The Invisibility of the Saint
To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical inquiry 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 710 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 703 |
container_title | Critical inquiry |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Marion, Jean‐Luc |
description | To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/598808 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_598808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/598808</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/598808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz01LAzEQBuAgCtaq_6BQRMTL6mTzsZmjFD8KBQ_Wc8hmE5tSu2uyFfrvjazoVeYwMDy8w0vIOYUbCkreClQK1AEZUcGwqJRQh2QEgKygCuUxOUlpDUCpAjkik-XKTefbz5BCHTah309bP-3z7cWEbX9KjrzZJHf2s8fk9eF-OXsqFs-P89ndorCM8b7gvCop5rHgaAPUSV5L7yteo2SIhjU1qkZ5ISwIK4UBZ-tGIpWlMpQLNiYXQ24X24-dS71et7u4zS81zW24klWZ0dWAbGxTis7rLoZ3E_eagv5urofmGV4OcGdXwZq3tosupb_IX3b9D6a7xmc6Geg69W38_VsKgcgQ2Be97mwx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198848672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><description>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-1896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/598808</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRINDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Alterity ; Business orders ; Definitions ; Divinity ; Heroism ; Holiness ; Intentionality ; Paradoxes ; Politics of Idolatry ; Saints ; Sanctity ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Critical inquiry, 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710</ispartof><rights>2009 by The University of Chicago. 0093‐1896/09/3503‐0013$10.00. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2009 by The University of Chicago. 0093-1896/09/3503-0013$10.00. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4022,27922,27923,27924,30994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><title>Critical inquiry</title><description>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</description><subject>Alterity</subject><subject>Business orders</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Divinity</subject><subject>Heroism</subject><subject>Holiness</subject><subject>Intentionality</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Politics of Idolatry</subject><subject>Saints</subject><subject>Sanctity</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0093-1896</issn><issn>1539-7858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNz01LAzEQBuAgCtaq_6BQRMTL6mTzsZmjFD8KBQ_Wc8hmE5tSu2uyFfrvjazoVeYwMDy8w0vIOYUbCkreClQK1AEZUcGwqJRQh2QEgKygCuUxOUlpDUCpAjkik-XKTefbz5BCHTah309bP-3z7cWEbX9KjrzZJHf2s8fk9eF-OXsqFs-P89ndorCM8b7gvCop5rHgaAPUSV5L7yteo2SIhjU1qkZ5ISwIK4UBZ-tGIpWlMpQLNiYXQ24X24-dS71et7u4zS81zW24klWZ0dWAbGxTis7rLoZ3E_eagv5urofmGV4OcGdXwZq3tosupb_IX3b9D6a7xmc6Geg69W38_VsKgcgQ2Be97mwx</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>The Invisibility of the Saint</title><author>Marion, Jean‐Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-447219191c0e1d01e64b6ff74b96399a3db98d8f55c05c65a0ecbd691628a1453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Alterity</topic><topic>Business orders</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Divinity</topic><topic>Heroism</topic><topic>Holiness</topic><topic>Intentionality</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Politics of Idolatry</topic><topic>Saints</topic><topic>Sanctity</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marion, Jean‐Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Critical inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marion, Jean‐Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Invisibility of the Saint</atitle><jtitle>Critical inquiry</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>703-710</pages><issn>0093-1896</issn><eissn>1539-7858</eissn><coden>CRINDL</coden><abstract>To call anyone holy, one must first know what this word holiness actually means, have direct experience of it oneself, and, finally, be able to legitimately assign the quality thus signified to someone. No one can claim to define the concept (or the meaning) of holiness without running the risk of the most obvious of idolatries. Since all idolatry actually results in self-idolatry, this idolized sanctity immediately presupposes that those who assert and define it claim to know what holiness means, hence they claim to experience it and consequently to incarnate it themselves. Here, Marion discusses how should one justify sainthood, and on what definition of holiness should it be grounded.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/598808</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-1896 |
ispartof | Critical inquiry, 2009, Vol.35 (3), p.703-710 |
issn | 0093-1896 1539-7858 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_598808 |
source | ARTbibliographies Modern; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Alterity Business orders Definitions Divinity Heroism Holiness Intentionality Paradoxes Politics of Idolatry Saints Sanctity Theology |
title | The Invisibility of the Saint |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Invisibility%20of%20the%20Saint&rft.jtitle=Critical%20inquiry&rft.au=Marion,%20Jean%E2%80%90Luc&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=703-710&rft.issn=0093-1896&rft.eissn=1539-7858&rft.coden=CRINDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/598808&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/598808%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198848672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/598808&rfr_iscdi=true |