Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice
The inferior performance of DBA/2 mice when compared to C57BL/6 mice in hippocampus‐dependent behavioral tasks including contextual fear conditioning has been attributed to impaired hippocampal function. However, DBA/2J mice have been reported to perform similarly or even better than C57BL/6J mice i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hippocampus 2008-01, Vol.18 (1), p.11-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Hippocampus |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Baarendse, Petra J.J. van Grootheest, Gerard Jansen, René F. Pieneman, Anton W. Ögren, Sven Ove Verhage, Matthijs Stiedl, Oliver |
description | The inferior performance of DBA/2 mice when compared to C57BL/6 mice in hippocampus‐dependent behavioral tasks including contextual fear conditioning has been attributed to impaired hippocampal function. However, DBA/2J mice have been reported to perform similarly or even better than C57BL/6J mice in the passive avoidance (PA) task that most likely also depends on hippocampal function. The apparent discrepancy in PA versus fear conditioning performance in these two strains of mice was investigated using an automated PA system. The aim was to determine whether these two mouse strains utilize different strategies involving a different contribution of hippocampal mechanisms to encode PA. C57BL/6J mice exhibited significantly longer retention latencies than DBA/2J mice when tested 24 h after training irrespective of the circadian cycle. Dorsohippocampal NMDA receptor inhibition by local injection of the selective antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (AP5, 3.2 μg/mouse) before training resulted in impaired PA retention in C57BL/6J but not in DBA/2J mice. Furthermore, nonreinforced pre‐exposure to the PA system before training caused a latent inhibition‐like reduction of retention latencies in C57BL/6J, whereas it improved PA retention in DBA/2J mice. These pre‐exposure experiments facilitated the discrimination of hippocampal involvement without local pharmacological intervention. The results indicate differences in PA learning between these two strains based on a different NMDA receptor involvement in the dorsal hippocampus in this emotional learning task. We hypothesize that mouse strains can differ in their PA learning performance based on their relative ability to form associations on the basis of unisensory versus multisensory contextual/spatial cues that involve hippocampal processing. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hipo.20356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_568794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70153644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5196-2c124885a25751a7bad13e54008bee698a8e09e5ce5c344899daac9289c98d363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhaOqVaHQS39A5VMPlcJ64tixj3S3XUCoFAlEb5bjTIRLEod4s5R_X6cb4NRKljwef--NNC9JPgA9Akqzxa3r_VFGGRevkn2gSqZABXs91ZymSjDYS96F8ItSAE7p22QPCqEECLmf2JWraxyw2zjTENdtfbPFNj6Jr8nmFknlhxB_4ozeW9P2Y4gU6U0IbovEbL2rTGdxai55UTYLcUZMV5HVl-NFdkZaZ_EweVObJuD7-T5Irr99vVqepOcX69Pl8XlqOSiRZhayXEpuMl5wMEVpKmDIc0pliSiUNBKpQm7jYXkulaqMsSqTyipZMcEOknTnGx6wH0vdD641w6P2xum5dRcr1FzIQuWRV__k-8FXL6InIYDI4wqFitpPO20E70cMG926YLFpTId-DLqgwJnIpyGfd6AdfAgD1s9jgOopPj3Fp__GF-GPs-tYtli9oHNeEYAd8OAafPyPlT45_XHxZDqvxYUN_n7WmOFOi4IVXN98X-uf66WEy9WlluwPx0-0gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70153644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Baarendse, Petra J.J. ; van Grootheest, Gerard ; Jansen, René F. ; Pieneman, Anton W. ; Ögren, Sven Ove ; Verhage, Matthijs ; Stiedl, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Baarendse, Petra J.J. ; van Grootheest, Gerard ; Jansen, René F. ; Pieneman, Anton W. ; Ögren, Sven Ove ; Verhage, Matthijs ; Stiedl, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>The inferior performance of DBA/2 mice when compared to C57BL/6 mice in hippocampus‐dependent behavioral tasks including contextual fear conditioning has been attributed to impaired hippocampal function. However, DBA/2J mice have been reported to perform similarly or even better than C57BL/6J mice in the passive avoidance (PA) task that most likely also depends on hippocampal function. The apparent discrepancy in PA versus fear conditioning performance in these two strains of mice was investigated using an automated PA system. The aim was to determine whether these two mouse strains utilize different strategies involving a different contribution of hippocampal mechanisms to encode PA. C57BL/6J mice exhibited significantly longer retention latencies than DBA/2J mice when tested 24 h after training irrespective of the circadian cycle. Dorsohippocampal NMDA receptor inhibition by local injection of the selective antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (AP5, 3.2 μg/mouse) before training resulted in impaired PA retention in C57BL/6J but not in DBA/2J mice. Furthermore, nonreinforced pre‐exposure to the PA system before training caused a latent inhibition‐like reduction of retention latencies in C57BL/6J, whereas it improved PA retention in DBA/2J mice. These pre‐exposure experiments facilitated the discrimination of hippocampal involvement without local pharmacological intervention. The results indicate differences in PA learning between these two strains based on a different NMDA receptor involvement in the dorsal hippocampus in this emotional learning task. We hypothesize that mouse strains can differ in their PA learning performance based on their relative ability to form associations on the basis of unisensory versus multisensory contextual/spatial cues that involve hippocampal processing. