Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study
Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 967 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7189 |
container_start_page | 963 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 318 |
creator | Andersson, Roland Lambe, Mats Bergström, Reinhold |
description | Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_605939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25184268</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25184268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtXYOy-gCKa9oBR_f0w8MBVWkMYAAXu1nMRZ3aVxsB2g_z2OWrUb0sTTtXx_x7rX52TZUwimEGL2ulwtpxiKKYdCTiXDD7IJJEwUVGD8MJsASWUhIBYH2VEISwAAwlxIRh9nBxDA1GVkkr09Nz7a1sZ13usYje9CrptUc933pqttZaroVuvTfGFDdN5Wus0rt3A-5iEO9fpJ9qjRbTBH23qY_Th__332obj4PP84O7soSkZILBoutSRCaKMpl9JUoOQYE1ojTWqmIWoYggQiAgRqykZTTXRZMa4xr0EpOT7Mis274bfph1L13q60Xyunrdpe3aSTUQxQiWXiX93Lv7NXZ8r5azUMCnEiQKLfbOiErkxdmS563d4R3e10dqGu3a8kFwgm-clW7t3PwYSoVjZUpm11Z9wQFJNMAAnHqV78Ay7d4Lv0cQoBAiDigCTo5X0Q5JwzgCiiiQIbqvIuBG-a3bQQqDEgKgVEpYCoMSAqBSRJnt_e8pZgE4cEHG8BHZLRjdddZcOe4xRINnrxbIMtx0js2ohCQRATe69SZMyfXV_7G5XUnKrLq5n69mV-KT59RWq-92qc-L9b_AWQseq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777602525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10195964</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Analysis. Health state ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth rates ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Childbirth ; Childhood ; Children ; Confidence interval ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Female fertility ; Fertility ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gender equality ; General aspects ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Medical sciences ; Parity ; Population ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Ratios ; SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP ; SOCIAL SCIENCES ; Statistics ; Statistics, computer and systems science ; Statistik ; Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Women ; Womens history</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967</ispartof><rights>1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 BMJ</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 1999 (c) 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright British Medical Association Apr 10, 1999</rights><rights>Copyright © 1999, British Medical Journal 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25184268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25184268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,30976,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1750967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10195964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-27480$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:15644816$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth rates</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Confidence interval</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female fertility</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP</subject><subject>SOCIAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Statistics, computer and systems science</subject><subject>Statistik</subject><subject>Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens history</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtXYOy-gCKa9oBR_f0w8MBVWkMYAAXu1nMRZ3aVxsB2g_z2OWrUb0sTTtXx_x7rX52TZUwimEGL2ulwtpxiKKYdCTiXDD7IJJEwUVGD8MJsASWUhIBYH2VEISwAAwlxIRh9nBxDA1GVkkr09Nz7a1sZ13usYje9CrptUc933pqttZaroVuvTfGFDdN5Wus0rt3A-5iEO9fpJ9qjRbTBH23qY_Th__332obj4PP84O7soSkZILBoutSRCaKMpl9JUoOQYE1ojTWqmIWoYggQiAgRqykZTTXRZMa4xr0EpOT7Mis274bfph1L13q60Xyunrdpe3aSTUQxQiWXiX93Lv7NXZ8r5azUMCnEiQKLfbOiErkxdmS563d4R3e10dqGu3a8kFwgm-clW7t3PwYSoVjZUpm11Z9wQFJNMAAnHqV78Ay7d4Lv0cQoBAiDigCTo5X0Q5JwzgCiiiQIbqvIuBG-a3bQQqDEgKgVEpYCoMSAqBSRJnt_e8pZgE4cEHG8BHZLRjdddZcOe4xRINnrxbIMtx0js2ohCQRATe69SZMyfXV_7G5XUnKrLq5n69mV-KT59RWq-92qc-L9b_AWQseq4</recordid><startdate>19990410</startdate><enddate>19990410</enddate><creator>Andersson, Roland</creator><creator>Lambe, Mats</creator><creator>Bergström, Reinhold</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Journal</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990410</creationdate><title>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</title><author>Andersson, Roland ; Lambe, Mats ; Bergström, Reinhold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b644t-f79a9488aea5799ec0b73345d2a4d6a12f6214124082fbfa5a4abc67a37d0b973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth rates</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Confidence interval</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female fertility</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP</topic><topic>SOCIAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Statistics, computer and systems science</topic><topic>Statistik</topic><topic>Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersson, Roland</au><au>Lambe, Mats</au><au>Bergström, Reinhold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1999-04-10</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>318</volume><issue>7189</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>963-967</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective: To examine fertility patterns in women who had their appendix removed in childhood. Design: Historical cohort study with computerised data and fertility data for this cohort and for an age matched cohort of women from the Swedish general population. The cohorts were followed to 1994. Setting: General population. Participants: 9840 women who were under 15 years when they underwent appendicectomy between 1964 and 1983; 47 590 control women. Main outcome measures: Diagnoses at discharge. Distributions of age at birth of first child among women with perforated and non-perforated appendix and women who underwent appendicectomy but were found to have a normal appendix compared with control women by using survival analysis methods. Parity distributions at the latest update of the registry were also examined. Results: Women with a history of perforated appendix had a similar rate of first birth as the control women (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95; 95%confidence interval 0.88 to 1.04) and had a similar distribution of parity at the end of follow up. Women who had had a normal appendix removed had an increased rate of first births (1.48;1.42 to 1.54) and on average had their first child at an earlier age and reached a higher parity than control women. Conclusion: A history of perforated appendix in childhood does not seem to have long term negative consequences on female fertility. This may have important implications for the management of young women with suspected appendicitis as the liberal attitude to surgical explorations with a subsequently high rate of removal of a normal appendix is often justified by a perceived increased risk of infertility after perforation. Women whose appendix was found to be normal at appendicectomy in childhood seem to belong to a subgroup with a higher fertility than the general population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>10195964</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963</doi><tpages>5</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 1999-04, Vol.318 (7189), p.963-967 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_605939 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Analysis of Variance Analysis. Health state Appendectomy Appendicitis Biological and medical sciences Birth rates Case-Control Studies Child Childbirth Childhood Children Confidence interval Epidemiology Female Female fertility Fertility Follow-Up Studies Gender equality General aspects Humans Maternal Age Medical sciences Parity Population Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Ratios SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP SOCIAL SCIENCES Statistics Statistics, computer and systems science Statistik Statistik, data- och systemvetenskap Surgery Time Factors Women Womens history |
title | Fertility patterns after appendicectomy: historical cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertility%20patterns%20after%20appendicectomy:%20historical%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Andersson,%20Roland&rft.date=1999-04-10&rft.volume=318&rft.issue=7189&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=963-967&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.318.7189.963&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E25184268%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777602525&rft_id=info:pmid/10195964&rft_jstor_id=25184268&rfr_iscdi=true |