Kepler: Moving the Earth
The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HOPOS 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | HOPOS |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | McMullin, Ernan |
description | The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/658917 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_658917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/658917</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/658917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz0FLwzAUB_AgCo45zx4LinipvqRtmniTMd1w4kXPIU1e1pa5lqQT_PZGu6vgu7x3-PHe-xNyTuGWguB3vBCSlkdkwmjBU85yOP6dWVpQIU7JLIQWYuUycpiQi2fst-jvk5fus9ltkqHGZKH9UJ-RE6e3AWeHPiXvj4u3-TJdvz6t5g_r1DDgQ8qsqUwmKq65BRZvAxgmeA5UO4torXCyQiOrDJmEkuWspK5yJndlqV2G2ZRcj3uN70Lw6FTvmw_tvxQF9RNJjZEivBnh3tSN0Zuu9xiCaru938UHD0z11kV69Q8a2eXI2jB0_q-735aFYgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>McMullin, Ernan</creator><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><description>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-5188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/658917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Aristotelianism ; Astronomy ; Earth ; Keplerian orbits ; Keplers laws of planetary motion ; Outer planets ; Physics ; Planetary orbits ; Planets ; Spheres</subject><ispartof>HOPOS, 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22</ispartof><rights>2011 by the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><title>HOPOS</title><description>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</description><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Keplerian orbits</subject><subject>Keplers laws of planetary motion</subject><subject>Outer planets</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Planetary orbits</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Spheres</subject><issn>2152-5188</issn><issn>2156-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNz0FLwzAUB_AgCo45zx4LinipvqRtmniTMd1w4kXPIU1e1pa5lqQT_PZGu6vgu7x3-PHe-xNyTuGWguB3vBCSlkdkwmjBU85yOP6dWVpQIU7JLIQWYuUycpiQi2fst-jvk5fus9ltkqHGZKH9UJ-RE6e3AWeHPiXvj4u3-TJdvz6t5g_r1DDgQ8qsqUwmKq65BRZvAxgmeA5UO4torXCyQiOrDJmEkuWspK5yJndlqV2G2ZRcj3uN70Lw6FTvmw_tvxQF9RNJjZEivBnh3tSN0Zuu9xiCaru938UHD0z11kV69Q8a2eXI2jB0_q-735aFYgc</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>McMullin, Ernan</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Kepler: Moving the Earth</title><author>McMullin, Ernan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-2dcbc38b6a6d0289100c286401afdeedd8f9bec9b3e290724271fbfc4f77af3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Keplerian orbits</topic><topic>Keplers laws of planetary motion</topic><topic>Outer planets</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Planetary orbits</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Spheres</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMullin, Ernan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>HOPOS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMullin, Ernan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kepler: Moving the Earth</atitle><jtitle>HOPOS</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>3-22</pages><issn>2152-5188</issn><eissn>2156-6240</eissn><abstract>The discrepancy between the Aristotelian and the Ptolemaic astronomies led many medievals to regard the latter (and mathematical astronomy generally) as no more than a calculational device. This was the challenge that Copernicus and Kepler had to meet: How was one to show that a mathematically expressed astronomy could indicate that the earth really moves? Copernicus pointed to features of the planetary motions that he could explain but that Ptolemy could not. Kepler went much further. His account of the planetary system yields a passable theory of why the planets move as they do; the geocentric account (now without the support of carrier spheres) most certainly cannot. The basic hypothesis that the sun is really at the center and the earth really in motion, he claims, is thus likely to be true.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/658917</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2152-5188 |
ispartof | HOPOS, 2011-05, Vol.1 (1), p.3-22 |
issn | 2152-5188 2156-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_658917 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Aristotelianism Astronomy Earth Keplerian orbits Keplers laws of planetary motion Outer planets Physics Planetary orbits Planets Spheres |
title | Kepler: Moving the Earth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kepler:%20Moving%20the%20Earth&rft.jtitle=HOPOS&rft.au=McMullin,%20Ernan&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=3-22&rft.issn=2152-5188&rft.eissn=2156-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/658917&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/658917%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/658917&rfr_iscdi=true |