Building Europe on a Weak Field: Law, Economics, and Scholarly Avatars in Transnational Politics1

The present article mobilizes the concepts of "weak field" and "avatar" to explain Europe's historically variable meanings, analyzing two successful reinventions (as a "community of law" and a "single market") and one failure ("social Europe"). Focusing on law and economics, the authors first show that the weak field of EU studies serves as a crossroads between nationally anchored scholarly professions and Europe's political field; second, they show that under certain conditions legal and economic constructions have exerted performative effects via scholarly avatars. Depending on their strategic positioning, scholarly avatars facilitate symbolic exchange across political, technocratic, and scholarly boundaries and endow theoretical constructions with performative potential.