Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort

Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2016-07, Vol.354 (8065), p.i2976-i2976
Hauptverfasser: Zeitlin, Jennifer, Manktelow, Bradley N, Piedvache, Aurelie, Cuttini, Marina, Boyle, Elaine, van Heijst, Arno, Gadzinowski, Janusz, Van Reempts, Patrick, Huusom, Lene, Weber, Tom, Schmidt, Stephan, Barros, Henrique, Dillalo, Dominico, Toome, Liis, Norman, Mikael, Blondel, Beatrice, Bonet, Mercedes, Draper, Elisabeth S, Maier, Rolf F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page i2976
container_issue 8065
container_start_page i2976
container_title BMJ (Online)
container_volume 354
creator Zeitlin, Jennifer
Manktelow, Bradley N
Piedvache, Aurelie
Cuttini, Marina
Boyle, Elaine
van Heijst, Arno
Gadzinowski, Janusz
Van Reempts, Patrick
Huusom, Lene
Weber, Tom
Schmidt, Stephan
Barros, Henrique
Dillalo, Dominico
Toome, Liis
Norman, Mikael
Blondel, Beatrice
Bonet, Mercedes
Draper, Elisabeth S
Maier, Rolf F
description Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population based observational study.Setting 19 regions from 11 European countries covering 850 000 annual births participating in the EPICE (Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe for very preterm births) project.Participants 7336 infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks’ gestation in 2011/12 without serious congenital anomalies and surviving to neonatal admission.Main outcome measures Combined use of four evidence based practices for infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation using an “all or none” approach: delivery in a maternity unit with appropriate level of neonatal care; administration of antenatal corticosteroids; prevention of hypothermia (temperature on admission to neonatal unit ≥36°C); surfactant used within two hours of birth or early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Infant outcomes were in-hospital mortality, severe neonatal morbidity at discharge, and a composite measure of death or severe morbidity, or both. We modelled associations using risk ratios, with propensity score weighting to account for potential confounding bias. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within delivery hospital.Results Only 58.3% (n=4275) of infants received all evidence based practices for which they were eligible. Infants with low gestational age, growth restriction, low Apgar scores, and who were born on the day of maternal admission to hospital were less likely to receive evidence based care. After adjustment, evidence based care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.87) and in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity, or both (0.82, 0.73 to 0.92), corresponding to an estimated 18% decrease in all deaths without an increase in severe morbidity if these interventions had been provided to all infants.Conclusions More comprehensive use of evidence based practices in perinatal medicine could result in considerable gains for very preterm infants, in terms of increased survival without severe morbidity.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.i2976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_504048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4111019661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b530t-c723e8476ee25c4c9dd18eb9890ca5302bb2da23a41c3181360a8cab720738673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEolXpgRdAluAAhxT_S2xzQEKrBSpVggM9W44zYb0kcbCdVPsgvC_e7lK1SEicPJr5zczn0VcUzwm-IITVb5the-GoEvWj4pSIqi6JZOzxvfikOI9xizGmTEhVV0-LEyqYJIrVp8Wv6wjIdwgW18JoATUmQoumYGxyFiJKHrlhCn4BFOewuMX06MaljZ8TirBAADT40LjWpR3qfEA5tcv9kCAMyI2dGVN8hwLEuU8RdcEPKG0Arb9ertZo8tPcm-T8eFxs_caH9Kx40pk-wvnxPSuuP66_rT6XV18-Xa4-XJVNxXAqraAMJBc1AK0st6ptiYRGSYWtyQRtGtoaygwnlhGZr4WNtKYRFOcD1IKdFeVhbryBaW70FNxgwk574_Qx9SNHoCvMMZeZf3_gc2WA1sKYgukftD2sjG6jv_tFc8WYUPuFr48Dgv85Q0x6cNFC35sR_Bx1FomzSsnUf6CYCs4EYxl9-Re69XMY8-VuKY6rquKZenOgbPAxBujudBOs91bS2Ur61kqZfXH_o3fkH-Nk4NUB2Pf8e85vqIPTXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802405554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>Zeitlin, Jennifer ; Manktelow, Bradley N ; Piedvache, Aurelie ; Cuttini, Marina ; Boyle, Elaine ; van Heijst, Arno ; Gadzinowski, Janusz ; Van Reempts, Patrick ; Huusom, Lene ; Weber, Tom ; Schmidt, Stephan ; Barros, Henrique ; Dillalo, Dominico ; Toome, Liis ; Norman, Mikael ; Blondel, Beatrice ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Draper, Elisabeth S ; Maier, Rolf F</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeitlin, Jennifer ; Manktelow, Bradley N ; Piedvache, Aurelie ; Cuttini, Marina ; Boyle, Elaine ; van Heijst, Arno ; Gadzinowski, Janusz ; Van Reempts, Patrick ; Huusom, Lene ; Weber, Tom ; Schmidt, Stephan ; Barros, Henrique ; Dillalo, Dominico ; Toome, Liis ; Norman, Mikael ; Blondel, Beatrice ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Draper, Elisabeth