Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays
Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxico...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicologic pathology 2012-12, Vol.40 (8), p.1160-1168 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1168 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1160 |
| container_title | Toxicologic pathology |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Kadekar, Sandeep Peddada, Shyamal Silins, Ilona French, John E. Högberg, Johan Stenius, Ulla |
| description | Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database for sex differences in rat responses to chemical carcinogens. We found that the odds that male rat bioassays were assigned a higher level of evidence than female rat bioassays was 1.69 (p < .001). Of 278 carcinogenic chemicals in the database, 201 (72%) exhibited statistical gender differences (p ≤ .05) in at least one nonreproductive organ. One hundred thirty of these 201 chemicals induced gender-specific tumors in male rats and 59 in female rats. Sixty-eight chemicals induced tumors in males but no tumors in females. Less than one third (i.e., 19 chemicals) induced tumors in females but not males. Male-specific tumors included pancreatic and skin tumors, and female-specific tumors included lung tumors. For some tumor sites, these differences in gender susceptibility can be associated with literature data on sex hormone receptor expression. In conclusion, gender-specific tumors were common. The male dominance is in line with recent human data, and the male susceptibility to carcinogens should be further studied. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0192623312446527 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_537128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0192623312446527</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1257785084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8353d6dc9ece728cb8e6b5cc29e4d3700d9c3b04c4181d85828f62cf1534b8463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0K1G5L7z1VuSBxCfjbzhGWsiBVwKEcOKDIcSZblyTeejYq-9_Xy25bgdTTWPN-b0bjR8gZo28ZM-YdZRXXXAjGpdSKmwMyY0qIkmnKXpDZVi63-hE5RryhlFkm6SE54lxZVUk2I78WMLaQio-h6yDB6AGLMBbzaxiCd30xd8mHMS5hBAx_pa9uHeKYpav4J_jYx-Wm-J7iMrmh4OVPcKn4EKJDdBt8RV52rkc43dcT8uPTxdX8c3n5bfFl_v6y9ErQdWmFEq1ufQUeDLe-saAb5T2vQLbCUNpWXjRUepkPaK2y3Haa-y7fKhsrtTgh5W4u3sFqaupVCoNLmzq6UO9bv_MLaiUM4zbz1bP8KsX2yfRgZFzLympTZe-bnTeDtxPguh4Ceuh7N0KcMJPKGKuolRmlO9SniJige1zEaL0NsP4_wGw530-fmgHaR8NDYhl4vQcc5oC65EYf8InTRkv1z5e4JdQ3cUo5M3x-8T3n-LA-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1257785084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kadekar, Sandeep ; Peddada, Shyamal ; Silins, Ilona ; French, John E. ; Högberg, Johan ; Stenius, Ulla</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadekar, Sandeep ; Peddada, Shyamal ; Silins, Ilona ; French, John E. ; Högberg, Johan ; Stenius, Ulla</creatorcontrib><description>Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database for sex differences in rat responses to chemical carcinogens. We found that the odds that male rat bioassays were assigned a higher level of evidence than female rat bioassays was 1.69 (p < .001). Of 278 carcinogenic chemicals in the database, 201 (72%) exhibited statistical gender differences (p ≤ .05) in at least one nonreproductive organ. One hundred thirty of these 201 chemicals induced gender-specific tumors in male rats and 59 in female rats. Sixty-eight chemicals induced tumors in males but no tumors in females. Less than one third (i.e., 19 chemicals) induced tumors in females but not males. Male-specific tumors included pancreatic and skin tumors, and female-specific tumors included lung tumors. For some tumor sites, these differences in gender susceptibility can be associated with literature data on sex hormone receptor expression. In conclusion, gender-specific tumors were common. The male dominance is in line with recent human data, and the male susceptibility to carcinogens should be further studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6233</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192623312446527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22585941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Carcinogenesis ; Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens ; Carcinogenicity Tests ; Carcinogens ; Carcinogens - toxicity ; Chemical agents ; Computer programs ; Data processing ; Disease Susceptibility ; Dominance ; Female ; Lung ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred Strains ; Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Pancreas ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred Strains ; Sex differences ; Sex Factors ; Sex hormones ; Skin ; Statistics ; Toxicology ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Toxicologic pathology, 2012-12, Vol.40 (8), p.1160-1168</ispartof><rights>2012 by The Author(s)</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8353d6dc9ece728cb8e6b5cc29e4d3700d9c3b04c4181d85828f62cf1534b8463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8353d6dc9ece728cb8e6b5cc29e4d3700d9c3b04c4181d85828f62cf1534b8463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0192623312446527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192623312446527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26764546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22585941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:126498679$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadekar, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peddada, Shyamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högberg, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenius, Ulla</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays</title><title>Toxicologic pathology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><description>Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database for sex differences in rat responses to chemical carcinogens. We found that the odds that male rat bioassays were assigned a higher level of evidence than female rat bioassays was 1.69 (p < .001). Of 278 carcinogenic chemicals in the database, 201 (72%) exhibited statistical gender differences (p ≤ .05) in at least one nonreproductive organ. One hundred thirty of these 201 chemicals induced gender-specific tumors in male rats and 59 in female rats. Sixty-eight chemicals induced tumors in males but no tumors in females. Less than one third (i.e., 19 chemicals) induced tumors in females but not males. Male-specific tumors included pancreatic and skin tumors, and female-specific tumors included lung tumors. For some tumor sites, these differences in gender susceptibility can be associated with literature data on sex hormone receptor expression. In conclusion, gender-specific tumors were common. The male dominance is in line with recent human data, and the male susceptibility to carcinogens should be further studied.