DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS: Differential Effects of Strategy Instruction for Younger and Older Elementary Students
This study compared the effects of 2 strategy-based comprehension treatments intended to promote vocabulary and content knowledge for elementary students at risk for developing reading difficulties (N = 105) with a traditional content approach. The study examined the effectiveness of strategy versus...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Elementary school journal 2017-12, Vol.118 (2), p.232-256 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 256 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 232 |
| container_title | The Elementary school journal |
| container_volume | 118 |
| creator | Elleman, Amy M. Olinghouse, Natalie G. Gilbert, Jennifer K. Compton, Donald L. Spencer, Jane Lawrence |
| description | This study compared the effects of 2 strategy-based comprehension treatments intended to promote vocabulary and content knowledge for elementary students at risk for developing reading difficulties (N = 105) with a traditional content approach. The study examined the effectiveness of strategy versus nonstrategy instruction on reading comprehension, vocabulary, and knowledge acquisition. In addition, the study considered the trade-offs between using a program focused on building vocabulary and a program focused on building content knowledge through strategy-based dialogue. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses revealed that the vocabulary strategy instruction produced higher vocabulary acquisition than the other conditions for younger students. However, traditional content instruction was more effective for older students. The findings suggest that practitioners should focus heavily on vocabulary when using expository texts with young children. Based on our results, we suggest blending the best of content and strategy instruction to optimize comprehension instruction in the classroom. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/694322 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1162545</ericid><jstor_id>26546674</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26546674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1e54d1905a16d6fef2623528ee11217aa72384ab01fb42704306a76e205e95c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsFb9B0JAcRedN5-ZZWnHWA2JpKkuwzSdaIOaOtMu_PemRCq4ejzO4V64CJ0DvgEciVuhGCXkAA2AcxZGRKpDNMAYaMhVxI7RifdN93JF-QCRiX7WSfY0TeNgnKWFTovgMc1eEj2JdTBNg1mRz-M42fFcjyY6n52io9q8e3v2e4dofqeL8X2YZPF0PErCihK2CcFytgSFuQGxFLWtiSCUk8haAALSGEloxMwCQ71gRGJGsTBSWIK5VbxidIgu-9y1a7-21m_Kpt26z66yBBVJiaVisrOue6tyrffO1uXarT6M-y4Bl7s9yn6PTrzoRetW1V7SDwCCcMY7ftXzbfW2qsxru3bW-7_O_zGN37Run0MEZ0JIRn8AyFtp2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987707947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS: Differential Effects of Strategy Instruction for Younger and Older Elementary Students</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Elleman, Amy M. ; Olinghouse, Natalie G. ; Gilbert, Jennifer K. ; Compton, Donald L. ; Spencer, Jane Lawrence</creator><creatorcontrib>Elleman, Amy M. ; Olinghouse, Natalie G. ; Gilbert, Jennifer K. ; Compton, Donald L. ; Spencer, Jane Lawrence</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the effects of 2 strategy-based comprehension treatments intended to promote vocabulary and content knowledge for elementary students at risk for developing reading difficulties (N = 105) with a traditional content approach. The study examined the effectiveness of strategy versus nonstrategy instruction on reading comprehension, vocabulary, and knowledge acquisition. In addition, the study considered the trade-offs between using a program focused on building vocabulary and a program focused on building content knowledge through strategy-based dialogue. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses revealed that the vocabulary strategy instruction produced higher vocabulary acquisition than the other conditions for younger students. However, traditional content instruction was more effective for older students. The findings suggest that practitioners should focus heavily on vocabulary when using expository texts with young children. Based on our results, we suggest blending the best of content and strategy instruction to optimize comprehension instruction in the classroom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-5984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/694322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; At Risk Students ; Children ; Conventional Instruction ; Elementary School Students ; Expository Writing ; Hierarchical Linear Modeling ; Knowledge Level ; Program Effectiveness ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Strategies ; Teaching ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary learning</subject><ispartof>The Elementary school journal, 2017-12, Vol.118 (2), p.232-256</ispartof><rights>2017 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1e54d1905a16d6fef2623528ee11217aa72384ab01fb42704306a76e205e95c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1e54d1905a16d6fef2623528ee11217aa72384ab01fb42704306a76e205e95c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26546674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26546674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1162545$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elleman, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinghouse, Natalie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compton, Donald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Jane Lawrence</creatorcontrib><title>DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS: Differential Effects of Strategy Instruction for Younger and Older Elementary Students</title><title>The Elementary school journal</title><description>This study compared the effects of 2 strategy-based comprehension treatments intended to promote vocabulary and content knowledge for elementary students at risk for developing reading difficulties (N = 105) with a traditional content approach. The study examined the effectiveness of strategy versus nonstrategy instruction on reading comprehension, vocabulary, and knowledge acquisition. In addition, the study considered the trade-offs between using a program focused on building vocabulary and a program focused on building content knowledge through strategy-based dialogue. