The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study
Objective To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand implant placement, in fully edentulous arches. Materials and Methods Twenty‐one patients with a total of 88 fixtures wer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.841-853 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 853 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 841 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit Mahardawi, Basel Arunjaroensuk, Sirida Kaboosaya, Boosana Mattheos, Nikos Pimkhaokham, Atiphan |
| description | Objective
To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand implant placement, in fully edentulous arches.
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐one patients with a total of 88 fixtures were included. Implants were divided equally into four groups: a combination of static and dynamic CAIS (SD group), static CAIS (S group), dynamic CAIS (D group), and freehand placement (FH group). Angular deviation, as well as the 3D platform and apex deviations, were measured for all groups. Furthermore, the direction of implant deviation was recorded and compared.
Results
The FH group showed significantly more deviation compared to all groups, considering all the aspects, and at both the implant platform and apex. A significant difference in angular deviation between the SD and S groups (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.14185 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_824609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2869220039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4f1c36c1e55f82fe9855a1b9c76203ae7103dcb6aed4ee82d71e701f95a25e053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xgkdZO4iRmV43KjzQSEipry3FuWhfHCXbcKjseoe_CG_Ek3CHDLJDwwj6yPh3f40PIS87OOK5z48IZL3kjHpENrxjLmGD8MdkwyURW84qfkGcx3jLGKtnIp-SkqGuBTLEhP69ugGpjUtBmoWNP7TA57WeKu4EBUKVo_TXV1IxDa72e7ej3YJxRGqp9R7vF6wE1ElOaIfz68aBjtHGG7ugXU7iGsFDraZ-cWyh0aJ7cmCLVwdxAfEcv6BTGOIGZ7R2gm5_D6ByaGGe9Ndrho6lbnpMnvXYRXhzOU_L1_eXV9mO2-_zh0_Zil5kyr0RW9twUleEgRN_kPchGCM1baeoqZ4WGmrOiM22loSsBmryrOdSM91LoXAATxSnJVt94D1Nq1RTsoMOiRm3V4eobKlBNXlZMIv9m5THF9wRxVoONBhzmB4yp8qaSec5YsUdf_4Pejil4TKMKbI1JyYr9AG9XyuC3xAD9cQTO1L55hc2rP80j--rgmNoBuiP5t2oEzlfg3jpY_u-ktrsvq-VvLrm9aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit ; Mahardawi, Basel ; Arunjaroensuk, Sirida ; Kaboosaya, Boosana ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit ; Mahardawi, Basel ; Arunjaroensuk, Sirida ; Kaboosaya, Boosana ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand implant placement, in fully edentulous arches.
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐one patients with a total of 88 fixtures were included. Implants were divided equally into four groups: a combination of static and dynamic CAIS (SD group), static CAIS (S group), dynamic CAIS (D group), and freehand placement (FH group). Angular deviation, as well as the 3D platform and apex deviations, were measured for all groups. Furthermore, the direction of implant deviation was recorded and compared.
Results
The FH group showed significantly more deviation compared to all groups, considering all the aspects, and at both the implant platform and apex. A significant difference in angular deviation between the SD and S groups (p < .001), and between the SD and D groups (p < .001) was noted, favoring the SD group. When evaluating implant distribution, the FH group showed a tendency towards the buccal, apical, and distal directions at platform and apex, while in the D group, implants shifted more to the buccal. In contrast, the SD group did not show a trend toward any specific direction. The S and SD groups did not show a statistical significance considering any direction.
Conclusions
The combination of static and dynamic CAIS increases the accuracy of implant placement in fully edentulous arches when compared with either static or dynamic CAIS alone, as well as freehand placement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37750503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; computer‐aided design ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Deviation ; Edentulous ; edentulous jaws ; Female ; Fixtures ; Humans ; Implants ; Jaw, Edentulous - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mouth, Edentulous - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.841-853</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4f1c36c1e55f82fe9855a1b9c76203ae7103dcb6aed4ee82d71e701f95a25e053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4f1c36c1e55f82fe9855a1b9c76203ae7103dcb6aed4ee82d71e701f95a25e053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7358-7496 ; 0000-0002-0170-243X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.14185$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.14185$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:153755736$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahardawi, Basel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arunjaroensuk, Sirida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaboosaya, Boosana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattheos, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</creatorcontrib><title>The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand implant placement, in fully edentulous arches.
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐one patients with a total of 88 fixtures were included. Implants were divided equally into four groups: a combination of static and dynamic CAIS (SD group), static CAIS (S group), dynamic CAIS (D group), and freehand placement (FH group). Angular deviation, as well as the 3D platform and apex deviations, were measured for all groups. Furthermore, the direction of implant deviation was recorded and compared.
