A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004

ObjectiveTo examine differences in the relative survival and excess death rates of patients with colorectal cancer in Norway, Sweden and England.MethodsAll individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) C18–C20) between 1996 and 2004 in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2011-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1087-1093
Hauptverfasser: Morris, Eva J A, Sandin, Fredrik, Lambert, Paul C, Bray, Freddie, Klint, Åsa, Linklater, Karen, Robinson, David, Påhlman, Lars, Holmberg, Lars, Møller, Henrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1087
container_title Gut
container_volume 60
creator Morris, Eva J A
Sandin, Fredrik
Lambert, Paul C
Bray, Freddie
Klint, Åsa
Linklater, Karen
Robinson, David
Påhlman, Lars
Holmberg, Lars
Møller, Henrik
description ObjectiveTo examine differences in the relative survival and excess death rates of patients with colorectal cancer in Norway, Sweden and England.MethodsAll individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) C18–C20) between 1996 and 2004 in England, Norway and Sweden were included in this population-based study of patients with colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were 5-year cumulative relative period of survival and excess death rates stratified by age and period of follow-up.ResultsThe survival of English patients with colorectal cancer was significantly lower than was observed in both Norway and Sweden. Five-year age-standardised colon cancer relative survival was 51.1% (95% CI 50.1% to 52.0%) in England compared with 57.9% (95% CI 55.2% to 60.5%) in Norway and 59.9% (95% CI 57.7% to 62.0%) in Sweden. Five-year rectal cancer survival was 52.3% (95% CI 51.1% to 53.5%) in England compared with 60.7% (95% CI 57.0% to 64.2%) and 59.8% (95% CI 56.9% to 62.6%) in Norway and Sweden, respectively. The lower survival for colon cancer in England was primarily due to a high number of excess deaths among older patients in the first 3 months after diagnosis. In patients with rectal cancer, excess deaths remained elevated until 2 years of follow-up. If the lower excess death rate in Norway applied in the English population, then 890 (13.6%) and 654 (16.8%) of the excess deaths in the colon and rectal cancer populations, respectively, could have been prevented at 5 years follow-up. Most of these avoidable deaths occurred shortly after diagnosis.ConclusionsThere was significant variation in survival between the countries, with the English population experiencing a poorer outcome, primarily due to a relatively higher number of excess deaths in older patients in the short term after diagnosis. It seems likely, therefore, that in England a greater proportion of the population present with more rapidly fatal disease (especially in the older age groups) than in Norway or Sweden.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.2010.229575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_546243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1753456220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-a4144c36c888381bf4941013b50d5477ad00d64cc778a4dec0c350cf3033dd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s1v0zAUAPAIgVgZnLkhSwiB0LLZsR3bx6qMD6kaAqqJm-U4TucujYOdrOzOH84rLZ2EBJz89fOT3_PLsqcEnxJCy7PlOJwWGFZFobjg97IJYaXMaSHl_WyCMRE5F0wdZY9SWmGMpVTkYXZUEIqpImKS_ZiiPvRjawYfurwyydXIhnVvok-hQ6FBw5VDaYw3_sa023UP1HVDQhs_XIFtQ3R2gDNrOusi8h0675at6eoTdBHixtwimKMvG1e7DlVu2DgYiVLlr_0CY_Y4e9CYNrkn-_E4W7w9X8ze5_OP7z7MpvO84pQPuWGEMUtLK6WkklQNU4xgQiuOa86EMDXGdcmsFUIaVjuLLeXYNpArrWtOj7N8FzZtXD9Wuo9-beKtDsbr_dY1zJzmrCwYBX_yV__GX051iEs9jppw4BL4yx3vY_g2ujTotU_WtVAKF8akpWBSMcUxyFf_lERwyiBosaXP_6CrMMYOqgRKKCoKSBzU2U7ZGFKKrjm8lWC9bRQNjaK3jaJ3jQI3nu3jjtXa1Qf_uzMAvNgDk6xpmwi_69Odg_pwqsq7ovo0uO-HcxOvdSmo4PricqbnX6n4xBef9Tah1ztfrVf_feVPaEng2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779372477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Morris, Eva J A ; Sandin, Fredrik ; Lambert, Paul C ; Bray, Freddie ; Klint, Åsa ; Linklater, Karen ; Robinson, David ; Påhlman, Lars ; Holmberg, Lars ; Møller, Henrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Eva J A ; Sandin, Fredrik ; Lambert, Paul C ; Bray, Freddie ; Klint, Åsa ; Linklater, Karen ; Robinson, David ; Påhlman, Lars ; Holmberg, Lars ; Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo examine differences in the relative survival and excess death rates of patients with colorectal cancer in Norway, Sweden and England.MethodsAll individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) C18–C20) between 1996 and 2004 in England, Norway and Sweden were included in this population-based study of patients with colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were 5-year cumulative relative period of survival and excess death rates stratified by age and period of follow-up.ResultsThe survival of English patients with colorectal cancer was significantly lower than was observed in both Norway and Sweden. Five-year age-standardised colon cancer relative survival was 51.1% (95% CI 50.1% to 52.0%) in England compared with 57.9% (95% CI 55.2% to 60.5%) in Norway and 59.9% (95% CI 57.7% to 62.0%) in Sweden. Five-year rectal cancer survival was 52.3% (95% CI 51.1% to 53.5%) in England compared with 60.7% (95% CI 57.0% to 64.2%) and 59.8% (95% CI 56.9% to 62.6%) in Norway