Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study

To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice. We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2016-01, Vol.86 (1), p.50-58
Hauptverfasser: Zwan, Marissa D, Rinne, Juha O, Hasselbalch, Steen G, Nordberg, Agneta, Lleó, Alberto, Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa, Soininen, Hilkka, Law, Ian, Bahl, Justyna M C, Carter, Stephen F, Fortea, Juan, Blesa, Rafael, Teunissen, Charlotte E, Bouwman, Femke H, van Berckel, Bart N M, Visser, Pieter J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 50
container_title Neurology
container_volume 86
creator Zwan, Marissa D
Rinne, Juha O
Hasselbalch, Steen G
Nordberg, Agneta
Lleó, Alberto
Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa
Soininen, Hilkka
Law, Ian
Bahl, Justyna M C
Carter, Stephen F
Fortea, Juan
Blesa, Rafael
Teunissen, Charlotte E
Bouwman, Femke H
van Berckel, Bart N M
Visser, Pieter J
description To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice. We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images. Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels. Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET. This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.
doi_str_mv 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_510015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1752586697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9f694de881d061337b98b53fc2c55daffcfce4819c9bc1938cd8068ce1c94f213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUVtLwzAYDaLovPwDkTz6Us2lTRMfBBnzAkMFN_QtdOkXrbbNTFpl_96MTVHzkvCdy3fCQeiQkhPKKDt9vB2fkF-HEUk30IBmTCSCs6dNNIhDmXCZyx20G8IrIRHM1TbaYSIVMqVkgG6nAbCzuGgWtavK5H40wZ3DJXTgm6oFbPpu7qq2C9g6j4cPl7gp_Bv4cIYvcNPXXWWgjWQcur5c7KMtW9QBDtb3HppejibD62R8d3UzvBgnJgboEmWFSkuQkpZEUM7zmZKzjFvDTJaVhbXGGkglVUbNDFVcmlISIQ1Qo1LLKN9Dyco3fMK8n-m5r2KshXZFpdejt_gCndHlryP_fMWPSAPlMrIv6j-yv0hbvehn96HTnFOmSDQ4Xht4995D6HRTBQN1XbTg-qBpnrFMCqHySE1XVONdCB7szxpK9LI6HavT_6uLsqPfEX9E313xL1ZSleU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752586697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Zwan, Marissa D ; Rinne, Juha O ; Hasselbalch, Steen G ; Nordberg, Agneta ; Lleó, Alberto ; Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa ; Soininen, Hilkka ; Law, Ian ; Bahl, Justyna M C ; Carter, Stephen F ; Fortea, Juan ; Blesa, Rafael ; Teunissen, Charlotte E ; Bouwman, Femke H ; van Berckel, Bart N M ; Visser, Pieter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Zwan, Marissa D ; Rinne, Juha O ; Hasselbalch, Steen G ; Nordberg, Agneta ; Lleó, Alberto ; Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa ; Soininen, Hilkka ; Law, Ian ; Bahl, Justyna M C ; Carter, Stephen F ; Fortea, Juan ; Blesa, Rafael ; Teunissen, Charlotte E ; Bouwman, Femke H ; van Berckel, Bart N M ; Visser, Pieter J</creatorcontrib><description>To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice. We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images. Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels. Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET. This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-632X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26468410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Alzheimer Disease - cerebrospinal fluid ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid ; Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid ; Cognitive Dysfunction - cerebrospinal fluid ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging ; Cohort Studies ; Dementia - cerebrospinal fluid ; Dementia - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid ; Plaque, Amyloid - cerebrospinal fluid ; Plaque, Amyloid - diagnostic imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</subject><ispartof>Neurology, 2016-01, Vol.86 (1), p.50-58</ispartof><rights>2015 American Academy of Neurology.</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Neurology 2015 American Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9f694de881d061337b98b53fc2c55daffcfce4819c9bc1938cd8068ce1c94f213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132662822$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zwan, Marissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, Juha O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselbalch, Steen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lleó, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soininen, Hilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Justyna M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortea, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blesa, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Femke H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berckel, Bart N M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter J</creatorcontrib><title>Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study</title><title>Neurology</title><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><description>To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice. We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images. Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels. Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET. This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dementia - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Dementia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Plaque, Amyloid - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Plaque, Amyloid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</subject><issn>0028-3878</issn><issn>1526-632X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUVtLwzAYDaLovPwDkTz6Us2lTRMfBBnzAkMFN_QtdOkXrbbNTFpl_96MTVHzkvCdy3fCQeiQkhPKKDt9vB2fkF-HEUk30IBmTCSCs6dNNIhDmXCZyx20G8IrIRHM1TbaYSIVMqVkgG6nAbCzuGgWtavK5H40wZ3DJXTgm6oFbPpu7qq2C9g6j4cPl7gp_Bv4cIYvcNPXXWWgjWQcur5c7KMtW9QBDtb3HppejibD62R8d3UzvBgnJgboEmWFSkuQkpZEUM7zmZKzjFvDTJaVhbXGGkglVUbNDFVcmlISIQ1Qo1LLKN9Dyco3fMK8n-m5r2KshXZFpdejt_gCndHlryP_fMWPSAPlMrIv6j-yv0hbvehn96HTnFOmSDQ4Xht4995D6HRTBQN1XbTg-qBpnrFMCqHySE1XVONdCB7szxpK9LI6HavT_6uLsqPfEX9E313xL1ZSleU</recordid><startdate>20160105</startdate><enddate>20160105</enddate><creator>Zwan, Marissa D</creator><creator>Rinne, Juha