Results
The FH group showed significantly more deviation compared to all groups, considering all the aspects, and at both the implant platform and apex. A significant difference in angular deviation between the SD and S groups (p < .001), and between the SD and D groups (p < .001) was noted, favoring the SD group. When evaluating implant distribution, the FH group showed a tendency towards the buccal, apical, and distal directions at platform and apex, while in the D group, implants shifted more to the buccal. In contrast, the SD group did not show a trend toward any specific direction. The S and SD groups did not show a statistical significance considering any direction.
Conclusions
The combination of static and dynamic CAIS increases the accuracy of implant placement in fully edentulous arches when compared with either static or dynamic CAIS alone, as well as freehand placement.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>computer‐aided design</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>edentulous jaws</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixtures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xgkdZO4iRmV43KjzQSEipry3FuWhfHCXbcKjseoe_CG_Ek3CHDLJDwwj6yPh3f40PIS87OOK5z48IZL3kjHpENrxjLmGD8MdkwyURW84qfkGcx3jLGKtnIp-SkqGuBTLEhP69ugGpjUtBmoWNP7TA57WeKu4EBUKVo_TXV1IxDa72e7ej3YJxRGqp9R7vF6wE1ElOaIfz68aBjtHGG7ugXU7iGsFDraZ-cWyh0aJ7cmCLVwdxAfEcv6BTGOIGZ7R2gm5_D6ByaGGe9Ndrho6lbnpMnvXYRXhzOU_L1_eXV9mO2-_zh0_Zil5kyr0RW9twUleEgRN_kPchGCM1baeoqZ4WGmrOiM22loSsBmryrOdSM91LoXAATxSnJVt94D1Nq1RTsoMOiRm3V4eobKlBNXlZMIv9m5THF9wRxVoONBhzmB4yp8qaSec5YsUdf_4Pejil4TKMKbI1JyYr9AG9XyuC3xAD9cQTO1L55hc2rP80j--rgmNoBuiP5t2oEzlfg3jpY_u-ktrsvq-VvLrm9aw</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit</creator><creator>Mahardawi, Basel</creator><creator>Arunjaroensuk, Sirida</creator><creator>Kaboosaya, Boosana</creator><creator>Mattheos, Nikos</creator><creator>Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-7496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-243X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study</title><author>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit ; Mahardawi, Basel ; Arunjaroensuk, Sirida ; Kaboosaya, Boosana ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4265-4f1c36c1e55f82fe9855a1b9c76203ae7103dcb6aed4ee82d71e701f95a25e053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>computer‐aided design</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>edentulous jaws</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixtures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahardawi, Basel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arunjaroensuk, Sirida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaboosaya, Boosana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattheos, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lorwicheanrung, Jarungvit</au><au>Mahardawi, Basel</au><au>Arunjaroensuk, Sirida</au><au>Kaboosaya, Boosana</au><au>Mattheos, Nikos</au><au>Pimkhaokham, Atiphan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>841</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>841-853</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand implant placement, in fully edentulous arches.
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐one patients with a total of 88 fixtures were included. Implants were divided equally into four groups: a combination of static and dynamic CAIS (SD group), static CAIS (S group), dynamic CAIS (D group), and freehand placement (FH group). Angular deviation, as well as the 3D platform and apex deviations, were measured for all groups. Furthermore, the direction of implant deviation was recorded and compared.
Results
The FH group showed significantly more deviation compared to all groups, considering all the aspects, and at both the implant platform and apex. A significant difference in angular deviation between the SD and S groups (p < .001), and between the SD and D groups (p < .001) was noted, favoring the SD group. When evaluating implant distribution, the FH group showed a tendency towards the buccal, apical, and distal directions at platform and apex, while in the D group, implants shifted more to the buccal. In contrast, the SD group did not show a trend toward any specific direction. The S and SD groups did not show a statistical significance considering any direction.
Conclusions
The combination of static and dynamic CAIS increases the accuracy of implant placement in fully edentulous arches when compared with either static or dynamic CAIS alone, as well as freehand placement.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37750503</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14185</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-7496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-243X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.841-853 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_824609 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Accuracy Aged computer‐aided design Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Implants Deviation Edentulous edentulous jaws Female Fixtures Humans Implants Jaw, Edentulous - surgery Male Middle Aged Mouth, Edentulous - surgery Prospective Studies Surgery Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Transplants & implants |
| title | The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20accuracy%20of%20implant%20placement%20using%20a%20combination%20of%20static%20and%20dynamic%20computer%E2%80%90assisted%20implant%20surgery%20in%20fully%20edentulous%20arches:%20A%20prospective%20controlled%20clinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Lorwicheanrung,%20Jarungvit&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=841&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=841-853&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2869220039%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099035&rft_id=info:pmid/37750503&rfr_iscdi=true |