The Excess Burden of Government Indecision
Governments are known for procrastinating when it comes to resolving painful policy problems. Whatever the political motives for waiting to decide, procrastination distorts economic decisions relative to what would arise with early policy resolution. In so doing, it engenders excess burden. This pap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tax policy and the economy 2012-06, Vol.26 (1), p.125-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Tax policy and the economy |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Gomes, Francisco J. Kotlikoff, Laurence J. Viceira, Luis M. |
description | Governments are known for procrastinating when it comes to resolving painful policy problems. Whatever the political motives for waiting to decide, procrastination distorts economic decisions relative to what would arise with early policy resolution. In so doing, it engenders excess burden. This paper posits, calibrates, and simulates a life cycle model with earnings, life span, investment return, and future policy uncertainty. It then measures the excess burden from delayed resolution of policy uncertainty. The first uncertain policy we consider concerns the level of future Social Security benefits. Specifically, we examine how an agent would respond to learning in advance whether she will experience a major Social Security benefit cut starting at age 65. We show that having to wait to learn materially affects consumption, saving, labor supply, and portfolio decisions. It also reduces welfare. Indeed, we show that the excess burden of government indecision can, in this instance, range as high as 0.6% of the agent’s economic resources. This is a significant distortion in and of itself. It is also significant when compared to other distortions measured in the literature. The second uncertain policy we consider concerns marginal tax rates. We obtain similar results once we adjust for the impact of tax rates on income. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/665505 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_665505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/665505</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/665505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-6a9a49bdfbe9cd561a35b1912edcc5704bdfac9bed56735ea92348d2f54a83be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMoWKt-hoIiIlST5k-boy7rurDgZT2XNJm6LW5Sk63otzdSYU-Cpzm837w38xA6J_iW4ErcCcE55gcoIZyWeSE4PkQJrmSRV4LJY3QSQo8xJlKwBN2sN5DNPzWEkD2M3oDNXJst3Ad4uwW7y5bWgO5C5-wpOmrVW4Cz35mil8f5evaUr54Xy9n9KteUSJ4LJRWTjWkbkNpwQRTlDZGkAKM1LzGLktKygaiVlIOSBWWVKVrOVEUboCm6mHwH795HCLu6d6O3MbImmOGywiKupOhqorR3IXho68F3W-W_IlT_9FBPPUTwegJHvem0enWDj8_uPSesHkwb0ct_oPsD-7Bz_q_cb8xOc_o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1040780692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Excess Burden of Government Indecision</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gomes, Francisco J. ; Kotlikoff, Laurence J. ; Viceira, Luis M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Francisco J. ; Kotlikoff, Laurence J. ; Viceira, Luis M.</creatorcontrib><description>Governments are known for procrastinating when it comes to resolving painful policy problems. Whatever the political motives for waiting to decide, procrastination distorts economic decisions relative to what would arise with early policy resolution. In so doing, it engenders excess burden. This paper posits, calibrates, and simulates a life cycle model with earnings, life span, investment return, and future policy uncertainty. It then measures the excess burden from delayed resolution of policy uncertainty. The first uncertain policy we consider concerns the level of future Social Security benefits. Specifically, we examine how an agent would respond to learning in advance whether she will experience a major Social Security benefit cut starting at age 65. We show that having to wait to learn materially affects consumption, saving, labor supply, and portfolio decisions. It also reduces welfare. Indeed, we show that the excess burden of government indecision can, in this instance, range as high as 0.6% of the agent’s economic resources. This is a significant distortion in and of itself. It is also significant when compared to other distortions measured in the literature. The second uncertain policy we consider concerns marginal tax rates. We obtain similar results once we adjust for the impact of tax rates on income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-8649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/665505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Consumer economics ; Decision making ; Federal government ; Fiscal policy ; Household consumption ; Income taxes ; Labor supply ; Procrastination ; Public assistance programs ; Retirement benefits ; Retirement income ; Risk aversion ; Social security ; Studies ; Tax rates</subject><ispartof>Tax policy and the economy, 2012-06, Vol.26 (1), p.125-164</ispartof><rights>2012 by the National Bureau of Economic Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2012 by the National Bureau of Economic Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-6a9a49bdfbe9cd561a35b1912edcc5704bdfac9bed56735ea92348d2f54a83be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-6a9a49bdfbe9cd561a35b1912edcc5704bdfac9bed56735ea92348d2f54a83be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlikoff, Laurence J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceira, Luis M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Excess Burden of Government Indecision</title><title>Tax policy and the economy</title><description>Governments are known for procrastinating when it comes to resolving painful policy problems. Whatever the political motives for waiting