Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review
The objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively study the criterion-related validity of the existing field-based fitness tests used in children and adolescents. The studies were scored according to the number of subjects, description of the study population and statistical analysis. E...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of sports medicine 2010-10, Vol.44 (13), p.934-943 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 943 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 934 |
| container_title | British journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Castro-Piñero, J Artero, E G España-Romero, V Ortega, F B Sjöström, M Suni, J Ruiz, J R |
| description | The objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively study the criterion-related validity of the existing field-based fitness tests used in children and adolescents. The studies were scored according to the number of subjects, description of the study population and statistical analysis. Each study was classified as high, low and very low quality. Three levels of evidence were constructed: strong evidence, when consistent findings were observed in three or more high quality studies; moderate evidence, when consistent findings were observed in two high quality studies; and limited evidence when consistency of findings and/or the number of studies did not achieve the criteria for moderate. The results of 73 studies (50 of high quality) addressing the criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in children and adolescents indicate the following: that there is strong evidence indicating that the 20 m shuttle run test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness, that the hand-grip strength test is a valid measure of musculoskeletal fitness, that skin fold thickness and body mass index are good estimates of body composition, and that waist circumference is a valid measure to estimate central body fat. Moderate evidence was found that the 1-mile run/walk test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness. A large number of other field-based fitness tests presented limited evidence, mainly due to a limited number of studies (one for each test). The results of the present systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial lack of consistency in reporting and designing the existing validity studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058321 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_558665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166755491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b563t-2b9fc47d9030637e25d000f497c19d9fcbd41340aef7ff8ac0d3748f317f9f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctrFTEUxoMo9ra6dyWDLrqQuZ5M3t3pxReUCsUquAmZmQRzO49rkmm9_70Z5tKCIF0lnPM7j-98CL3AsMaY8Lf1NvbrCkCtgUlS4UdohakgJVAJj9EKCPCScEGP0HGMWwBcMZBP0RFWhFPB-ApdbYJPNvhxKIPtTLJtcWM63_q0L0ZXOG-7tqxNzHHn02BjLJKNKRZ-KPbjlH6dFaaI-5hsb5JvimBvvL19hp4400X7_PCeoKuPH75tPpfnXz992bw7L2vGSSqrWrmGilbNixJhK9YCgKNKNFi1OVe3FBMKxjrhnDQNtERQ6QgWTjlFyQkql77x1u6mWu-C703Y69F4fQhd55_VjEnOWeZPF34Xxt9T1qF7HxvbdWaw4xS1YpRjUVXqQTIfj3PJQWby1T_kdpzCkGVnSAGm2akMvf4fhIVQFeFKzuvBQjVhjDFYdycIg54N17PhejZcL4bnkpeHxlPd2_a-4ODw_Yl89ujPXd6Ea80FEUxffN_o9xc_Ly9VHvIj828Wvu63D4__C1wnwrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779236985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Castro-Piñero, J ; Artero, E G ; España-Romero, V ; Ortega, F B ; Sjöström, M ; Suni, J ; Ruiz, J R</creator><creatorcontrib>Castro-Piñero, J ; Artero, E G ; España-Romero, V ; Ortega, F B ; Sjöström, M ; Suni, J ; Ruiz, J R</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively study the criterion-related validity of the existing field-based fitness tests used in children and adolescents. The studies were scored according to the number of subjects, description of the study population and statistical analysis. Each study was classified as high, low and very low quality. Three levels of evidence were constructed: strong evidence, when consistent findings were observed in three or more high quality studies; moderate evidence, when consistent findings were observed in two high quality studies; and limited evidence when consistency of findings and/or the number of studies did not achieve the criteria for moderate. The results of 73 studies (50 of high quality) addressing the criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in children and adolescents indicate the following: that there is strong evidence indicating that the 20 m shuttle run test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness, that the hand-grip strength test is a valid measure of musculoskeletal fitness, that skin fold thickness and body mass index are good estimates of body composition, and that waist circumference is a valid measure to estimate central body fat. Moderate evidence was found that the 1-mile run/walk test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness. A large number of other field-based fitness tests presented limited evidence, mainly due to a limited number of studies (one for each test). The results of the present systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial lack of consistency in reporting and designing the existing validity studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058321</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19364756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Body Composition - physiology ; Body Mass Index ; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena ; Child ; Children & youth ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena ; Physical education teachers ; Physical fitness ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Running ; Skinfold Thickness ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Teenagers ; Validation studies ; Waist Circumference</subject><ispartof>British journal of sports medicine, 2010-10, Vol.44 (13), p.934-943</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2010 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b563t-2b9fc47d9030637e25d000f497c19d9fcbd41340aef7ff8ac0d3748f317f9f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b563t-2b9fc47d9030637e25d000f497c19d9fcbd41340aef7ff8ac0d3748f317f9f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/13/934.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/13/934.