Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study

Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967
Hauptverfasser: Andersson, Roland, Lambe, Mats, Bergström, Reinhold
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 967
container_issue 7189
container_start_page 963
container_title BMJ
container_volume 318
creator Andersson, Roland
Lambe, Mats
Bergström, Reinhold
description Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_605939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25184268</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25184268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtXYOy-gCKa9oBR_f0w8MBVWkMYAAXu1nMRZ3aVxsB2g_z2OWrUb0sTTtXx_x7rX52TZUwimEGL2ulwtpxiKKYdCTiXDD7IJJEwUVGD8MJsASWUhIBYH2VEISwAAwlxIRh9nBxDA1GVkkr09Nz7a1sZ13usYje9CrptUc933pqttZaroVuvTfGFDdN5Wus0rt3A-5iEO9fpJ9qjRbTBH23qY_Th__332obj4PP84O7soSkZILBoutSRCaKMpl9JUoOQYE1ojTWqmIWoYggQiAgRqykZTTXRZMa4xr0EpOT7Mis274bfph1L13q60Xyunrdpe3aSTUQxQiWXiX93Lv7NXZ8r5azUMCnEiQKLfbOiErkxdmS563d4R3e10dqGu3a8kFwgm-clW7t3PwYSoVjZUpm11Z9wQFJNMAAnHqV78Ay7d4Lv0cQoBAiDigCTo5X0Q5JwzgCiiiQIbqvIuBG-a3bQQqDEgKgVEpYCoMSAqBSRJnt_e8pZgE4cEHG8BHZLRjdddZcOe4xRINnrxbIMtx0js2ohCQRATe69SZMyfXV_7G5XUnKrLq5n69mV-KT59RWq-92qc-L9b_AWQseq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777602525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10195964</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Analysis. Health state ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth rates ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Childbirth ; Childhood ; Children ; Confidence interval ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Female fertility ; Fertility ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gender equality ; General aspects ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Medical sciences ; Parity ; Population ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Ratios ; SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP ; SOCIAL SCIENCES ; Statistics ; Statistics, computer and systems science ; Statistik ; Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Women ; Womens history</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967</ispartof><rights>1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 BMJ</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 1999 (c) 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright British Medical Association Apr 10, 1999</rights><rights>Copyright © 1999, British Medical Journal 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25184268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25184268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,30976,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1750967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10195964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-27480$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:15644816$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth rates</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Confidence interval</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female fertility</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP</subject><subject>SOCIAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Statistics, computer and systems science</subject><subject>Statistik</subject><subject>Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens history</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtXYOy-gCKa9oBR_f0w8MBVWkMYAAXu1nMRZ3aVxsB2g_z2OWrUb0sTTtXx_x7rX52TZUwimEGL2ulwtpxiKKYdCTiXDD7IJJEwUVGD8MJsASWUhIBYH2VEISwAAwlxIRh9nBxDA1GVkkr09Nz7a1sZ13usYje9CrptUc933pqttZaroVuvTfGFDdN5Wus0rt3A-5iEO9fpJ9qjRbTBH23qY_Th__332obj4PP84O7soSkZILBoutSRCaKMpl9JUoOQYE1ojTWqmIWoYggQiAgRqykZTTXRZMa4xr0EpOT7Mis274bfph1L13q60Xyunrdpe3aSTUQxQiWXiX93Lv7NXZ8r5azUMCnEiQKLfbOiErkxdmS563d4R3e10dqGu3a8kFwgm-clW7t3PwYSoVjZUpm11Z9wQFJNMAAnHqV78Ay7d4Lv0cQoBAiDigCTo5X0Q5JwzgCiiiQIbqvIuBG-a3bQQqDEgKgVEpYCoMSAqBSRJnt_e8pZgE4cEHG8BHZLRjdddZcOe4xRINnrxbIMtx0js2ohCQRATe69SZMyfXV_7G5XUnKrLq5n69mV-KT59RWq-92qc-L9b_AWQseq4</recordid><startdate>19990410</startdate><enddate>19990410</enddate><creator>Andersson, Roland</creator><creator>Lambe, Mats</creator><creator>Bergström, Reinhold</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Journal</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990410</creationdate><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><author>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth rates</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Confidence interval</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female fertility</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP</topic><topic>SOCIAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Statistics, computer and systems science</topic><topic>Statistik</topic><topic>Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersson, Roland</au><au>Lambe, Mats</au><au>Bergström, Reinhold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1999-04-10</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>318</volume><issue>7189</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>963-967</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>10195964</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963</doi><tpages>5</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967
issn 0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_605939
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Analysis. Health state
Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Biological and medical sciences
Birth rates
Case-Control Studies
Child
Childbirth
Childhood
Children
Confidence interval
Epidemiology
Female
Female fertility
Fertility
Follow-Up Studies
Gender equality
General aspects
Humans
Maternal Age
Medical sciences
Parity
Population
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Ratios
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SOCIAL SCIENCES
Statistics
Statistics, computer and systems science
Statistik
Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap
Surgery
Time Factors
Women
Womens history
title Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertility%20patterns%20after%20appendicectomy:%20historical%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Andersson,%20Roland&rft.date=1999-04-10&rft.volume=318&rft.issue=7189&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=963-967&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E25184268%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777602525&rft_id=info:pmid/10195964&rft_jstor_id=25184268&rfr_iscdi=true