S ; Maier, Rolf F ; EPICE Research Group ; and the EPICE Research Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population based observational study.Setting 19 regions from 11 European countries covering 850 000 annual births participating in the EPICE (Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe for very preterm births) project.Participants 7336 infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks’ gestation in 2011/12 without serious congenital anomalies and surviving to neonatal admission.Main outcome measures Combined use of four evidence based practices for infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation using an “all or none” approach: delivery in a maternity unit with appropriate level of neonatal care; administration of antenatal corticosteroids; prevention of hypothermia (temperature on admission to neonatal unit ≥36°C); surfactant used within two hours of birth or early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Infant outcomes were in-hospital mortality, severe neonatal morbidity at discharge, and a composite measure of death or severe morbidity, or both. We modelled associations using risk ratios, with propensity score weighting to account for potential confounding bias. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within delivery hospital.Results Only 58.3% (n=4275) of infants received all evidence based practices for which they were eligible. Infants with low gestational age, growth restriction, low Apgar scores, and who were born on the day of maternal admission to hospital were less likely to receive evidence based care. After adjustment, evidence based care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.87) and in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity, or both (0.82, 0.73 to 0.92), corresponding to an estimated 18% decrease in all deaths without an increase in severe morbidity if these interventions had been provided to all infants.Conclusions More comprehensive use of evidence based practices in perinatal medicine could result in considerable gains for very preterm infants, in terms of increased survival without severe morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-535X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2976</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27381936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Births ; Europe - epidemiology ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Gestational age ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant, Extremely Premature ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature, Diseases - mortality ; Medical records ; Menstruation ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Newborn babies ; Pregnancy ; Premature babies ; Prospective Studies ; Regions ; Survival Rate ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2016-07, Vol.354 (8065), p.i2976-i2976</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Jul 5, 2016</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to 2016 BMJ</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b530t-c723e8476ee25c4c9dd18eb9890ca5302bb2da23a41c3181360a8cab720738673</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i2976.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i2976.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,550,776,780,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:133855639$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeitlin, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manktelow, Bradley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piedvache, Aurelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuttini, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heijst, Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadzinowski, Janusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Reempts, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huusom, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillalo, Dominico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toome, Liis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blondel, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonet, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Elisabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Rolf F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPICE Research Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the EPICE Research Group</creatorcontrib><title>Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population based observational study.Setting 19 regions from 11 European countries covering 850 000 annual births participating in the EPICE (Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe for very preterm births) project.Participants 7336 infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks’ gestation in 2011/12 without serious congenital anomalies