Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study
Abstract Background Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective To investigate short-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2016-07, Vol.70 (1), p.64-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Plym, Anna Chiesa, Flaminia Voss, Margaretha Holmberg, Lars Johansson, Eva Stattin, Pär Lambe, Mats |
description | Abstract Background Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective To investigate short- and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d ( p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP—12 d versus 15 d—but the association was not statistically significant ( p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82–1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_507939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0302283816000075</els_id><sourcerecordid>1797544388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-8df8cb047208e08aa5406db32a5ec1607545c661820f75b0d7867b960f4cb6ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl1v0zAUhiMEYqXwDxDKJRdLObYT2-ECqdpgIE1s2vi4tBzbAbdp3PmDqf9-Lu02CWksN4mj5z1-ZT9F8RrBDAGi7xYzk3zyboYBNTOEZ1C3T4oJ4oxUrKHwtJgAAVxhTvhB8SKEBQCQpiXPiwNMGcekbibF75_OL8tjG2RnBxs35byPxpcXrnOxkiHYEI0unS_P1mYsL6S2Sg7luXchymhUdKvN-3JefpXRuvHaanNYnrt1Gv6uq06GnL6MSW9eFs96OQTzav-eFt8_ffx29Lk6PTv5cjQ_rRTlJFZc91x1UDMM3ACXsqmB6o5g2RiFKLCmbhSliGPoWdOBZpyyrqXQ16qjUpNpUe3mhmuzTp1Ye7uSfiOctGL_a5m_jGiAtaTNfPsgv_ZO34dug4gQSgkDkrOHD2aP7Y-5cP6XSEnglnNC_lvtHl8lgTCBmmb-7Y7PPa6SCVGsbFBmGORoXAoCceAME56rPIqyNp9cTXKPaVHvUJUvMXjT3_VAILZmiYXYmSW2ZuUyIpuVY2_2O6RuZfRd6FalDHzYASbf7h9rvAjKmlEZbX0WRWhnH9vh3wFqsOPWt6XZmLBwyY_ZHIFEyAFxubV7K3e2Ij-sITfcCveK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797544388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Plym, Anna ; Chiesa, Flaminia ; Voss, Margaretha ; Holmberg, Lars ; Johansson, Eva ; Stattin, Pär ; Lambe, Mats</creator><creatorcontrib>Plym, Anna ; Chiesa, Flaminia ; Voss, Margaretha ; Holmberg, Lars ; Johansson, Eva ; Stattin, Pär ; Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective To investigate short- and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d ( p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP—12 d versus 15 d—but the association was not statistically significant ( p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82–1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26782345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cohort Studies ; Disability pension ; Humans ; Insurance, Disability - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Middle Aged ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Retropubic radical prostatectomy ; Return to work ; Return to Work - statistics & numerical data ; Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy ; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Sick leave ; Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data ; Sweden ; Time Factors ; Urology ; Work disability</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2016-07, Vol.70 (1), p.64-71</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2016 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-8df8cb047208e08aa5406db32a5ec1607545c661820f75b0d7867b960f4cb6ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-8df8cb047208e08aa5406db32a5ec1607545c661820f75b0d7867b960f4cb6ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26782345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-123046$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-298833$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:133663703$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plym, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Flaminia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Margaretha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stattin, Pär</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><title>Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective To investigate short- and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d ( p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP—12 d versus 15 d—but the association was not statistically significant ( p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82–1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective.</description><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disability pension</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Disability - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retropubic radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Return to work</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Work