Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic NEN G3: a multicenter cohort study

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors grade 1–2 (G1–G2). However, its possible benefit in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) is largely unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the benefits and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine-related cancer 2019-02, Vol.26 (2), p.227-239
Hauptverfasser: Carlsen, Esben Andreas, Fazio, Nicola, Granberg, Dan, Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona, Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat, Grana, Chiara Maria, Zandee, Wouter T, Cwikla, Jaroslaw, Walter, Martin A, Oturai, Peter Sandor, Rinke, Anja, Weaver, Andrew, Frilling, Andrea, Gritti, Sara, Arveschoug, Anne Kirstine, Meirovitz, Amichay, Knigge, Ulrich, Sorbye, Halfdan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors grade 1–2 (G1–G2). However, its possible benefit in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) is largely unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the benefits and side effects of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 12 centers to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT in patients with GEP NEN G3. Outcomes were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. We included 149 patients (primary tumor: pancreatic n = 89, gastrointestinal n = 34, unknown n = 26). PRRT was first-line (n = 30), second-line (n = 62) or later-line treatment (n = 57). Of 114 patients evaluated, 1% had complete response, 41% partial response, 38% stable disease and 20% progressive disease. Of 104 patients with documented progressive disease before PRRT, disease control rate was 69%. The total cohort had median PFS of 14 months and OS of 29 months. Ki-67 21–54% (n = 125) vs Ki-67 ≥55% (n = 23): PFS 16 vs 6 months (P 
ISSN:1351-0088
1479-6821
1479-6821
DOI:10.1530/ERC-18-0424