Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in mode-of-action based risk and safety assessments to estimate internal dosimetry in animals and humans. When used in risk assessment, these models can provide a basis for extrapolating between species, doses, and exposure routes or for j...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicological Sciences 2007-10, Vol.99 (2), p.395-402
Hauptverfasser: Barton, Hugh A., Chiu, Weihsueh A., Woodrow Setzer, R., Andersen, Melvin E., Bailer, A. John, Bois, Frédéric Y., DeWoskin, Robert S., Hays, Sean, Johanson, Gunnar, Jones, Nancy, Loizou, George, MacPhail, Robert C., Portier, Christopher J., Spendiff, Martin, Tan, Yu-Mei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 402
container_issue 2
container_start_page 395
container_title Toxicological Sciences
container_volume 99
creator Barton, Hugh A.
Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Woodrow Setzer, R.
Andersen, Melvin E.
Bailer, A. John
Bois, Frédéric Y.
DeWoskin, Robert S.
Hays, Sean
Johanson, Gunnar
Jones, Nancy
Loizou, George
MacPhail, Robert C.
Portier, Christopher J.
Spendiff, Martin
Tan, Yu-Mei
description Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in mode-of-action based risk and safety assessments to estimate internal dosimetry in animals and humans. When used in risk assessment, these models can provide a basis for extrapolating between species, doses, and exposure routes or for justifying nondefault values for uncertainty factors. Characterization of uncertainty and variability is increasingly recognized as important for risk assessment; this represents a continuing challenge for both PBPK modelers and users. Current practices show significant progress in specifying deterministic biological models and nondeterministic (often statistical) models, estimating parameters using diverse data sets from multiple sources, using them to make predictions, and characterizing uncertainty and variability of model parameters and predictions. The International Workshop on Uncertainty and Variability in PBPK Models, held 31 Oct–2 Nov 2006, identified the state-of-the-science, needed changes in practice and implementation, and research priorities. For the short term, these include (1) multidisciplinary teams to integrate deterministic and nondeterministic/statistical models; (2) broader use of sensitivity analyses, including for structural and global (rather than local) parameter changes; and (3) enhanced transparency and reproducibility through improved documentation of model structure(s), parameter values, sensitivity and other analyses, and supporting, discrepant, or excluded data. Longer-term needs include (1) theoretical and practical methodological improvements for nondeterministic/statistical modeling; (2) better methods for evaluating alternative model structures; (3) peer-reviewed databases of parameters and covariates, and their distributions; (4) expanded coverage of PBPK models across chemicals with different properties; and (5) training and reference materials, such as cases studies, bibliographies/glossaries, model repositories, and enhanced software. The multidisciplinary dialogue initiated by this Workshop will foster the collaboration, research, data collection, and training necessary to make characterizing uncertainty and variability a standard practice in PBPK modeling and risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/toxsci/kfm100
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_570277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/toxsci/kfm100</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20335695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-523efb89b003212f4ba96b38d79c5afdc98a7b784c0eb06a962771edb50483873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIu8QiwY6sc4jtm1w2MqzRTUUoTYWI5z0zGTxMH2QIefwq_FbUJHLFBXto-_c2xf3yx7SvArgiU7jO4qGHu4rluC8b1sP4n5BEsq74_zHBd4L3sUwjeMCcmxfJjtETEtGKFkP_s9W2mvTQRvf9nuEl10BnzUtotbpLsKfdbe6tI2Nq1thz6utsG6xl1ao5tmi451gCqp2rfauLXtIFqDlq6CJrxG51FHQK5GcQXo3FhI4TeppwBVQLXz6AwCaG9WN_JJ2zfQQpds1nWPswe1bgI8GceD7OLd20-z-WTx4f3J7GgxMZyLOOGUQV0WssSYUULraallXrKiEtJwXVdGFlqUopgaDCXO0yYVgkBVcpyKUAh2kE2G3PAT-k2pem9b7bfKaatGaZ1moLjAyZp4-V--967amf4ar8vOp3jKkvfl4F3p5h_j_GihUvW8DQqnX2NY8B8k4c8HPOV-30CIqrXBQNPoDtwmqLygklJc3AlSzBjPJd891ngXgof69hYEq-uGUkNDqaGhEv9sDN6ULVQ7euygBLwYALfp78waz7YhwtUtrP1a5YIJruZfvqrTxfJssWRUvWF_AAn_6Vo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20335695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Barton, Hugh A. ; Chiu, Weihsueh A. ; Woodrow Setzer, R. ; Andersen, Melvin E. ; Bailer, A. John ; Bois, Frédéric Y. ; DeWoskin, Robert S. ; Hays, Sean ; Johanson, Gunnar ; Jones, Nancy ; Loizou, George ; MacPhail, Robert C. ; Portier, Christopher