Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance
Scientific interest in expertise-superior performance within a specific domain-has a long history in psychology. Although there is a broad consensus that a long period of practice is essential for expertise, a long-standing controversy in the field concerns the importance of other variables such as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 2016-04, Vol.142 (4), p.427-446 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 446 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 427 |
| container_title | Psychological bulletin |
| container_volume | 142 |
| creator | Ullén, Fredrik Hambrick, David Zachary Mosing, Miriam Anna |
| description | Scientific interest in expertise-superior performance within a specific domain-has a long history in psychology. Although there is a broad consensus that a long period of practice is essential for expertise, a long-standing controversy in the field concerns the importance of other variables such as cognitive abilities and genetic factors. According to the influential deliberate practice theory, expert performance is essentially limited by a single variable: the amount of deliberate practice an individual has accumulated. Here, we provide a review of the literature on deliberate practice, expert performance, and its neural correlates. A particular emphasis is on recent studies indicating that expertise is related to numerous traits other than practice as well as genetic factors. We argue that deliberate practice theory is unable to account for major recent findings relating to expertise and expert performance, and propose an alternative multifactorial gene-environment interaction model of expertise, which provides an adequate explanation for the available empirical data and may serve as a useful framework for future empirical and theoretical work on expert performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/bul0000033 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_508481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3993297301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-383dd1816be6cfd8bb21cfe341cf797178db9f75018a1d4148d3fe95e26ddd6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZeWCw-AInFDDWRiO7a5VdW2VGoFQuVsOfEY3GbtYCdA3x6vdtveOocZa_zpH49_Qt5C8xEaKj71y9hsg9IXZAWKqhoY5y_JatuqW9WoQ_I659uCCN7RV-Sw7TqpGslWRH_H-ZcPdz78rNb_Jkyzz_i5Oq2ul3H2zgxzTN6M1QUGrNfhj08xbDDM1WWYMZVrH0N1HS2OVXR7heobJhfTxoQBj8mBM2PGN_t6RH6cr2_OvtRXXy8uz06vasM4zDWV1FqQ0PXYDc7Kvm9hcEhZyUIJENL2ygnegDRgGTBpqUPFse2stZ2lR6Te6ea_OC29npLfmHSvo_F637orJ9S8rC2h8O93_JTi7wXzrG_jkkJ5ogYhmAIuZPs8xQGUYFIW6sOOGlLMOaF7nA6N3jqknxwq8Lu95NJv0D6iD5YU4GQHmMnoKd8PpngyjJiHJaXy81sxDazVTLNW0P8uApwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751197488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Ullén, Fredrik ; Hambrick, David Zachary ; Mosing, Miriam Anna</creator><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ullén, Fredrik ; Hambrick, David Zachary ; Mosing, Miriam Anna ; Albarracín, Dolores</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific interest in expertise-superior performance within a specific domain-has a long history in psychology. Although there is a broad consensus that a long period of practice is essential for expertise, a long-standing controversy in the field concerns the importance of other variables such as cognitive abilities and genetic factors. According to the influential deliberate practice theory, expert performance is essentially limited by a single variable: the amount of deliberate practice an individual has accumulated. Here, we provide a review of the literature on deliberate practice, expert performance, and its neural correlates. A particular emphasis is on recent studies indicating that expertise is related to numerous traits other than practice as well as genetic factors. We argue that deliberate practice theory is unable to account for major recent findings relating to expertise and expert performance, and propose an alternative multifactorial gene-environment interaction model of expertise, which provides an adequate explanation for the available empirical data and may serve as a useful framework for future empirical and theoretical work on expert performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26689084</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Aptitude - physiology ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Brain - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive psychology ; Correlation analysis ; Disputes ; Experience Level ; Experts ; Gene-Environment Interaction ; Genetic factors ; Genetics ; Human ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Learning ; Literature reviews ; Models, Theoretical ; Neural Plasticity ; Neuropsychology ; Practice (Psychology) ; Professional Competence ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2016-04, Vol.142 (4), p.427-446</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-383dd1816be6cfd8bb21cfe341cf797178db9f75018a1d4148d3fe95e26ddd6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:133375391$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ullén, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hambrick, David Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosing, Miriam Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Scientific interest in expertise-superior performance within a specific domain-has a long history in psychology. Although there is a broad consensus that a long