The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures
To approach isolated anterior frontal bone fracture, coronal incision is the common surgical access of choice. This approach has complications such as aesthetically undesirable scarring and alopecia along the incision line. An alternative approach to these fractures is through a supratarsal incision...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2018-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1906-1909 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1909 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1906 |
| container_title | The Journal of craniofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Alinasab, Babak Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola Sunnergren, Ola Stjärne, Pär |
| description | To approach isolated anterior frontal bone fracture, coronal incision is the common surgical access of choice. This approach has complications such as aesthetically undesirable scarring and alopecia along the incision line. An alternative approach to these fractures is through a supratarsal incision. The aim of the present study was to correct the frontal bone fracture, through supratarsal approach.
Six consecutive patients with frontal bone fracture were operated through supratarsal incision and evaluated regarding: patient cosmetic satisfaction, forehead contour, scarring, sensibility and motility in forehead and upper eyelids.
Seven months (6-12) postoperatively, all the patients had normal mobility in the forehead and the upper eyelids and 17% (n = 1) had hypoesthesia of superior orbital nerve. The forehead contour was excellent in all patients. About 83% (n = 5) of the patients were very satisfied and 17% (n = 1) were satisfied with the surgical result.
Correction of anterior frontal bone fracture through a supratarsal approach appears to be safe and offers a sufficient exposure to the frontal bone fracture correction with excellent contouring results and no noticeable scarring. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004984 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_485936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097594154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-758857857639a9a54f17ffb62d78026714a074b48b140d26e1703f59ad5d03dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UVtLwzAUDqJ4mf4DkT760plr0zzO6bww8GHT15C2qat2TU1axH_vkV0UQUMgJ4fvcg4fQqcEDwlW8mI2ng3xj8NVynfQIREsiZlkdBdqaMaUSnGAjkJ4wZgSQpN9dMAwEZLw9BDdzxc2mvWtN53xwdTRqG29M_kiKp2Pxs57m3eVayJXRqOms76C9sS7pgPspWssfEze9d6GY7RXmjrYk_U7QI-T6_n4Np4-3NyNR9M454x1sRRpKiTchCmjjOAlkWWZJbSQKaYJjGWw5BlPM8JxQRNLJGalUKYQBWZFwQYoXumGd9v2mW59tTT-QztT6XXrFSqreSoUSwCv_sTDrsU3aUMkTEkOrsm_XlfV00g7_6zrqtckxQTWG6DzFR6E33obOr2sQm7r2jTW9UFTSE4oTgQHKF9Bc-9C8LbcihOsvxLWkLD-nTDQztYOfba0xZa0iZR9AtTQoQM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097594154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Alinasab, Babak ; Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola ; Sunnergren, Ola ; Stjärne, Pär</creator><creatorcontrib>Alinasab, Babak ; Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola ; Sunnergren, Ola ; Stjärne, Pär</creatorcontrib><description>To approach isolated anterior frontal bone fracture, coronal incision is the common surgical access of choice. This approach has complications such as aesthetically undesirable scarring and alopecia along the incision line. An alternative approach to these fractures is through a supratarsal incision. The aim of the present study was to correct the frontal bone fracture, through supratarsal approach.
Six consecutive patients with frontal bone fracture were operated through supratarsal incision and evaluated regarding: patient cosmetic satisfaction, forehead contour, scarring, sensibility and motility in forehead and upper eyelids.
Seven months (6-12) postoperatively, all the patients had normal mobility in the forehead and the upper eyelids and 17% (n = 1) had hypoesthesia of superior orbital nerve. The forehead contour was excellent in all patients. About 83% (n = 5) of the patients were very satisfied and 17% (n = 1) were satisfied with the surgical result.
Correction of anterior frontal bone fracture through a supratarsal approach appears to be safe and offers a sufficient exposure to the frontal bone fracture correction with excellent contouring results and no noticeable scarring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004984</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30157148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anterior table ; blepharoplasty ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cicatrix - prevention & control ; Cicatrix - psychology ; Dentistry ; Esthetics ; Eyelids - surgery ; Female ; Frontal Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Frontal Bone - injuries ; Frontal Bone - surgery ; frontal bone fracture ; General Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; management ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; noticeable ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Postoperative Complications - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; scarring ; Skull Fractures - surgery ; supra tarsal ; Surgery ; Sweden ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2018-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1906-1909</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-758857857639a9a54f17ffb62d78026714a074b48b140d26e1703f59ad5d03dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-758857857639a9a54f17ffb62d78026714a074b48b140d26e1703f59ad5d03dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-180143$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:139747036$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alinasab, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunnergren, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stjärne, Pär</creatorcontrib><title>The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>To approach isolated anterior frontal bone fracture, coronal incision is the common surgical access of choice. This approach has complications such as aesthetically undesirable scarring and alopecia along the incision line. An alternative approach to these fractures is through a supratarsal incision. The aim of the present study was to correct the frontal bone fracture, through supratarsal approach.
Six consecutive patients with frontal bone fracture were operated through supratarsal incision and evaluated regarding: patient cosmetic satisfaction, forehead contour, scarring, sensibility and motility in forehead and upper eyelids.
