Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation
Learning manual skills is a fundamental part of health care education, and motor, sensory and cognitive learning processes are essential aspects of professional development. Simulator training has been shown to enhance factors that facilitate motor and cognitive learning. The present study aimed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2013-03, Vol.18 (1), p.99-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Johannesson, Eva Silén, Charlotte Kvist, Joanna Hult, Håkan |
description | Learning manual skills is a fundamental part of health care education, and motor, sensory and cognitive learning processes are essential aspects of professional development. Simulator training has been shown to enhance factors that facilitate motor and cognitive learning. The present study aimed to investigate the students’ experiences and thoughts about their learning through simulation skills training. The study was designed for an educational setting at a clinical skills centre. Ten third-year undergraduate nursing students performed urethral catheterisation, using the virtual reality simulator UrecathVision
™
, which has haptic properties. The students practised in pairs. Each session was videotaped and the video was used to stimulate recall in subsequent interviews. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The analysis from interviews resulted in three themes: what the students learn, how the students learn, and the simulator’s contribution to the students’ learning. Students learned manual skills, how to perform the procedure, and professional behaviour. They learned by preparing, watching, practising and reflecting. The simulator contributed by providing opportunities for students to prepare for the skills training, to see anatomical structures, to feel resistance, and to become aware of their own performance ability. The findings show that the students related the task to previous experiences, used sensory information, tested themselves and practised techniques in a hands-on fashion, and reflected in and on action. The simulator was seen as a facilitator to learning the manual skills. The study design, with students working in pairs combined with video recording, was found to enhance opportunities for reflection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_538577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ996721</ericid><sourcerecordid>2259135158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-333d11ef4d14b9290fe45c49ff055b600ac4de4453dad95cf9d84fda7823a68d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFTEUgAdRbK0-gCAy4KaLjubk5yZZllqtUnHhzzbkJpnbtJnMNZlg7crX8PX6JM1lrlcQusoh5zt_fE3zHNBrQIi_yYAokx0C3EnCRHfzoNkHxkkHC84f1pgI3FEpF3vNk5wvEUIEhHjc7GFMJCOI7zefvkzFujjl299_Wne9dsm7aFxux74NTqfo46oddCw6tCb46E0N8pUPIbfTRRrL6qLNfihBT36MT5tHvQ7ZPdu-B823d6dfT86688_vP5wcn3eGAUwdIcQCuJ5aoEuJJeodZYbKvkeMLRcIaUOto5QRq61kppdW0N5qLjDRC2HJQdPNffNPty5LtU5-0OmXGrVX26-rGjnFiGCcV_7oXv6t_36sxrRSwRfFGUO04oczvk7jj-LypAafjQtBRzeWrAALTgQBBhV99R96OZYU6_EKYyaBMGCiUjBTJo05J9fvNgCkNirVrFJVlWqjUt3UmpfbzmU5OLur-OuuAi9moDozu_Tpx-qb481meHtzTcWVS_82u3_oHY_ztTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259135158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Johannesson, Eva ; Silén, Charlotte ; Kvist, Joanna ; Hult, Håkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Johannesson, Eva ; Silén, Charlotte ; Kvist, Joanna ; Hult, Håkan</creatorcontrib><description>Learning manual skills is a fundamental part of health care education, and motor, sensory and cognitive learning processes are essential aspects of professional development. Simulator training has been shown to enhance factors that facilitate motor and cognitive learning. The present study aimed to investigate the students’ experiences and thoughts about their learning through simulation skills training. The study was designed for an educational setting at a clinical skills centre. Ten third-year undergraduate nursing students performed urethral catheterisation, using the virtual reality simulator UrecathVision
™
, which has haptic properties. The students practised in pairs. Each session was videotaped and the video was used to stimulate recall in subsequent interviews. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The analysis from interviews resulted in three themes: what the students learn, how the students learn, and the simulator’s contribution to the students’ learning. Students learned manual skills, how to perform the procedure, and professional behaviour. They learned by preparing, watching, practising and reflecting. The simulator contributed by providing opportunities for students to prepare for the skills training, to see anatomical structures, to feel resistance, and to become aware of their own performance ability. The findings show that the students related the task to previous experiences, used sensory information, tested themselves and practised techniques in a hands-on fashion, and reflected in and on action. The simulator was seen as a facilitator to learning the manual skills. The study design, with students working in pairs combined with video recording, was found to enhance opportunities for reflection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22395307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence ; Clinical Experience ; Computer Simulation ; Content Analysis ; Education ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Medical Education ; Middle Aged ; Nursing Students ; Psychomotor Skills ; Qualitative Research ; Reflection ; Simulation ; Skill Development ; Student Experience ; Students ; Students, Nursing ; Undergraduate Students ; User-Computer Interface ; Video Technology ; Videotape Recording ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2013-03, Vol.18 (1), p.99-114</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-333d11ef4d14b9290fe45c49ff055b600ac4de4453dad95cf9d84fda7823a68d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-333d11ef4d14b9290fe45c49ff055b600ac4de4453dad95cf9d84fda7823a68d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ996721$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395307$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-75504$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:126157562$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johannesson, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silén, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvist, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hult, Håkan</creatorcontrib><title>Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>Learning manual skills is a fundamental part of health care education, and motor, sensory and cognitive learning processes are essential aspects of professional development. Simulator training has been shown to enhance factors that facilitate motor and cognitive learning. The present study aimed to investigate the students’ experiences and thoughts about their learning through simulation skills training. The study was designed for an educational setting at a clinical skills centre. Ten third-year undergraduate nursing students performed urethral catheterisation, using the virtual reality simulator UrecathVision
