Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)
Objectives ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2013-11, Vol.46 (5), p.510-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 510 |
container_title | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Halliday, Alison Bulbulia, Richard Gray, William Naughten, Ally den Hartog, Anne Delmestri, Antonella Wallis, Carol le Conte, Stephanie Macdonald, Sumaira |
description | Objectives ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70–99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50–99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial : ISRCTN21144362. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_526810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588413005029</els_id><sourcerecordid>1446871911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-2ad9905ca9402161ca68a4a69790110962522674e3f81b83b1538185b6022cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURx19E_4EFy3D30WEl3p9MgwjCouzAgOLPgrUinazSz_WWSXpl_b5qZ3YOghyJFeO_VS14lyVsOSw5cvj8s6fDglwJ4toRyCQKeJZe8yEQquCyexx5KlRZK5RfJK-8PAFDwrHiZXIg8dhzUZfJ9G3SYPLsbGx2I6b5ht30gZzv2jfzUBs_2buhY-Els5Y_dGIZOB2vYWrsh2IZtJ_eD3JHtnNVtKtjVar3dpeL6dfJir1tPb87nIrn7_Gm3vkk3X7_crleb1EihQip0U1VQGF3lEF1zo6XSuZZVWUF0WElRCCHLnLK94rXK6vg-xVVRSxDCNFm2SNKTrv9N41TjGK1rd8RBWzxf3ceOsBBScYj4zT_x7TTGqmPNBC3AlJoIZV3lmCsDqBUUWNc6L1UJRkU_i-TqJDe64ddEPmBnvaG21T0Nk0ee51KVvOI8QsUJatzgvaP902wOOAeKB5wDxTlQhBJjoJH07qw_1R01T5THBCPgwwlA8ZMfLDn0xlJvqLGOTMBmsP_X__gX3bS2t0a393Qkfxgm18f4kKMXCLidV2reKJ7FZQJRZX8AsE7DoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1446871911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Halliday, Alison ; Bulbulia, Richard ; Gray, William ; Naughten, Ally ; den Hartog, Anne ; Delmestri, Antonella ; Wallis, Carol ; le Conte, Stephanie ; Macdonald, Sumaira</creator><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Alison ; Bulbulia, Richard ; Gray, William ; Naughten, Ally ; den Hartog, Anne ; Delmestri, Antonella ; Wallis, Carol ; le Conte, Stephanie ; Macdonald, Sumaira ; ACST-2 Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70–99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50–99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial : ISRCTN21144362.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24051108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty - adverse effects ; Angioplasty - instrumentation ; Angioplasty - mortality ; Asymptomatic Diseases ; Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems ; Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use ; Carotid artery stenosis ; Carotid artery stenting ; Carotid endarterectomy ; Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis ; Carotid Stenosis - mortality ; Carotid Stenosis - surgery ; Carotid Stenosis - therapy ; Clinical Medicine ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Kardiologi ; Klinisk medicin ; Male ; Medical and Health Sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - etiology ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Patient Selection ; Randomized controlled trial ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents ; Stroke ; Stroke - etiology ; Stroke - mortality ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2013-11, Vol.46 (5), p.510-518</ispartof><rights>European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-2ad9905ca9402161ca68a4a69790110962522674e3f81b83b1538185b6022cd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-2ad9905ca9402161ca68a4a69790110962522674e3f81b83b1538185b6022cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588413005029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24051108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a20c7aee-6b94-48c0-a805-bba47870c8b8$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:127754794$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulbulia, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughten, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Hartog, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmestri, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>le Conte, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Sumaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ACST-2 Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70–99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50–99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial : ISRCTN21144362.