One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View

In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely, that theories may be different although the corresponding sets of models are the same. This critique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Philosophy of science 2014-04, Vol.81 (2), p.276-283
1. Verfasser:	van Fraassen, Bas C.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Criticism Denotational semantics Empiricism Evaluation Logical empiricism Mathematical models Mathematical objects Model theory Philosophy of science Physical theory Semantic models Semantics Terminology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	283
container_issue	2
container_start_page	276
container_title	Philosophy of science
container_volume	81
creator	van Fraassen, Bas C.
description	In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely, that theories may be different although the corresponding sets of models are the same. This critique will be assessed, first, as it pertains to issues concerning scientific models in the empirical sciences and, second, independent of any concern with empirical science.
doi_str_mv	10.1086/675645
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_675645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/675645</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/675645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-a4ce59b5c2da8404f4ac7d9f653777f9ec01f82100d15652655799980b5073333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0N1KwzAYBuAgCs6p1xBQZCfVpM3voQzdhMFEp3hWsjR1nV1Tk9bhmbfh7XklRioOBMEcJCfP9-XlBeAQo1OMBDtjnDJCt0AP00RGnPGHbdBDKMGRiInYBXveLxHCWCDRA9fTykDr4Gxt4chUTWngjVkp9-Shmtu2gWNV-XCVL9Z5W328vXs4dEVTPLdhLofNwsDbMFA1hYb3hVnvg51cld4cfL99cHd5MRuOo8l0dDU8n0Q64aSJFNGGyjnVcaYEQSQnSvNM5owmnPNcGo1wLmKMUIYpozGjlEspBZpTxJNw-mDQ7a2dDVl8k64Kr01ZqsrY1qeYEiKZYFQGevSLLm3rqpAuqITgJIkxC-qkU9pZ753J09oVoYnXFKP0q9i0KzbA4w62elFo9WhrZ7zf7Pxhg3-wtM7yTcClb6z7699PdyWOig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534133216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>van Fraassen, Bas C.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Fraassen, Bas C.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely, that theories may be different although the corresponding sets of models are the same. This critique will be assessed, first, as it pertains to issues concerning scientific models in the empirical sciences and, second, independent of any concern with empirical science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-767X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/675645</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHSCA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Denotational semantics ; Empiricism ; Evaluation ; Logical empiricism ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical objects ; Model theory ; Philosophy of science ; Physical theory ; Semantic models ; Semantics ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of science, 2014-04, Vol.81 (2), p.276-283</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-a4ce59b5c2da8404f4ac7d9f653777f9ec01f82100d15652655799980b5073333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-a4ce59b5c2da8404f4ac7d9f653777f9ec01f82100d15652655799980b5073333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Fraassen, Bas C.</creatorcontrib><title>One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View</title><title>Philosophy of science</title><description>In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely, that theories may be different although the corresponding sets of models are the same. This critique will be assessed, first, as it pertains to issues concerning scientific models in the empirical sciences and, second, independent of any concern with empirical science.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Denotational semantics</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Logical empiricism</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical objects</subject><subject>Model theory</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Physical theory</subject><subject>Semantic models</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>0031-8248</issn><issn>1539-767X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0N1KwzAYBuAgCs6p1xBQZCfVpM3voQzdhMFEp3hWsjR1nV1Tk9bhmbfh7XklRioOBMEcJCfP9-XlBeAQo1OMBDtjnDJCt0AP00RGnPGHbdBDKMGRiInYBXveLxHCWCDRA9fTykDr4Gxt4chUTWngjVkp9-Shmtu2gWNV-XCVL9Z5W328vXs4dEVTPLdhLofNwsDbMFA1hYb3hVnvg51cld4cfL99cHd5MRuOo8l0dDU8n0Q64aSJFNGGyjnVcaYEQSQnSvNM5owmnPNcGo1wLmKMUIYpozGjlEspBZpTxJNw-mDQ7a2dDVl8k64Kr01ZqsrY1qeYEiKZYFQGevSLLm3rqpAuqITgJIkxC-qkU9pZ753J09oVoYnXFKP0q9i0KzbA4w62elFo9WhrZ7zf7Pxhg3-wtM7yTcClb6z7699PdyWOig</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>van Fraassen, Bas C.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View</title><author>van Fraassen, Bas C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-a4ce59b5c2da8404f4ac7d9f653777f9ec01f82100d15652655799980b5073333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Denotational semantics</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Logical empiricism</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical objects</topic><topic>Model theory</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Physical theory</topic><topic>Semantic models</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Fraassen, Bas C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Fraassen, Bas C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of science</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>276-283</pages><issn>0031-8248</issn><eissn>1539-767X</eissn><coden>PHSCA6</coden><abstract>In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely, that theories may be different although the corresponding sets of models are the same. This critique will be assessed, first, as it pertains to issues concerning scientific models in the empirical sciences and, second, independent of any concern with empirical science.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/675645</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0031-8248
ispartof	Philosophy of science, 2014-04, Vol.81 (2), p.276-283
issn	0031-8248 1539-767X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_uchicagopress_journals_675645
source	Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects	Criticism Denotational semantics Empiricism Evaluation Logical empiricism Mathematical models Mathematical objects Model theory Philosophy of science Physical theory Semantic models Semantics Terminology
title	One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20or%20Two%20Gentle%20Remarks%20about%20Hans%20Halvorson%E2%80%99s%20Critique%20of%20the%20Semantic%20View&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20science&rft.au=van%20Fraassen,%20Bas%20C.&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=276-283&rft.issn=0031-8248&rft.eissn=1539-767X&rft.coden=PHSCA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/675645&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/675645%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534133216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/675645&rfr_iscdi=true