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,313,314,776,780,788,881,3183,23550,27899,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19364756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:121461180$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castro-Piñero, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artero, E G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>España-Romero, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, F B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjöström, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suni, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, J R</creatorcontrib><title>Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review</title><title>British journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><description>The objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively study the criterion-related validity of the existing field-based fitness tests used in children and adolescents. The studies were scored according to the number of subjects, description of the study population and statistical analysis. Each study was classified as high, low and very low quality. Three levels of evidence were constructed: strong evidence, when consistent findings were observed in three or more high quality studies; moderate evidence, when consistent findings were observed in two high quality studies; and limited evidence when consistency of findings and/or the number of studies did not achieve the criteria for moderate. The results of 73 studies (50 of high quality) addressing the criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in children and adolescents indicate the following: that there is strong evidence indicating that the 20 m shuttle run test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness, that the hand-grip strength test is a valid measure of musculoskeletal fitness, that skin fold thickness and body mass index are good estimates of body composition, and that waist circumference is a valid measure to estimate central body fat. Moderate evidence was found that the 1-mile run/walk test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness. A large number of other field-based fitness tests presented limited evidence, mainly due to a limited number of studies (one for each test). The results of the present systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial lack of consistency in reporting and designing the existing validity studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Physical education teachers</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><issn>0306-3674</issn><issn>1473-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctrFTEUxoMo9ra6dyWDLrqQuZ5M3t3pxReUCsUquAmZmQRzO49rkmm9_70Z5tKCIF0lnPM7j-98CL3AsMaY8Lf1NvbrCkCtgUlS4UdohakgJVAJj9EKCPCScEGP0HGMWwBcMZBP0RFWhFPB-ApdbYJPNvhxKIPtTLJtcWM63_q0L0ZXOG-7tqxNzHHn02BjLJKNKRZ-KPbjlH6dFaaI-5hsb5JvimBvvL19hp4400X7_PCeoKuPH75tPpfnXz992bw7L2vGSSqrWrmGilbNixJhK9YCgKNKNFi1OVe3FBMKxjrhnDQNtERQ6QgWTjlFyQkql77x1u6mWu-C703Y69F4fQhd55_VjEnOWeZPF34Xxt9T1qF7HxvbdWaw4xS1YpRjUVXqQTIfj3PJQWby1T_kdpzCkGVnSAGm2akMvf4fhIVQFeFKzuvBQjVhjDFYdycIg54N17PhejZcL4bnkpeHxlPd2_a-4ODw_Yl89ujPXd6Ea80FEUxffN_o9xc_Ly9VHvIj828Wvu63D4__C1wnwrk</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Castro-Piñero, J</creator><creator>Artero, E G</creator><creator>España-Romero, V</creator><creator>Ortega, F B</creator><creator>Sjöström, M</creator><creator>Suni, J</creator><creator>Ruiz, J R</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review</title><author>Castro-Piñero, J ; Artero, E G ; España-Romero, V ; Ortega, F B ; Sjöström, M ; Suni, J ; Ruiz, J R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b563t-2b9fc47d9030637e25d000f497c19d9fcbd41340aef7ff8ac0d3748f317f9f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Physical education teachers</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castro-Piñero, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artero, E G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>España-Romero, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, F B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjöström, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suni, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, J R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castro-Piñero, J</au><au>Artero, E G</au><au>España-Romero, V</au><au>Ortega, F B</au><au>Sjöström, M</au><au>Suni, J</au><au>Ruiz, J R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>934</spage><epage>943</epage><pages>934-943</pages><issn>0306-3674</issn><eissn>1473-0480</eissn><abstract>The objective of this systematic review was to comprehensively study the criterion-related validity of the existing field-based fitness tests used in children and adolescents. The studies were scored according to the number of subjects, description of the study population and statistical analysis. Each study was classified as high, low and very low quality. Three levels of evidence were constructed: strong evidence, when consistent findings were observed in three or more high quality studies; moderate evidence, when consistent findings were observed in two high quality studies; and limited evidence when consistency of findings and/or the number of studies did not achieve the criteria for moderate. The results of 73 studies (50 of high quality) addressing the criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in children and adolescents indicate the following: that there is strong evidence indicating that the 20 m shuttle run test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness, that the hand-grip strength test is a valid measure of musculoskeletal fitness, that skin fold thickness and body mass index are good estimates of body composition, and that waist circumference is a valid measure to estimate central body fat. Moderate evidence was found that the 1-mile run/walk test is a valid test to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness. A large number of other field-based fitness tests presented limited evidence, mainly due to a limited number of studies (one for each test). The results of the present systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to the substantial lack of consistency in reporting and designing the existing validity studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</pub><pmid>19364756</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjsm.2009.058321</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0306-3674 |
| ispartof | British journal of sports medicine, 2010-10, Vol.44 (13), p.934-943 |
| issn | 0306-3674 1473-0480 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_558665 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
| subjects | Adolescent Body Composition - physiology Body Mass Index Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena Child Children & youth Exercise Test - methods Female Hand Strength - physiology Health Status Humans Male Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena Physical education teachers Physical fitness Physical Fitness - physiology Running Skinfold Thickness Studies Systematic review Teenagers Validation studies Waist Circumference |
| title | Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criterion-related%20validity%20of%20field-based%20fitness%20tests%20in%20youth:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Castro-Pi%C3%B1ero,%20J&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=934&rft.epage=943&rft.pages=934-943&rft.issn=0306-3674&rft.eissn=1473-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058321&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2166755491%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779236985&rft_id=info:pmid/19364756&rfr_iscdi=true |