Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam
In northern Vietnam the Neonatal health - Knowledge Into Practice (NeoKIP, Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44599712) trial has evaluated facilitation as a knowledge translation intervention to improve neonatal survival. The results demonstrated that intervention sites, each having an assigned group...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH 2013-12, Vol.13 (1), p.234-234, Article 234 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 234 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 234 |
container_title | BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Eriksson, Leif Duc, Duong M Eldh, Ann Catrine Vu, Pham N Thanh Tran, Q Huy Målqvist, Mats Wallin, Lars |
description | In northern Vietnam the Neonatal health - Knowledge Into Practice (NeoKIP, Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44599712) trial has evaluated facilitation as a knowledge translation intervention to improve neonatal survival. The results demonstrated that intervention sites, each having an assigned group including local stakeholders supported by a facilitator, lowered the neonatal mortality rate by 50% during the last intervention year compared with control sites. This process evaluation was conducted to identify and describe mechanisms of the NeoKIP intervention based on experiences of facilitators and intervention group members.
Four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with all facilitators at different occasions and 12 FGDs with 6 intervention groups at 2 occasions. Fifteen FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes and 17 sub-themes emerged from the 3 FGDs with facilitators, and 5 themes and 18 sub-themes were identified from the 12 FGDs with the intervention groups mirroring the process of, and the barriers to, the intervention. Facilitators and intervention group members concurred that having groups representing various organisations was beneficial. Facilitators were considered important in assembling the groups. The facilitators functioned best if coming from the same geographical area as the groups and if they were able to come to terms with the chair of the groups. However, the facilitators' lack of health knowledge was regarded as a deficit for assisting the groups' assignments. FGD participants experienced the NeoKIP intervention to have impact on the knowledge and behaviour of both intervention group members and the general public, however, they found that the intervention was a slow and time-consuming process. Perceived facilitation barriers were lack of money, inadequate support, and the function of the intervention groups.
This qualitative process evaluation contributes to explain the improved neonatal survival and why this occurred after a latent period in the NeoKIP project. The used knowledge translation intervention, where facilitators supported multi-stakeholder coalitions with the mandate to impact upon attitudes and behaviour in the communes, has low costs and potential for being scaled-up within existing healthcare systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1471-2393-13-234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_525008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534612942</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534612942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-4788a530632614cfc3fbd4173b8c9f90ee72fbd65b98bab66d9a1ebb98d422f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFk9-L1DAQx4so3nn67pMUfBG8nvnVtH0RlvUnLIqg9xrSdrqbuzRZk3ZF_3qndl1uxVPyMMnM5zudTKZJ8piSC0pL-YKKgmaMVzyjHK24k5weXHdv7E-SBzFeEUKLMif3kxMmOCeiYKfJjxXE6F1MLejgoE274Ps0DvoaNt62EGJqXKrTTjfGmkEPxjv0DBB24H4dBh3WMBi3Th14pwdt0w1oO2wm4adRY-CDcZt0G_zOuAbO00sDg9P9w-Rep22ER3t7lnx58_rz8l22-vj2_XKxyuqCkCETRVnqnBPJmaSi6Rre1a2gBa_LpuoqAlAw9Mi8rspa11K2laZQ46kVjHWCnyXZnDd-g-1Yq20wvQ7flddG7V3XuAOVs5yQEvnzW_lX5nKhfFircVRYAq-qf6Y_4NYgzyXlOfLP_8-3E57LqZiXM41oD22DTQ_aHomOI85s1NrvFC-lzEuCCZZzgtr4WxIcRxrfq2lw1DQ4WAXaqYfP9mUE_3WEOKjexAas1fjoY0RBRQrBSDmhT_9Ar_wYHL4wUrIqSM7KqQsXM7XWFpRxncePN7ha6E3jHXQG_YucC0lZJRgKyCxogo8xQHe4AiVq-hn-VvSTm707CH5PP_8JhUUIfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469705285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Eriksson, Leif ; Duc, Duong M ; Eldh, Ann Catrine ; Vu, Pham N Thanh ; Tran, Q Huy ; Målqvist, Mats ; Wallin, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Leif ; Duc, Duong M ; Eldh, Ann Catrine ; Vu, Pham N Thanh ; Tran, Q Huy ; Målqvist, Mats ; Wallin, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>In northern Vietnam the Neonatal health - Knowledge Into Practice (NeoKIP, Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44599712) trial has evaluated facilitation as a knowledge translation intervention to improve neonatal survival. The results demonstrated that intervention sites, each having an assigned group including local stakeholders supported by a facilitator, lowered the neonatal mortality rate by 50% during the last intervention year compared with control sites. This process evaluation was conducted to identify and describe mechanisms of the NeoKIP intervention based on experiences of facilitators and intervention group members.
