A population-based binational register for monitoring long-term outcome and possible disease concordance among blood donors and recipients

Background and Objectives  Even with appropriate donor deferrals and advanced screening tests, the risk of disease transmission through blood transfusion cannot be completely disregarded. Efficient monitoring of possible disease transmission between blood donors and recipients should be an important...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vox sanguinis 2006-11, Vol.91 (4), p.316-323
Hauptverfasser: Edgren, G., Hjalgrim, H., Tran, T. N., Rostgaard, K., Shanwell, A., Titlestad, K., Jakobsson, L., Gridley, G., Wideroff, L., Jersild, C., Adami, J., Melbye, M., Reilly, M., Nyrén, O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives  Even with appropriate donor deferrals and advanced screening tests, the risk of disease transmission through blood transfusion cannot be completely disregarded. Efficient monitoring of possible disease transmission between blood donors and recipients should be an important component of a comprehensive haemovigilance system. Materials and Methods  We assembled the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusions (SCANDAT) database, with data on virtually all blood donors and recipients who have been registered at least once in any of the computerized local blood bank databases in Sweden and Denmark since the start of computerized registration in 1966. The records of these individuals, with their entire computerized donation and/or transfusion histories and all donor‐component‐recipient connections, were linked to nationwide population and health registers to attain essentially complete follow‐up for up to 36 years regarding reproduction, hospital morbidity, cancer, and death. Results  After data cleaning, the database contained 1 134 290 blood donors who contributed 15 091 280 records of donations and 1 311 079 recipients who received 11 693 844 transfusions. The data quality in the existing data sources was satisfactory. From the data obtained from local blood banks, 4·6%, 1·6%, and 6·4% of the person, donation, and transfusion records, respectively, had to be discarded after review of the legitimacy of recorded values, and comparisons with independent, external databases. Conclusion  It is possible to use existing computerized data, collected in routine health care, in haemovigilance systems for monitoring long‐term outcome and disease concordance in blood donors and transfusion recipients.
ISSN:0042-9007
1423-0410
DOI:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00827.x