Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups

Abstract A substantial literature indicates that pain acceptance is a useful behavioral process in chronic pain rehabilitation. Pain acceptance consists of willingness to experience pain and to engage in important activities even in the presence of pain and is often measured using the Chronic Pain A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of pain 2015-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1095-1105
Hauptverfasser: Rovner, Graciela, Vowles, Kevin E, Gerdle, Björn, Gillanders, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1105
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1095
container_title The journal of pain
container_volume 16
creator Rovner, Graciela
Vowles, Kevin E
Gerdle, Björn
Gillanders, David
description Abstract A substantial literature indicates that pain acceptance is a useful behavioral process in chronic pain rehabilitation. Pain acceptance consists of willingness to experience pain and to engage in important activities even in the presence of pain and is often measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). Previous traditional cluster analyses of the 20-item CPAQ identified 3 patient clusters that differed across measures of patient functioning in meaningful ways. The aims of this study were to replicate the previous study in a new sample, using the more robust method of latent class analysis (LCA), and to compare the cluster structure of the CPAQ and the shorter CPAQ-8. In total, 914 patients with chronic pain completed the CPAQ and a range of measures of psychological and physical function. Patient clusters identified via LCA were then used to compare patients across functional measures. Contrary to previous research, LCA demonstrated that a 4-cluster structure was superior to a 3-cluster structure. Consistent with previous research, cluster membership based on patterns of pain willingness and activity engagement was significantly associated with specific patterns of psychological and physical function, in line with theoretical predictions. These cluster structures were similar for both CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 items. These results provide further evidence of the relevance of chronic pain acceptance, and a more nuanced understanding of how the components of acceptance are related to function. Perspective Pain acceptance is important in chronic pain. The findings of the present study, which included 914 individuals with chronic pain, provide support for 4 discrete groups of patients based on levels of acceptance (low, medium, and high), as well as a group with a high level of activity engagement and low willingness to have pain. These groups appear statistically robust and differed in predictable ways across measures of functioning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_511208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S152659001500810X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1729349007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-e19b5beedfda5045bc4564b3fcda0f830c562c62a30cf13fd509f2398eaca6663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl2O0zAYjBCIXRZOgIT8yEuC7cT5QQKpKltAqsSiAuLNcpwvrbOpnbUToIfgDj1LT4bTdBcJCXjyyN_MN05mguApwRHBJH3RRE0nlI4oJizCWYRxdi84J4zmYZ4k2f0jTkNWYHwWPHKuwZgQlmUPgzOa0iIr0vw8-LkUPegezVvhHJpp0e6ccsjUqN8AWm2M7ZHQFVoavUYLY7fj7LD3w8N-vrFGK3nYX_lnoJmU0PVCS0AfB3C9MloLZeElWgzW8y26_CG2Sotxclxy5aH3PuxXQ7m2Zujc4-BBLVoHT07nRfB5cflp_i5cfnj7fj5bhpLlrA-BFCUrAaq6EgwnrJQJS5MyrmUlcJ3HWLKUypQKj2oS1xXDRU3jIgchRZqm8UUQTnvdd-iGkndWbYXdcSMUP11dewScEUJx7vnFX_mdNdVv0a2QxN6PJEnyT6836suMG7vmrRo4obEPzPOfT3y_-Gb8kXyrnIS2FRrM4DjJaBEnPtTMU-OJKq1xzkJ9t5xgPnaEN_zYET52hOOMT6pnJ4Oh3EJ1p7kthSe8mgjgI_imwHInfVASKh-n7Hll1H8MXv-hl63yRRHtNezANWawvmf-S7ijHPPVWNOxpYRhnBP8Nf4FNSvraQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729349007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Rovner, Graciela ; Vowles, Kevin E ; Gerdle, Björn ; Gillanders, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Rovner, Graciela ; Vowles, Kevin E ; Gerdle, Björn ; Gillanders, David</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract A substantial literature indicates that pain acceptance is a useful behavioral process in chronic pain rehabilitation. Pain acceptance consists of willingness to experience pain and to engage in important activities even in the presence of pain and is often measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). Previous traditional cluster analyses of the 20-item CPAQ identified 3 patient clusters that differed across measures of patient functioning in meaningful ways. The aims of this study were to replicate the previous study in a new sample, using the more robust method of latent class analysis (LCA), and to compare the cluster structure of the CPAQ and the shorter CPAQ-8. In total, 914 patients with chronic pain completed the CPAQ and a range of measures of psychological and physical function. Patient clusters identified via LCA were then used to compare patients across functional measures. Contrary to previous research, LCA demonstrated that a 4-cluster structure was superior to a 3-cluster structure. Consistent with previous research, cluster membership based on patterns of pain willingness and activity engagement was significantly associated with specific patterns of psychological and physical function, in line with theoretical predictions. These cluster structures