Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory
We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of labor economics 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S70 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S13 |
container_title | Journal of labor economics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Card, David Cardoso, Ana Rute Heining, Joerg Kline, Patrick |
description | We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/694153 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26553344</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26553344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj8FKxDAQhoMoWFd9A6GieKsmJpkkR1lcXah4UfAW0jTR1t1mN2kP-_ZWKuscZg7_xzf8CJ0TfEuwhDtQjHB6gLJxi4JTLA5RhgVlBcXwcYxOUmrxOIJBhi4XTVyn3HR1XpoqxPzFxG_X58vObQezavrdKTryZpXc2d-doffF49v8uShfn5bzh7KwDHhfMF-DMzXDnPmKgKskeCtMZXmtqFJcApEgKls5Y5VXrvaSGkaBCGKox57O0NXk3cSwHVzqdRuG2I0vNVEKU1BU8pG6mSgbQ0rReb2JzdrEnSZY_9bXU_0RvJ7AwX411nyGTXQp_Tv32MWEtakPcS-7Bz6GjNEf4itg3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990369385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-306X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/694153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Elasticity ; Inequality ; Labor economics ; Labor market ; Premiums ; Specifications ; Studies ; Value added ; Wage determination ; Wage differential ; Wages & salaries ; Workers ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of labor economics, 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70</ispartof><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>2018 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26553344$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26553344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Card, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heining, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</title><title>Journal of labor economics</title><description>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</description><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Value added</subject><subject>Wage determination</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0734-306X</issn><issn>1537-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj8FKxDAQhoMoWFd9A6GieKsmJpkkR1lcXah4UfAW0jTR1t1mN2kP-_ZWKuscZg7_xzf8CJ0TfEuwhDtQjHB6gLJxi4JTLA5RhgVlBcXwcYxOUmrxOIJBhi4XTVyn3HR1XpoqxPzFxG_X58vObQezavrdKTryZpXc2d-doffF49v8uShfn5bzh7KwDHhfMF-DMzXDnPmKgKskeCtMZXmtqFJcApEgKls5Y5VXrvaSGkaBCGKox57O0NXk3cSwHVzqdRuG2I0vNVEKU1BU8pG6mSgbQ0rReb2JzdrEnSZY_9bXU_0RvJ7AwX411nyGTXQp_Tv32MWEtakPcS-7Bz6GjNEf4itg3w</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Card, David</creator><creator>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creator><creator>Heining, Joerg</creator><creator>Kline, Patrick</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Firms and Labor Market Inequality</title><author>Card, David ; Cardoso, Ana Rute ; Heining, Joerg ; Kline, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4fd6ead4054fb16eb86fc7abc5d93995861867bcbeac9f9edf83a436171a3f0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Value added</topic><topic>Wage determination</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Card, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Ana Rute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heining, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Card, David</au><au>Cardoso, Ana Rute</au><au>Heining, Joerg</au><au>Kline, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of labor economics</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S13</spage><epage>S70</epage><pages>S13-S70</pages><issn>0734-306X</issn><eissn>1537-5307</eissn><abstract>We synthesize two related literatures on firm-level drivers of wage inequality. Studies of rent sharing that use matched worker-firm data find elasticities of wages with respect to value added per worker in the range of 0.05–0.15. Studies of wage determination with worker and firm fixed effects typically find that firm-specific premiums explain 20% of overall wage variation. To interpret these findings, we develop a model of wage setting in which workers have idiosyncratic tastes for different workplaces. Simple versions of this model can rationalize standard fixed effects specifications and also match the typical rent-sharing elasticities in the literature.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/694153</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-306X |
ispartof | Journal of labor economics, 2018-01, Vol.36 (S1), p.S13-S70 |
issn | 0734-306X 1537-5307 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_694153 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR |
subjects | Elasticity Inequality Labor economics Labor market Premiums Specifications Studies Value added Wage determination Wage differential Wages & salaries Workers Workplaces |
title | Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Firms%20and%20Labor%20Market%20Inequality:%20Evidence%20and%20Some%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20labor%20economics&rft.au=Card,%20David&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S13&rft.epage=S70&rft.pages=S13-S70&rft.issn=0734-306X&rft.eissn=1537-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/694153&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E26553344%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990369385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26553344&rfr_iscdi=true |