The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports
Introduction Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in compa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of occupational therapy 2021-07, Vol.84 (7), p.446-455 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 455 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 446 |
| container_title | The British journal of occupational therapy |
| container_volume | 84 |
| creator | Jakobsson, Elin Nygård, Louise Kottorp, Anders Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm Malinowsky, Camilla |
| description | Introduction
Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in comparison with their proxies’ estimates using the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.
Method
In this cross-sectional study, persons with cognitive impairment (n = 21) and their proxies (n = 21) were interviewed on separate occasions with the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, which measures the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies. The data were analysed with t-tests, z-comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set at p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0308022620954117 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_607812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0308022620954117</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2541260116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1d63021bbff59d225e67d150a871db867e2da9046aa06269b6a86a23cf9281de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFO3DAQhq0KpC7Qe4-WeiV0PMk6iXpCQGklJC7A1XLiya63u3FqJ9C9ceEh-np9kjrsChDSnmzP__nXzPyMfRZwIkSef4UUCkCUCOU0i5UPbCKyPE8kgNxjk1FORv0jOwhhAYCQFzhhTzdz4kMg7hpO9-TXRq95T_W8dUs3W3_jmtdu1Wlvg2tHyC0Ned6Rj-_AH2w_j8Cstb29J24jaf2K2j78e_zLAy2bxFPnfB-4bg3v52TjZ-_-WHomtuIR22_0MtCn7XnIbr9f3Jz9SK6uL3-enV4ldYayT4SRKaCoqqaZlgZxSjI3Ygq6yIWpCpkTGl1CJrUGibKspC6kxrRuSiyEofSQJRvf8EDdUKnO25X2a-W0VdvSr3gjJeN2BEb-eCd_bu9OlfMztdKDyjAtZcS_bPA44e-BQq8WbvBtnEhhDAUlCDFSsKFq70Lw1LzYClBjlup9lm_61jN6Nd3J_wfTdKLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541260116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Jakobsson, Elin ; Nygård, Louise ; Kottorp, Anders ; Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm ; Malinowsky, Camilla</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakobsson, Elin ; Nygård, Louise ; Kottorp, Anders ; Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm ; Malinowsky, Camilla</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in comparison with their proxies’ estimates using the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.
Method
In this cross-sectional study, persons with cognitive impairment (n = 21) and their proxies (n = 21) were interviewed on separate occasions with the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, which measures the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies. The data were analysed with t-tests, z-comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
At the group level, no significant differences were found between persons with cognitive impairments’ perceptions and their proxies’ estimates regarding the number of relevant everyday technologies or the ability to use everyday technologies.
On the individual level, significant differences were found in the ability measures within four out of the 21 dyads.
Conclusion
The persons with cognitive impairment and their proxies verified each other’s responses, providing evidence that persons with cognitive impairment should be the primary source for information about their own everyday technology use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0226</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-6006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-6006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0308022620954117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ability ; Activities of daily living ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive impairment ; Dementia ; everyday technology ; IADL ; Information technology ; Occupational therapy ; Older people ; older persons ; Perceptions ; proxy ; Questionnaires ; Usability</subject><ispartof>The British journal of occupational therapy, 2021-07, Vol.84 (7), p.446-455</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1d63021bbff59d225e67d150a871db867e2da9046aa06269b6a86a23cf9281de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1d63021bbff59d225e67d150a871db867e2da9046aa06269b6a86a23cf9281de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9756-1354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0308022620954117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308022620954117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-42396$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:146532491$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakobsson, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottorp, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malinowsky, Camilla</creatorcontrib><title>The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports</title><title>The British journal of occupational therapy</title><description>Introduction
Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in comparison with their proxies’ estimates using the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.
Method
In this cross-sectional study, persons with cognitive impairment (n = 21) and their proxies (n = 21) were interviewed on separate occasions with the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, which measures the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies. The data were analysed with t-tests, z-comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
At the group level, no significant differences were found between persons with cognitive impairments’ perceptions and their proxies’ estimates regarding the number of relevant everyday technologies or the ability to use everyday technologies.