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Angioplasty - mortality</subject><subject>Asymptomatic Diseases</subject><subject>Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carotid artery stenosis</subject><subject>Carotid artery stenting</subject><subject>Carotid endarterectomy</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical Medicine</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kardiologi</subject><subject>Klinisk medicin</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Stroke - mortality</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURx19E_4EFy3D30WEl3p9MgwjCouzAgOLPgrUinazSz_WWSXpl_b5qZ3YOghyJFeO_VS14lyVsOSw5cvj8s6fDglwJ4toRyCQKeJZe8yEQquCyexx5KlRZK5RfJK-8PAFDwrHiZXIg8dhzUZfJ9G3SYPLsbGx2I6b5ht30gZzv2jfzUBs_2buhY-Els5Y_dGIZOB2vYWrsh2IZtJ_eD3JHtnNVtKtjVar3dpeL6dfJir1tPb87nIrn7_Gm3vkk3X7_crleb1EihQip0U1VQGF3lEF1zo6XSuZZVWUF0WElRCCHLnLK94rXK6vg-xVVRSxDCNFm2SNKTrv9N41TjGK1rd8RBWzxf3ceOsBBScYj4zT_x7TTGqmPNBC3AlJoIZV3lmCsDqBUUWNc6L1UJRkU_i-TqJDe64ddEPmBnvaG21T0Nk0ee51KVvOI8QsUJatzgvaP902wOOAeKB5wDxTlQhBJjoJH07qw_1R01T5THBCPgwwlA8ZMfLDn0xlJvqLGOTMBmsP_X__gX3bS2t0a393Qkfxgm18f4kKMXCLidV2reKJ7FZQJRZX8AsE7DoA</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Halliday, Alison</creator><creator>Bulbulia, Richard</creator><creator>Gray, William</creator><creator>Naughten, Ally</creator><creator>den Hartog, Anne</creator><creator>Delmestri, Antonella</creator><creator>Wallis, Carol</creator><creator>le Conte, Stephanie</creator><creator>Macdonald, Sumaira</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AGCHP</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D95</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)</title><author>Halliday, Alison ; Bulbulia, Richard ; Gray, William ; Naughten, Ally ; den Hartog, Anne ; Delmestri, Antonella ; Wallis, Carol ; le Conte, Stephanie ; Macdonald, Sumaira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-2ad9905ca9402161ca68a4a69790110962522674e3f81b83b1538185b6022cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Angioplasty - mortality</topic><topic>Asymptomatic Diseases</topic><topic>Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carotid artery stenosis</topic><topic>Carotid artery stenting</topic><topic>Carotid endarterectomy</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical Medicine</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kardiologi</topic><topic>Klinisk medicin</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Stroke - mortality</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulbulia, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughten, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Hartog, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmestri, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>le Conte, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Sumaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ACST-2 Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halliday, Alison</au><au>Bulbulia, Richard</au><au>Gray, William</au><au>Naughten, Ally</au><au>den Hartog, Anne</au><au>Delmestri, Antonella</au><au>Wallis, Carol</au><au>le Conte, Stephanie</au><au>Macdonald, Sumaira</au><aucorp>ACST-2 Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>510-518</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Objectives ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70–99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50–99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial : ISRCTN21144362.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24051108</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-5884 |
ispartof | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2013-11, Vol.46 (5), p.510-518 |
issn | 1078-5884 1532-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_526810 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online |
subjects | Aged Angioplasty - adverse effects Angioplasty - instrumentation Angioplasty - mortality Asymptomatic Diseases Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems Cardiovascular Agents - therapeutic use Carotid artery stenosis Carotid artery stenting Carotid endarterectomy Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis Carotid Stenosis - mortality Carotid Stenosis - surgery Carotid Stenosis - therapy Clinical Medicine Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects Endarterectomy, Carotid - mortality Female Humans Kardiologi Klinisk medicin Male Medical and Health Sciences Medicin och hälsovetenskap Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - etiology Myocardial Infarction - mortality Patient Selection Randomized controlled trial Risk Assessment Risk Factors Severity of Illness Index Stents Stroke Stroke - etiology Stroke - mortality Surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20Update%20and%20Interim%20Results%20from%20the%20Asymptomatic%20Carotid%20Surgery%20Trial-2%20(ACST-2)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Halliday,%20Alison&rft.aucorp=ACST-2%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=510-518&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1446871911%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1446871911&rft_id=info:pmid/24051108&rft_els_id=S1078588413005029&rfr_iscdi=true |