J. ; Spendiff, Martin ; Tan, Yu-Mei</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh A. ; Chiu, Weihsueh A. ; Woodrow Setzer, R. ; Andersen, Melvin E. ; Bailer, A. John ; Bois, Frédéric Y. ; DeWoskin, Robert S. ; Hays, Sean ; Johanson, Gunnar ; Jones, Nancy ; Loizou, George ; MacPhail, Robert C. ; Portier, Christopher J. ; Spendiff, Martin ; Tan, Yu-Mei</creatorcontrib><description>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in mode-of-action based risk and safety assessments to estimate internal dosimetry in animals and humans. When used in risk assessment, these models can provide a basis for extrapolating between species, doses, and exposure routes or for justifying nondefault values for uncertainty factors. Characterization of uncertainty and variability is increasingly recognized as important for risk assessment; this represents a continuing challenge for both PBPK modelers and users. Current practices show significant progress in specifying deterministic biological models and nondeterministic (often statistical) models, estimating parameters using diverse data sets from multiple sources, using them to make predictions, and characterizing uncertainty and variability of model parameters and predictions. The International Workshop on Uncertainty and Variability in PBPK Models, held 31 Oct–2 Nov 2006, identified the state-of-the-science, needed changes in practice and implementation, and research priorities. For the short term, these include (1) multidisciplinary teams to integrate deterministic and nondeterministic/statistical models; (2) broader use of sensitivity analyses, including for structural and global (rather than local) parameter changes; and (3) enhanced transparency and reproducibility through improved documentation of model structure(s), parameter values, sensitivity and other analyses, and supporting, discrepant, or excluded data. Longer-term needs include (1) theoretical and practical methodological improvements for nondeterministic/statistical modeling; (2) better methods for evaluating alternative model structures; (3) peer-reviewed databases of parameters and covariates, and their distributions; (4) expanded coverage of PBPK models across chemicals with different properties; and (5) training and reference materials, such as cases studies, bibliographies/glossaries, model repositories, and enhanced software. The multidisciplinary dialogue initiated by this Workshop will foster the collaboration, research, data collection, and training necessary to make characterizing uncertainty and variability a standard practice in PBPK modeling and risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-6099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm100</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17483121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bayesian models ; Calibration ; Environmental Sciences ; Humans ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Models, Biological ; nonlinear modeling ; Pharmacokinetics ; physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling ; population variability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Toxicological Sciences, 2007-10, Vol.99 (2), p.395-402</ispartof><rights>The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-523efb89b003212f4ba96b38d79c5afdc98a7b784c0eb06a962771edb50483873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-523efb89b003212f4ba96b38d79c5afdc98a7b784c0eb06a962771edb50483873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1585,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17483121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://ineris.hal.science/ineris-00963075$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:116054043$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Weihsueh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodrow Setzer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Melvin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailer, A. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bois, Frédéric Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeWoskin, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johanson, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loizou, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacPhail, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spendiff, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yu-Mei</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation</title><title>Toxicological Sciences</title><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><description>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in mode-of-action based risk and safety assessments to estimate internal dosimetry in animals and humans. When