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-9631</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1098-1063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17696168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate - pharmacology ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Avoidance Learning - drug effects ; Avoidance Learning - physiology ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Circadian Rhythm - drug effects ; Circadian Rhythm - physiology ; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - pharmacology ; fear conditioning ; Hippocampus - drug effects ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; latent inhibition ; learning and memory ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Inbred DBA ; multisensory associations ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Species Specificity ; strain comparison</subject><ispartof>Hippocampus, 2008-01, Vol.18 (1), p.11-19</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5196-2c124885a25751a7bad13e54008bee698a8e09e5ce5c344899daac9289c98d363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5196-2c124885a25751a7bad13e54008bee698a8e09e5ce5c344899daac9289c98d363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhipo.20356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhipo.20356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17696168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:116415069$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baarendse, Petra J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Grootheest, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, René F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieneman, Anton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ögren, Sven Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhage, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiedl, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice</title><title>Hippocampus</title><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><description>The inferior performance of DBA/2 mice when compared to C57BL/6 mice in hippocampus‐dependent behavioral tasks including contextual fear conditioning has been attributed to impaired hippocampal function. However, DBA/2J mice have been reported to perform similarly or even better than C57BL/6J mice in the passive avoidance (PA) task that most likely also depends on hippocampal function. The apparent discrepancy in PA versus fear conditioning performance in these two strains of mice was investigated using an automated PA system. The aim was to determine whether these two mouse strains utilize different strategies involving a different contribution of hippocampal mechanisms to encode PA. C57BL/6J mice exhibited significantly longer retention latencies than DBA/2J mice when tested 24 h after training irrespective of the circadian cycle. Dorsohippocampal NMDA receptor inhibition by local injection of the selective antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (AP5, 3.2 μg/mouse) before training resulted in impaired PA retention in C57BL/6J but not in DBA/2J mice. Furthermore, nonreinforced pre‐exposure to the PA system before training caused a latent inhibition‐like reduction of retention latencies in C57BL/6J, whereas it improved PA retention in DBA/2J mice. These pre‐exposure experiments facilitated the discrimination of hippocampal involvement without local pharmacological intervention. The results indicate differences in PA learning between these two strains based on a different NMDA receptor involvement in the dorsal hippocampus in this emotional learning task. We hypothesize that mouse strains can differ in their PA learning performance based on their relative ability to form associations on the basis of unisensory versus multisensory contextual/spatial cues that involve hippocampal processing. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate - pharmacology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm - drug effects</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm - physiology</subject><subject>Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>fear conditioning</subject><subject>Hippocampus - drug effects</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>latent inhibition</subject><subject>learning and memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred DBA</subject><subject>multisensory associations</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>strain comparison</subject><issn>1050-9631</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhaOqVaHQS39A5VMPlcJ64tixj3S3XUCoFAlEb5bjTIRLEod4s5R_X6cb4NRKljwef--NNC9JPgA9Akqzxa3r_VFGGRevkn2gSqZABXs91ZymSjDYS96F8ItSAE7p22QPCqEECLmf2JWraxyw2zjTENdtfbPFNj6Jr8nmFknlhxB_4ozeW9P2Y4gU6U0IbovEbL2rTGdxai55UTYLcUZMV5HVl-NFdkZaZ_EweVObJuD7-T5Irr99vVqepOcX69Pl8XlqOSiRZhayXEpuMl5wMEVpKmDIc0pliSiUNBKpQm7jYXkulaqMsSqTyipZMcEOknTnGx6wH0vdD641w6P2xum5dRcr1FzIQuWRV__k-8FXL6InIYDI4wqFitpPO20E70cMG926YLFpTId-DLqgwJnIpyGfd6AdfAgD1s9jgOopPj3Fp__GF-GPs-tYtli9oHNeEYAd8OAafPyPlT45_XHxZDqvxYUN_n7WmOFOi4IVXN98X-uf66WEy9WlluwPx0-0gw</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Baarendse, Petra J.J.