Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon
Environmental conditions are known to affect phenotypic development in many organisms, making the characteristics of an animal reared under one set of conditions not always representative of animals reared under a different set of conditions. Previous results show that such plasticity can also affec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.67-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 76 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Sundström, L. F. Lõhmus, M. Devlin, R. H. |
description | Environmental conditions are known to affect phenotypic development in many organisms, making the characteristics of an animal reared under one set of conditions not always representative of animals reared under a different set of conditions. Previous results show that such plasticity can also affect the phenotypes and ecological interactions of different genotypes, including animals anthropogenically generated by genetic modification. To understand how plastic development can affect behavior in animals of different genotypes, we examined the feeding and risk-taking behavior in growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon (with two- to threefold enhanced daily growth rates compared to wild type) under a range of conditions. When compared to wild-type siblings, we found clear effects of the rearing environment on feeding and risk-taking in transgenic animals and noted that in some cases, this environmental effect was stronger than the effects of the genetic modification. Generally, transgenic fish, regardless of rearing conditions, behaved similar to wild-type fish reared under natural-like conditions. Instead, the more unusual phenotype was associated with wild-type fish reared under hatchery conditions, which possessed an extreme risk averse phenotype compared to the same strain reared in naturalized conditions. Thus, the relative performance of genotypes from one environment (e.g., laboratory) may not always accurately reflect ecological interactions as would occur in a different environment (e.g., nature). Further, when assessing risks of genetically modified organisms, it is important to understand how the environment affects phenotypic development, which in turn may variably influence consequences to ecosystem components across different conditions found in the complexity of nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/15-0252 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_506132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24701221</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24701221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-fbb7c6d2c8c2b0f5a2de6ff5f9748f96a0d299aaca67cc1cf5ba17d7c7f3cc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvFCEYhidGY2tr_AWaudWDox-wDMxx09Zq0kQPTa-EgY8tdQZWmGnTW3-Ev9BfIuuu7amJJIQXePIG8lTVGwIfiezgE-ENUE6fVfukY13DuaTPSwZOGhAt2ate5XwNZVBKX1Z7VADrOIH9Kp5hwN_3vzDc-BTDiGGqfZgwaTP5GHLZuGHGYLB2iNaHVa2DLXPyzTqh1VNMdY9X-saX4EN96wf7F5mSDnmFwZvaxKtYZz2MMRxWL5weMr7erQfVxefTi-Mvzfm3s6_Hy_PGLCSBxvW9MK2lRhrag-OaWmyd464TC-m6VoOlXae10a0whhjHe02EFUY4ZkzLDqpmW5tvcT33ap38qNOditqr3dGPklBxaAmjhf_wJH_iL5cqppWaZ0UlBcYL_n6Lr1P8OWOe1OizwWHQAeOcFRFCCuAtiP9BmWQSQBb0aIuaFHNO6B6eQUBtNCvC1UZzId_tSud-RPvA_fP6-J-iA--e6lGny--E0g3-dotf5-LzsW4hoNwT9getpbym</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773838008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Sundström, L. F. ; Lõhmus, M. ; Devlin, R. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sundström, L. F. ; Lõhmus, M. ; Devlin, R. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental conditions are known to affect phenotypic development in many organisms, making the characteristics of an animal reared under one set of conditions not always representative of animals reared under a different set of conditions. Previous results show that such plasticity can also affect the phenotypes and ecological interactions of different genotypes, including animals anthropogenically generated by genetic modification. To understand how plastic development can affect behavior in animals of different genotypes, we examined the feeding and risk-taking behavior in growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon (with two- to threefold enhanced daily growth rates compared to wild type) under a range of conditions. When compared to wild-type siblings, we found clear effects of the rearing environment on feeding and risk-taking in transgenic animals and noted that in some cases, this environmental effect was stronger than the effects of the genetic modification. Generally, transgenic fish, regardless of rearing conditions, behaved similar to wild-type fish reared under natural-like conditions. Instead, the more unusual phenotype was associated with wild-type fish reared under hatchery conditions, which possessed an extreme risk averse phenotype compared to the same strain reared in naturalized conditions. Thus, the relative performance of genotypes from one environment (e.g., laboratory) may not always accurately reflect ecological interactions as would occur in a different environment (e.g., nature). Further, when assessing risks of genetically modified organisms, it is important to understand how the environment affects phenotypic development, which in turn may variably influence consequences to ecosystem components across different conditions found in the complexity of nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/15-0252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27039510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Genetically Modified ; Animals, Wild ; ecological interaction ; Escape Reaction ; Feeding Behavior ; genetically modified ; genotype ; growth hormone ; Oncorhynchus kisutch ; Oncorhynchus kisutch - genetics ; Oncorhynchus kisutch - physiology ; plasticity ; predation</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.67-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-fbb7c6d2c8c2b0f5a2de6ff5f9748f96a0d299aaca67cc1cf5ba17d7c7f3cc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-fbb7c6d2c8c2b0f5a2de6ff5f9748f96a0d299aaca67cc1cf5ba17d7c7f3cc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24701221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24701221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,4009,27902,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27039510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-282035$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132994141$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sundström, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lõhmus, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, R. