Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experienc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal 2010-04, Vol.46 (3-4), p.247-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Akopian, Veronika Andrews, Peter W Beil, Stephen Benvenisty, Nissim Brehm, Jennifer Christie, Megan Ford, Angela Fox, Victoria Gokhale, Paul J Healy, Lyn Holm, Frida Hovatta, Outi Knowles, Barbara B Ludwig, Tenneille E McKay, Ronald D. G Miyazaki, Takamichi Nakatsuji, Norio Oh, Steve K. W Pera, Martin F Rossant, Janet Stacey, Glyn N Suemori, Hirofumi |
description | There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_552947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40663804</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40663804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4cd353278178d91e3c3aa929fcb2c5896407887c05505a7171e45220a13c592d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwAzgAVi89BTx2bMcXJLQqFKlSD1CJm-V1JtssSRzsBLT99TjNslAO4IutzPfeZEYvy54DfQ2UqjcRQDKZU6C5Zlrltw-yYxAFzxWVXx6mN1WQM6npUfYkxi1NR4N8nB0xCqUUwI6zauW7wYYm-p74mlRYNz1WxE3tOAUkcRdH7CKpfSA1YoWBOGxbUgdEMgQ_2I0dm0V7M3W2J9itw873jSOz8o6OT7NHtW0jPtvfJ9n1-_PPq4v88urDx9W7y9yJshjzwlVccKZKUGWlAbnj1qbBardmidCyoKoslaNCUGEVKMBCMEYtcCc0q_hJli--8QcO09oMoels2BlvG7P_9DW90AjBdKES_3bhU6XDymE_Btvek92v9M2N2fjvhpVClLRIBmd7g-C_TRhH0zVxHtn26KdoNGVcKNDyv6TiXGiqS5HI07_IrZ9Cn_ZmCq0laGBzY1ggF3yMAevDTwM1czbMkg2TsmHmbJjbpHn557QHxa8wJIDt15dK_QbD787_cn2xiLZx9OFgWlAp-bKiV0u9tt7YTUqauf6UWvLUlTPOBP8Jg6fYng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>499619124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Akopian, Veronika ; Andrews, Peter W ; Beil, Stephen ; Benvenisty, Nissim ; Brehm, Jennifer ; Christie, Megan ; Ford, Angela ; Fox, Victoria ; Gokhale, Paul J ; Healy, Lyn ; Holm, Frida ; Hovatta, Outi ; Knowles, Barbara B ; Ludwig, Tenneille E ; McKay, Ronald D. G ; Miyazaki, Takamichi ; Nakatsuji, Norio ; Oh, Steve K. W ; Pera, Martin F ; Rossant, Janet ; Stacey, Glyn N ; Suemori, Hirofumi</creator><creatorcontrib>Akopian, Veronika ; Andrews, Peter W ; Beil, Stephen ; Benvenisty, Nissim ; Brehm, Jennifer ; Christie, Megan ; Ford, Angela ; Fox, Victoria ; Gokhale, Paul J ; Healy, Lyn ; Holm, Frida ; Hovatta, Outi ; Knowles, Barbara B ; Ludwig, Tenneille E ; McKay, Ronald D. G ; Miyazaki, Takamichi ; Nakatsuji, Norio ; Oh, Steve K. W ; Pera, Martin F ; Rossant, Janet ; Stacey, Glyn N ; Suemori, Hirofumi ; International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium ; The International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-2690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-706X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20186512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IVCAED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adaptations ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell Biology ; Cell Count ; Cell Culture ; Cell culture techniques ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell death ; Cell growth ; Cell Line ; Cell lines ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell Survival ; Cultured cells ; Cytology ; Developmental Biology ; Differentiation ; Embryo cells ; Embryo fibroblasts ; Embryonic stem cells ; Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology ; epigenetics ; Feeder cells ; Fibroblast growth factor 2 ; Flow Cytometry ; Growth factors ; Human growth ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Media (culture) ; Mice ; Microscopy ; Pluripotent stem cells ; Quality control ; Stem Cells ; Surface markers</subject><ispartof>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2010-04, Vol.46 (3-4), p.247-258</ispartof><rights>2010 Society for In Vitro Biology</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Society for In Vitro Biology Mar/Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4cd353278178d91e3c3aa929fcb2c5896407887c05505a7171e45220a13c592d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4cd353278178d91e3c3aa929fcb2c5896407887c05505a7171e45220a13c592d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40663804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40663804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20186512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:120304669$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akopian, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beil, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benvenisty, Nissim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokhale, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Frida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovatta, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Barbara B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Tenneille E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Ronald D. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Takamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuji, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Steve K. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pera, Martin F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossant, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, Glyn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suemori, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells</title><title>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</title><addtitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</addtitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><description>There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.