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses revealed that the vocabulary strategy instruction produced higher vocabulary acquisition than the other conditions for younger students. However, traditional content instruction was more effective for older students. The findings suggest that practitioners should focus heavily on vocabulary when using expository texts with young children. Based on our results, we suggest blending the best of content and strategy instruction to optimize comprehension instruction in the classroom.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Expository Writing</subject><subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Strategies</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><issn>0013-5984</issn><issn>1554-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsFb9B0JAcRedN5-ZZWnHWA2JpKkuwzSdaIOaOtMu_PemRCq4ejzO4V64CJ0DvgEciVuhGCXkAA2AcxZGRKpDNMAYaMhVxI7RifdN93JF-QCRiX7WSfY0TeNgnKWFTovgMc1eEj2JdTBNg1mRz-M42fFcjyY6n52io9q8e3v2e4dofqeL8X2YZPF0PErCihK2CcFytgSFuQGxFLWtiSCUk8haAALSGEloxMwCQ71gRGJGsTBSWIK5VbxidIgu-9y1a7-21m_Kpt26z66yBBVJiaVisrOue6tyrffO1uXarT6M-y4Bl7s9yn6PTrzoRetW1V7SDwCCcMY7ftXzbfW2qsxru3bW-7_O_zGN37Run0MEZ0JIRn8AyFtp2g</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Elleman, Amy M.</creator><creator>Olinghouse, Natalie G.</creator><creator>Gilbert, Jennifer K.</creator><creator>Compton, Donald L.</creator><creator>Spencer, Jane Lawrence</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS</title><author>Elleman, Amy M. ; Olinghouse, Natalie G. ; Gilbert, Jennifer K. ; Compton, Donald L. ; Spencer, Jane Lawrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1e54d1905a16d6fef2623528ee11217aa72384ab01fb42704306a76e205e95c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Expository Writing</topic><topic>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Strategies</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elleman, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinghouse, Natalie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compton, Donald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Jane Lawrence</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Elementary school journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elleman, Amy M.</au><au>Olinghouse, Natalie G.</au><au>Gilbert, Jennifer K.</au><au>Compton, Donald L.</au><au>Spencer, Jane Lawrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1162545</ericid><atitle>DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS: Differential Effects of Strategy Instruction for Younger and Older Elementary Students</atitle><jtitle>The Elementary school journal</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>232-256</pages><issn>0013-5984</issn><eissn>1554-8279</eissn><abstract>This study compared the effects of 2 strategy-based comprehension treatments intended to promote vocabulary and content knowledge for elementary students at risk for developing reading difficulties (N = 105) with a traditional content approach. The study examined the effectiveness of strategy versus nonstrategy instruction on reading comprehension, vocabulary, and knowledge acquisition. In addition, the study considered the trade-offs between using a program focused on building vocabulary and a program focused on building content knowledge through strategy-based dialogue. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses revealed that the vocabulary strategy instruction produced higher vocabulary acquisition than the other conditions for younger students. However, traditional content instruction was more effective for older students. The findings suggest that practitioners should focus heavily on vocabulary when using expository texts with young children. Based on our results, we suggest blending the best of content and strategy instruction to optimize comprehension instruction in the classroom.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/694322</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-5984 |
| ispartof | The Elementary school journal, 2017-12, Vol.118 (2), p.232-256 |
| issn | 0013-5984 1554-8279 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694322 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source |
| subjects | Age Differences At Risk Students Children Conventional Instruction Elementary School Students Expository Writing Hierarchical Linear Modeling Knowledge Level Program Effectiveness Reading Comprehension Reading Difficulties Reading Strategies Teaching Vocabulary Vocabulary Development Vocabulary learning |
| title | DEVELOPING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE IN STRUGGLING READERS: Differential Effects of Strategy Instruction for Younger and Older Elementary Students |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A17%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEVELOPING%20CONTENT%20KNOWLEDGE%20IN%20STRUGGLING%20READERS:%20Differential%20Effects%20of%20Strategy%20Instruction%20for%20Younger%20and%20Older%20Elementary%20Students&rft.jtitle=The%20Elementary%20school%20journal&rft.au=Elleman,%20Amy%20M.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=232-256&rft.issn=0013-5984&rft.eissn=1554-8279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/694322&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E26546674%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987707947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1162545&rft_jstor_id=26546674&rfr_iscdi=true |