Seven months (6-12) postoperatively, all the patients had normal mobility in the forehead and the upper eyelids and 17% (n = 1) had hypoesthesia of superior orbital nerve. The forehead contour was excellent in all patients. About 83% (n = 5) of the patients were very satisfied and 17% (n = 1) were satisfied with the surgical result.
Correction of anterior frontal bone fracture through a supratarsal approach appears to be safe and offers a sufficient exposure to the frontal bone fracture correction with excellent contouring results and no noticeable scarring.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior table</subject><subject>blepharoplasty</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cicatrix - psychology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Eyelids - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Frontal Bone - injuries</subject><subject>Frontal Bone - surgery</subject><subject>frontal bone fracture</subject><subject>General Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>noticeable</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>scarring</subject><subject>Skull Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>supra tarsal</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UVtLwzAUDqJ4mf4DkT760plr0zzO6bww8GHT15C2qat2TU1axH_vkV0UQUMgJ4fvcg4fQqcEDwlW8mI2ng3xj8NVynfQIREsiZlkdBdqaMaUSnGAjkJ4wZgSQpN9dMAwEZLw9BDdzxc2mvWtN53xwdTRqG29M_kiKp2Pxs57m3eVayJXRqOms76C9sS7pgPspWssfEze9d6GY7RXmjrYk_U7QI-T6_n4Np4-3NyNR9M454x1sRRpKiTchCmjjOAlkWWZJbSQKaYJjGWw5BlPM8JxQRNLJGalUKYQBWZFwQYoXumGd9v2mW59tTT-QztT6XXrFSqreSoUSwCv_sTDrsU3aUMkTEkOrsm_XlfV00g7_6zrqtckxQTWG6DzFR6E33obOr2sQm7r2jTW9UFTSE4oTgQHKF9Bc-9C8LbcihOsvxLWkLD-nTDQztYOfba0xZa0iZR9AtTQoQM</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Alinasab, Babak</creator><creator>Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola</creator><creator>Sunnergren, Ola</creator><creator>Stjärne, Pär</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DG8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures</title><author>Alinasab, Babak ; Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola ; Sunnergren, Ola ; Stjärne, Pär</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-758857857639a9a54f17ffb62d78026714a074b48b140d26e1703f59ad5d03dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior table</topic><topic>blepharoplasty</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cicatrix - psychology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Eyelids - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Frontal Bone - injuries</topic><topic>Frontal Bone - surgery</topic><topic>frontal bone fracture</topic><topic>General Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>noticeable</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>scarring</topic><topic>Skull Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>supra tarsal</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alinasab, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunnergren, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stjärne, Pär</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Linköpings universitet</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alinasab, Babak</au><au>Fridman-Bengtsson, Ola</au><au>Sunnergren, Ola</au><au>Stjärne, Pär</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1906</spage><epage>1909</epage><pages>1906-1909</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>To approach isolated anterior frontal bone fracture, coronal incision is the common surgical access of choice. This approach has complications such as aesthetically undesirable scarring and alopecia along the incision line. An alternative approach to these fractures is through a supratarsal incision. The aim of the present study was to correct the frontal bone fracture, through supratarsal approach.
Six consecutive patients with frontal bone fracture were operated through supratarsal incision and evaluated regarding: patient cosmetic satisfaction, forehead contour, scarring, sensibility and motility in forehead and upper eyelids.
Seven months (6-12) postoperatively, all the patients had normal mobility in the forehead and the upper eyelids and 17% (n = 1) had hypoesthesia of superior orbital nerve. The forehead contour was excellent in all patients. About 83% (n = 5) of the patients were very satisfied and 17% (n = 1) were satisfied with the surgical result.
Correction of anterior frontal bone fracture through a supratarsal approach appears to be safe and offers a sufficient exposure to the frontal bone fracture correction with excellent contouring results and no noticeable scarring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30157148</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0000000000004984</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-2275 |
| ispartof | The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2018-10, Vol.29 (7), p.1906-1909 |
| issn | 1049-2275 1536-3732 1536-3732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_485936 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
| subjects | Adult Anterior table blepharoplasty Cicatrix - etiology Cicatrix - prevention & control Cicatrix - psychology Dentistry Esthetics Eyelids - surgery Female Frontal Bone - diagnostic imaging Frontal Bone - injuries Frontal Bone - surgery frontal bone fracture General Medicine Humans Male management Medicin och hälsovetenskap noticeable Otorhinolaryngology Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Postoperative Complications - psychology Retrospective Studies scarring Skull Fractures - surgery supra tarsal Surgery Sweden Treatment Outcome |
| title | The Supratarsal Approach for Correction of Anterior Frontal Bone Fractures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A35%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Supratarsal%20Approach%20for%20Correction%20of%20Anterior%20Frontal%20Bone%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Alinasab,%20Babak&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1906&rft.epage=1909&rft.pages=1906-1909&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2097594154%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097594154&rft_id=info:pmid/30157148&rfr_iscdi=true |