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Environmental conditions are known to affect phenotypic development in many organisms, making the characteristics of an animal reared under one set of conditions not always representative of animals reared under a different set of conditions. Previous results show that such plasticity can also affect the phenotypes and ecological interactions of different genotypes, including animals anthropogenically generated by genetic modification. To understand how plastic development can affect behavior in animals of different genotypes, we examined the feeding and risk-taking behavior in growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon (with two- to threefold enhanced daily growth rates compared to wild type) under a range of conditions. When compared to wild-type siblings, we found clear effects of the rearing environment on feeding and risk-taking in transgenic animals and noted that in some cases, this environmental effect was stronger than the effects of the genetic modification. Generally, transgenic fish, regardless of rearing conditions, behaved similar to wild-type fish reared under natural-like conditions. Instead, the more unusual phenotype was associated with wild-type fish reared under hatchery conditions, which possessed an extreme risk averse phenotype compared to the same strain reared in naturalized conditions. Thus, the relative performance of genotypes from one environment (e.g., laboratory) may not always accurately reflect ecological interactions as would occur in a different environment (e.g., nature). Further, when assessing risks of genetically modified organisms, it is important to understand how the environment affects phenotypic development, which in turn may variably influence consequences to ecosystem components across different conditions found in the complexity of nature.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>ecological interaction</subject><subject>Escape Reaction</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>genetically modified</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>growth hormone</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus kisutch</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus kisutch - genetics</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus kisutch - physiology</subject><subject>plasticity</subject><subject>predation</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvFCEYhidGY2tr_AWaudWDox-wDMxx09Zq0kQPTa-EgY8tdQZWmGnTW3-Ev9BfIuuu7amJJIQXePIG8lTVGwIfiezgE-ENUE6fVfukY13DuaTPSwZOGhAt2ate5XwNZVBKX1Z7VADrOIH9Kp5hwN_3vzDc-BTDiGGqfZgwaTP5GHLZuGHGYLB2iNaHVa2DLXPyzTqh1VNMdY9X-saX4EN96wf7F5mSDnmFwZvaxKtYZz2MMRxWL5weMr7erQfVxefTi-Mvzfm3s6_Hy_PGLCSBxvW9MK2lRhrag-OaWmyd464TC-m6VoOlXae10a0whhjHe02EFUY4ZkzLDqpmW5tvcT33ap38qNOditqr3dGPklBxaAmjhf_wJH_iL5cqppWaZ0UlBcYL_n6Lr1P8OWOe1OizwWHQAeOcFRFCCuAtiP9BmWQSQBb0aIuaFHNO6B6eQUBtNCvC1UZzId_tSud-RPvA_fP6-J-iA--e6lGny--E0g3-dotf5-LzsW4hoNwT9getpbym</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Sundström, L. F.</creator><creator>Lõhmus, M.</creator><creator>Devlin, R. H.</creator><general>ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon</title><author>Sundström, L. F. ; Lõhmus, M. ; Devlin, R. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-fbb7c6d2c8c2b0f5a2de6ff5f9748f96a0d299aaca67cc1cf5ba17d7c7f3cc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>ecological interaction</topic><topic>Escape Reaction</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>genetically modified</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>growth hormone</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus kisutch</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus kisutch - genetics</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus kisutch - physiology</topic><topic>plasticity</topic><topic>predation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sundström, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lõhmus, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, R. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sundström, L. F.</au><au>Lõhmus, M.</au><au>Devlin, R. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>67-76</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Environmental conditions are known to affect phenotypic development in many organisms, making the characteristics of an animal reared under one set of conditions not always representative of animals reared under a different set of conditions. Previous results show that such plasticity can also affect the phenotypes and ecological interactions of different genotypes, including animals anthropogenically generated by genetic modification. To understand how plastic development can affect behavior in animals of different genotypes, we examined the feeding and risk-taking behavior in growth-enhanced transgenic coho salmon (with two- to threefold enhanced daily growth rates compared to wild type) under a range of conditions. When compared to wild-type siblings, we found clear effects of the rearing environment on feeding and risk-taking in transgenic animals and noted that in some cases, this environmental effect was stronger than the effects of the genetic modification. Generally, transgenic fish, regardless of rearing conditions, behaved similar to wild-type fish reared under natural-like conditions. Instead, the more unusual phenotype was associated with wild-type fish reared under hatchery conditions, which possessed an extreme risk averse phenotype compared to the same strain reared in naturalized conditions. Thus, the relative performance of genotypes from one environment (e.g., laboratory) may not always accurately reflect ecological interactions as would occur in a different environment (e.g., nature). Further, when assessing risks of genetically modified organisms, it is important to understand how the environment affects phenotypic development, which in turn may variably influence consequences to ecosystem components across different conditions found in the complexity of nature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA</pub><pmid>27039510</pmid><doi>10.1890/15-0252</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.67-76 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_506132 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animals Animals, Genetically Modified Animals, Wild ecological interaction Escape Reaction Feeding Behavior genetically modified genotype growth hormone Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch - genetics Oncorhynchus kisutch - physiology plasticity predation |
title | Gene—environment interactions influence feeding and anti-predator behavior in wild and transgenic coho salmon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gene%E2%80%94environment%20interactions%20influence%20feeding%20and%20anti-predator%20behavior%20in%20wild%20and%20transgenic%20coho%20salmon&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Sundstr%C3%B6m,%20L.%20F.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=67-76&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/15-0252&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E24701221%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773838008&rft_id=info:pmid/27039510&rft_jstor_id=24701221&rfr_iscdi=true |