Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA

This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations from a consultation held in New York City, USA (31 January-2 February 2006) organized by the joint World Health Organization-United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV Vaccine Initiative and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The consu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS (London) 2007-02, Vol.21 (4), p.539-546
1. Verfasser: Osmanov, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 4
container_start_page 539
container_title AIDS (London)
container_volume 21
creator Osmanov, S
description This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations from a consultation held in New York City, USA (31 January-2 February 2006) organized by the joint World Health Organization-United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV Vaccine Initiative and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The consultation discussed issues related to the design and implementation of phase IIB 'test of concept' trials (phase IIB-TOC), also referred to as 'proof of concept' trials, in evaluating candidate HIV vaccines and their implications for future approval and licensure. The results of a single phase IIB-TOC trial would not be expected to provide sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy required for licensure. In many instances, phase IIB-TOC trials may be undertaken relatively early in development, before manufacturing processes and capacity are developed sufficiently to distribute the vaccine on a large scale. However, experts at this meeting considered the pressure that could arise, particularly in regions hardest hit by AIDS, if a phase IIB-TOC trial showed high levels of efficacy. The group largely agreed that full-scale phase III trials would still be necessary to demonstrate that the vaccine candidate was safe and effective, but emphasized that governments and organizations conducting trials should consider these issues in advance. The recommendations from this meeting should be helpful for all organizations involved in HIV vaccine trials, in particular for the national regulatory authorities in assessing the utility of phase IIB-TOC trials in the overall HIV vaccine research and development process.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011a0c9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_571616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21057269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-876efa4d8822a1ac51d6aab7419e73a89fa0b6ba2e9cf5d39dbc93cf24a13eca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1u1DAQhXMBoqXwBgjNFb3ZdMfO_-Wybdmgqgtqt4iraOJM2tD8YSdp-7i8Cd7uCiRukEbyyPrO-Gh8HOedwBOBSTT_ujg9wRyFx56MUQhClbxwDlGGiZt4ER44r435gYgBxvEr50BEHooglofOr7NHVuNQTQxmbBrST0BtAZpV1zTcFjRUXWug1F0Dwx3Dt9V6vrlcpKdX83RxkwI_9qwHuNXd2IOy6FgPzxqwdfzljgxDmn50r9dLGHRFtQGyBW03cQ1m0DTw7ROUnQaeqB732hJ6zRO3z8ZW6Q1MpFTVsjmegSfgM7WjtepKOOdcb1uQiOEMtp5mcMkP8L3T9zPYXC3eOC9L-yy_3Z9Hzub87Hq5ci_Wn9Ll4sJVvsTBjaOQS_KLOJaSBKlAFCFRHvki4cijOCkJ8zAnyYkqg8JLilwlniqlT3btirwjx93NNQ_cj3nW62q7zqyjKttf3duOsyASoQgt_2HH97r7ObIZsqYyiuuaWu5Gk4UJoo-B-C8oBQaR_WkL-jtQ6c4YzeUfDwKzbU4ym5Ps35xY2fv9_DFvuPgr2ofE-w10fr2H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21057269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Osmanov, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Osmanov, S ; WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI International Expert Group</creatorcontrib><description>This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations from a consultation held in New York City, USA (31 January-2 February 2006) organized by the joint World Health Organization-United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV Vaccine Initiative and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The consultation discussed issues related to the design and implementation of phase IIB 'test of concept' trials (phase IIB-TOC), also referred to as 'proof of concept' trials, in evaluating candidate HIV vaccines and their implications for future approval and licensure. The results of a single phase IIB-TOC trial would not be expected to provide sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy required for licensure. In many instances, phase IIB-TOC trials may be undertaken relatively early in development, before manufacturing processes and capacity are developed sufficiently to distribute the vaccine on a large scale. However, experts at this meeting considered the pressure that could arise, particularly in regions hardest hit by AIDS, if a phase IIB-TOC trial showed high levels of efficacy. The group largely agreed that full-scale phase III trials would still be necessary to demonstrate that the vaccine candidate was safe and effective, but emphasized that governments and organizations conducting trials should consider these issues in advance. The recommendations from this meeting should be helpful for all organizations involved in HIV vaccine trials, in particular for the national regulatory authorities in assessing the utility of phase IIB-TOC trials in the overall HIV vaccine research and development process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011a0c9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17301582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>AIDS Vaccines ; AIDS/HIV ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Research Design</subject><ispartof>AIDS (London), 2007-02, Vol.21 (4), p.539-546</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-876efa4d8822a1ac51d6aab7419e73a89fa0b6ba2e9cf5d39dbc93cf24a13eca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-876efa4d8822a1ac51d6aab7419e73a89fa0b6ba2e9cf5d39dbc93cf24a13eca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17301582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:12154816$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osmanov, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI International Expert Group</creatorcontrib><title>Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA</title><title>AIDS (London)</title><addtitle>AIDS</addtitle><description>This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations from a consultation held in New York City, USA (31 January-2 February 2006) organized by the joint World Health Organization-United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV Vaccine Initiative and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The consultation discussed issues