Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory

We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of labor economics 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70
Hauptverfasser: Card, David, Cardoso, Ana Rute, Heining, Joerg, Kline, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S70
container_issue S1
container_start_page S13
container_title Journal of labor economics
container_volume 36
creator Card, David
Cardoso, Ana Rute
Heining, Joerg
Kline, Patrick
description We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/694153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26553344</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26553344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj8FKxDAQhoMoWFd9A6GieKsmJpkkR1lcXah4UfAW0jTR1t1mN2kP-_ZWKuscZg7_xzf8CJ0TfEuwhDtQjHB6gLJxi4JTLA5RhgVlBcXwcYxOUmrxOIJBhi4XTVyn3HR1XpoqxPzFxG_X58vObQezavrdKTryZpXc2d-doffF49v8uShfn5bzh7KwDHhfMF-DMzXDnPmKgKskeCtMZXmtqFJcApEgKls5Y5VXrvaSGkaBCGKox57O0NXk3cSwHVzqdRuG2I0vNVEKU1BU8pG6mSgbQ0rReb2JzdrEnSZY_9bXU_0RvJ7AwX411nyGTXQp_Tv32MWEtakPcS-7Bz6GjNEf4itg3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990369385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-306X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/694153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Elasticity ; Inequality ; Labor economics ; Labor market ; Premiums ; Specifications ; Studies ; Value added ; Wage determination ; Wage differential ; Wages &amp; salaries ; Workers ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of labor economics, 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70</ispartof><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26553344$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26553344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Card, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heining, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</title><title>Journal of labor economics</title><description>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</description><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Value added</subject><subject>Wage determination</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0734-306X</issn><issn>1537-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj8FKxDAQhoMoWFd9A6GieKsmJpkkR1lcXah4UfAW0jTR1t1mN2kP-_ZWKuscZg7_xzf8CJ0TfEuwhDtQjHB6gLJxi4JTLA5RhgVlBcXwcYxOUmrxOIJBhi4XTVyn3HR1XpoqxPzFxG_X58vObQezavrdKTryZpXc2d-doffF49v8uShfn5bzh7KwDHhfMF-DMzXDnPmKgKskeCtMZXmtqFJcApEgKls5Y5VXrvaSGkaBCGKox57O0NXk3cSwHVzqdRuG2I0vNVEKU1BU8pG6mSgbQ0rReb2JzdrEnSZY_9bXU_0RvJ7AwX411nyGTXQp_Tv32MWEtakPcS-7Bz6GjNEf4itg3w</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Card, David</creator><creator>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creator><creator>Heining, Joerg</creator><creator>Kline, Patrick</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality</title><author>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Value added</topic><topic>Wage determination</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Card, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heining, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Card, David</au><au>Cardoso, Ana Rute</au><au>Heining, Joerg</au><au>Kline, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S13</spage><epage>S70</epage><pages>S13-S70</pages><issn>0734-306X</issn><eissn>1537-5307</eissn><abstract>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/694153</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0734-306X
ispartof Journal of labor economics, 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70
issn 0734-306X
1537-5307
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694153
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR
subjects Elasticity
Inequality
Labor economics
Labor market
Premiums
Specifications
Studies
Value added
Wage determination
Wage differential
Wages & salaries
Workers
Workplaces
title Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Firms%20and%20Labor%20Market%20Inequality:%20Evidence%20and%20Some%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20labor%20economics&rft.au=Card,%20David&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S13&rft.epage=S70&rft.pages=S13-S70&rft.issn=0734-306X&rft.eissn=1537-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/694153&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E26553344%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990369385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26553344&rfr_iscdi=true