Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task

The aim of the study was to analyze the assessment procedure and identify predictors for the team decision when assessing fitness to drive a car after stroke. The material used was a retrospective data set with 200 stroke clients from Queen Elisabeth's Foundation Mobility Centre at Banstead UK....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2008-03, Vol.40 (2), p.452-460
Hauptverfasser: Ponsford, A.-S., Viitanen, M., Lundberg, C., Johansson, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 460
container_issue 2
container_start_page 452
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 40
creator Ponsford, A.-S.
Viitanen, M.
Lundberg, C.
Johansson, K.
description The aim of the study was to analyze the assessment procedure and identify predictors for the team decision when assessing fitness to drive a car after stroke. The material used was a retrospective data set with 200 stroke clients from Queen Elisabeth's Foundation Mobility Centre at Banstead UK. Fifty-four percent of clients were considered fit to continue driving where 9% could resume driving after car adaptation and training. Important factors for the outcome were vision (acuity and field), neuropsychological functions (divided attention), and track and/or on road test (reaction time, anticipation, speed, and positioning). Cognitive impairment was the main problem in those who failed the driving test and judged not fit for continued driving. Car adaptation, mainly comprising infrared transmitted secondary controls together with automatic transmission was recommended in 35% of the cases. Conclusions: The contribution of different specialist groups appears to be necessary for an effective evaluation, but the assessment procedure can be done more cost-effectively by dividing it into two separate parts and removing certain subtests. The in-car track test is an important part of the assessment procedure with a high face validity and could in many cases make it unnecessary to perform in-traffic tests with unsafe drivers. Car adaptation is often necessary for a client with pronounced hemi-paresis and a full road test can for those only be performed after training the use of car controls.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_565469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457507001273</els_id><sourcerecordid>32688986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e910e6fde4ccbe4b2c94675d883f1708710c784ccec16361b3aa238ec8aa49e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVJaDZpH6CX4lNu3mr035QeltAkhUAvyVnI8rho12u7kp2QWx-iT9gnicwu7a2BgZFGv_n40EfIB6BroKA-bdfOjWtGqV4vBfINWYHRVcmo1CdkRSmFUkgtz8h5Stt81UbLt-QMDGcVr8SKfNmkhCntsZ-KoS2aGB5D_6Nw7YSxSFMcdvjn1-9NMXZzDE1IPoxd6F18LiaXdu_Iaeu6hO-P_YI8XH-9v7ot777ffLva3JVeSJhKrICiahsU3tcoauYrobRsjOEtaGo0UK9NfkQPiiuouXOMG_TGOVEh5xekPOimJxzn2o4x7LMHO7hgj6NdPqGVSgpVZf7ywI9x-Dljmuw-W8eucz0Oc7Kacs2UgldBzpQxlVGvgowqxZiQGYQD6OOQUsT2r1mgdknNbm1OzS6p2aVg2fl4FJ_rPTb_No4xZeDzAcD8yY8Bo81BYO-xCRH9ZJsh_Ef-BbcaqP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20662245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ponsford, A.-S. ; Viitanen, M. ; Lundberg, C. ; Johansson, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ponsford, A.-S. ; Viitanen, M. ; Lundberg, C. ; Johansson, K.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to analyze the assessment procedure and identify predictors for the team decision when assessing fitness to drive a car after stroke. The material used was a retrospective data set with 200 stroke clients from Queen Elisabeth's Foundation Mobility Centre at Banstead UK. Fifty-four percent of clients were considered fit to continue driving where 9% could resume driving after car adaptation and training. Important factors for the outcome were vision (acuity and field), neuropsychological functions (divided attention), and track and/or on road test (reaction time, anticipation, speed, and positioning). Cognitive impairment was the main problem in those who failed the driving test and judged not fit for continued driving. Car adaptation, mainly comprising infrared transmitted secondary controls together with automatic transmission was recommended in 35% of the cases. Conclusions: The contribution of different specialist groups appears to be necessary for an effective evaluation, but the assessment procedure can be done more cost-effectively by dividing it into two separate parts and removing certain subtests. The in-car track test is an important part of the assessment procedure with a high face validity and could in many cases make it unnecessary to perform in-traffic tests with unsafe drivers. Car adaptation is often necessary for a client with pronounced hemi-paresis and a full road test can for those only be performed after training the use of car controls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18329394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assessment ; Automobile ; Automobile Driving - psychology ; Automobiles ; Cognition ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Driving ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Procedure ; Psychometrics ; Risk Assessment ; Stroke ; Stroke - complications ; Vision Tests</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2008-03, Vol.40 (2), p.452-460</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e910e6fde4ccbe4b2c94675d883f1708710c784ccec16361b3aa238ec8aa49e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e910e6fde4ccbe4b2c94675d883f1708710c784ccec16361b3aa238ec8aa49e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18329394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:116867488$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ponsford, A.