and surviving to neonatal admission.Main outcome measures Combined use of four evidence based practices for infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation using an “all or none” approach: delivery in a maternity unit with appropriate level of neonatal care; administration of antenatal corticosteroids; prevention of hypothermia (temperature on admission to neonatal unit ≥36°C); surfactant used within two hours of birth or early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Infant outcomes were in-hospital mortality, severe neonatal morbidity at discharge, and a composite measure of death or severe morbidity, or both. We modelled associations using risk ratios, with propensity score weighting to account for potential confounding bias. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within delivery hospital.Results Only 58.3% (n=4275) of infants received all evidence based practices for which they were eligible. Infants with low gestational age, growth restriction, low Apgar scores, and who were born on the day of maternal admission to hospital were less likely to receive evidence based care. After adjustment, evidence based care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.87) and in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity, or both (0.82, 0.73 to 0.92), corresponding to an estimated 18% decrease in all deaths without an increase in severe morbidity if these interventions had been provided to all infants.Conclusions More comprehensive use of evidence based practices in perinatal medicine could result in considerable gains for very preterm infants, in terms of increased survival without severe morbidity.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Extremely Premature</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature, Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature babies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-535X</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEolXpgRdAluAAhxT_S2xzQEKrBSpVggM9W44zYb0kcbCdVPsgvC_e7lK1SEicPJr5zczn0VcUzwm-IITVb5the-GoEvWj4pSIqi6JZOzxvfikOI9xizGmTEhVV0-LEyqYJIrVp8Wv6wjIdwgW18JoATUmQoumYGxyFiJKHrlhCn4BFOewuMX06MaljZ8TirBAADT40LjWpR3qfEA5tcv9kCAMyI2dGVN8hwLEuU8RdcEPKG0Arb9ertZo8tPcm-T8eFxs_caH9Kx40pk-wvnxPSuuP66_rT6XV18-Xa4-XJVNxXAqraAMJBc1AK0st6ptiYRGSYWtyQRtGtoaygwnlhGZr4WNtKYRFOcD1IKdFeVhbryBaW70FNxgwk574_Qx9SNHoCvMMZeZf3_gc2WA1sKYgukftD2sjG6jv_tFc8WYUPuFr48Dgv85Q0x6cNFC35sR_Bx1FomzSsnUf6CYCs4EYxl9-Re69XMY8-VuKY6rquKZenOgbPAxBujudBOs91bS2Ur61kqZfXH_o3fkH-Nk4NUB2Pf8e85vqIPTXw</recordid><startdate>20160705</startdate><enddate>20160705</enddate><creator>Zeitlin, Jennifer</creator><creator>Manktelow, Bradley N</creator><creator>Piedvache, Aurelie</creator><creator>Cuttini, Marina</creator><creator>Boyle, Elaine</creator><creator>van Heijst, Arno</creator><creator>Gadzinowski, Janusz</creator><creator>Van Reempts, Patrick</creator><creator>Huusom, Lene</creator><creator>Weber, Tom</creator><creator>Schmidt, Stephan</creator><creator>Barros, Henrique</creator><creator>Dillalo, Dominico</creator><creator>Toome, Liis</creator><creator>Norman, Mikael</creator><creator>Blondel, Beatrice</creator><creator>Bonet, Mercedes</creator><creator>Draper, Elisabeth S</creator><creator>Maier, Rolf F</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160705</creationdate><title>Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort</title><author>Zeitlin, Jennifer ; Manktelow, Bradley N ; Piedvache, Aurelie ; Cuttini, Marina ; Boyle, Elaine ; van Heijst, Arno ; Gadzinowski, Janusz ; Van Reempts, Patrick ; Huusom, Lene ; Weber, Tom ; Schmidt, Stephan ; Barros, Henrique ; Dillalo, Dominico ; Toome, Liis ; Norman, Mikael ; Blondel, Beatrice ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Draper, Elisabeth S ; Maier, Rolf F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b530t-c723e8476ee25c4c9dd18eb9890ca5302bb2da23a41c3181360a8cab720738673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Extremely Premature</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature, Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature babies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeitlin, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manktelow, Bradley N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piedvache, Aurelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuttini, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heijst, Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadzinowski, Janusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Reempts, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huusom, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillalo, Dominico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toome, Liis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blondel, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonet, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Elisabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Rolf