Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning

CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2002-05, Vol.178 (5), p.263-268
Hauptverfasser: WACHTER, Stefan, WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha, BOCK, Thomas, GOLDNER, Gregor, KOVACS, György, FRANSSON, Annette, PÖTTER, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue 5
container_start_page 263
container_title Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
container_volume 178
creator WACHTER, Stefan
WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha
BOCK, Thomas
GOLDNER, Gregor
KOVACS, György
FRANSSON, Annette
PÖTTER, Richard
description CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the sagittal MRI in an interobserver analysis. 22 patients with pathologically proven prostatic carcinoma were included in the analysis. In all patients sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI and conventional CT were performed. The position of the MRI and CT apices were localized independently by three observers in relation to the intertrochanteric line. Additional subjective judgment of the ability to define the apical border of the prostatic gland was performed by a five-scaled score. The apex of the prostate could be discriminated statistically significant (p < 0.001) better in the MRI as compared to CT with best judgement for the sagittal MRI. The interobserver variation for the definition of the prostatic apex was statistically significant (p = 0.009) smaller for the sagittal MRI compared to axial MRI and CT. On the average the apex as determined by sagittal MRI, axial MRI and CT was located 29 mm, 27 mm and 24 mm above the intertrochanteric line. The apex defined by CT would have led to an additional treatment of 6-13 mm in 10/22 patients compared to the sagittal MRI, defined by axial MRI only in five patients. Additional MRI provides a superior anatomic information especially in the apical portion of the prostate. It should be recommended for every single patient in the treatment planning process. It helps to avoid an unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissue and could lead to a decrease of anal side effects and radiation-induced impotency due to a reduction of the extent of irradiated penile structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00066-002-0907-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_593558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449166621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-17e34f968d40ec4b09251af5e94a61600ffec707ae886879ee1718fd973d74783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9rFTEQxYMo9rb6AXyRIPgYnexu_vkml2ovVASp4NuS3Z3U1N1kTXJr-wn82ubSqz7NmcOPw8wh5AWHNxxAvc0AICUDaBgYUOzuEdnwrjV1M98ekw1wZZjiQp-Q05xvALjsTPeUnPAGdCO13JDfu1AwxSFjusVEx7isNvkcA42Obq-oDRP99GXHBptxomuKudiC1K54Ryd0PvjiY3hHt3OVo51pwhlvbRiRunjIC3UsB99OPpbvmOx6T0tCWxYMha6zDcGH62fkibNzxufHeUa-fji_2l6wy88fd9v3l-y65U1hXGHbOSP11AGO3QCmEdw6gaazkksA53BUoCxqLbUyiFxx7Saj2kl1SrdnhD3k5l-47od-TX6x6b6P1vdH60dV2AvTCnHgXz3w9fWfe8ylv4n7FOqJvdZaNKZiFXp5hPbDgtO_0L81V-D1EbC5luRSLcjn_1wrhTYg2j82hI8l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888529935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>WACHTER, Stefan ; WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha ; BOCK, Thomas ; GOLDNER, Gregor ; KOVACS, György ; FRANSSON, Annette ; PÖTTER, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>WACHTER, Stefan ; WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha ; BOCK, Thomas ; GOLDNER, Gregor ; KOVACS, György ; FRANSSON, Annette ; PÖTTER, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the sagittal MRI in an interobserver analysis. 22 patients with pathologically proven prostatic carcinoma were included in the analysis. In all patients sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI and conventional CT were performed. The position of the MRI and CT apices were localized independently by three observers in relation to the intertrochanteric line. Additional subjective judgment of the ability to define the apical border of the prostatic gland was performed by a five-scaled score. The apex of the prostate could be discriminated statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) better in the MRI as compared to CT with best judgement for the sagittal MRI. The interobserver variation for the definition of the prostatic apex was statistically significant (p = 0.009) smaller for the sagittal MRI compared to axial MRI and CT. On the average the apex as determined by sagittal MRI, axial MRI and CT was located 29 mm, 27 mm and 24 mm above the intertrochanteric line. The apex defined by CT would have led to an additional treatment of 6-13 mm in 10/22 patients compared to the sagittal MRI, defined by axial MRI only in five patients. Additional MRI provides a superior anatomic information especially in the apical portion of the prostate. It should be recommended for every single patient in the treatment planning process. It helps to avoid an unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissue and could lead to a decrease of anal side effects and radiation-induced impotency due to a reduction of the extent of irradiated penile structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-7158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-099X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00066-002-0907-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12082686</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STONE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>München: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Staging ; Observer Variation ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - radiation effects ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2002-05, Vol.178 (5), p.263-268</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Urban &amp; Vogel München 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13658905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12082686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:1959240$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WACHTER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCK, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDNER, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOVACS, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANSSON, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÖTTER, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning</title><title>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</title><addtitle>Strahlenther Onkol</addtitle><description>CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the sagittal MRI in an interobserver analysis. 