to decide, procrastination distorts economic decisions relative to what would arise with early policy resolution. In so doing, it engenders excess burden. This paper posits, calibrates, and simulates a life cycle model with earnings, life span, investment return, and future policy uncertainty. It then measures the excess burden from delayed resolution of policy uncertainty. The first uncertain policy we consider concerns the level of future Social Security benefits. Specifically, we examine how an agent would respond to learning in advance whether she will experience a major Social Security benefit cut starting at age 65. We show that having to wait to learn materially affects consumption, saving, labor supply, and portfolio decisions. It also reduces welfare. Indeed, we show that the excess burden of government indecision can, in this instance, range as high as 0.6% of the agent’s economic resources. This is a significant distortion in and of itself. It is also significant when compared to other distortions measured in the literature. The second uncertain policy we consider concerns marginal tax rates. We obtain similar results once we adjust for the impact of tax rates on income.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Household consumption</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Procrastination</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Retirement benefits</subject><subject>Retirement income</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><issn>0892-8649</issn><issn>1537-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMoWKt-hoIiIlST5k-boy7rurDgZT2XNJm6LW5Sk63otzdSYU-Cpzm837w38xA6J_iW4ErcCcE55gcoIZyWeSE4PkQJrmSRV4LJY3QSQo8xJlKwBN2sN5DNPzWEkD2M3oDNXJst3Ad4uwW7y5bWgO5C5-wpOmrVW4Cz35mil8f5evaUr54Xy9n9KteUSJ4LJRWTjWkbkNpwQRTlDZGkAKM1LzGLktKygaiVlIOSBWWVKVrOVEUboCm6mHwH795HCLu6d6O3MbImmOGywiKupOhqorR3IXho68F3W-W_IlT_9FBPPUTwegJHvem0enWDj8_uPSesHkwb0ct_oPsD-7Bz_q_cb8xOc_o</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Gomes, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Kotlikoff, Laurence J.</creator><creator>Viceira, Luis M.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>MIT Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>The Excess Burden of Government Indecision</title><author>Gomes, Francisco J. ; Kotlikoff, Laurence J. ; Viceira, Luis M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-6a9a49bdfbe9cd561a35b1912edcc5704bdfac9bed56735ea92348d2f54a83be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Household consumption</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Procrastination</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Retirement benefits</topic><topic>Retirement income</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlikoff, Laurence J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceira, Luis M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tax policy and the economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, Francisco J.</au><au>Kotlikoff, Laurence J.</au><au>Viceira, Luis M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Excess Burden of Government Indecision</atitle><jtitle>Tax policy and the economy</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>125-164</pages><issn>0892-8649</issn><eissn>1537-2650</eissn><abstract>Governments are known for procrastinating when it comes to resolving painful policy problems. Whatever the political motives for waiting to decide, procrastination distorts economic decisions relative to what would arise with early policy resolution. In so doing, it engenders excess burden. This paper posits, calibrates, and simulates a life cycle model with earnings, life span, investment return, and future policy uncertainty. It then measures the excess burden from delayed resolution of policy uncertainty. The first uncertain policy we consider concerns the level of future Social Security benefits. Specifically, we examine how an agent would respond to learning in advance whether she will experience a major Social Security benefit cut starting at age 65. We show that having to wait to learn materially affects consumption, saving, labor supply, and portfolio decisions. It also reduces welfare. Indeed, we show that the excess burden of government indecision can, in this instance, range as high as 0.6% of the agent’s economic resources. This is a significant distortion in and of itself. It is also significant when compared to other distortions measured in the literature. The second uncertain policy we consider concerns marginal tax rates. We obtain similar results once we adjust for the impact of tax rates on income.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/665505</doi><tpages>40</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-8649 |
ispartof | Tax policy and the economy, 2012-06, Vol.26 (1), p.125-164 |
issn | 0892-8649 1537-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_665505 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Age Consumer economics Decision making Federal government Fiscal policy Household consumption Income taxes Labor supply Procrastination Public assistance programs Retirement benefits Retirement income Risk aversion Social security Studies Tax rates |
title | The Excess Burden of Government Indecision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Excess%20Burden%20of%20Government%20Indecision&rft.jtitle=Tax%20policy%20and%20the%20economy&rft.au=Gomes,%20Francisco%20J.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=125-164&rft.issn=0892-8649&rft.eissn=1537-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/665505&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/665505%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1040780692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/665505&rfr_iscdi=true |