</description><subject>Adaptations</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell Culture</subject><subject>Cell culture techniques</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cultured cells</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Embryo cells</subject><subject>Embryo fibroblasts</subject><subject>Embryonic stem cells</subject><subject>Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>epigenetics</subject><subject>Feeder cells</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor 2</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Human growth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Media (culture)</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Pluripotent stem cells</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Surface markers</subject><issn>1071-2690</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwAzgAVi89BTx2bMcXJLQqFKlSD1CJm-V1JtssSRzsBLT99TjNslAO4IutzPfeZEYvy54DfQ2UqjcRQDKZU6C5Zlrltw-yYxAFzxWVXx6mN1WQM6npUfYkxi1NR4N8nB0xCqUUwI6zauW7wYYm-p74mlRYNz1WxE3tOAUkcRdH7CKpfSA1YoWBOGxbUgdEMgQ_2I0dm0V7M3W2J9itw873jSOz8o6OT7NHtW0jPtvfJ9n1-_PPq4v88urDx9W7y9yJshjzwlVccKZKUGWlAbnj1qbBardmidCyoKoslaNCUGEVKMBCMEYtcCc0q_hJli--8QcO09oMoels2BlvG7P_9DW90AjBdKES_3bhU6XDymE_Btvek92v9M2N2fjvhpVClLRIBmd7g-C_TRhH0zVxHtn26KdoNGVcKNDyv6TiXGiqS5HI07_IrZ9Cn_ZmCq0laGBzY1ggF3yMAevDTwM1czbMkg2TsmHmbJjbpHn557QHxa8wJIDt15dK_QbD787_cn2xiLZx9OFgWlAp-bKiV0u9tt7YTUqauf6UWvLUlTPOBP8Jg6fYng</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Akopian, Veronika</creator><creator>Andrews, Peter W</creator><creator>Beil, Stephen</creator><creator>Benvenisty, Nissim</creator><creator>Brehm, Jennifer</creator><creator>Christie, Megan</creator><creator>Ford, Angela</creator><creator>Fox, Victoria</creator><creator>Gokhale, Paul J</creator><creator>Healy, Lyn</creator><creator>Holm, Frida</creator><creator>Hovatta, Outi</creator><creator>Knowles, Barbara B</creator><creator>Ludwig, Tenneille E</creator><creator>McKay, Ronald D. G</creator><creator>Miyazaki, Takamichi</creator><creator>Nakatsuji, Norio</creator><creator>Oh, Steve K. W</creator><creator>Pera, Martin F</creator><creator>Rossant, Janet</creator><creator>Stacey, Glyn N</creator><creator>Suemori, Hirofumi</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Society for In Vitro Biology</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells</title><author>Akopian, Veronika ; Andrews, Peter W ; Beil, Stephen ; Benvenisty, Nissim ; Brehm, Jennifer ; Christie, Megan ; Ford, Angela ; Fox, Victoria ; Gokhale, Paul J ; Healy, Lyn ; Holm, Frida ; Hovatta, Outi ; Knowles, Barbara B ; Ludwig, Tenneille E ; McKay, Ronald D. G ; Miyazaki, Takamichi ; Nakatsuji, Norio ; Oh, Steve K. W ; Pera, Martin F ; Rossant, Janet ; Stacey, Glyn N ; Suemori, Hirofumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4cd353278178d91e3c3aa929fcb2c5896407887c05505a7171e45220a13c592d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptations</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell Culture</topic><topic>Cell culture techniques</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cultured cells</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Embryo cells</topic><topic>Embryo fibroblasts</topic><topic>Embryonic stem cells</topic><topic>Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>epigenetics</topic><topic>Feeder cells</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor 2</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Human growth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Media (culture)</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Pluripotent stem cells</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Surface markers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akopian, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beil, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benvenisty, Nissim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokhale, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Frida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovatta, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Barbara B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Tenneille E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Ronald D. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Takamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuji, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Steve K. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pera, Martin F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossant, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, Glyn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suemori, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akopian, Veronika</au><au>Andrews, Peter W</au><au>Beil, Stephen</au><au>Benvenisty, Nissim</au><au>Brehm, Jennifer</au><au>Christie, Megan</au><au>Ford, Angela</au><au>Fox, Victoria</au><au>Gokhale, Paul J</au><au>Healy, Lyn</au><au>Holm, Frida</au><au>Hovatta, Outi</au><au>Knowles, Barbara B</au><au>Ludwig, Tenneille E</au><au>McKay, Ronald D. G</au><au>Miyazaki, Takamichi</au><au>Nakatsuji, Norio</au><au>Oh, Steve K. W</au><au>Pera, Martin F</au><au>Rossant, Janet</au><au>Stacey, Glyn N</au><au>Suemori, Hirofumi</au><aucorp>International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>The International Stem Cell Initiative Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells</atitle><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle><stitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</stitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>247-258</pages><issn>1071-2690</issn><eissn>1543-706X</eissn><coden>IVCAED</coden><abstract>There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20186512</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-2690 |
ispartof | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2010-04, Vol.46 (3-4), p.247-258 |
issn | 1071-2690 1543-706X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_552947 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Adaptations Animal Genetics and Genomics Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Cell Adhesion Cell Biology Cell Count Cell Culture Cell culture techniques Cell Culture Techniques - methods Cell death Cell growth Cell Line Cell lines Cell Proliferation Cell Survival Cultured cells Cytology Developmental Biology Differentiation Embryo cells Embryo fibroblasts Embryonic stem cells Embryonic Stem Cells - cytology epigenetics Feeder cells Fibroblast growth factor 2 Flow Cytometry Growth factors Human growth Humans Life Sciences Media (culture) Mice Microscopy Pluripotent stem cells Quality control Stem Cells Surface markers |
title | Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A43%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20defined%20culture%20systems%20for%20feeder%20cell%20free%20propagation%20of%20human%20embryonic%20stem%20cells&rft.jtitle=In%20vitro%20cellular%20&%20developmental%20biology.%20Animal&rft.au=Akopian,%20Veronika&rft.aucorp=International%20Stem%20Cell%20Initiative%20Consortium&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=247-258&rft.issn=1071-2690&rft.eissn=1543-706X&rft.coden=IVCAED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E40663804%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=499619124&rft_id=info:pmid/20186512&rft_jstor_id=40663804&rfr_iscdi=true |