Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Aims: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. Methods: This study...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics 2017-01, Vol.37 (2), p.199-209 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 209 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 199 |
| container_title | Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Ryll, Ulrike C. Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G. Eliasson, Ann-Christin |
| description | Aims: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. Methods: This study investigates a convenience sample of 34 children (16 girls) with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 6-18 years (mean 12.1, SD 3.9) in a cross-sectional design. Results: The AHA and CHEQ subscales share 8-25% of their variance (R
2
). Bland-Altman plots for AHA and all three CHEQ subscales indicate good average agreement, with a mean difference approaching zero but large 95% confidence intervals. Limits of agreement were extremely wide, indicating considerable disagreement between AHA and CHEQ subscales. Conclusion: AHA and CHEQ seem to measure different though somewhat related constructs of bimanual performance. Results of this investigation reinforce the recommendation to use both instruments to obtain complementary information about bimanual performance including observed and perceived performance of children with unilateral cerebral palsy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01942638.2016.1185498 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_D8T</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_504601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826698282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-be4e6eeae5c7db9017ca853de771934880f65bb9a6870bff337af3da9a8c4a173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5Rg9kseM4dm4sSz-QKrVIbK-Wk0xaQ9ZZPEm3-4P4nzjdD07lYNkzft6xNfMS8o6zKWeafWK8yNJc6GnKeD7lXMus0C_IhMuMJ4Jn2UsyGZlkhI7IMeJPxrjOlX5NjlKVaqG0nJA_M0SHvfN39NL6msYQEJfgezqG83vX1gH8B3y6ThYI9OxxBcGBr4B-HyBqO--tC0CT6xIhPEBNbyHggPQGQgVuTHxxS-sH246ppgsxiGrnD_Xp2vX3dOFda3sIkZtDgHI83NgWN2_Iqybu8Ha3n5DF-dmP-WVydX3xbT67SiopdJ-UkEEOYEFWqi4LxlVltRQ1KMULkWnNmlyWZWFzrVjZNEIo24jaFlZXmeVKnJBkWxfXsBpKswrx32FjOuvMLvUrnsBIluWMR754ll-Frv4n2gu5kGlsvJBR-_FZ7Vd3OzNduItrMFoUXET8dIvHur_Htpulwwra1nroBjRcp3le6FSnEZVbtAodYoDmUJszM5rH7M1jRvOYnXmi7v3uiaFcQn1Q7d0Sgc9bwPmnIa670Namt5u2C02IM3VoxP_f-AuL39j8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826698282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy</title><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Ryll, Ulrike C. ; Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G. ; Eliasson, Ann-Christin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryll, Ulrike C. ; Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G. ; Eliasson, Ann-Christin</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. Methods: This study investigates a convenience sample of 34 children (16 girls) with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 6-18 years (mean 12.1, SD 3.9) in a cross-sectional design. Results: The AHA and CHEQ subscales share 8-25% of their variance (R
2
). Bland-Altman plots for AHA and all three CHEQ subscales indicate good average agreement, with a mean difference approaching zero but large 95% confidence intervals. Limits of agreement were extremely wide, indicating considerable disagreement between AHA and CHEQ subscales. Conclusion: AHA and CHEQ seem to measure different though somewhat related constructs of bimanual performance. Results of this investigation reinforce the recommendation to use both instruments to obtain complementary information about bimanual performance including observed and perceived performance of children with unilateral cerebral palsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-2638</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1541-3144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-3144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2016.1185498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27283785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Assessments ; bimanual performance ; cerebral palsy ; Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology ; Child ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Hand - physiopathology ; hand function ; Humans ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Motor Skills ; Observation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics, 2017-01, Vol.37 (2), p.199-209</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC © Ulrike C. Ryll, Carolien H. G. Bastiaenen, Ann-Christin Eliasson 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-be4e6eeae5c7db9017ca853de771934880f65bb9a6870bff337af3da9a8c4a173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-be4e6eeae5c7db9017ca853de771934880f65bb9a6870bff337af3da9a8c4a173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,552,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:135278535$$EView_record_in_Swedish_Publication_Index_(SWEPUB)$$FView_record_in_$$GSwedish_Publication_Index_(SWEPUB)$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27283785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-83913$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:135278535$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryll, Ulrike C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliasson, Ann-Christin</creatorcontrib><title>Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy</title><title>Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics</title><addtitle>Phys Occup Ther Pediatr</addtitle><description>Aims: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. Methods: This study investigates a convenience sample of 34 children (16 girls) with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 6-18 years (mean 12.1, SD 3.9) in a cross-sectional design. Results: The AHA and CHEQ subscales share 8-25% of their variance (R