™
, which has haptic properties. The students practised in pairs. Each session was videotaped and the video was used to stimulate recall in subsequent interviews. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The analysis from interviews resulted in three themes: what the students learn, how the students learn, and the simulator’s contribution to the students’ learning. Students learned manual skills, how to perform the procedure, and professional behaviour. They learned by preparing, watching, practising and reflecting. The simulator contributed by providing opportunities for students to prepare for the skills training, to see anatomical structures, to feel resistance, and to become aware of their own performance ability. The findings show that the students related the task to previous experiences, used sensory information, tested themselves and practised techniques in a hands-on fashion, and reflected in and on action. The simulator was seen as a facilitator to learning the manual skills. The study design, with students working in pairs combined with video recording, was found to enhance opportunities for reflection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical Experience</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Psychomotor Skills</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFTEUgAdRbK0-gCAy4KaLjubk5yZZllqtUnHhzzbkJpnbtJnMNZlg7crX8PX6JM1lrlcQusoh5zt_fE3zHNBrQIi_yYAokx0C3EnCRHfzoNkHxkkHC84f1pgI3FEpF3vNk5wvEUIEhHjc7GFMJCOI7zefvkzFujjl299_Wne9dsm7aFxux74NTqfo46oddCw6tCb46E0N8pUPIbfTRRrL6qLNfihBT36MT5tHvQ7ZPdu-B823d6dfT86688_vP5wcn3eGAUwdIcQCuJ5aoEuJJeodZYbKvkeMLRcIaUOto5QRq61kppdW0N5qLjDRC2HJQdPNffNPty5LtU5-0OmXGrVX26-rGjnFiGCcV_7oXv6t_36sxrRSwRfFGUO04oczvk7jj-LypAafjQtBRzeWrAALTgQBBhV99R96OZYU6_EKYyaBMGCiUjBTJo05J9fvNgCkNirVrFJVlWqjUt3UmpfbzmU5OLur-OuuAi9moDozu_Tpx-qb481meHtzTcWVS_82u3_oHY_ztTM</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Johannesson, Eva</creator><creator>Silén, Charlotte</creator><creator>Kvist, Joanna</creator><creator>Hult, Håkan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ABXSW</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation</title><author>Johannesson, Eva ; Silén, Charlotte ; Kvist, Joanna ; Hult, Håkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-333d11ef4d14b9290fe45c49ff055b600ac4de4453dad95cf9d84fda7823a68d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical Experience</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Psychomotor Skills</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johannesson, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silén, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvist, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hult, Håkan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johannesson, Eva</au><au>Silén, Charlotte</au><au>Kvist, Joanna</au><au>Hult, Håkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ996721</ericid><atitle>Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>99-114</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>Learning manual skills is a fundamental part of health care education, and motor, sensory and cognitive learning processes are essential aspects of professional development. Simulator training has been shown to enhance factors that facilitate motor and cognitive learning. The present study aimed to investigate the students’ experiences and thoughts about their learning through simulation skills training. The study was designed for an educational setting at a clinical skills centre. Ten third-year undergraduate nursing students performed urethral catheterisation, using the virtual reality simulator UrecathVision
™
, which has haptic properties. The students practised in pairs. Each session was videotaped and the video was used to stimulate recall in subsequent interviews. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The analysis from interviews resulted in three themes: what the students learn, how the students learn, and the simulator’s contribution to the students’ learning. Students learned manual skills, how to perform the procedure, and professional behaviour. They learned by preparing, watching, practising and reflecting. The simulator contributed by providing opportunities for students to prepare for the skills training, to see anatomical structures, to feel resistance, and to become aware of their own performance ability. The findings show that the students related the task to previous experiences, used sensory information, tested themselves and practised techniques in a hands-on fashion, and reflected in and on action. The simulator was seen as a facilitator to learning the manual skills. The study design, with students working in pairs combined with video recording, was found to enhance opportunities for reflection.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>22395307</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2013-03, Vol.18 (1), p.99-114 |
issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 1573-1677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_538577 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Adult Clinical Competence Clinical Experience Computer Simulation Content Analysis Education Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods Female Humans Interviews Learning Learning Processes Medical Education Middle Aged Nursing Students Psychomotor Skills Qualitative Research Reflection Simulation Skill Development Student Experience Students Students, Nursing Undergraduate Students User-Computer Interface Video Technology Videotape Recording Young Adult |
title | Students’ experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students%E2%80%99%20experiences%20of%20learning%20manual%20clinical%20skills%20through%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Johannesson,%20Eva&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=99-114&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2259135158%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259135158&rft_id=info:pmid/22395307&rft_ericid=EJ996721&rfr_iscdi=true |