Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security

While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 2010-08, Vol.51 (4), p.487-517
1. Verfasser: Goldstein, Daniel M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 517
container_issue 4
container_start_page 487
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 51
creator Goldstein, Daniel M.
description While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the significance of security discourses and practices to the global and local contexts in which cultural anthropology operates. Many issues that have historically preoccupied anthropology are today inextricably linked to security themes, and anthropology expresses a characteristic approach to topics that today must be considered within a security rubric. A focus on security is particularly important to an understanding of human rights in contemporary neoliberal society. Drawing on examples from Latin America and my own work in Bolivia, I track the decline of neoliberalism and the rise of the security paradigm as a framework for organizing contemporary social life. I suggest that security, rather than a reaction to a terrorist attack that “changed everything,” is characteristic of a neoliberalism that predates the events of 9/11, affecting the subjects of anthropological work and shaping the contexts within which that work is conducted.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/655393
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_655393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/655393</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/655393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dfd43168e351c7835dfe88b83f4d413bed9fce4e5bc6ab07bfba63e76ce2a2983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKxDAUBuAgCo6jPkPBK0I196TLYfAGAy4c1yFNk5kOtalJi8zbG-ngTnSVxfn4z8kPwCmCtwhKfscZIwXZAxPEiMgZkXgfTCBEKCcY0kNwFOMGQlgwJCbgZuk_dagync1D3ddGN9ms7dfBd77xq23mXfZqzZBm22Nw4HQT7cnunYK3h_vl_ClfvDw-z2eL3FAo-rxyFSWIS0sYMkISVjkrZSmJoxVFpLRV4YyllpWG6xKK0pWaEyu4sVjjQpIpuBpzu-A_Bht79V5HY5tGt9YPUUnEiZAo_e4vKZhEmIq0dQouR2mCjzFYp7pQv-uwVQiq79bU2FqCF7tIHVMZLujW1PFHY4JpQRlO7np0g1mn1la-CzZGtfFDaFM5uzjVVS7R83_QxM5Gtom9D7_d9wXc65Cb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758124741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Goldstein, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the significance of security discourses and practices to the global and local contexts in which cultural anthropology operates. Many issues that have historically preoccupied anthropology are today inextricably linked to security themes, and anthropology expresses a characteristic approach to topics that today must be considered within a security rubric. A focus on security is particularly important to an understanding of human rights in contemporary neoliberal society. Drawing on examples from Latin America and my own work in Bolivia, I track the decline of neoliberalism and the rise of the security paradigm as a framework for organizing contemporary social life. I suggest that security, rather than a reaction to a terrorist attack that “changed everything,” is characteristic of a neoliberalism that predates the events of 9/11, affecting the subjects of anthropological work and shaping the contexts within which that work is conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/655393</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Bolivia ; Communities ; Critical theory ; Cultural anthropology ; Discourse ; Economic liberalism ; Ethnography ; Fear ; General studies ; Human rights ; Latin America ; Neoliberalism ; Political anthropology ; Political security ; Risk and disasters sociology ; Security ; Social Anthropology ; Social organization. Social system. Social structure ; Sociology ; Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture ; Sociology of leisure and mass culture ; Terrorism ; Victimology ; Violent crimes</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2010-08, Vol.51 (4), p.487-517</ispartof><rights>2010 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dfd43168e351c7835dfe88b83f4d413bed9fce4e5bc6ab07bfba63e76ce2a2983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dfd43168e351c7835dfe88b83f4d413bed9fce4e5bc6ab07bfba63e76ce2a2983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23249452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the significance of security discourses and practices to the global and local contexts in which cultural anthropology operates. Many issues that have historically preoccupied anthropology are today inextricably linked to security themes, and anthropology expresses a characteristic approach to topics that today must be considered within a security rubric. A focus on security is particularly important to an understanding of human rights in contemporary neoliberal society. Drawing on examples from Latin America and my own work in Bolivia, I track the decline of neoliberalism and the rise of the security paradigm as a framework for organizing contemporary social life. I suggest that security, rather than a reaction to a terrorist attack that “changed everything,” is characteristic of a neoliberalism that predates the events of 9/11, affecting the subjects of anthropological work and shaping the contexts within which that work is conducted.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Bolivia</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Economic liberalism</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>General studies</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Political anthropology</subject><subject>Political security</subject><subject>Risk and disasters sociology</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social Anthropology</subject><subject>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture</subject><subject>Sociology of leisure and mass culture</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKxDAUBuAgCo6jPkPBK0I196TLYfAGAy4c1yFNk5kOtalJi8zbG-ngTnSVxfn4z8kPwCmCtwhKfscZIwXZAxPEiMgZkXgfTCBEKCcY0kNwFOMGQlgwJCbgZuk_dagync1D3ddGN9ms7dfBd77xq23mXfZqzZBm22Nw4HQT7cnunYK3h_vl_ClfvDw-z2eL3FAo-rxyFSWIS0sYMkISVjkrZSmJoxVFpLRV4YyllpWG6xKK0pWaEyu4sVjjQpIpuBpzu-A_Bht79V5HY5tGt9YPUUnEiZAo_e4vKZhEmIq0dQouR2mCjzFYp7pQv-uwVQiq79bU2FqCF7tIHVMZLujW1PFHY4JpQRlO7np0g1mn1la-CzZGtfFDaFM5uzjVVS7R83_QxM5Gtom9D7_d9wXc65Cb</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Goldstein, Daniel M.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security</title><author>Goldstein, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dfd43168e351c7835dfe88b83f4d413bed9fce4e5bc6ab07bfba63e76ce2a2983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Bolivia</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Economic liberalism</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>General studies</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Political anthropology</topic><topic>Political security</topic><topic>Risk and disasters sociology</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social Anthropology</topic><topic>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture</topic><topic>Sociology of leisure and mass culture</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>487-517</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract>While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the significance of security discourses and practices to the global and local contexts in which cultural anthropology operates. Many issues that have historically preoccupied anthropology are today inextricably linked to security themes, and anthropology expresses a characteristic approach to topics that today must be considered within a security rubric. A focus on security is particularly important to an understanding of human rights in contemporary neoliberal society. Drawing on examples from Latin America and my own work in Bolivia, I track the decline of neoliberalism and the rise of the security paradigm as a framework for organizing contemporary social life. I suggest that security, rather than a reaction to a terrorist attack that “changed everything,” is characteristic of a neoliberalism that predates the events of 9/11, affecting the subjects of anthropological work and shaping the contexts within which that work is conducted.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/655393</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 2010-08, Vol.51 (4), p.487-517
issn 0011-3204
1537-5382
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_655393
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Anthropology
Bolivia
Communities
Critical theory
Cultural anthropology
Discourse
Economic liberalism
Ethnography
Fear
General studies
Human rights
Latin America
Neoliberalism
Political anthropology
Political security
Risk and disasters sociology
Security
Social Anthropology
Social organization. Social system. Social structure
Sociology
Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture
Sociology of leisure and mass culture
Terrorism
Victimology
Violent crimes
title Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T15%3A17%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20Critical%20Anthropology%20of%20Security&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Goldstein,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=487-517&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/655393&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/655393%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758124741&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/655393&rfr_iscdi=true