disability</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl1v0zAUhiMEYqXwDxDKJRdLObYT2-ECqdpgIE1s2vi4tBzbAbdp3PmDqf9-Lu02CWksN4mj5z1-ZT9F8RrBDAGi7xYzk3zyboYBNTOEZ1C3T4oJ4oxUrKHwtJgAAVxhTvhB8SKEBQCQpiXPiwNMGcekbibF75_OL8tjG2RnBxs35byPxpcXrnOxkiHYEI0unS_P1mYsL6S2Sg7luXchymhUdKvN-3JefpXRuvHaanNYnrt1Gv6uq06GnL6MSW9eFs96OQTzav-eFt8_ffx29Lk6PTv5cjQ_rRTlJFZc91x1UDMM3ACXsqmB6o5g2RiFKLCmbhSliGPoWdOBZpyyrqXQ16qjUpNpUe3mhmuzTp1Ye7uSfiOctGL_a5m_jGiAtaTNfPsgv_ZO34dug4gQSgkDkrOHD2aP7Y-5cP6XSEnglnNC_lvtHl8lgTCBmmb-7Y7PPa6SCVGsbFBmGORoXAoCceAME56rPIqyNp9cTXKPaVHvUJUvMXjT3_VAILZmiYXYmSW2ZuUyIpuVY2_2O6RuZfRd6FalDHzYASbf7h9rvAjKmlEZbX0WRWhnH9vh3wFqsOPWt6XZmLBwyY_ZHIFEyAFxubV7K3e2Ij-sITfcCveK</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Plym, Anna</creator><creator>Chiesa, Flaminia</creator><creator>Voss, Margaretha</creator><creator>Holmberg, Lars</creator><creator>Johansson, Eva</creator><creator>Stattin, Pär</creator><creator>Lambe, Mats</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study</title><author>Plym, Anna ; Chiesa, Flaminia ; Voss, Margaretha ; Holmberg, Lars ; Johansson, Eva ; Stattin, Pär ; Lambe, Mats</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-8df8cb047208e08aa5406db32a5ec1607545c661820f75b0d7867b960f4cb6ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disability pension</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Disability - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retropubic radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Return to work</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Work disability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plym, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Flaminia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Margaretha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stattin, Pär</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Mats</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plym, Anna</au><au>Chiesa, Flaminia</au><au>Voss, Margaretha</au><au>Holmberg, Lars</au><au>Johansson, Eva</au><au>Stattin, Pär</au><au>Lambe, Mats</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>64-71</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been associated with reduced bleeding and shorter hospital stays than open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), but it is unclear whether these differences translate into shorter absence from work. Objective To investigate short- and long-term rates of work disability following RARP and RRP. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of 2571 men of working age treated with RARP or RRP between 2007 and 2009 identified in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Information about physician-certified sick leave and disability pension was retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency through 2012. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used Cox regression to calculate time to return to work (RTW, or duration of sick leave) after surgery and used generalised estimating equations to analyse days lost from work (because of sick leave and disability pension) after RTW. Results and limitations Men treated with RARP returned to work after a median of 35 d, whereas the corresponding time for RRP was 48 d ( p < 0.001). The difference was seen early; within the first month, men treated with RARP returned to work nearly four times faster than men treated with RRP (adjusted relative RTW rate 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04–4.66). During a median of 3.6 yr after return to work, men treated with RARP lost fewer days from work per person-year than men treated with RRP—12 d versus 15 d—but the association was not statistically significant ( p = 0.10). The adjusted rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82–1.42). One limitation is the nonrandomised design of this study. Conclusions RARP was associated with a faster RTW compared with RRP, but the surgical method did not influence long-term rates of work disability in terms of days lost from work after RTW. Patient summary We compared disease-related absence from work between two surgical methods for the removal of the prostate. Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a faster return to work compared with open surgery but did not influence absence from work in a long-term perspective.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26782345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2016-07, Vol.70 (1), p.64-71 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_507939 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Cohort Studies Disability pension Humans Insurance, Disability - statistics & numerical data Male Medicin och hälsovetenskap Middle Aged Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Retropubic radical prostatectomy Return to work Return to Work - statistics & numerical data Robot-assisted dical prostatectomy Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Robotic Surgical Procedures Sick leave Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data Sweden Time Factors Urology Work disability |
title | Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Work%20Disability%20After%20Robot-assisted%20or%20Open%20Radical%20Prostatectomy:%20A%20Nationwide,%20Population-based%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Plym,%20Anna&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=64-71&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1797544388%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797544388&rft_id=info:pmid/26782345&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0302283816000075&rfr_iscdi=true |