On the individual level, significant differences were found in the ability measures within four out of the 21 dyads.
Conclusion
The persons with cognitive impairment and their proxies verified each other’s responses, providing evidence that persons with cognitive impairment should be the primary source for information about their own everyday technology use.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>everyday technology</subject><subject>IADL</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>older persons</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>proxy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>0308-0226</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFO3DAQhq0KpC7Qe4-WeiV0PMk6iXpCQGklJC7A1XLiya63u3FqJ9C9ceEh-np9kjrsChDSnmzP__nXzPyMfRZwIkSef4UUCkCUCOU0i5UPbCKyPE8kgNxjk1FORv0jOwhhAYCQFzhhTzdz4kMg7hpO9-TXRq95T_W8dUs3W3_jmtdu1Wlvg2tHyC0Ned6Rj-_AH2w_j8Cstb29J24jaf2K2j78e_zLAy2bxFPnfB-4bg3v52TjZ-_-WHomtuIR22_0MtCn7XnIbr9f3Jz9SK6uL3-enV4ldYayT4SRKaCoqqaZlgZxSjI3Ygq6yIWpCpkTGl1CJrUGibKspC6kxrRuSiyEofSQJRvf8EDdUKnO25X2a-W0VdvSr3gjJeN2BEb-eCd_bu9OlfMztdKDyjAtZcS_bPA44e-BQq8WbvBtnEhhDAUlCDFSsKFq70Lw1LzYClBjlup9lm_61jN6Nd3J_wfTdKLg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Jakobsson, Elin</creator><creator>Nygård, Louise</creator><creator>Kottorp, Anders</creator><creator>Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm</creator><creator>Malinowsky, Camilla</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-1354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports</title><author>Jakobsson, Elin ; Nygård, Louise ; Kottorp, Anders ; Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm ; Malinowsky, Camilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-1d63021bbff59d225e67d150a871db867e2da9046aa06269b6a86a23cf9281de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>everyday technology</topic><topic>IADL</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>older persons</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>proxy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakobsson, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygård, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottorp, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malinowsky, Camilla</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakobsson, Elin</au><au>Nygård, Louise</au><au>Kottorp, Anders</au><au>Olsson, Cecilia Bråkenhielm</au><au>Malinowsky, Camilla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>446-455</pages><issn>0308-0226</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><eissn>1477-6006</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in comparison with their proxies’ estimates using the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.
Method
In this cross-sectional study, persons with cognitive impairment (n = 21) and their proxies (n = 21) were interviewed on separate occasions with the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, which measures the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies. The data were analysed with t-tests, z-comparisons, and Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
At the group level, no significant differences were found between persons with cognitive impairments’ perceptions and their proxies’ estimates regarding the number of relevant everyday technologies or the ability to use everyday technologies.
On the individual level, significant differences were found in the ability measures within four out of the 21 dyads.
Conclusion
The persons with cognitive impairment and their proxies verified each other’s responses, providing evidence that persons with cognitive impairment should be the primary source for information about their own everyday technology use.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0308022620954117</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-1354</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0308-0226 |
| ispartof | The British journal of occupational therapy, 2021-07, Vol.84 (7), p.446-455 |
| issn | 0308-0226 1477-6006 1477-6006 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_607812 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online |
| subjects | Ability Activities of daily living Cognitive ability Cognitive impairment Dementia everyday technology IADL Information technology Occupational therapy Older people older persons Perceptions proxy Questionnaires Usability |
| title | The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments’ self-reports and their proxies’ reports |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20everyday%20technology;%20a%20comparison%20of%20older%20persons%20with%20cognitive%20impairments%E2%80%99%20self-reports%20and%20their%20proxies%E2%80%99%20reports&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20occupational%20therapy&rft.au=Jakobsson,%20Elin&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=446-455&rft.issn=0308-0226&rft.eissn=1477-6006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0308022620954117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2541260116%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541260116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0308022620954117&rfr_iscdi=true |