were similar for both CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 items. These results provide further evidence of the relevance of chronic pain acceptance, and a more nuanced understanding of how the components of acceptance are related to function. Perspective Pain acceptance is important in chronic pain. The findings of the present study, which included 914 individuals with chronic pain, provide support for 4 discrete groups of patients based on levels of acceptance (low, medium, and high), as well as a group with a high level of activity engagement and low willingness to have pain. These groups appear statistically robust and differed in predictable ways across measures of functioning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-5900</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1528-8447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26297968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acceptance and commitment therapy ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; assessment ; Chronic Pain - diagnosis ; Chronic Pain - psychology ; Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire ; Cluster Analysis ; cluster membership ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; latent class analysis ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Medicine ; pain rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>The journal of pain, 2015-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1095-1105</ispartof><rights>American Pain Society</rights><rights>2015 American Pain Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-e19b5beedfda5045bc4564b3fcda0f830c562c62a30cf13fd509f2398eaca6663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-e19b5beedfda5045bc4564b3fcda0f830c562c62a30cf13fd509f2398eaca6663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6738-1624 ; 0000-0003-4071-4211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26297968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-123152$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132391444$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rovner, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vowles, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdle, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillanders, David</creatorcontrib><title>Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups</title><title>The journal of pain</title><addtitle>J Pain</addtitle><description>Abstract A substantial literature indicates that pain acceptance is a useful behavioral process in chronic pain rehabilitation. Pain acceptance consists of willingness to experience pain and to engage in important activities even in the presence of pain and is often measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). Previous traditional cluster analyses of the 20-item CPAQ identified 3 patient clusters that differed across measures of patient functioning in meaningful ways. The aims of this study were to replicate the previous study in a new sample, using the more robust method of latent class analysis (LCA), and to compare the cluster structure of the CPAQ and the shorter CPAQ-8. In total, 914 patients with chronic pain completed the CPAQ and a range of measures of psychological and physical function. Patient clusters identified via LCA were then used to compare patients across functional measures. Contrary to previous research, LCA demonstrated that a 4-cluster structure was superior to a 3-cluster structure. Consistent with previous research, cluster membership based on patterns of pain willingness and activity engagement was significantly associated with specific patterns of psychological and physical function, in line with theoretical predictions. These cluster structures were similar for both CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 items. These results provide further evidence of the relevance of chronic pain acceptance, and a more nuanced understanding of how the components of acceptance are related to function. Perspective Pain acceptance is important in chronic pain. The findings of the present study, which included 914 individuals with chronic pain, provide support for 4 discrete groups of patients based on levels of acceptance (low, medium, and high), as well as a group with a high level of activity engagement and low willingness to have pain. These groups appear statistically robust and differed in predictable ways across measures of functioning.</description><subject>acceptance and commitment therapy</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>cluster membership</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>latent class analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>pain rehabilitation</subject><issn>1526-5900</issn><issn>1528-8447</issn><issn>1528-8447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl2O0zAYjBCIXRZOgIT8yEuC7cT5QQKpKltAqsSiAuLNcpwvrbOpnbUToIfgDj1LT4bTdBcJCXjyyN_MN05mguApwRHBJH3RRE0nlI4oJizCWYRxdi84J4zmYZ4k2f0jTkNWYHwWPHKuwZgQlmUPgzOa0iIr0vw8-LkUPegezVvhHJpp0e6ccsjUqN8AWm2M7ZHQFVoavUYLY7fj7LD3w8N-vrFGK3nYX_lnoJmU0PVCS0AfB3C9MloLZeElWgzW8y26_CG2Sotxclxy5aH3PuxXQ7m2Zujc4-BBLVoHT07nRfB5cflp_i5cfnj7fj5bhpLlrA-BFCUrAaq6EgwnrJQJS5MyrmUlcJ3HWLKUypQKj2oS1xXDRU3jIgchRZqm8UUQTnvdd-iGkndWbYXdcSMUP11dewScEUJx7vnFX_mdNdVv0a2QxN6PJEnyT6836suMG7vmrRo4obEPzPOfT3y_-Gb8kXyrnIS2FRrM4DjJaBEnPtTMU-OJKq1xzkJ9t5xgPnaEN_zYET52hOOMT6pnJ4Oh3EJ1p7kthSe8mgjgI_imwHInfVASKh-n7Hll1H8MXv-hl63yRRHtNezANWawvmf-S7ijHPPVWNOxpYRhnBP8Nf4FNSvraQ</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Rovner, Graciela</creator><creator>Vowles, Kevin