2
). Bland-Altman plots for AHA and all three CHEQ subscales indicate good average agreement, with a mean difference approaching zero but large 95% confidence intervals. Limits of agreement were extremely wide, indicating considerable disagreement between AHA and CHEQ subscales. Conclusion: AHA and CHEQ seem to measure different though somewhat related constructs of bimanual performance. Results of this investigation reinforce the recommendation to use both instruments to obtain complementary information about bimanual performance including observed and perceived performance of children with unilateral cerebral palsy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>bimanual performance</subject><subject>cerebral palsy</subject><subject>Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand - physiopathology</subject><subject>hand function</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Motor Skills</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>0194-2638</issn><issn>1541-3144</issn><issn>1541-3144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5Rg9kseM4dm4sSz-QKrVIbK-Wk0xaQ9ZZPEm3-4P4nzjdD07lYNkzft6xNfMS8o6zKWeafWK8yNJc6GnKeD7lXMus0C_IhMuMJ4Jn2UsyGZlkhI7IMeJPxrjOlX5NjlKVaqG0nJA_M0SHvfN39NL6msYQEJfgezqG83vX1gH8B3y6ThYI9OxxBcGBr4B-HyBqO--tC0CT6xIhPEBNbyHggPQGQgVuTHxxS-sH246ppgsxiGrnD_Xp2vX3dOFda3sIkZtDgHI83NgWN2_Iqybu8Ha3n5DF-dmP-WVydX3xbT67SiopdJ-UkEEOYEFWqi4LxlVltRQ1KMULkWnNmlyWZWFzrVjZNEIo24jaFlZXmeVKnJBkWxfXsBpKswrx32FjOuvMLvUrnsBIluWMR754ll-Frv4n2gu5kGlsvJBR-_FZ7Vd3OzNduItrMFoUXET8dIvHur_Htpulwwra1nroBjRcp3le6FSnEZVbtAodYoDmUJszM5rH7M1jRvOYnXmi7v3uiaFcQn1Q7d0Sgc9bwPmnIa670Namt5u2C02IM3VoxP_f-AuL39j8</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Ryll, Ulrike C.</creator><creator>Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G.</creator><creator>Eliasson, Ann-Christin</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>AABEP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D91</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy</title><author>Ryll, Ulrike C. ; Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G. ; Eliasson, Ann-Christin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-be4e6eeae5c7db9017ca853de771934880f65bb9a6870bff337af3da9a8c4a173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>bimanual performance</topic><topic>cerebral palsy</topic><topic>Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand - physiopathology</topic><topic>hand function</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Motor Skills</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryll, Ulrike C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliasson, Ann-Christin</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryll, Ulrike C.</au><au>Bastiaenen, Carolien H. G.</au><au>Eliasson, Ann-Christin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy</atitle><jtitle>Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Occup Ther Pediatr</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>199-209</pages><issn>0194-2638</issn><issn>1541-3144</issn><eissn>1541-3144</eissn><abstract>Aims: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. Methods: This study investigates a convenience sample of 34 children (16 girls) with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 6-18 years (mean 12.1, SD 3.9) in a cross-sectional design. Results: The AHA and CHEQ subscales share 8-25% of their variance (R
2
). Bland-Altman plots for AHA and all three CHEQ subscales indicate good average agreement, with a mean difference approaching zero but large 95% confidence intervals. Limits of agreement were extremely wide, indicating considerable disagreement between AHA and CHEQ subscales. Conclusion: AHA and CHEQ seem to measure different though somewhat related constructs of bimanual performance. Results of this investigation reinforce the recommendation to use both instruments to obtain complementary information about bimanual performance including observed and perceived performance of children with unilateral cerebral palsy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>27283785</pmid><doi>10.1080/01942638.2016.1185498</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0194-2638 |
| ispartof | Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics, 2017-01, Vol.37 (2), p.199-209 |
| issn | 0194-2638 1541-3144 1541-3144 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_504601 |
| source | SWEPUB Freely available online |
| subjects | Adolescent Assessments bimanual performance cerebral palsy Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology Child Cross-Sectional Studies Disability Evaluation Female Hand - physiopathology hand function Humans Male Medicin och hälsovetenskap Motor Skills Observation Surveys and Questionnaires Task Performance and Analysis |
| title | Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_D8T&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisting%20Hand%20Assessment%20and%20Children's%20Hand-Use%20Experience%20Questionnaire%20-Observed%20Versus%20Perceived%20Bimanual%20Performance%20in%20Children%20with%20Unilateral%20Cerebral%20Palsy&rft.jtitle=Physical%20&%20occupational%20therapy%20in%20pediatrics&rft.au=Ryll,%20Ulrike%20C.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=199-209&rft.issn=0194-2638&rft.eissn=1541-3144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01942638.2016.1185498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_D8T%3E1826698282%3C/proquest_D8T%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826698282&rft_id=info:pmid/27283785&rfr_iscdi=true |