Four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with all facilitators at different occasions and 12 FGDs with 6 intervention groups at 2 occasions. Fifteen FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes and 17 sub-themes emerged from the 3 FGDs with facilitators, and 5 themes and 18 sub-themes were identified from the 12 FGDs with the intervention groups mirroring the process of, and the barriers to, the intervention. Facilitators and intervention group members concurred that having groups representing various organisations was beneficial. Facilitators were considered important in assembling the groups. The facilitators functioned best if coming from the same geographical area as the groups and if they were able to come to terms with the chair of the groups. However, the facilitators' lack of health knowledge was regarded as a deficit for assisting the groups' assignments. FGD participants experienced the NeoKIP intervention to have impact on the knowledge and behaviour of both intervention group members and the general public, however, they found that the intervention was a slow and time-consuming process. Perceived facilitation barriers were lack of money, inadequate support, and the function of the intervention groups.
This qualitative process evaluation contributes to explain the improved neonatal survival and why this occurred after a latent period in the NeoKIP project. The used knowledge translation intervention, where facilitators supported multi-stakeholder coalitions with the mandate to impact upon attitudes and behaviour in the communes, has low costs and potential for being scaled-up within existing healthcare systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24330472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Children & youth ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Community Health Centers ; Cooperative Behavior ; Developing Countries ; Focus Groups ; Global health ; Health and Welfare ; Health Plan Implementation - economics ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Hälsa och välfärd ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; International Health ; Internationell hälsa ; Intervention ; Knowledge ; Knowledge transfer ; Maternal & child health ; Meetings ; Neonatology ; Neurosciences ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - ethnology ; Patient outcomes ; Prenatal care ; Primary care ; Problem Solving ; Program Evaluation ; Public health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality improvement ; Social aspects ; Stakeholders ; Translational Medical Research ; Vietnam ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013-12, Vol.13 (1), p.234-234, Article 234</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Eriksson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Eriksson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Eriksson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-4788a530632614cfc3fbd4173b8c9f90ee72fbd65b98bab66d9a1ebb98d422f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-4788a530632614cfc3fbd4173b8c9f90ee72fbd65b98bab66d9a1ebb98d422f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866580/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866580/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24330472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-13568$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136135$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-173399$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:127983280$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Leif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duc, Duong M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldh, Ann Catrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Pham N Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Q Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Målqvist, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallin, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam</title><title>BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH</title><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><description>In northern Vietnam the Neonatal health - Knowledge Into Practice (NeoKIP, Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44599712) trial has evaluated facilitation as a knowledge translation intervention to improve neonatal survival. The results demonstrated that intervention sites, each having an assigned group including local stakeholders supported by a facilitator, lowered the neonatal mortality rate by 50% during the last intervention year compared with control sites. This process evaluation was conducted to identify and describe mechanisms of the NeoKIP intervention based on experiences of facilitators and intervention group members.
Four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with all facilitators at different occasions and 12 FGDs with 6 intervention groups at 2 occasions. Fifteen FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes and 17 sub-themes emerged from the 3 FGDs with facilitators, and 5 themes and 18 sub-themes were identified from the 12 FGDs with the intervention groups mirroring the process of, and the barriers to, the intervention. Facilitators and intervention group members concurred that having groups representing various organisations was beneficial. Facilitators were considered important in assembling the groups. The facilitators functioned best if coming from the same geographical area as the groups and if they were able to come to terms with the chair of the groups. However, the facilitators' lack of health knowledge was regarded as a deficit for assisting the groups' assignments. FGD participants experienced the NeoKIP intervention to have impact on the knowledge and behaviour of both intervention group members and the general public, however, they found that the intervention was a slow and time-consuming process. Perceived facilitation barriers were lack of money, inadequate support, and the function of the intervention groups.
This qualitative process evaluation contributes to explain the improved neonatal survival and why this occurred after a latent period in the NeoKIP project. The used knowledge translation intervention, where facilitators supported multi-stakeholder coalitions with the mandate to impact upon attitudes and behaviour in the communes, has low costs and potential for being scaled-up within existing healthcare systems.