Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction: We conducted a mono-centric cohort study to evaluate the long-term functional results and safety of transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 a total of 148 patients who underwent TVM repair for POP were retrospectively enrolled. Lon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hüsch, T, Mager, R, Ober, E, Bentler, R, Ulm, K, Haferkamp, A
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Hüsch, T
Mager, R
Ober, E
Bentler, R
Ulm, K
Haferkamp, A
description Introduction: We conducted a mono-centric cohort study to evaluate the long-term functional results and safety of transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 a total of 148 patients who underwent TVM repair for POP were retrospectively enrolled. Long-term complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Additionally, standardised and validated questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of complication rates, physical complaints and quality of life. Descriptive statistic was performed for evaluation of complications and efficacy rates. Univariate analysis by the chi 2 -test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict recurrence of prolapse and mesh erosion using the variables prior hysterectomy, age, BMI, prolapse degree and anterior vs. combined mesh as predictor. Results: The mean follow-up time was 27.2 months. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% including bowel and bladder injury. Mesh erosion occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh erosion could be identified. A recurrent prolapse was present in 6.8% whereas only 4.7% were in need of secondary prolapse repair. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in 2.8%. None of the patients developed painful mesh shrinking or fistula. An improvement of POP symptoms was reported by 84.6%. The mean postoperative vaginal pain score was 0.6 according the international index of pain. Conclusion: The TVM repair is a safe and effective procedure for POP repair if performed by experienced surgeons and by careful patient selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0036-1593131
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>thieme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0036_1593131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1055_s_0036_1593131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0036_15931313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzsFqwzAQBFBREqjb5prz_oBaLbIc51xaeugtuYvFWTkKtmS0biB_3wTyAzkNA8PwlFqjeUfj3IdoY2yj0W0tWnxSFda21W1r6oWqjMFGu43DZ_UicrrWeotNpXa_OfV65jKCUOD5ApQOwCHEjroL5ABzoSRn6mOiAUaWIxSeKBYIucDEwzl2kEtPCaaSB5qE39Qy0CC8uuer0t9f-88fPR8jj-xP-a9cz8Sj8Te5F3-T-7vcPrr_B-1cSrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hüsch, T ; Mager, R ; Ober, E ; Bentler, R ; Ulm, K ; Haferkamp, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hüsch, T ; Mager, R ; Ober, E ; Bentler, R ; Ulm, K ; Haferkamp, A</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: We conducted a mono-centric cohort study to evaluate the long-term functional results and safety of transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 a total of 148 patients who underwent TVM repair for POP were retrospectively enrolled. Long-term complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Additionally, standardised and validated questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of complication rates, physical complaints and quality of life. Descriptive statistic was performed for evaluation of complications and efficacy rates. Univariate analysis by the chi 2 -test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict recurrence of prolapse and mesh erosion using the variables prior hysterectomy, age, BMI, prolapse degree and anterior vs. combined mesh as predictor. Results: The mean follow-up time was 27.2 months. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% including bowel and bladder injury. Mesh erosion occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh erosion could be identified. A recurrent prolapse was present in 6.8% whereas only 4.7% were in need of secondary prolapse repair. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in 2.8%. None of the patients developed painful mesh shrinking or fistula. An improvement of POP symptoms was reported by 84.6%. The mean postoperative vaginal pain score was 0.6 according the international index of pain. Conclusion: The TVM repair is a safe and effective procedure for POP repair if performed by experienced surgeons and by careful patient selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593131</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2016</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hüsch, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ober, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulm, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haferkamp, A</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse</title><title>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</title><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><description>Introduction: We conducted a mono-centric cohort study to evaluate the long-term functional results and safety of transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 a total of 148 patients who underwent TVM repair for POP were retrospectively enrolled. Long-term complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Additionally, standardised and validated questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of complication rates, physical complaints and quality of life. Descriptive statistic was performed for evaluation of complications and efficacy rates. Univariate analysis by the chi 2 -test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict recurrence of prolapse and mesh erosion using the variables prior hysterectomy, age, BMI, prolapse degree and anterior vs. combined mesh as predictor. Results: The mean follow-up time was 27.2 months. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% including bowel and bladder injury. Mesh erosion occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh erosion could be identified. A recurrent prolapse was present in 6.8% whereas only 4.7% were in need of secondary prolapse repair. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in 2.8%. None of the patients developed painful mesh shrinking or fistula. An improvement of POP symptoms was reported by 84.6%. The mean postoperative vaginal pain score was 0.6 according the international index of pain. Conclusion: The TVM repair is a safe and effective procedure for POP repair if performed by experienced surgeons and by careful patient selection.</description><issn>0016-5751</issn><issn>1438-8804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNqVzsFqwzAQBFBREqjb5prz_oBaLbIc51xaeugtuYvFWTkKtmS0biB_3wTyAzkNA8PwlFqjeUfj3IdoY2yj0W0tWnxSFda21W1r6oWqjMFGu43DZ_UicrrWeotNpXa_OfV65jKCUOD5ApQOwCHEjroL5ABzoSRn6mOiAUaWIxSeKBYIucDEwzl2kEtPCaaSB5qE39Qy0CC8uuer0t9f-88fPR8jj-xP-a9cz8Sj8Te5F3-T-7vcPrr_B-1cSrY</recordid><startdate>20161013</startdate><enddate>20161013</enddate><creator>Hüsch, T</creator><creator>Mager, R</creator><creator>Ober, E</creator><creator>Bentler, R</creator><creator>Ulm, K</creator><creator>Haferkamp, A</creator><scope>0U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161013</creationdate><title>Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse</title><author>Hüsch, T ; Mager, R ; Ober, E ; Bentler, R ; Ulm, K ; Haferkamp, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0036_15931313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hüsch, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ober, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulm, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haferkamp, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hüsch, T</au><au>Mager, R</au><au>Ober, E</au><au>Bentler, R</au><au>Ulm, K</au><au>Haferkamp, A</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse</atitle><btitle>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</btitle><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><date>2016-10-13</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issn>0016-5751</issn><eissn>1438-8804</eissn><abstract>Introduction: We conducted a mono-centric cohort study to evaluate the long-term functional results and safety of transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 a total of 148 patients who underwent TVM repair for POP were retrospectively enrolled. Long-term complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Additionally, standardised and validated questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of complication rates, physical complaints and quality of life. Descriptive statistic was performed for evaluation of complications and efficacy rates. Univariate analysis by the chi 2 -test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict recurrence of prolapse and mesh erosion using the variables prior hysterectomy, age, BMI, prolapse degree and anterior vs. combined mesh as predictor. Results: The mean follow-up time was 27.2 months. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% including bowel and bladder injury. Mesh erosion occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh erosion could be identified. A recurrent prolapse was present in 6.8% whereas only 4.7% were in need of secondary prolapse repair. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in 2.8%. None of the patients developed painful mesh shrinking or fistula. An improvement of POP symptoms was reported by 84.6%. The mean postoperative vaginal pain score was 0.6 according the international index of pain. Conclusion: The TVM repair is a safe and effective procedure for POP repair if performed by experienced surgeons and by careful patient selection.</abstract><doi>10.1055/s-0036-1593131</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5751
ispartof Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2016
issn 0016-5751
1438-8804
language eng
recordid cdi_thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0036_1593131
source PubMed Central
title Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-thieme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Long-term%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20transvaginal%20mesh%20repair%20for%20pelvic%20organ%20prolapse&rft.btitle=Geburtshilfe%20und%20Frauenheilkunde&rft.au=H%C3%BCsch,%20T&rft.date=2016-10-13&rft.issn=0016-5751&rft.eissn=1438-8804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0036-1593131&rft_dat=%3Cthieme%3E10_1055_s_0036_1593131%3C/thieme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true