Modeling non-random deletions in cancer
Abstract Chromosome deletions do abound in cancer and are detected in certain regions in a non-random manner. Although their relevance remains elusive, it is a general agreement that segmental losses provide the cell with selective growth advantage. Consequently these may contain genes and/or regula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in cancer biology 2007-02, Vol.17 (1), p.19-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Seminars in cancer biology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Kost-Alimova, Maria Imreh, Stefan |
description | Abstract Chromosome deletions do abound in cancer and are detected in certain regions in a non-random manner. Although their relevance remains elusive, it is a general agreement that segmental losses provide the cell with selective growth advantage. Consequently these may contain genes and/or regulatory sequences that control normal growth and inhibit malignancy. We have developed a monochromosomal hybrid based experimental model for the generation and functional analysis of deletions, that is called “elimination test” (Et). Focused on human chromosome 3 – that was known to carry multiple 3p deletions – the Et was expected to restrict a 3p tumor suppressor region to a sufficiently small segment that permits the selection of a critically important candidate gene. Surprisingly, we detected three regions that were lost in all or majority of tumors: CER1 (3p21.3, Mb: 43.32–45.74), CER2 (3p22, Mb: 37.83–39.06) and FER (3p14.3-p21.2, Mb: 50.12–58.03). In contrast a 3q26-qter region (CRR) was regularly retained. CER1 – our main focus – contains multiple genes that may inhibit tumor growth, but 3 genes, RIS1 , LF ( LTF ) and LIMD1 have already the necessary experimental support to be considered bona fide tumor suppressors. Tumor suppressor region borders display instability features including: (1) they break in evolution and in tumors, (2) they evolve horizontally, and (3) they are enriched with pseudogene insertions. The most remarkable features at the breakpoint cluster regions were segmental duplications that drive horizontal evolution and contribute to cancer associated instability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_572478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1044579X06001179</els_id><sourcerecordid>68429611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e15c833bd714e5c8bae305487e43f4d37c13ad1dd826c5eb1dd2c931d6b656523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhhtR3A_9CzonPXVblc_ui7AsugorHlTwFrqTGslsdzIm08r-e9P0uAuC6CkvleetCnmrqp4jNAioXu2aTJPtg6XUMADVIDYA_EF1itCpmisJDxctRC119_WkOst5BwCdQPG4OkGNWpTb0-rlh-ho9OHbJsRQpz64OG1KhQ4-hrzxYbNOeVI92vZjpqfH87z68vbN58t39fXHq_eXF9e1lYIdakJpW84Hp1FQkUNPHKRoNQm-FY5ri7x36FzLlJU0FMVsx9GpQUklGT-v6rVv_kn7eTD75Kc-3ZrYe3Ms3RRFRmomdFv49q_8PkV3b_ptRCZ5h2Kxvlithfs-Uz6YyWdL49gHinM2qhWsU4j_BBkw3TIGBdQraFPMOdH27jkIZsnN7MxdbmbJzSCakltxPjuOmIeJ3L3vGFQBLlaAyuf_8MWerafSx_lE9mBc9P8x5PUfPWxJ3tt-vKFbyrs4p1CyNWgyM2A-LeuzbA8oAETd8V_t5cJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20278220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling non-random deletions in cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kost-Alimova, Maria ; Imreh, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kost-Alimova, Maria ; Imreh, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Chromosome deletions do abound in cancer and are detected in certain regions in a non-random manner. Although their relevance remains elusive, it is a general agreement that segmental losses provide the cell with selective growth advantage. Consequently these may contain genes and/or regulatory sequences that control normal growth and inhibit malignancy. We have developed a monochromosomal hybrid based experimental model for the generation and functional analysis of deletions, that is called “elimination test” (Et). Focused on human chromosome 3 – that was known to carry multiple 3p deletions – the Et was expected to restrict a 3p tumor suppressor region to a sufficiently small segment that permits the selection of a critically important candidate gene. Surprisingly, we detected three regions that were lost in all or majority of tumors: CER1 (3p21.3, Mb: 43.32–45.74), CER2 (3p22, Mb: 37.83–39.06) and FER (3p14.3-p21.2, Mb: 50.12–58.03). In contrast a 3q26-qter region (CRR) was regularly retained. CER1 – our main focus – contains multiple genes that may inhibit tumor growth, but 3 genes, RIS1 , LF ( LTF ) and LIMD1 have already the necessary experimental support to be considered bona fide tumor suppressors. Tumor suppressor region borders display instability features including: (1) they break in evolution and in tumors, (2) they evolve horizontally, and (3) they are enriched with pseudogene insertions. The most remarkable features at the breakpoint cluster regions were segmental duplications that drive horizontal evolution and contribute to cancer associated instability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-579X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-3650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17174104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Chromosome 3 ; Chromosome Deletion ; Chromosome Mapping ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3 ; Deletion ; Elimination test ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary plasticity ; Gene Deletion ; Genes, Tumor Suppressor ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Mice ; Models, Genetic ; Neoplasms - genetics ; Pseudogenes</subject><ispartof>Seminars in cancer biology, 2007-02, Vol.17 (1), p.19-30</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e15c833bd714e5c8bae305487e43f4d37c13ad1dd826c5eb1dd2c931d6b656523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e15c833bd714e5c8bae305487e43f4d37c13ad1dd826c5eb1dd2c931d6b656523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17174104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:12539148$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kost-Alimova, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imreh, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling non-random deletions in cancer</title><title>Seminars in cancer biology</title><addtitle>Semin Cancer Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Chromosome deletions do abound in cancer and are detected in certain regions in a non-random manner. Although their relevance remains elusive, it is a general agreement that segmental losses provide the cell with selective growth advantage. Consequently these may contain genes and/or regulatory sequences that control normal growth and inhibit malignancy. We have developed a monochromosomal hybrid based experimental model for the generation and functional analysis of deletions, that is called “elimination test” (Et). Focused on human chromosome 3 – that was known to carry multiple 3p deletions – the Et was expected to restrict a 3p tumor suppressor region to a sufficiently small segment that permits the selection of a critically important candidate gene. Surprisingly, we detected three regions that were lost in all or majority of tumors: CER1 (3p21.3, Mb: 43.32–45.74), CER2 (3p22, Mb: 37.83–39.06) and FER (3p14.3-p21.2, Mb: 50.12–58.03). In contrast a 3q26-qter region (CRR) was regularly retained. CER1 – our main focus – contains multiple genes that may inhibit tumor growth, but 3 genes, RIS1 , LF ( LTF ) and LIMD1 have already the necessary experimental support to be considered bona fide tumor suppressors. Tumor suppressor region borders display instability features including: (1) they break in evolution and in tumors, (2) they evolve horizontally, and (3) they are enriched with pseudogene insertions. The most remarkable features at the breakpoint cluster regions were segmental duplications that drive horizontal evolution and contribute to cancer associated instability.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Chromosome 3</subject><subject>Chromosome Deletion</subject><subject>Chromosome Mapping</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3</subject><subject>Deletion</subject><subject>Elimination test</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary plasticity</subject><subject>Gene Deletion</subject><subject>Genes, Tumor Suppressor</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Pseudogenes</subject><issn>1044-579X</issn><issn>1096-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhhtR3A_9CzonPXVblc_ui7AsugorHlTwFrqTGslsdzIm08r-e9P0uAuC6CkvleetCnmrqp4jNAioXu2aTJPtg6XUMADVIDYA_EF1itCpmisJDxctRC119_WkOst5BwCdQPG4OkGNWpTb0-rlh-ho9OHbJsRQpz64OG1KhQ4-hrzxYbNOeVI92vZjpqfH87z68vbN58t39fXHq_eXF9e1lYIdakJpW84Hp1FQkUNPHKRoNQm-FY5ri7x36FzLlJU0FMVsx9GpQUklGT-v6rVv_kn7eTD75Kc-3ZrYe3Ms3RRFRmomdFv49q_8PkV3b_ptRCZ5h2Kxvlithfs-Uz6YyWdL49gHinM2qhWsU4j_BBkw3TIGBdQraFPMOdH27jkIZsnN7MxdbmbJzSCakltxPjuOmIeJ3L3vGFQBLlaAyuf_8MWerafSx_lE9mBc9P8x5PUfPWxJ3tt-vKFbyrs4p1CyNWgyM2A-LeuzbA8oAETd8V_t5cJw</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Kost-Alimova, Maria</creator><creator>Imreh, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Modeling