and Sweden, respectively. The lower survival for colon cancer in England was primarily due to a high number of excess deaths among older patients in the first 3 months after diagnosis. In patients with rectal cancer, excess deaths remained elevated until 2 years of follow-up. If the lower excess death rate in Norway applied in the English population, then 890 (13.6%) and 654 (16.8%) of the excess deaths in the colon and rectal cancer populations, respectively, could have been prevented at 5 years follow-up. Most of these avoidable deaths occurred shortly after diagnosis.ConclusionsThere was significant variation in survival between the countries, with the English population experiencing a poorer outcome, primarily due to a relatively higher number of excess deaths in older patients in the short term after diagnosis. It seems likely, therefore, that in England a greater proportion of the population present with more rapidly fatal disease (especially in the older age groups) than in Norway or Sweden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.229575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21303917</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer therapies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal neoplasms ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Disease ; England - epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical sciences ; MEDICIN ; MEDICINE ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Norway - epidemiology ; Population ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Public health ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Studies ; survival ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate - trends ; Sweden - epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2011-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1087-1093</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-a4144c36c888381bf4941013b50d5477ad00d64cc778a4dec0c350cf3033dd53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/60/8/1087.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/60/8/1087.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24335396$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303917$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-156248$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:122861459$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Eva J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandin, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Freddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klint, Åsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linklater, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Påhlman, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><title>A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo examine differences in the relative survival and excess death rates of patients with colorectal cancer in Norway, Sweden and England.MethodsAll individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) C18–C20) between 1996 and 2004 in England, Norway and Sweden were included in this population-based study of patients with colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were 5-year cumulative relative period of survival and excess death rates stratified by age and period of follow-up.ResultsThe survival of English patients with colorectal cancer was significantly lower than was observed in both Norway and Sweden. Five-year age-standardised colon cancer relative survival was 51.1% (95% CI 50.1% to 52.0%) in England compared with 57.9% (95% CI 55.2% to 60.5%) in Norway and 59.9% (95% CI 57.7% to 62.0%) in Sweden. Five-year rectal cancer survival was 52.3% (95% CI 51.1% to 53.5%) in England compared with 60.7% (95% CI 57.0% to 64.2%) and 59.8% (95% CI 56.9% to 62.6%) in Norway and Sweden, respectively. The lower survival for colon cancer in England was primarily due to a high number of excess deaths among older patients in the first 3 months after diagnosis. In patients with rectal cancer, excess deaths remained elevated until 2 years of follow-up. If the lower excess death rate in Norway applied in the English population, then 890 (13.6%) and 654 (16.8%) of the excess deaths in the colon and rectal cancer populations, respectively, could have been prevented at 5 years follow-up. Most of these avoidable deaths occurred shortly after diagnosis.ConclusionsThere was significant variation in survival between the countries, with the English population experiencing a poorer outcome, primarily due to a relatively higher number of excess deaths in older patients in the short term after diagnosis. It seems likely, therefore, that in England a greater proportion of the population present with more rapidly fatal disease (especially in the older age groups) than in Norway or Sweden.