Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances

Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact dermatitis 2013-12, Vol.69 (6), p.335-341
Hauptverfasser: Uter, Wolfgang, Yazar, Kerem, Kratz, Eva-Maria, Mildau, Gerd, Lidén, Carola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 341
container_issue 6
container_start_page 335
container_title Contact dermatitis
container_volume 69
creator Uter, Wolfgang
Yazar, Kerem
Kratz, Eva-Maria
Mildau, Gerd
Lidén, Carola
description Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrances in different categories of cosmetics, addressing the 26 fragrances that need to be identified on the label according to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC amended by 2003/15/EC. Methods A survey of products marketed in Germany, conducted in 2006–2009 by the Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office in Karlsruhe, identified 4991 products with information on the presence of fragrances. The products were categorized according to Annex I to the Cosmetics Directive. The occurrence and co‐occurrence of fragrances were analysed in tabular form and as social network diagrams. Results The median number of fragrances in products varied greatly between categories, ranging up to nine in perfumes. Limonene and linalool were the most commonly identified fragrances, often used together, but also with other fragrances. Thirty per cent of all products were not declared to contain any fragrances. Conclusions For the first time, the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrance ingredients in important categories of cosmetic products has been described. The observations illustrate and quantify the ‘cocktail’ of fragrance allergens that may facilitate sensitization.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.12125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_526459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3317771501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5755-cca37399aee8db3568a4b939a12864065bcc9e0517c32aa4858f65abf96609a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1r1TAcBvAgijtOL_wCUhBBL3qWl-bNO6nuOBhnN8ouQ5r-O7r1NDVp2fbtTT09ZyAsNw3h9yRpHoTeE7wmaZw5X68JJZS_QCsiMM4xZ-IlWmGCeU6UZCfoTYy3GBNRUPUandCC4OTJCpWln4YO6gweBh-nANnos7a_CVC30I8x803mfNzB2LpsCL6e3Bi_Zhfr7DzYm2B7B_EtetXYLsK75XuKfp__-FX-zC-vNhflt8vcccl57pxlkmltAVRdMS6ULSrNtCVUiQILXjmnAXMiHaPWFoqrRnBbNVoIrC1npyjf7xvvYZgqM4R2Z8Oj8bY1y9JdmoHhVBRcJ6-f9fOvPIUOQUKlxAWhLGU_77MJ_pkgjmbXRgddZ3vwUzSk4IooQYv5Wh__o7d-Cn16CUM41UJLRmVSX_bKBR9jgOZ4HYLN3KJJLZp_LSb7YdlxqnZQH-WhtgQ-LcBGZ7tm7qGNT07qhOTszvbuvu3g8fkTTXn1_XD08sZtHOHhmLDhzgjJJDfX243hW7a53kpiNuwvlhbBGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1529697327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Uter, Wolfgang ; Yazar, Kerem ; Kratz, Eva-Maria ; Mildau, Gerd ; Lidén, Carola</creator><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang ; Yazar, Kerem ; Kratz, Eva-Maria ; Mildau, Gerd ; Lidén, Carola</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrances in different categories of cosmetics, addressing the 26 fragrances that need to be identified on the label according to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC amended by 2003/15/EC. Methods A survey of products marketed in Germany, conducted in 2006–2009 by the Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office in Karlsruhe, identified 4991 products with information on the presence of fragrances. The products were categorized according to Annex I to the Cosmetics Directive. The occurrence and co‐occurrence of fragrances were analysed in tabular form and as social network diagrams. Results The median number of fragrances in products varied greatly between categories, ranging up to nine in perfumes. Limonene and linalool were the most commonly identified fragrances, often used together, but also with other fragrances. Thirty per cent of all products were not declared to contain any fragrances. Conclusions For the first time, the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrance ingredients in important categories of cosmetic products has been described. The observations illustrate and quantify the ‘cocktail’ of fragrance allergens that may facilitate sensitization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.12125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24102121</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CODEDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens - adverse effects ; Allergens - analysis ; Allergic diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cosmetics ; Cyclohexenes - analysis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology ; Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Environmental Exposure - analysis ; exposure analysis ; fragrances ; Germany ; Humans ; Immunopathology ; ingredient label ; Medical sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Monoterpenes - analysis ; Perfume - adverse effects ; Perfume - analysis ; Perfume - chemistry ; Product Labeling ; Risk Assessment ; Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies ; Terpenes - analysis ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2013-12, Vol.69 (6), p.335-341</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5755-cca37399aee8db3568a4b939a12864065bcc9e0517c32aa4858f65abf96609a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5755-cca37399aee8db3568a4b939a12864065bcc9e0517c32aa4858f65abf96609a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.12125$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.12125$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27921371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:127704123$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazar, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratz, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mildau, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lidén, Carola</creatorcontrib><title>Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrances in different categories of cosmetics, addressing the 26 fragrances that need to be identified on the label according to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC amended by 2003/15/EC. Methods A survey of products marketed in Germany, conducted in 2006–2009 by the Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office in Karlsruhe, identified 4991 products with information on the presence of fragrances. The products were categorized according to Annex I to the Cosmetics Directive. The occurrence and co‐occurrence of fragrances were analysed in tabular form and as social network diagrams. Results The median number of fragrances in products varied greatly between categories, ranging up to nine in perfumes. Limonene and linalool were the most commonly identified fragrances, often used together, but also with other fragrances. Thirty per cent of all products were not declared to contain any fragrances. Conclusions For the first time, the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrance ingredients in important categories of cosmetic products has been described. The observations illustrate and quantify the ‘cocktail’ of fragrance allergens that may facilitate sensitization.