period of practice is essential for expertise, a long-standing controversy in the field concerns the importance of other variables such as cognitive abilities and genetic factors. According to the influential deliberate practice theory, expert performance is essentially limited by a single variable: the amount of deliberate practice an individual has accumulated. Here, we provide a review of the literature on deliberate practice, expert performance, and its neural correlates. A particular emphasis is on recent studies indicating that expertise is related to numerous traits other than practice as well as genetic factors. We argue that deliberate practice theory is unable to account for major recent findings relating to expertise and expert performance, and propose an alternative multifactorial gene-environment interaction model of expertise, which provides an adequate explanation for the available empirical data and may serve as a useful framework for future empirical and theoretical work on expert performance.</description><subject>Aptitude - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Gene-Environment Interaction</subject><subject>Genetic factors</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Neural Plasticity</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Practice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZeWCw-AInFDDWRiO7a5VdW2VGoFQuVsOfEY3GbtYCdA3x6vdtveOocZa_zpH49_Qt5C8xEaKj71y9hsg9IXZAWKqhoY5y_JatuqW9WoQ_I659uCCN7RV-Sw7TqpGslWRH_H-ZcPdz78rNb_Jkyzz_i5Oq2ul3H2zgxzTN6M1QUGrNfhj08xbDDM1WWYMZVrH0N1HS2OVXR7heobJhfTxoQBj8mBM2PGN_t6RH6cr2_OvtRXXy8uz06vasM4zDWV1FqQ0PXYDc7Kvm9hcEhZyUIJENL2ygnegDRgGTBpqUPFse2stZ2lR6Te6ea_OC29npLfmHSvo_F637orJ9S8rC2h8O93_JTi7wXzrG_jkkJ5ogYhmAIuZPs8xQGUYFIW6sOOGlLMOaF7nA6N3jqknxwq8Lu95NJv0D6iD5YU4GQHmMnoKd8PpngyjJiHJaXy81sxDazVTLNW0P8uApwQ</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Ullén, Fredrik</creator><creator>Hambrick, David Zachary</creator><creator>Mosing, Miriam Anna</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance</title><author>Ullén, Fredrik ; Hambrick, David Zachary ; Mosing, Miriam Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-383dd1816be6cfd8bb21cfe341cf797178db9f75018a1d4148d3fe95e26ddd6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aptitude - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Gene-Environment Interaction</topic><topic>Genetic factors</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Neural Plasticity</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Practice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ullén, Fredrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hambrick, David Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosing, Miriam Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ullén, Fredrik</au><au>Hambrick, David Zachary</au><au>Mosing, Miriam Anna</au><au>Albarracín, Dolores</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>427-446</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>Scientific interest in expertise-superior performance within a specific domain-has a long history in psychology. Although there is a broad consensus that a long period of practice is essential for expertise, a long-standing controversy in the field concerns the importance of other variables such as cognitive abilities and genetic factors. According to the influential deliberate practice theory, expert performance is essentially limited by a single variable: the amount of deliberate practice an individual has accumulated. Here, we provide a review of the literature on deliberate practice, expert performance, and its neural correlates. A particular emphasis is on recent studies indicating that expertise is related to numerous traits other than practice as well as genetic factors. We argue that deliberate practice theory is unable to account for major recent findings relating to expertise and expert performance, and propose an alternative multifactorial gene-environment interaction model of expertise, which provides an adequate explanation for the available empirical data and may serve as a useful framework for future empirical and theoretical work on expert performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26689084</pmid><doi>10.1037/bul0000033</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
| ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2016-04, Vol.142 (4), p.427-446 |
| issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_508481 |
| source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Aptitude - physiology Brain - anatomy & histology Brain - physiology Cognitive ability Cognitive psychology Correlation analysis Disputes Experience Level Experts Gene-Environment Interaction Genetic factors Genetics Human Humans Intelligence Learning Literature reviews Models, Theoretical Neural Plasticity Neuropsychology Practice (Psychology) Professional Competence Psychology |
| title | Rethinking Expertise: A Multifactorial Gene-Environment Interaction Model of Expert Performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A34%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20Expertise:%20A%20Multifactorial%20Gene-Environment%20Interaction%20Model%20of%20Expert%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Ull%C3%A9n,%20Fredrik&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=427-446&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3993297301%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751197488&rft_id=info:pmid/26689084&rfr_iscdi=true |