Kepler: Moving the Earth

The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HOPOS 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22
1. Verfasser: McMullin, Ernan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title HOPOS
container_volume 1
creator McMullin, Ernan
description The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/658917
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_658917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/658917</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/658917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz0FLwzAUB_AgCo45zx4LinipvqRtmniTMd1w4kXPIU1e1pa5lqQT_PZGu6vgu7x3-PHe-xNyTuGWguB3vBCSlkdkwmjBU85yOP6dWVpQIU7JLIQWYuUycpiQi2fst-jvk5fus9ltkqHGZKH9UJ-RE6e3AWeHPiXvj4u3-TJdvz6t5g_r1DDgQ8qsqUwmKq65BRZvAxgmeA5UO4torXCyQiOrDJmEkuWspK5yJndlqV2G2ZRcj3uN70Lw6FTvmw_tvxQF9RNJjZEivBnh3tSN0Zuu9xiCaru938UHD0z11kV69Q8a2eXI2jB0_q-735aFYgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>McMullin, Ernan</creator><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><description>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-5188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/658917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Aristotelianism ; Astronomy ; Earth ; Keplerian orbits ; Keplers laws of planetary motion ; Outer planets ; Physics ; Planetary orbits ; Planets ; Spheres</subject><ispartof>HOPOS, 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22</ispartof><rights>2011 by the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><title>HOPOS</title><description>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</description><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Keplerian orbits</subject><subject>Keplers laws of planetary motion</subject><subject>Outer planets</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Planetary orbits</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Spheres</subject><issn>2152-5188</issn><issn>2156-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNz0FLwzAUB_AgCo45zx4LinipvqRtmniTMd1w4kXPIU1e1pa5lqQT_PZGu6vgu7x3-PHe-xNyTuGWguB3vBCSlkdkwmjBU85yOP6dWVpQIU7JLIQWYuUycpiQi2fst-jvk5fus9ltkqHGZKH9UJ-RE6e3AWeHPiXvj4u3-TJdvz6t5g_r1DDgQ8qsqUwmKq65BRZvAxgmeA5UO4torXCyQiOrDJmEkuWspK5yJndlqV2G2ZRcj3uN70Lw6FTvmw_tvxQF9RNJjZEivBnh3tSN0Zuu9xiCaru938UHD0z11kV69Q8a2eXI2jB0_q-735aFYgc</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>McMullin, Ernan</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><author>McMullin, Ernan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Keplerian orbits</topic><topic>Keplers laws of planetary motion</topic><topic>Outer planets</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Planetary orbits</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Spheres</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>HOPOS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMullin, Ernan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kepler: Moving the Earth</atitle><jtitle>HOPOS</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>3-22</pages><issn>2152-5188</issn><eissn>2156-6240</eissn><abstract>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/658917</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2152-5188
ispartof HOPOS, 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22
issn 2152-5188
2156-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_658917
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Aristotelianism
Astronomy
Earth
Keplerian orbits
Keplers laws of planetary motion
Outer planets
Physics
Planetary orbits
Planets
Spheres
title Kepler: Moving the Earth
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kepler:%20Moving%20the%20Earth&rft.jtitle=HOPOS&rft.au=McMullin,%20Ernan&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=3-22&rft.issn=2152-5188&rft.eissn=2156-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/658917&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/658917%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/658917&rfr_iscdi=true