22 patients with pathologically proven prostatic carcinoma were included in the analysis. In all patients sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI and conventional CT were performed. The position of the MRI and CT apices were localized independently by three observers in relation to the intertrochanteric line. Additional subjective judgment of the ability to define the apical border of the prostatic gland was performed by a five-scaled score. The apex of the prostate could be discriminated statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) better in the MRI as compared to CT with best judgement for the sagittal MRI. The interobserver variation for the definition of the prostatic apex was statistically significant (p = 0.009) smaller for the sagittal MRI compared to axial MRI and CT. On the average the apex as determined by sagittal MRI, axial MRI and CT was located 29 mm, 27 mm and 24 mm above the intertrochanteric line. The apex defined by CT would have led to an additional treatment of 6-13 mm in 10/22 patients compared to the sagittal MRI, defined by axial MRI only in five patients. Additional MRI provides a superior anatomic information especially in the apical portion of the prostate. It should be recommended for every single patient in the treatment planning process. It helps to avoid an unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissue and could lead to a decrease of anal side effects and radiation-induced impotency due to a reduction of the extent of irradiated penile structures.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - radiation effects</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0179-7158</issn><issn>1439-099X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF9rFTEQxYMo9rb6AXyRIPgYnexu_vkml2ovVASp4NuS3Z3U1N1kTXJr-wn82ubSqz7NmcOPw8wh5AWHNxxAvc0AICUDaBgYUOzuEdnwrjV1M98ekw1wZZjiQp-Q05xvALjsTPeUnPAGdCO13JDfu1AwxSFjusVEx7isNvkcA42Obq-oDRP99GXHBptxomuKudiC1K54Ryd0PvjiY3hHt3OVo51pwhlvbRiRunjIC3UsB99OPpbvmOx6T0tCWxYMha6zDcGH62fkibNzxufHeUa-fji_2l6wy88fd9v3l-y65U1hXGHbOSP11AGO3QCmEdw6gaazkksA53BUoCxqLbUyiFxx7Saj2kl1SrdnhD3k5l-47od-TX6x6b6P1vdH60dV2AvTCnHgXz3w9fWfe8ylv4n7FOqJvdZaNKZiFXp5hPbDgtO_0L81V-D1EbC5luRSLcjn_1wrhTYg2j82hI8l</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>WACHTER, Stefan</creator><creator>WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha</creator><creator>BOCK, Thomas</creator><creator>GOLDNER, Gregor</creator><creator>KOVACS, György</creator><creator>FRANSSON, Annette</creator><creator>PÖTTER, Richard</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning</title><author>WACHTER, Stefan ; WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha ; BOCK, Thomas ; GOLDNER, Gregor ; KOVACS, György ; FRANSSON, Annette ; PÖTTER, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-17e34f968d40ec4b09251af5e94a61600ffec707ae886879ee1718fd973d74783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - radiation effects</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WACHTER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCK, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDNER, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOVACS, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANSSON, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÖTTER, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WACHTER, Stefan</au><au>WACHTER-GERSTNER, Natascha</au><au>BOCK, Thomas</au><au>GOLDNER, Gregor</au><au>KOVACS, György</au><au>FRANSSON, Annette</au><au>PÖTTER, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning</atitle><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle><addtitle>Strahlenther Onkol</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>263-268</pages><issn>0179-7158</issn><eissn>1439-099X</eissn><coden>STONE4</coden><abstract>CT is widely used for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma. Its limitations are especially at the prostatic apex which cannot be separated from the urogenital diaphragm. The aim of this study was to compare the localization of the prostatic apex in CT and axial MRI to the sagittal MRI in an interobserver analysis. 22 patients with pathologically proven prostatic carcinoma were included in the analysis. In all patients sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI and conventional CT were performed. The position of the MRI and CT apices were localized independently by three observers in relation to the intertrochanteric line. Additional subjective judgment of the ability to define the apical border of the prostatic gland was performed by a five-scaled score. The apex of the prostate could be discriminated statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) better in the MRI as compared to CT with best judgement for the sagittal MRI. The interobserver variation for the definition of the prostatic apex was statistically significant (p = 0.009) smaller for the sagittal MRI compared to axial MRI and CT. On the average the apex as determined by sagittal MRI, axial MRI and CT was located 29 mm, 27 mm and 24 mm above the intertrochanteric line. The apex defined by CT would have led to an additional treatment of 6-13 mm in 10/22 patients compared to the sagittal MRI, defined by axial MRI only in five patients. Additional MRI provides a superior anatomic information especially in the apical portion of the prostate. It should be recommended for every single patient in the treatment planning process. It helps to avoid an unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissue and could lead to a decrease of anal side effects and radiation-induced impotency due to a reduction of the extent of irradiated penile structures.</abstract><cop>München</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12082686</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00066-002-0907-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-7158
ispartof Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2002-05, Vol.178 (5), p.263-268
issn 0179-7158
1439-099X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_593558
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Neoplasm Staging
Observer Variation
Prostate - pathology
Prostate - radiation effects
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy, Conformal
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Interobserver comparison of CT and MRI-based prostate apex definition: Clinical relevance for conformal radiotherapy treatment planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A52%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interobserver%20comparison%20of%20CT%20and%20MRI-based%20prostate%20apex%20definition:%20Clinical%20relevance%20for%20conformal%20radiotherapy%20treatment%20planning&rft.jtitle=Strahlentherapie%20und%20Onkologie&rft.au=WACHTER,%20Stefan&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=263-268&rft.issn=0179-7158&rft.eissn=1439-099X&rft.coden=STONE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00066-002-0907-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2449166621%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888529935&rft_id=info:pmid/12082686&rfr_iscdi=true