</description><subject>Allergens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Allergens - analysis</subject><subject>Allergic diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Cyclohexenes - analysis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</subject><subject>Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>exposure analysis</subject><subject>fragrances</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>ingredient label</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Monoterpenes - analysis</subject><subject>Perfume - adverse effects</subject><subject>Perfume - analysis</subject><subject>Perfume - chemistry</subject><subject>Product Labeling</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</subject><subject>Terpenes - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V1r1TAcBvAgijtOL_wCUhBBL3qWl-bNO6nuOBhnN8ouQ5r-O7r1NDVp2fbtTT09ZyAsNw3h9yRpHoTeE7wmaZw5X68JJZS_QCsiMM4xZ-IlWmGCeU6UZCfoTYy3GBNRUPUandCC4OTJCpWln4YO6gweBh-nANnos7a_CVC30I8x803mfNzB2LpsCL6e3Bi_Zhfr7DzYm2B7B_EtetXYLsK75XuKfp__-FX-zC-vNhflt8vcccl57pxlkmltAVRdMS6ULSrNtCVUiQILXjmnAXMiHaPWFoqrRnBbNVoIrC1npyjf7xvvYZgqM4R2Z8Oj8bY1y9JdmoHhVBRcJ6-f9fOvPIUOQUKlxAWhLGU_77MJ_pkgjmbXRgddZ3vwUzSk4IooQYv5Wh__o7d-Cn16CUM41UJLRmVSX_bKBR9jgOZ4HYLN3KJJLZp_LSb7YdlxqnZQH-WhtgQ-LcBGZ7tm7qGNT07qhOTszvbuvu3g8fkTTXn1_XD08sZtHOHhmLDhzgjJJDfX243hW7a53kpiNuwvlhbBGw</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Uter, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Yazar, Kerem</creator><creator>Kratz, Eva-Maria</creator><creator>Mildau, Gerd</creator><creator>Lidén, Carola</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances</title><author>Uter, Wolfgang ; Yazar, Kerem ; Kratz, Eva-Maria ; Mildau, Gerd ; Lidén, Carola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5755-cca37399aee8db3568a4b939a12864065bcc9e0517c32aa4858f65abf96609a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Allergens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Allergens - analysis</topic><topic>Allergic diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Cyclohexenes - analysis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</topic><topic>Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>exposure analysis</topic><topic>fragrances</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>ingredient label</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Monoterpenes - analysis</topic><topic>Perfume - adverse effects</topic><topic>Perfume - analysis</topic><topic>Perfume - chemistry</topic><topic>Product Labeling</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</topic><topic>Terpenes - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazar, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratz, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mildau, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lidén, Carola</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uter, Wolfgang</au><au>Yazar, Kerem</au><au>Kratz, Eva-Maria</au><au>Mildau, Gerd</au><au>Lidén, Carola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>335-341</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><coden>CODEDG</coden><abstract>Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrances in different categories of cosmetics, addressing the 26 fragrances that need to be identified on the label according to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC amended by 2003/15/EC. Methods A survey of products marketed in Germany, conducted in 2006–2009 by the Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office in Karlsruhe, identified 4991 products with information on the presence of fragrances. The products were categorized according to Annex I to the Cosmetics Directive. The occurrence and co‐occurrence of fragrances were analysed in tabular form and as social network diagrams. Results The median number of fragrances in products varied greatly between categories, ranging up to nine in perfumes. Limonene and linalool were the most commonly identified fragrances, often used together, but also with other fragrances. Thirty per cent of all products were not declared to contain any fragrances. Conclusions For the first time, the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrance ingredients in important categories of cosmetic products has been described. The observations illustrate and quantify the ‘cocktail’ of fragrance allergens that may facilitate sensitization.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24102121</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.12125</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-1873
ispartof Contact dermatitis, 2013-12, Vol.69 (6), p.335-341
issn 0105-1873
1600-0536
1600-0536
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_526459
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Allergens - adverse effects
Allergens - analysis
Allergic diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Cosmetics
Cyclohexenes - analysis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology
Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology
Environmental Exposure - adverse effects
Environmental Exposure - analysis
exposure analysis
fragrances
Germany
Humans
Immunopathology
ingredient label
Medical sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Monoterpenes - analysis
Perfume - adverse effects
Perfume - analysis
Perfume - chemistry
Product Labeling
Risk Assessment
Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies
Terpenes - analysis
Toxicology
title Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A17%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coupled%20exposure%20to%20ingredients%20of%20cosmetic%20products:%20I.%20Fragrances&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Uter,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=335-341&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft.coden=CODEDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.12125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3317771501%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1529697327&rft_id=info:pmid/24102121&rfr_iscdi=true