The Invisibility of the Saint

To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical inquiry 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710
1. Verfasser: Marion, Jean‐Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 710
container_issue 3
container_start_page 703
container_title Critical inquiry
container_volume 35
creator Marion, Jean‐Luc
description To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/598808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_598808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/598808</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/598808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz01LAzEQBuAgCtaq_6BQRMTL6mTzsZmjFD8KBQ_Wc8hmE5tSu2uyFfrvjazoVeYwMDy8w0vIOYUbCkreClQK1AEZUcGwqJRQh2QEgKygCuUxOUlpDUCpAjkik-XKTefbz5BCHTah309bP-3z7cWEbX9KjrzZJHf2s8fk9eF-OXsqFs-P89ndorCM8b7gvCop5rHgaAPUSV5L7yteo2SIhjU1qkZ5ISwIK4UBZ-tGIpWlMpQLNiYXQ24X24-dS71et7u4zS81zW24klWZ0dWAbGxTis7rLoZ3E_eagv5urofmGV4OcGdXwZq3tosupb_IX3b9D6a7xmc6Geg69W38_VsKgcgQ2Be97mwx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198848672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><description>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-1896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/598808</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRINDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Alterity ; Business orders ; Definitions ; Divinity ; Heroism ; Holiness ; Intentionality ; Paradoxes ; Politics of Idolatry ; Saints ; Sanctity ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Critical inquiry, 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710</ispartof><rights>2009 by The University of Chicago. 0093‐1896/09/3503‐0013$10.00. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2009 by The University of Chicago. 0093-1896/09/3503-0013$10.00. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4022,27922,27923,27924,30994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><title>Critical inquiry</title><description>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</description><subject>Alterity</subject><subject>Business orders</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Divinity</subject><subject>Heroism</subject><subject>Holiness</subject><subject>Intentionality</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Politics of Idolatry</subject><subject>Saints</subject><subject>Sanctity</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0093-1896</issn><issn>1539-7858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNz01LAzEQBuAgCtaq_6BQRMTL6mTzsZmjFD8KBQ_Wc8hmE5tSu2uyFfrvjazoVeYwMDy8w0vIOYUbCkreClQK1AEZUcGwqJRQh2QEgKygCuUxOUlpDUCpAjkik-XKTefbz5BCHTah309bP-3z7cWEbX9KjrzZJHf2s8fk9eF-OXsqFs-P89ndorCM8b7gvCop5rHgaAPUSV5L7yteo2SIhjU1qkZ5ISwIK4UBZ-tGIpWlMpQLNiYXQ24X24-dS71et7u4zS81zW24klWZ0dWAbGxTis7rLoZ3E_eagv5urofmGV4OcGdXwZq3tosupb_IX3b9D6a7xmc6Geg69W38_VsKgcgQ2Be97mwx</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><author>Marion, Jean‐Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Alterity</topic><topic>Business orders</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Divinity</topic><topic>Heroism</topic><topic>Holiness</topic><topic>Intentionality</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Politics of Idolatry</topic><topic>Saints</topic><topic>Sanctity</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Critical inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marion, Jean‐Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Invisibility of the Saint</atitle><jtitle>Critical inquiry</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>703-710</pages><issn>0093-1896</issn><eissn>1539-7858</eissn><coden>CRINDL</coden><abstract>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/598808</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-1896
ispartof Critical inquiry, 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710
issn 0093-1896
1539-7858
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_598808
source ARTbibliographies Modern; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Alterity
Business orders
Definitions
Divinity
Heroism
Holiness
Intentionality
Paradoxes
Politics of Idolatry
Saints
Sanctity
Theology
title The Invisibility of the Saint
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Invisibility%20of%20the%20Saint&rft.jtitle=Critical%20inquiry&rft.au=Marion,%20Jean%E2%80%90Luc&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=703-710&rft.issn=0093-1896&rft.eissn=1539-7858&rft.coden=CRINDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/598808&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/598808%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198848672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/598808&rfr_iscdi=true