E</creator><creator>Gerdle, Björn</creator><creator>Gillanders, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DG8</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-1624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-4211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups</title><author>Rovner, Graciela ; Vowles, Kevin E ; Gerdle, Björn ; Gillanders, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-e19b5beedfda5045bc4564b3fcda0f830c562c62a30cf13fd509f2398eaca6663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>acceptance and commitment therapy</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>cluster membership</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>latent class analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>pain rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rovner, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vowles, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdle, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillanders, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>The journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rovner, Graciela</au><au>Vowles, Kevin E</au><au>Gerdle, Björn</au><au>Gillanders, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups</atitle><jtitle>The journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1095</spage><epage>1105</epage><pages>1095-1105</pages><issn>1526-5900</issn><issn>1528-8447</issn><eissn>1528-8447</eissn><abstract>Abstract A substantial literature indicates that pain acceptance is a useful behavioral process in chronic pain rehabilitation. Pain acceptance consists of willingness to experience pain and to engage in important activities even in the presence of pain and is often measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). Previous traditional cluster analyses of the 20-item CPAQ identified 3 patient clusters that differed across measures of patient functioning in meaningful ways. The aims of this study were to replicate the previous study in a new sample, using the more robust method of latent class analysis (LCA), and to compare the cluster structure of the CPAQ and the shorter CPAQ-8. In total, 914 patients with chronic pain completed the CPAQ and a range of measures of psychological and physical function. Patient clusters identified via LCA were then used to compare patients across functional measures. Contrary to previous research, LCA demonstrated that a 4-cluster structure was superior to a 3-cluster structure. Consistent with previous research, cluster membership based on patterns of pain willingness and activity engagement was significantly associated with specific patterns of psychological and physical function, in line with theoretical predictions. These cluster structures were similar for both CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 items. These results provide further evidence of the relevance of chronic pain acceptance, and a more nuanced understanding of how the components of acceptance are related to function. Perspective Pain acceptance is important in chronic pain. The findings of the present study, which included 914 individuals with chronic pain, provide support for 4 discrete groups of patients based on levels of acceptance (low, medium, and high), as well as a group with a high level of activity engagement and low willingness to have pain. These groups appear statistically robust and differed in predictable ways across measures of functioning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26297968</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.007</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-1624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-4211</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-5900
ispartof The journal of pain, 2015-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1095-1105
issn 1526-5900
1528-8447
1528-8447
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_511208
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects acceptance and commitment therapy
Adaptation, Psychological
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
assessment
Chronic Pain - diagnosis
Chronic Pain - psychology
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Cluster Analysis
cluster membership
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Female
Humans
latent class analysis
Male
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain Medicine
pain rehabilitation
title Latent Class Analysis of the Short and Long Forms of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Further Examination of Patient Subgroups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Latent%20Class%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Short%20and%20Long%20Forms%20of%C2%A0the%C2%A0Chronic%C2%A0Pain%20Acceptance%20Questionnaire:%20Further%20Examination%20of%C2%A0Patient%C2%A0Subgroups&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Rovner,%20Graciela&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1095&rft.epage=1105&rft.pages=1095-1105&rft.issn=1526-5900&rft.eissn=1528-8447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1729349007%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729349007&rft_id=info:pmid/26297968&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S152659001500810X&rfr_iscdi=true