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viitanen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to analyze the assessment procedure and identify predictors for the team decision when assessing fitness to drive a car after stroke. The material used was a retrospective data set with 200 stroke clients from Queen Elisabeth's Foundation Mobility Centre at Banstead UK. Fifty-four percent of clients were considered fit to continue driving where 9% could resume driving after car adaptation and training. Important factors for the outcome were vision (acuity and field), neuropsychological functions (divided attention), and track and/or on road test (reaction time, anticipation, speed, and positioning). Cognitive impairment was the main problem in those who failed the driving test and judged not fit for continued driving. Car adaptation, mainly comprising infrared transmitted secondary controls together with automatic transmission was recommended in 35% of the cases. Conclusions: The contribution of different specialist groups appears to be necessary for an effective evaluation, but the assessment procedure can be done more cost-effectively by dividing it into two separate parts and removing certain subtests. The in-car track test is an important part of the assessment procedure with a high face validity and could in many cases make it unnecessary to perform in-traffic tests with unsafe drivers. Car adaptation is often necessary for a client with pronounced hemi-paresis and a full road test can for those only be performed after training the use of car controls.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Automobile</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - psychology</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Driving</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Procedure</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Vision Tests</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVJaDZpH6CX4lNu3mr035QeltAkhUAvyVnI8rho12u7kp2QWx-iT9gnicwu7a2BgZFGv_n40EfIB6BroKA-bdfOjWtGqV4vBfINWYHRVcmo1CdkRSmFUkgtz8h5Stt81UbLt-QMDGcVr8SKfNmkhCntsZ-KoS2aGB5D_6Nw7YSxSFMcdvjn1-9NMXZzDE1IPoxd6F18LiaXdu_Iaeu6hO-P_YI8XH-9v7ot777ffLva3JVeSJhKrICiahsU3tcoauYrobRsjOEtaGo0UK9NfkQPiiuouXOMG_TGOVEh5xekPOimJxzn2o4x7LMHO7hgj6NdPqGVSgpVZf7ywI9x-Dljmuw-W8eucz0Oc7Kacs2UgldBzpQxlVGvgowqxZiQGYQD6OOQUsT2r1mgdknNbm1OzS6p2aVg2fl4FJ_rPTb_No4xZeDzAcD8yY8Bo81BYO-xCRH9ZJsh_Ef-BbcaqP0</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Ponsford, A.-S.</creator><creator>Viitanen, M.</creator><creator>Lundberg, C.</creator><creator>Johansson, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task</title><author>Ponsford, A.-S. ; Viitanen, M. ; Lundberg, C. ; Johansson, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e910e6fde4ccbe4b2c94675d883f1708710c784ccec16361b3aa238ec8aa49e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Automobile</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - psychology</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Driving</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Procedure</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Vision Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ponsford, A.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viitanen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ponsford, A.-S.</au><au>Viitanen, M.</au><au>Lundberg, C.</au><au>Johansson, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>452-460</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study was to analyze the assessment procedure and identify predictors for the team decision when assessing fitness to drive a car after stroke. The material used was a retrospective data set with 200 stroke clients from Queen Elisabeth's Foundation Mobility Centre at Banstead UK. Fifty-four percent of clients were considered fit to continue driving where 9% could resume driving after car adaptation and training. Important factors for the outcome were vision (acuity and field), neuropsychological functions (divided attention), and track and/or on road test (reaction time, anticipation, speed, and positioning). Cognitive impairment was the main problem in those who failed the driving test and judged not fit for continued driving. Car adaptation, mainly comprising infrared transmitted secondary controls together with automatic transmission was recommended in 35% of the cases. Conclusions: The contribution of different specialist groups appears to be necessary for an effective evaluation, but the assessment procedure can be done more cost-effectively by dividing it into two separate parts and removing certain subtests. The in-car track test is an important part of the assessment procedure with a high face validity and could in many cases make it unnecessary to perform in-traffic tests with unsafe drivers. Car adaptation is often necessary for a client with pronounced hemi-paresis and a full road test can for those only be performed after training the use of car controls.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18329394</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2008-03, Vol.40 (2), p.452-460
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_565469
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adaptation
Adaptation, Physiological
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Assessment
Automobile
Automobile Driving - psychology
Automobiles
Cognition
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Driving
Female
Health Status
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Male
Middle Aged
Procedure
Psychometrics
Risk Assessment
Stroke
Stroke - complications
Vision Tests
title Assessment of driving after stroke—A pluridisciplinary task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20driving%20after%20stroke%E2%80%94A%20pluridisciplinary%20task&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Ponsford,%20A.-S.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=452-460&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E32688986%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20662245&rft_id=info:pmid/18329394&rft_els_id=S0001457507001273&rfr_iscdi=true