F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPICE Research Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the EPICE Research Group</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeitlin, Jennifer</au><au>Manktelow, Bradley N</au><au>Piedvache, Aurelie</au><au>Cuttini, Marina</au><au>Boyle, Elaine</au><au>van Heijst, Arno</au><au>Gadzinowski, Janusz</au><au>Van Reempts, Patrick</au><au>Huusom, Lene</au><au>Weber, Tom</au><au>Schmidt, Stephan</au><au>Barros, Henrique</au><au>Dillalo, Dominico</au><au>Toome, Liis</au><au>Norman, Mikael</au><au>Blondel, Beatrice</au><au>Bonet, Mercedes</au><au>Draper, Elisabeth S</au><au>Maier, Rolf F</au><aucorp>EPICE Research Group</aucorp><aucorp>and the EPICE Research Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2016-07-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>354</volume><issue>8065</issue><spage>i2976</spage><epage>i2976</epage><pages>i2976-i2976</pages><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-535X</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the implementation of four high evidence practices for the care of very preterm infants to assess their use and impact in routine clinical practice and whether they constitute a driver for reducing mortality and neonatal morbidity.Design Prospective multinational population based observational study.Setting 19 regions from 11 European countries covering 850 000 annual births participating in the EPICE (Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe for very preterm births) project.Participants 7336 infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks’ gestation in 2011/12 without serious congenital anomalies and surviving to neonatal admission.Main outcome measures Combined use of four evidence based practices for infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation using an “all or none” approach: delivery in a maternity unit with appropriate level of neonatal care; administration of antenatal corticosteroids; prevention of hypothermia (temperature on admission to neonatal unit ≥36°C); surfactant used within two hours of birth or early nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Infant outcomes were in-hospital mortality, severe neonatal morbidity at discharge, and a composite measure of death or severe morbidity, or both. We modelled associations using risk ratios, with propensity score weighting to account for potential confounding bias. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within delivery hospital.Results Only 58.3% (n=4275) of infants received all evidence based practices for which they were eligible. Infants with low gestational age, growth restriction, low Apgar scores, and who were born on the day of maternal admission to hospital were less likely to receive evidence based care. After adjustment, evidence based care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.87) and in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity, or both (0.82, 0.73 to 0.92), corresponding to an estimated 18% decrease in all deaths without an increase in severe morbidity if these interventions had been provided to all infants.Conclusions More comprehensive use of evidence based practices in perinatal medicine could result in considerable gains for very preterm infants, in terms of increased survival without severe morbidity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27381936</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.i2976</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-1833
ispartof BMJ (Online), 2016-07, Vol.354 (8065), p.i2976-i2976
issn 1756-1833
0959-8138
0959-535X
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_504048
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects Births
Europe - epidemiology
Evidence-Based Practice
Female
Gestational age
Hospitals
Humans
Infant, Extremely Premature
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature, Diseases - mortality
Medical records
Menstruation
Morbidity
Mortality
Newborn babies
Pregnancy
Premature babies
Prospective Studies
Regions
Survival Rate
Ultrasonic imaging
title Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20evidence%20based%20practices%20to%20improve%20survival%20without%20severe%20morbidity%20for%20very%20preterm%20infants:%20results%20from%20the%20EPICE%20population%20based%20cohort&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Zeitlin,%20Jennifer&rft.aucorp=EPICE%20Research%20Group&rft.date=2016-07-05&rft.volume=354&rft.issue=8065&rft.spage=i2976&rft.epage=i2976&rft.pages=i2976-i2976&rft.issn=1756-1833&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.i2976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E4111019661%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802405554&rft_id=info:pmid/27381936&rfr_iscdi=true