related to the design and implementation of phase IIB 'test of concept' trials (phase IIB-TOC), also referred to as 'proof of concept' trials, in evaluating candidate HIV vaccines and their implications for future approval and licensure. The results of a single phase IIB-TOC trial would not be expected to provide sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy required for licensure. In many instances, phase IIB-TOC trials may be undertaken relatively early in development, before manufacturing processes and capacity are developed sufficiently to distribute the vaccine on a large scale. However, experts at this meeting considered the pressure that could arise, particularly in regions hardest hit by AIDS, if a phase IIB-TOC trial showed high levels of efficacy. The group largely agreed that full-scale phase III trials would still be necessary to demonstrate that the vaccine candidate was safe and effective, but emphasized that governments and organizations conducting trials should consider these issues in advance. The recommendations from this meeting should be helpful for all organizations involved in HIV vaccine trials, in particular for the national regulatory authorities in assessing the utility of phase IIB-TOC trials in the overall HIV vaccine research and development process.</description><subject>AIDS Vaccines</subject><subject>AIDS/HIV</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><issn>0269-9370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1u1DAQhXMBoqXwBgjNFb3ZdMfO_-Wybdmgqgtqt4iraOJM2tD8YSdp-7i8Cd7uCiRukEbyyPrO-Gh8HOedwBOBSTT_ujg9wRyFx56MUQhClbxwDlGGiZt4ER44r435gYgBxvEr50BEHooglofOr7NHVuNQTQxmbBrST0BtAZpV1zTcFjRUXWug1F0Dwx3Dt9V6vrlcpKdX83RxkwI_9qwHuNXd2IOy6FgPzxqwdfzljgxDmn50r9dLGHRFtQGyBW03cQ1m0DTw7ROUnQaeqB732hJ6zRO3z8ZW6Q1MpFTVsjmegSfgM7WjtepKOOdcb1uQiOEMtp5mcMkP8L3T9zPYXC3eOC9L-yy_3Z9Hzub87Hq5ci_Wn9Ll4sJVvsTBjaOQS_KLOJaSBKlAFCFRHvki4cijOCkJ8zAnyYkqg8JLilwlniqlT3btirwjx93NNQ_cj3nW62q7zqyjKttf3duOsyASoQgt_2HH97r7ObIZsqYyiuuaWu5Gk4UJoo-B-C8oBQaR_WkL-jtQ6c4YzeUfDwKzbU4ym5Ps35xY2fv9_DFvuPgr2ofE-w10fr2H</recordid><startdate>20070219</startdate><enddate>20070219</enddate><creator>Osmanov, S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070219</creationdate><title>Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA</title><author>Osmanov, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-876efa4d8822a1ac51d6aab7419e73a89fa0b6ba2e9cf5d39dbc93cf24a13eca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>AIDS Vaccines</topic><topic>AIDS/HIV</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osmanov, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI International Expert Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>AIDS (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osmanov, S</au><aucorp>WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI International Expert Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA</atitle><jtitle>AIDS (London)</jtitle><addtitle>AIDS</addtitle><date>2007-02-19</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>539-546</pages><issn>0269-9370</issn><abstract>This report summarizes the discussions and recommendations from a consultation held in New York City, USA (31 January-2 February 2006) organized by the joint World Health Organization-United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV Vaccine Initiative and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The consultation discussed issues related to the design and implementation of phase IIB 'test of concept' trials (phase IIB-TOC), also referred to as 'proof of concept' trials, in evaluating candidate HIV vaccines and their implications for future approval and licensure. The results of a single phase IIB-TOC trial would not be expected to provide sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy required for licensure. In many instances, phase IIB-TOC trials may be undertaken relatively early in development, before manufacturing processes and capacity are developed sufficiently to distribute the vaccine on a large scale. However, experts at this meeting considered the pressure that could arise, particularly in regions hardest hit by AIDS, if a phase IIB-TOC trial showed high levels of efficacy. The group largely agreed that full-scale phase III trials would still be necessary to demonstrate that the vaccine candidate was safe and effective, but emphasized that governments and organizations conducting trials should consider these issues in advance. The recommendations from this meeting should be helpful for all organizations involved in HIV vaccine trials, in particular for the national regulatory authorities in assessing the utility of phase IIB-TOC trials in the overall HIV vaccine research and development process.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17301582</pmid><doi>10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011a0c9</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9370
ispartof AIDS (London), 2007-02, Vol.21 (4), p.539-546
issn 0269-9370
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_571616
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects AIDS Vaccines
AIDS/HIV
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods
Evaluation Studies as Topic
HIV Infections - prevention & control
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
International Cooperation
Research Design
title Executive summary and recommendations from the WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI expert group consultation on 'Phase IIB-TOC trials as a novel strategy for evaluation of preventive HIV vaccines', 31 January-2 February 2006, IAVI, New York, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A21%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Executive%20summary%20and%20recommendations%20from%20the%20WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI%20expert%20group%20consultation%20on%20'Phase%20IIB-TOC%20trials%20as%20a%20novel%20strategy%20for%20evaluation%20of%20preventive%20HIV%20vaccines',%2031%20January-2%20February%202006,%20IAVI,%20New%20York,%20USA&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20(London)&rft.au=Osmanov,%20S&rft.aucorp=WHO/UNAIDS/IAVI%20International%20Expert%20Group&rft.date=2007-02-19&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=539-546&rft.issn=0269-9370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011a0c9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E21057269%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21057269&rft_id=info:pmid/17301582&rfr_iscdi=true