Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study
In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizabi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Europace (London, England) England), 2024-03, Vol.26 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Europace (London, England) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Fernstad, Jonatan Svennberg, Emma Åberg, Peter Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin Jansson, Anders Engdahl, Johan |
description | In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL).
Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded.
A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/europace/euae079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_853776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3003436319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-d2cbd51772298cb1ff80ea9ee61fcc2bfa371ef2945add3917de1c26fc9d71d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkrmP1DAUxiMEYg_oqZBLmiw-xnFMg4bVckiLkNiB1nLs50kgiYPtLErJf45Xc8AWNFT-bH-_d-kVxTOCLwiW7CXMwU_aQBYasJAPilPCGS0plvRh1ljKkhMqT4qzGL9hjAWV_HFxwmrOWM2q0-LXV913VqfOj8g7pNHob6FHcdAhTa0foWx0BIuyTn7qIbVLHPw26KntDBry3VvkfEB6aOZeJx8W1EKGUWiX1A7Idno7-pg6E1-h1AK6-bj-vHlztd7coJhmuzwpHjndR3i6P8-LL2-vNpfvy-tP7z5crq9Ls6rrVFpqGsuJEJTK2jTEuRqDlgAVccbQxmkmCDgqV1xbyyQRFoihlTPSCmIJOy_KXdz4E6a5UVPocpOL8rpT-6fvWYHKsxGiyn75T_8UvP0DHUB6GOt_sITzlaywFJl9vWOzYQBrYExB9_dD3PsZu1Zt_a0iBFPG8V32F_sIwf-YISY1dNFA3-sR_BwVw5itcpVEZiveWU3wMQZwxzwEq7sVU4cVU_sVy8jzv-s7AsfmfwM_XNfW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3003436319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fernstad, Jonatan ; Svennberg, Emma ; Åberg, Peter ; Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin ; Jansson, Anders ; Engdahl, Johan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernstad, Jonatan ; Svennberg, Emma ; Åberg, Peter ; Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin ; Jansson, Anders ; Engdahl, Johan</creatorcontrib><description>In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL).
Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded.
A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38533836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Flutter - diagnosis ; Clinical Research ; Electric Countershock ; Electrocardiography - methods ; Humans ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Photoplethysmography ; Smartphone</subject><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2024-03, Vol.26 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-d2cbd51772298cb1ff80ea9ee61fcc2bfa371ef2945add3917de1c26fc9d71d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5106-749X ; 0000-0002-3678-8050 ; 0009-0002-7361-6992 ; 0000-0002-6413-0870 ; 0000-0002-1677-7215 ; 0000-0003-0370-1956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11023506/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11023506/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38533836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:155496097$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:238533836$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernstad, Jonatan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svennberg, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åberg, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engdahl, Johan</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL).
Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded.
A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.</description><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Flutter - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Photoplethysmography</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkrmP1DAUxiMEYg_oqZBLmiw-xnFMg4bVckiLkNiB1nLs50kgiYPtLErJf45Xc8AWNFT-bH-_d-kVxTOCLwiW7CXMwU_aQBYasJAPilPCGS0plvRh1ljKkhMqT4qzGL9hjAWV_HFxwmrOWM2q0-LXV913VqfOj8g7pNHob6FHcdAhTa0foWx0BIuyTn7qIbVLHPw26KntDBry3VvkfEB6aOZeJx8W1EKGUWiX1A7Idno7-pg6E1-h1AK6-bj-vHlztd7coJhmuzwpHjndR3i6P8-LL2-vNpfvy-tP7z5crq9Ls6rrVFpqGsuJEJTK2jTEuRqDlgAVccbQxmkmCDgqV1xbyyQRFoihlTPSCmIJOy_KXdz4E6a5UVPocpOL8rpT-6fvWYHKsxGiyn75T_8UvP0DHUB6GOt_sITzlaywFJl9vWOzYQBrYExB9_dD3PsZu1Zt_a0iBFPG8V32F_sIwf-YISY1dNFA3-sR_BwVw5itcpVEZiveWU3wMQZwxzwEq7sVU4cVU_sVy8jzv-s7AsfmfwM_XNfW</recordid><startdate>20240330</startdate><enddate>20240330</enddate><creator>Fernstad, Jonatan</creator><creator>Svennberg, Emma</creator><creator>Åberg, Peter</creator><creator>Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin</creator><creator>Jansson, Anders</creator><creator>Engdahl, Johan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-749X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-8050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7361-6992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-0870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-7215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-1956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240330</creationdate><title>Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study</title><author>Fernstad, Jonatan ; Svennberg, Emma ; Åberg, Peter ; Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin ; Jansson, Anders ; Engdahl, Johan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-d2cbd51772298cb1ff80ea9ee61fcc2bfa371ef2945add3917de1c26fc9d71d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Flutter - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Photoplethysmography</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernstad, Jonatan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svennberg, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åberg, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engdahl, Johan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernstad, Jonatan</au><au>Svennberg, Emma</au><au>Åberg, Peter</au><au>Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Katrin</au><au>Jansson, Anders</au><au>Engdahl, Johan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2024-03-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL).
Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded.
A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38533836</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euae079</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-749X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-8050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7361-6992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-0870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-7215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-1956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1099-5129 |
ispartof | Europace (London, England), 2024-03, Vol.26 (4) |
issn | 1099-5129 1532-2092 1532-2092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_853776 |
source | MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis Atrial Flutter - diagnosis Clinical Research Electric Countershock Electrocardiography - methods Humans Medicin och hälsovetenskap Photoplethysmography Smartphone |
title | Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A41%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20novel%20smartphone-based%20photoplethysmographic%20method%20for%20ambulatory%20heart%20rhythm%20diagnostics:%20the%20SMARTBEATS%20study&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Fernstad,%20Jonatan&rft.date=2024-03-30&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euae079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3003436319%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3003436319&rft_id=info:pmid/38533836&rfr_iscdi=true |