O</creator><creator>Hasselbalch, Steen G</creator><creator>Nordberg, Agneta</creator><creator>Lleó, Alberto</creator><creator>Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa</creator><creator>Soininen, Hilkka</creator><creator>Law, Ian</creator><creator>Bahl, Justyna M C</creator><creator>Carter, Stephen F</creator><creator>Fortea, Juan</creator><creator>Blesa, Rafael</creator><creator>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creator><creator>Bouwman, Femke H</creator><creator>van Berckel, Bart N M</creator><creator>Visser, Pieter J</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160105</creationdate><title>Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study</title><author>Zwan, Marissa D ; Rinne, Juha O ; Hasselbalch, Steen G ; Nordberg, Agneta ; Lleó, Alberto ; Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa ; Soininen, Hilkka ; Law, Ian ; Bahl, Justyna M C ; Carter, Stephen F ; Fortea, Juan ; Blesa, Rafael ; Teunissen, Charlotte E ; Bouwman, Femke H ; van Berckel, Bart N M ; Visser, Pieter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9f694de881d061337b98b53fc2c55daffcfce4819c9bc1938cd8068ce1c94f213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dementia - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Dementia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Plaque, Amyloid - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Plaque, Amyloid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zwan, Marissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, Juha O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselbalch, Steen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lleó, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soininen, Hilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Justyna M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortea, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blesa, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Femke H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berckel, Bart N M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zwan, Marissa D</au><au>Rinne, Juha O</au><au>Hasselbalch, Steen G</au><au>Nordberg, Agneta</au><au>Lleó, Alberto</au><au>Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa</au><au>Soininen, Hilkka</au><au>Law, Ian</au><au>Bahl, Justyna M C</au><au>Carter, Stephen F</au><au>Fortea, Juan</au><au>Blesa, Rafael</au><au>Teunissen, Charlotte E</au><au>Bouwman, Femke H</au><au>van Berckel, Bart N M</au><au>Visser, Pieter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study</atitle><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><date>2016-01-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>50-58</pages><issn>0028-3878</issn><eissn>1526-632X</eissn><abstract>To define CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) cutpoints to detect cortical amyloid deposition as assessed by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B ([11C]PiB)-PET and to compare these calculated cutpoints with cutpoints currently used in clinical practice. We included 433 participants (57 controls, 99 with mild cognitive impairment, 195 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, and 82 with non-AD dementia) from 5 European centers. We calculated for each center and for the pooled cohort CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/tau ratio cutpoints for cortical amyloid deposition based on visual interpretation of [11C]PiB-PET images. Amyloid-PET-based calculated CSF Aβ42 cutpoints ranged from 521 to 616 pg/mL, whereas existing clinical-based cutpoints ranged from 400 to 550 pg/mL. Using the calculated cutpoint from the pooled sample (557 pg/mL), concordance between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid-PET was 84%. Similar concordance was found when using a dichotomized Aβ42/tau ratio. Exploratory analysis showed that participants with a positive amyloid-PET and normal CSF Aβ42 levels had higher CSF tau and phosphorylated tau levels and more often had mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia compared with participants who had negative amyloid-PET and abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels. Amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoints were higher and tended to reduce intercenter variability compared with clinical-based cutpoints. Discordant participants with normal CSF Aβ42 and a positive amyloid-PET may be more likely to have AD-related amyloid pathology than participants with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and a negative amyloid-PET. This study provides Class II evidence that an amyloid-PET-based CSF Aβ42 cutpoint identifies individuals with amyloid deposition with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>26468410</pmid><doi>10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3878
ispartof Neurology, 2016-01, Vol.86 (1), p.50-58
issn 0028-3878
1526-632X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_510015
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SWEPUB Freely available online; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Alzheimer Disease - cerebrospinal fluid
Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Amyloid beta-Peptides - cerebrospinal fluid
Biomarkers - cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive Dysfunction - cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging
Cohort Studies
Dementia - cerebrospinal fluid
Dementia - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Peptide Fragments - cerebrospinal fluid
Plaque, Amyloid - cerebrospinal fluid
Plaque, Amyloid - diagnostic imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography - utilization
title Use of amyloid-PET to determine cutpoints for CSF markers: A multicenter study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20amyloid-PET%20to%20determine%20cutpoints%20for%20CSF%20markers:%20A%20multicenter%20study&rft.jtitle=Neurology&rft.au=Zwan,%20Marissa%20D&rft.date=2016-01-05&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=50-58&rft.issn=0028-3878&rft.eissn=1526-632X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1752586697%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752586697&rft_id=info:pmid/26468410&rfr_iscdi=true