First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis

ABSTRACT Objectives The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2018-02, Vol.51 (2), p.176-183
Hauptverfasser: D'Antonio, F., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Monteagudo, A., Buca, D., Forlani, F., Minneci, G., Foti, F., Manzoli, L., Liberati, M., Acharya, G., Calì, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 51
creator D'Antonio, F.
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.
Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.
Monteagudo, A.
Buca, D.
Forlani, F.
Minneci, G.
Foti, F.
Manzoli, L.
Liberati, M.
Acharya, G.
Calì, G.
description ABSTRACT Objectives The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.18840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_494563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1998323413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4920-fb7c4da53e0ec7937f422645abab7710fddbc57d0d3b3ee9b34c03afb0811cc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1zgkNaOHTvmVlW0IFXqhZ4t25m0bpN4sZONcuMReMY-Sb1k6QGJk0ejbz555kfoPSUnlJDydAq3J7SuOXmBNpQLVRBJqpdoQ5QghRSqPEJvUronhAjOxGt0VNY1Y7IiGzRf-JjGx1-_x-h7SCNE3MAIbvRhwKHFxg4h9qbrFuyHnUl-B3jbGQfDaHIH3_nbuzwdfXrAc-hh-ILTkjW9Gb3DEXYeZmyGBvcwmgyawXRL8uktetWaLsG7w3uMbi6-_jj_VlxdX34_P7sqHFclKVorHW9MxYCAk4rJlpel4JWxxkpJSds01lWyIQ2zDEBZxh1hprWkptQ5yY5RsXrTDNvJ6m1e08RFB-P1ofWQK9Bc8UqwzH9a-W0MP6d8EN375KDrzABhSpoqVlIhqVAZ_fgPeh-mmPfbU6pmJeN0L_y8Ui6GlCK0z1-gRO_T0zk9_Se9zH44GCfbQ_NM_o0rA6crMPsOlv-b9M315ap8AqKqqe0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1998323413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><creator>D'Antonio, F. ; Timor‐Tritsch, I. E. ; Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J. ; Monteagudo, A. ; Buca, D. ; Forlani, F. ; Minneci, G. ; Foti, F. ; Manzoli, L. ; Liberati, M. ; Acharya, G. ; Calì, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, F. ; Timor‐Tritsch, I. E. ; Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J. ; Monteagudo, A. ; Buca, D. ; Forlani, F. ; Minneci, G. ; Foti, F. ; Manzoli, L. ; Liberati, M. ; Acharya, G. ; Calì, G.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objectives The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.18840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28833750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>abnormally invasive placenta ; Data processing ; Evidence-based medicine ; first‐trimester diagnosis ; Gestation ; Health risk assessment ; Implantation ; Medical diagnosis ; Meta-analysis ; Myometrium ; Placenta ; Pregnancy ; Risk ; Signs ; Systematic review ; Ultrasound ; Uterus ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2018-02, Vol.51 (2), p.176-183</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4920-fb7c4da53e0ec7937f422645abab7710fddbc57d0d3b3ee9b34c03afb0811cc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4920-fb7c4da53e0ec7937f422645abab7710fddbc57d0d3b3ee9b34c03afb0811cc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5178-3354 ; 0000-0001-6880-7407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.18840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.18840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:137674438$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteagudo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buca, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forlani, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minneci, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzoli, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberati, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calì, G.</creatorcontrib><title>First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objectives The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</description><subject>abnormally invasive placenta</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>first‐trimester diagnosis</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Myometrium</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Signs</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1zgkNaOHTvmVlW0IFXqhZ4t25m0bpN4sZONcuMReMY-Sb1k6QGJk0ejbz555kfoPSUnlJDydAq3J7SuOXmBNpQLVRBJqpdoQ5QghRSqPEJvUronhAjOxGt0VNY1Y7IiGzRf-JjGx1-_x-h7SCNE3MAIbvRhwKHFxg4h9qbrFuyHnUl-B3jbGQfDaHIH3_nbuzwdfXrAc-hh-ILTkjW9Gb3DEXYeZmyGBvcwmgyawXRL8uktetWaLsG7w3uMbi6-_jj_VlxdX34_P7sqHFclKVorHW9MxYCAk4rJlpel4JWxxkpJSds01lWyIQ2zDEBZxh1hprWkptQ5yY5RsXrTDNvJ6m1e08RFB-P1ofWQK9Bc8UqwzH9a-W0MP6d8EN375KDrzABhSpoqVlIhqVAZ_fgPeh-mmPfbU6pmJeN0L_y8Ui6GlCK0z1-gRO_T0zk9_Se9zH44GCfbQ_NM_o0rA6crMPsOlv-b9M315ap8AqKqqe0</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>D'Antonio, F.</creator><creator>Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.</creator><creator>Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.</creator><creator>Monteagudo, A.</creator><creator>Buca, D.</creator><creator>Forlani, F.</creator><creator>Minneci, G.</creator><creator>Foti, F.</creator><creator>Manzoli, L.</creator><creator>Liberati, M.</creator><creator>Acharya, G.</creator><creator>Calì, G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-3354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6880-7407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>D'Antonio, F. ; Timor‐Tritsch, I. E. ; Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J. ; Monteagudo, A. ; Buca, D. ; Forlani, F. ; Minneci, G. ; Foti, F. ; Manzoli, L. ; Liberati, M. ; Acharya, G. ; Calì, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4920-fb7c4da53e0ec7937f422645abab7710fddbc57d0d3b3ee9b34c03afb0811cc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>abnormally invasive placenta</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>first‐trimester diagnosis</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Myometrium</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Signs</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Antonio, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteagudo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buca, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forlani, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minneci, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzoli, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberati, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calì, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Antonio, F.</au><au>Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.</au><au>Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.</au><au>Monteagudo, A.</au><au>Buca, D.</au><au>Forlani, F.</au><au>Minneci, G.</au><au>Foti, F.</au><au>Manzoli, L.</au><au>Liberati, M.</au><au>Acharya, G.</au><au>Calì, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>176-183</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objectives The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>28833750</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.18840</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-3354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6880-7407</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2018-02, Vol.51 (2), p.176-183
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_494563
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online
subjects abnormally invasive placenta
Data processing
Evidence-based medicine
first‐trimester diagnosis
Gestation
Health risk assessment
Implantation
Medical diagnosis
Meta-analysis
Myometrium
Placenta
Pregnancy
Risk
Signs
Systematic review
Ultrasound
Uterus
Womens health
title First‐trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high‐risk women: systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A03%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%E2%80%90trimester%20detection%20of%20abnormally%20invasive%20placenta%20in%20high%E2%80%90risk%20women:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=D'Antonio,%20F.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=176-183&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.18840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1998323413%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1998323413&rft_id=info:pmid/28833750&rfr_iscdi=true