non-random deletions in cancer</title><author>Kost-Alimova, Maria ; Imreh, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e15c833bd714e5c8bae305487e43f4d37c13ad1dd826c5eb1dd2c931d6b656523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Chromosome 3</topic><topic>Chromosome Deletion</topic><topic>Chromosome Mapping</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3</topic><topic>Deletion</topic><topic>Elimination test</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary plasticity</topic><topic>Gene Deletion</topic><topic>Genes, Tumor Suppressor</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Pseudogenes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kost-Alimova, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imreh, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Seminars in cancer biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kost-Alimova, Maria</au><au>Imreh, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling non-random deletions in cancer</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in cancer biology</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Cancer Biol</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>19-30</pages><issn>1044-579X</issn><eissn>1096-3650</eissn><abstract>Abstract Chromosome deletions do abound in cancer and are detected in certain regions in a non-random manner. Although their relevance remains elusive, it is a general agreement that segmental losses provide the cell with selective growth advantage. Consequently these may contain genes and/or regulatory sequences that control normal growth and inhibit malignancy. We have developed a monochromosomal hybrid based experimental model for the generation and functional analysis of deletions, that is called “elimination test” (Et). Focused on human chromosome 3 – that was known to carry multiple 3p deletions – the Et was expected to restrict a 3p tumor suppressor region to a sufficiently small segment that permits the selection of a critically important candidate gene. Surprisingly, we detected three regions that were lost in all or majority of tumors: CER1 (3p21.3, Mb: 43.32–45.74), CER2 (3p22, Mb: 37.83–39.06) and FER (3p14.3-p21.2, Mb: 50.12–58.03). In contrast a 3q26-qter region (CRR) was regularly retained. CER1 – our main focus – contains multiple genes that may inhibit tumor growth, but 3 genes, RIS1 , LF ( LTF ) and LIMD1 have already the necessary experimental support to be considered bona fide tumor suppressors. Tumor suppressor region borders display instability features including: (1) they break in evolution and in tumors, (2) they evolve horizontally, and (3) they are enriched with pseudogene insertions. The most remarkable features at the breakpoint cluster regions were segmental duplications that drive horizontal evolution and contribute to cancer associated instability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17174104</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1044-579X |
ispartof | Seminars in cancer biology, 2007-02, Vol.17 (1), p.19-30 |
issn | 1044-579X 1096-3650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_572478 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Cell Line, Tumor Chromosome 3 Chromosome Deletion Chromosome Mapping Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3 Deletion Elimination test Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary plasticity Gene Deletion Genes, Tumor Suppressor Genetic Predisposition to Disease Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Medicin och hälsovetenskap Mice Models, Genetic Neoplasms - genetics Pseudogenes |
title | Modeling non-random deletions in cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20non-random%20deletions%20in%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20cancer%20biology&rft.au=Kost-Alimova,%20Maria&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=19-30&rft.issn=1044-579X&rft.eissn=1096-3650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E68429611%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20278220&rft_id=info:pmid/17174104&rft_els_id=S1044579X06001179&rfr_iscdi=true |