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinogenicity Tests</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinogens - toxicity</subject><subject>Chemical agents</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sex hormones</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0K1G5L7z1VuSBxCfjbzhGWsiBVwKEcOKDIcSZblyTeejYq-9_Xy25bgdTTWPN-b0bjR8gZo28ZM-YdZRXXXAjGpdSKmwMyY0qIkmnKXpDZVi63-hE5RryhlFkm6SE54lxZVUk2I78WMLaQio-h6yDB6AGLMBbzaxiCd30xd8mHMS5hBAx_pa9uHeKYpav4J_jYx-Wm-J7iMrmh4OVPcKn4EKJDdBt8RV52rkc43dcT8uPTxdX8c3n5bfFl_v6y9ErQdWmFEq1ufQUeDLe-saAb5T2vQLbCUNpWXjRUepkPaK2y3Haa-y7fKhsrtTgh5W4u3sFqaupVCoNLmzq6UO9bv_MLaiUM4zbz1bP8KsX2yfRgZFzLympTZe-bnTeDtxPguh4Ceuh7N0KcMJPKGKuolRmlO9SniJige1zEaL0NsP4_wGw530-fmgHaR8NDYhl4vQcc5oC65EYf8InTRkv1z5e4JdQ3cUo5M3x-8T3n-LA-</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Kadekar, Sandeep</creator><creator>Peddada, Shyamal</creator><creator>Silins, Ilona</creator><creator>French, John E.</creator><creator>Högberg, Johan</creator><creator>Stenius, Ulla</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays</title><author>Kadekar, Sandeep ; Peddada, Shyamal ; Silins, Ilona ; French, John E. ; Högberg, Johan ; Stenius, Ulla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8353d6dc9ece728cb8e6b5cc29e4d3700d9c3b04c4181d85828f62cf1534b8463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinogenicity Tests</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinogens - toxicity</topic><topic>Chemical agents</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sex hormones</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadekar, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peddada, Shyamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högberg, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenius, Ulla</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadekar, Sandeep</au><au>Peddada, Shyamal</au><au>Silins, Ilona</au><au>French, John E.</au><au>Högberg, Johan</au><au>Stenius, Ulla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays</atitle><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1160</spage><epage>1168</epage><pages>1160-1168</pages><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><eissn>1533-1601</eissn><abstract>Differences in cancer incidences between men and women are often explained by either differences in environmental exposures or by influences of sex hormones. However, there are few studies on intrinsic gender differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens. We have analyzed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) database for sex differences in rat responses to chemical carcinogens. We found that the odds that male rat bioassays were assigned a higher level of evidence than female rat bioassays was 1.69 (p < .001). Of 278 carcinogenic chemicals in the database, 201 (72%) exhibited statistical gender differences (p ≤ .05) in at least one nonreproductive organ. One hundred thirty of these 201 chemicals induced gender-specific tumors in male rats and 59 in female rats. Sixty-eight chemicals induced tumors in males but no tumors in females. Less than one third (i.e., 19 chemicals) induced tumors in females but not males. Male-specific tumors included pancreatic and skin tumors, and female-specific tumors included lung tumors. For some tumor sites, these differences in gender susceptibility can be associated with literature data on sex hormone receptor expression. In conclusion, gender-specific tumors were common. The male dominance is in line with recent human data, and the male susceptibility to carcinogens should be further studied.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22585941</pmid><doi>10.1177/0192623312446527</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0192-6233 |
| ispartof | Toxicologic pathology, 2012-12, Vol.40 (8), p.1160-1168 |
| issn | 0192-6233 1533-1601 1533-1601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_537128 |
| source | MEDLINE; SWEPUB Freely available online; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cancer Carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens Carcinogenicity Tests Carcinogens Carcinogens - toxicity Chemical agents Computer programs Data processing Disease Susceptibility Dominance Female Lung Male Medical sciences Medicin och hälsovetenskap Mice Mice, Inbred Strains Neoplasms - chemically induced Neoplasms - pathology Pancreas Rats Rats, Inbred Strains Sex differences Sex Factors Sex hormones Skin Statistics Toxicology Tumors |
| title | Gender Differences in Chemical Carcinogenesis in National Toxicology Program 2-Year Bioassays |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A34%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Differences%20in%20Chemical%20Carcinogenesis%20in%20National%20Toxicology%20Program%202-Year%20Bioassays&rft.jtitle=Toxicologic%20pathology&rft.au=Kadekar,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1160&rft.epage=1168&rft.pages=1160-1168&rft.issn=0192-6233&rft.eissn=1533-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192623312446527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1257785084%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1257785084&rft_id=info:pmid/22585941&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192623312446527&rfr_iscdi=true |