</creator><creator>van Grootheest, Gerard</creator><creator>Jansen, René F.</creator><creator>Pieneman, Anton W.</creator><creator>Ögren, Sven Ove</creator><creator>Verhage, Matthijs</creator><creator>Stiedl, Oliver</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice</title><author>Baarendse, Petra J.J. ; van Grootheest, Gerard ; Jansen, René F. ; Pieneman, Anton W. ; Ögren, Sven Ove ; Verhage, Matthijs ; Stiedl, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5196-2c124885a25751a7bad13e54008bee698a8e09e5ce5c344899daac9289c98d363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate - pharmacology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm - drug effects</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm - physiology</topic><topic>Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>fear conditioning</topic><topic>Hippocampus - drug effects</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>latent inhibition</topic><topic>learning and memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred DBA</topic><topic>multisensory associations</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>strain comparison</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baarendse, Petra J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Grootheest, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, René F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieneman, Anton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ögren, Sven Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhage, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiedl, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baarendse, Petra J.J.</au><au>van Grootheest, Gerard</au><au>Jansen, René F.</au><au>Pieneman, Anton W.</au><au>Ögren, Sven Ove</au><au>Verhage, Matthijs</au><au>Stiedl, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice</atitle><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>11-19</pages><issn>1050-9631</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><eissn>1098-1063</eissn><abstract>The inferior performance of DBA/2 mice when compared to C57BL/6 mice in hippocampus‐dependent behavioral tasks including contextual fear conditioning has been attributed to impaired hippocampal function. However, DBA/2J mice have been reported to perform similarly or even better than C57BL/6J mice in the passive avoidance (PA) task that most likely also depends on hippocampal function. The apparent discrepancy in PA versus fear conditioning performance in these two strains of mice was investigated using an automated PA system. The aim was to determine whether these two mouse strains utilize different strategies involving a different contribution of hippocampal mechanisms to encode PA. C57BL/6J mice exhibited significantly longer retention latencies than DBA/2J mice when tested 24 h after training irrespective of the circadian cycle. Dorsohippocampal NMDA receptor inhibition by local injection of the selective antagonist DL‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (AP5, 3.2 μg/mouse) before training resulted in impaired PA retention in C57BL/6J but not in DBA/2J mice. Furthermore, nonreinforced pre‐exposure to the PA system before training caused a latent inhibition‐like reduction of retention latencies in C57BL/6J, whereas it improved PA retention in DBA/2J mice. These pre‐exposure experiments facilitated the discrimination of hippocampal involvement without local pharmacological intervention. The results indicate differences in PA learning between these two strains based on a different NMDA receptor involvement in the dorsal hippocampus in this emotional learning task. We hypothesize that mouse strains can differ in their PA learning performance based on their relative ability to form associations on the basis of unisensory versus multisensory contextual/spatial cues that involve hippocampal processing. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>17696168</pmid><doi>10.1002/hipo.20356</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-9631 |
ispartof | Hippocampus, 2008-01, Vol.18 (1), p.11-19 |
issn | 1050-9631 1098-1063 1098-1063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_568794 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate - pharmacology Analysis of Variance Animals Avoidance Learning - drug effects Avoidance Learning - physiology Behavior, Animal - drug effects Circadian Rhythm - drug effects Circadian Rhythm - physiology Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - pharmacology fear conditioning Hippocampus - drug effects Hippocampus - physiology Inhibition (Psychology) latent inhibition learning and memory Male Medicin och hälsovetenskap Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Mice, Inbred DBA multisensory associations Reaction Time - drug effects Reaction Time - physiology Species Specificity strain comparison |
title | Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A58%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20involvement%20of%20the%20dorsal%20hippocampus%20in%20passive%20avoidance%20in%20C57bl/6J%20and%20DBA/2J%20mice&rft.jtitle=Hippocampus&rft.au=Baarendse,%20Petra%20J.J.&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=11-19&rft.issn=1050-9631&rft.eissn=1098-1063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hipo.20356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E70153644%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70153644&rft_id=info:pmid/17696168&rfr_iscdi=true |