</description><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Community Health Centers</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Health and Welfare</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hälsa och välfärd</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>International Health</subject><subject>Internationell hälsa</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge transfer</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Neonatology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - ethnology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research</subject><subject>Vietnam</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1471-2393</issn><issn>1471-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFk9-L1DAQx4so3nn67pMUfBG8nvnVtH0RlvUnLIqg9xrSdrqbuzRZk3ZF_3qndl1uxVPyMMnM5zudTKZJ8piSC0pL-YKKgmaMVzyjHK24k5weXHdv7E-SBzFeEUKLMif3kxMmOCeiYKfJjxXE6F1MLejgoE274Ps0DvoaNt62EGJqXKrTTjfGmkEPxjv0DBB24H4dBh3WMBi3Th14pwdt0w1oO2wm4adRY-CDcZt0G_zOuAbO00sDg9P9w-Rep22ER3t7lnx58_rz8l22-vj2_XKxyuqCkCETRVnqnBPJmaSi6Rre1a2gBa_LpuoqAlAw9Mi8rspa11K2laZQ46kVjHWCnyXZnDd-g-1Yq20wvQ7flddG7V3XuAOVs5yQEvnzW_lX5nKhfFircVRYAq-qf6Y_4NYgzyXlOfLP_8-3E57LqZiXM41oD22DTQ_aHomOI85s1NrvFC-lzEuCCZZzgtr4WxIcRxrfq2lw1DQ4WAXaqYfP9mUE_3WEOKjexAas1fjoY0RBRQrBSDmhT_9Ar_wYHL4wUrIqSM7KqQsXM7XWFpRxncePN7ha6E3jHXQG_YucC0lZJRgKyCxogo8xQHe4AiVq-hn-VvSTm707CH5PP_8JhUUIfg</recordid><startdate>20131213</startdate><enddate>20131213</enddate><creator>Eriksson, Leif</creator><creator>Duc, Duong M</creator><creator>Eldh, Ann Catrine</creator><creator>Vu, Pham N Thanh</creator><creator>Tran, Q Huy</creator><creator>Målqvist, Mats</creator><creator>Wallin, Lars</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>ABXSW</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>ACNBI</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131213</creationdate><title>Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam</title><author>Eriksson, Leif ; Duc, Duong M ; Eldh, Ann Catrine ; Vu, Pham N Thanh ; Tran, Q Huy ; Målqvist, Mats ; Wallin, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b700t-4788a530632614cfc3fbd4173b8c9f90ee72fbd65b98bab66d9a1ebb98d422f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Community Health Centers</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Health and Welfare</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hälsa och välfärd</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>International Health</topic><topic>Internationell hälsa</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge transfer</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Neonatology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - ethnology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research</topic><topic>Vietnam</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Leif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duc, Duong M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldh, Ann Catrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Pham N Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Q Huy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Målqvist, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallin, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eriksson, Leif</au><au>Duc, Duong M</au><au>Eldh, Ann Catrine</au><au>Vu, Pham N Thanh</au><au>Tran, Q Huy</au><au>Målqvist, Mats</au><au>Wallin, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam</atitle><jtitle>BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><date>2013-12-13</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>234</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>234-234</pages><artnum>234</artnum><issn>1471-2393</issn><eissn>1471-2393</eissn><abstract>In northern Vietnam the Neonatal health - Knowledge Into Practice (NeoKIP, Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44599712) trial has evaluated facilitation as a knowledge translation intervention to improve neonatal survival. The results demonstrated that intervention sites, each having an assigned group including local stakeholders supported by a facilitator, lowered the neonatal mortality rate by 50% during the last intervention year compared with control sites. This process evaluation was conducted to identify and describe mechanisms of the NeoKIP intervention based on experiences of facilitators and intervention group members.
Four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with all facilitators at different occasions and 12 FGDs with 6 intervention groups at 2 occasions. Fifteen FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes and 17 sub-themes emerged from the 3 FGDs with facilitators, and 5 themes and 18 sub-themes were identified from the 12 FGDs with the intervention groups mirroring the process of, and the barriers to, the intervention. Facilitators and intervention group members concurred that having groups representing various organisations was beneficial. Facilitators were considered important in assembling the groups. The facilitators functioned best if coming from the same geographical area as the groups and if they were able to come to terms with the chair of the groups. However, the facilitators' lack of health knowledge was regarded as a deficit for assisting the groups' assignments. FGD participants experienced the NeoKIP intervention to have impact on the knowledge and behaviour of both intervention group members and the general public, however, they found that the intervention was a slow and time-consuming process. Perceived facilitation barriers were lack of money, inadequate support, and the function of the intervention groups.
This qualitative process evaluation contributes to explain the improved neonatal survival and why this occurred after a latent period in the NeoKIP project. The used knowledge translation intervention, where facilitators supported multi-stakeholder coalitions with the mandate to impact upon attitudes and behaviour in the communes, has low costs and potential for being scaled-up within existing healthcare systems.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24330472</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2393-13-234</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2393 |
ispartof | BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013-12, Vol.13 (1), p.234-234, Article 234 |
issn | 1471-2393 1471-2393 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_525008 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SWEPUB Freely available online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Children & youth Collaboration Communication Community Health Centers Cooperative Behavior Developing Countries Focus Groups Global health Health and Welfare Health Plan Implementation - economics Health Services Accessibility Humans Hälsa och välfärd Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Infants International Health Internationell hälsa Intervention Knowledge Knowledge transfer Maternal & child health Meetings Neonatology Neurosciences Patient Acceptance of Health Care - ethnology Patient outcomes Prenatal care Primary care Problem Solving Program Evaluation Public health Qualitative Research Quality improvement Social aspects Stakeholders Translational Medical Research Vietnam Womens health |
title | Lessons learned from stakeholders in a facilitation intervention targeting neonatal health in Quang Ninh province, Vietnam |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A49%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20learned%20from%20stakeholders%20in%20a%20facilitation%20intervention%20targeting%20neonatal%20health%20in%20Quang%20Ninh%20province,%20Vietnam&rft.jtitle=BMC%20PREGNANCY%20AND%20CHILDBIRTH&rft.au=Eriksson,%20Leif&rft.date=2013-12-13&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=234&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=234-234&rft.artnum=234&rft.issn=1471-2393&rft.eissn=1471-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2393-13-234&rft_dat=%3Cgale_swepu%3EA534612942%3C/gale_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469705285&rft_id=info:pmid/24330472&rft_galeid=A534612942&rfr_iscdi=true |