae7df83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingold, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One world anthropology</atitle><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>158-171</pages><issn>2575-1433</issn><eissn>2049-1115</eissn><abstract>Anthropology is a philosophical inquiry into the conditions and possibilities of life in the one world we all inhabit. That this world is indeed one is a core principle of the discipline. By exploring the relation between the particular life and life-as-a-whole, I show how the latter can be understood as a correspondence in which lives are not added together but carry on alongside one another. Life itself, then, is not the summation but the correspondence of its particulars. Comparing ideas of the self and the soul, founded respectively in regimes of naturalism and animism, I show how correspondence proceeds through a process of interstitial differentiation, in which agency is inside action rather than in front of it. This calls for a “turn” that is not ontological but ontogenetic, leading us to conceive of the one world as neither a universe nor a fractiverse but as a pluriverse.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/698315</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2575-1433
ispartof HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2018-03, Vol.8 (1-2), p.158-171
issn 2575-1433
2049-1115
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_698315
source Freely Accessible Journals
title One world anthropology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20world%20anthropology&rft.jtitle=HAU%20journal%20of%20ethnographic%20theory&rft.au=Ingold,%20Tim&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=158-171&rft.issn=2575-1433&rft.eissn=2049-1115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/698315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_uchic%3E2284713869%3C/proquest_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284713869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true