used in risk assessment, these models can provide a basis for extrapolating between species, doses, and exposure routes or for justifying nondefault values for uncertainty factors. Characterization of uncertainty and variability is increasingly recognized as important for risk assessment; this represents a continuing challenge for both PBPK modelers and users. Current practices show significant progress in specifying deterministic biological models and nondeterministic (often statistical) models, estimating parameters using diverse data sets from multiple sources, using them to make predictions, and characterizing uncertainty and variability of model parameters and predictions. The International Workshop on Uncertainty and Variability in PBPK Models, held 31 Oct–2 Nov 2006, identified the state-of-the-science, needed changes in practice and implementation, and research priorities. For the short term, these include (1) multidisciplinary teams to integrate deterministic and nondeterministic/statistical models; (2) broader use of sensitivity analyses, including for structural and global (rather than local) parameter changes; and (3) enhanced transparency and reproducibility through improved documentation of model structure(s), parameter values, sensitivity and other analyses, and supporting, discrepant, or excluded data. Longer-term needs include (1) theoretical and practical methodological improvements for nondeterministic/statistical modeling; (2) better methods for evaluating alternative model structures; (3) peer-reviewed databases of parameters and covariates, and their distributions; (4) expanded coverage of PBPK models across chemicals with different properties; and (5) training and reference materials, such as cases studies, bibliographies/glossaries, model repositories, and enhanced software. The multidisciplinary dialogue initiated by this Workshop will foster the collaboration, research, data collection, and training necessary to make characterizing uncertainty and variability a standard practice in PBPK modeling and risk assessment.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayesian models</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>nonlinear modeling</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling</subject><subject>population variability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><issn>1096-6099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIu8QiwY6sc4jtm1w2MqzRTUUoTYWI5z0zGTxMH2QIefwq_FbUJHLFBXto-_c2xf3yx7SvArgiU7jO4qGHu4rluC8b1sP4n5BEsq74_zHBd4L3sUwjeMCcmxfJjtETEtGKFkP_s9W2mvTQRvf9nuEl10BnzUtotbpLsKfdbe6tI2Nq1thz6utsG6xl1ao5tmi451gCqp2rfauLXtIFqDlq6CJrxG51FHQK5GcQXo3FhI4TeppwBVQLXz6AwCaG9WN_JJ2zfQQpds1nWPswe1bgI8GceD7OLd20-z-WTx4f3J7GgxMZyLOOGUQV0WssSYUULraallXrKiEtJwXVdGFlqUopgaDCXO0yYVgkBVcpyKUAh2kE2G3PAT-k2pem9b7bfKaatGaZ1moLjAyZp4-V--967amf4ar8vOp3jKkvfl4F3p5h_j_GihUvW8DQqnX2NY8B8k4c8HPOV-30CIqrXBQNPoDtwmqLygklJc3AlSzBjPJd891ngXgof69hYEq-uGUkNDqaGhEv9sDN6ULVQ7euygBLwYALfp78waz7YhwtUtrP1a5YIJruZfvqrTxfJssWRUvWF_AAn_6Vo</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Barton, Hugh A.</creator><creator>Chiu, Weihsueh A.</creator><creator>Woodrow Setzer, R.</creator><creator>Andersen, Melvin E.</creator><creator>Bailer, A. John</creator><creator>Bois, Frédéric Y.</creator><creator>DeWoskin, Robert S.</creator><creator>Hays, Sean</creator><creator>Johanson, Gunnar</creator><creator>Jones, Nancy</creator><creator>Loizou, George</creator><creator>MacPhail, Robert C.</creator><creator>Portier, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Spendiff, Martin</creator><creator>Tan, Yu-Mei</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation</title><author>Barton, Hugh A. ; Chiu, Weihsueh A. ; Woodrow Setzer, R. ; Andersen, Melvin E. ; Bailer, A. John ; Bois, Frédéric Y. ; DeWoskin, Robert S. ; Hays, Sean ; Johanson, Gunnar ; Jones, Nancy ; Loizou, George ; MacPhail, Robert C. ; Portier, Christopher J. ; Spendiff, Martin ; Tan, Yu-Mei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-523efb89b003212f4ba96b38d79c5afdc98a7b784c0eb06a962771edb50483873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayesian models</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>nonlinear modeling</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling</topic><topic>population variability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Hugh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Weihsueh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodrow Setzer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Melvin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailer, A. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bois, Frédéric Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeWoskin, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johanson, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loizou, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacPhail, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spendiff, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yu-Mei</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Toxicological Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Hugh A.</au><au>Chiu, Weihsueh A.</au><au>Woodrow Setzer, R.</au><au>Andersen, Melvin E.</au><au>Bailer, A. John</au><au>Bois, Frédéric Y.</au><au>DeWoskin, Robert S.</au><au>Hays, Sean</au><au>Johanson, Gunnar</au><au>Jones, Nancy</au><au>Loizou, George</au><au>MacPhail, Robert C.</au><au>Portier, Christopher J.</au><au>Spendiff, Martin</au><au>Tan, Yu-Mei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>395-402</pages><issn>1096-6080</issn><eissn>1096-0929</eissn><eissn>1096-6099</eissn><abstract>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in mode-of-action based risk and safety assessments to estimate internal dosimetry in animals and humans. When used in risk assessment, these models can provide a basis for extrapolating between species, doses, and exposure routes or for justifying nondefault values for uncertainty factors. Characterization of uncertainty and variability is increasingly recognized as important for risk assessment; this represents a continuing challenge for both PBPK modelers and users. Current practices show significant progress in specifying deterministic biological models and nondeterministic (often statistical) models, estimating parameters using diverse data sets from multiple sources, using them to make predictions, and characterizing uncertainty and variability of model parameters and predictions. The International Workshop on Uncertainty and Variability in PBPK Models, held 31 Oct–2 Nov 2006, identified the state-of-the-science, needed changes in practice and implementation, and research priorities. For the short term, these include (1) multidisciplinary teams to integrate deterministic and nondeterministic/statistical models; (2) broader use of sensitivity analyses, including for structural and global (rather than local) parameter changes; and (3) enhanced transparency and reproducibility through improved documentation of model structure(s), parameter values, sensitivity and other analyses, and supporting, discrepant, or excluded data. Longer-term needs include (1) theoretical and practical methodological improvements for nondeterministic/statistical modeling; (2) better methods for evaluating alternative model structures; (3) peer-reviewed databases of parameters and covariates, and their distributions; (4) expanded coverage of PBPK models across chemicals with different properties; and (5) training and reference materials, such as cases studies, bibliographies/glossaries, model repositories, and enhanced software. The multidisciplinary dialogue initiated by this Workshop will foster the collaboration, research, data collection, and training necessary to make characterizing uncertainty and variability a standard practice in PBPK modeling and risk assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17483121</pmid><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfm100</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-6080
ispartof Toxicological Sciences, 2007-10, Vol.99 (2), p.395-402
issn 1096-6080
1096-0929
1096-6099
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_570277
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animals
Bayesian models
Calibration
Environmental Sciences
Humans
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Models, Biological
nonlinear modeling
Pharmacokinetics
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling
population variability
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
uncertainty
title Characterizing Uncertainty and Variability in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models: State of the Science and Needs for Research and Implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T10%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Uncertainty%20and%20Variability%20in%20Physiologically%20Based%20Pharmacokinetic%20Models:%20State%20of%20the%20Science%20and%20Needs%20for%20Research%20and%20Implementation&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20Sciences&rft.au=Barton,%20Hugh%20A.&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=395-402&rft.issn=1096-6080&rft.eissn=1096-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfm100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E20335695%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20335695&rft_id=info:pmid/17483121&rft_oup_id=10.1093/toxsci/kfm100&rfr_iscdi=true