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal neoplasms</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MEDICIN</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Sweden - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0s1v0zAUAPAIgVgZnLkhSwiB0LLZsR3bx6qMD6kaAqqJm-U4TucujYOdrOzOH84rLZ2EBJz89fOT3_PLsqcEnxJCy7PlOJwWGFZFobjg97IJYaXMaSHl_WyCMRE5F0wdZY9SWmGMpVTkYXZUEIqpImKS_ZiiPvRjawYfurwyydXIhnVvok-hQ6FBw5VDaYw3_sa023UP1HVDQhs_XIFtQ3R2gDNrOusi8h0675at6eoTdBHixtwimKMvG1e7DlVu2DgYiVLlr_0CY_Y4e9CYNrkn-_E4W7w9X8ze5_OP7z7MpvO84pQPuWGEMUtLK6WkklQNU4xgQiuOa86EMDXGdcmsFUIaVjuLLeXYNpArrWtOj7N8FzZtXD9Wuo9-beKtDsbr_dY1zJzmrCwYBX_yV__GX051iEs9jppw4BL4yx3vY_g2ujTotU_WtVAKF8akpWBSMcUxyFf_lERwyiBosaXP_6CrMMYOqgRKKCoKSBzU2U7ZGFKKrjm8lWC9bRQNjaK3jaJ3jQI3nu3jjtXa1Qf_uzMAvNgDk6xpmwi_69Odg_pwqsq7ovo0uO-HcxOvdSmo4PricqbnX6n4xBef9Tah1ztfrVf_feVPaEng2Q</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Morris, Eva J A</creator><creator>Sandin, Fredrik</creator><creator>Lambert, Paul C</creator><creator>Bray, Freddie</creator><creator>Klint, Åsa</creator><creator>Linklater, Karen</creator><creator>Robinson, David</creator><creator>Påhlman, Lars</creator><creator>Holmberg, Lars</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004</title><author>Morris, Eva J A ; Sandin, Fredrik ; Lambert, Paul C ; Bray, Freddie ; Klint, Åsa ; Linklater, Karen ; Robinson, David ; Påhlman, Lars ; Holmberg, Lars ; Møller, Henrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-a4144c36c888381bf4941013b50d5477ad00d64cc778a4dec0c350cf3033dd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal neoplasms</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MEDICIN</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Sweden - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Eva J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandin, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Freddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klint, Åsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linklater, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Påhlman, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Eva J A</au><au>Sandin, Fredrik</au><au>Lambert, Paul C</au><au>Bray, Freddie</au><au>Klint, Åsa</au><au>Linklater, Karen</au><au>Robinson, David</au><au>Påhlman, Lars</au><au>Holmberg, Lars</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1087-1093</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>ObjectiveTo examine differences in the relative survival and excess death rates of patients with colorectal cancer in Norway, Sweden and England.MethodsAll individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) C18–C20) between 1996 and 2004 in England, Norway and Sweden were included in this population-based study of patients with colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were 5-year cumulative relative period of survival and excess death rates stratified by age and period of follow-up.ResultsThe survival of English patients with colorectal cancer was significantly lower than was observed in both Norway and Sweden. Five-year age-standardised colon cancer relative survival was 51.1% (95% CI 50.1% to 52.0%) in England compared with 57.9% (95% CI 55.2% to 60.5%) in Norway and 59.9% (95% CI 57.7% to 62.0%) in Sweden. Five-year rectal cancer survival was 52.3% (95% CI 51.1% to 53.5%) in England compared with 60.7% (95% CI 57.0% to 64.2%) and 59.8% (95% CI 56.9% to 62.6%) in Norway and Sweden, respectively. The lower survival for colon cancer in England was primarily due to a high number of excess deaths among older patients in the first 3 months after diagnosis. In patients with rectal cancer, excess deaths remained elevated until 2 years of follow-up. If the lower excess death rate in Norway applied in the English population, then 890 (13.6%) and 654 (16.8%) of the excess deaths in the colon and rectal cancer populations, respectively, could have been prevented at 5 years follow-up. Most of these avoidable deaths occurred shortly after diagnosis.ConclusionsThere was significant variation in survival between the countries, with the English population experiencing a poorer outcome, primarily due to a relatively higher number of excess deaths in older patients in the short term after diagnosis. It seems likely, therefore, that in England a greater proportion of the population present with more rapidly fatal disease (especially in the older age groups) than in Norway or Sweden.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>21303917</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.2010.229575</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2011-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1087-1093
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_546243
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer therapies
Child
Child, Preschool
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Disease
England - epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Medical sciences
MEDICIN
MEDICINE
Middle Aged
Mortality
Norway - epidemiology
Population
Population Surveillance - methods
Public health
Retrospective Studies
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Studies
survival
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate - trends
Sweden - epidemiology
Time Factors
Tumors
Young Adult
title A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20population-based%20comparison%20of%20the%20survival%20of%20patients%20with%20colorectal%20cancer%20in%20England,%20Norway%20and%20Sweden%20between%201996%20and%202004&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Morris,%20Eva%20J%20A&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1087-1093&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2010.229575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1753456220%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779372477&rft_id=info:pmid/21303917&rfr_iscdi=true